PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
Despite scientific consensus on climate change, climate denial is still widespread. While much research has characterised climate denial, comparatively fewer studies have systematically examined how to counteract it. This review fills this gap by exploring the research about counteracting climate denial, the effectiveness and the intentions behind intervention. Through a systematic selection and analysis of 65 scientific articles, this review finds multiple intervention forms, including education, message framing and inoculation. The intentions of intervening range from changing understanding of climate science, science advocacy, influencing mitigation attitudes and counteracting vested industry. A number of divergent findings emerge: whether to separate science from policy; the disputed effects of emotions and the longitudinal impacts of interventions. The review offers guiding questions for those interested in counteracting denialism, the answers to which indicate particular strategies: identify the form of climate denial; consider the purpose of intervention and recognise one\'s relationship to their audiences.
摘要：
尽管在气候变化问题上达成了科学共识，气候否认仍然很普遍。虽然许多研究都以气候否认为特征，相对较少的研究系统地研究了如何抵消它。这篇综述通过探索关于抵制气候否认的研究来填补这一空白，干预背后的有效性和意图。通过对65篇科学文章的系统选择和分析，这篇综述发现了多种干预形式，包括教育,消息成帧和接种。干预的意图包括改变对气候科学的理解，科学宣传,影响缓解态度，抵消既得行业。出现了许多不同的发现：是否将科学与政策分开；情绪的有争议的影响以及干预措施的纵向影响。该评论为那些有兴趣抵制否认主义的人提供了指导性问题，指出特定策略的答案：确定气候否认的形式；考虑干预的目的，并认识到自己与受众的关系。
