PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Clinical research in perioperative medicine requires the perspectives of patients and caregivers to increase its relevance and quality, benefiting both researchers and the community. Identifying these priorities will enable researchers, funders, and governing bodies to efficiently use scarce funding and resources. We aim to identify the top 10 research priorities in perioperative medical research in Australia.
UNASSIGNED: A mixed-methods, exploratory-sequential design will be conducted. The study will include five phases. Initially, a published open-ended survey gathered responses from the population (researchers, healthcare workers, and consumers) regarding uncertainties/questions relevant to the population about perioperative medical research. We collected 544 questions and quantitatively analysed and grouped them according to the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine-Core Outcomes Measures in Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (StEP-COMPAC) endpoints. Using multicriteria decision-making software, workshops combining the population will be conducted to determine the top 10 priorities for perioperative medicine research for the Australian population.
UNASSIGNED: Ethical approval to conduct the study was obtained from the Alfred Health (Australia) Human Research Ethics Committee (ID: 171/19). The findings will be disseminated in peer review publications, conferences, and dissemination across perioperative research networks. The top 10 priorities will be available to inform research funders, grant submissions, guidelines, and the population.
UNASSIGNED: A mixed-methods, exploratory-sequential design will be conducted. The study will include five phases. Initially, a published open-ended survey gathered responses from the population (researchers, healthcare workers, and consumers) regarding uncertainties/questions relevant to the population about perioperative medical research. We collected 544 questions and quantitatively analysed and grouped them according to the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine-Core Outcomes Measures in Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (StEP-COMPAC) endpoints. Using multicriteria decision-making software, workshops combining the population will be conducted to determine the top 10 priorities for perioperative medicine research for the Australian population.
UNASSIGNED: Ethical approval to conduct the study was obtained from the Alfred Health (Australia) Human Research Ethics Committee (ID: 171/19). The findings will be disseminated in peer review publications, conferences, and dissemination across perioperative research networks. The top 10 priorities will be available to inform research funders, grant submissions, guidelines, and the population.
摘要：
■围手术期医学的临床研究需要患者和护理人员的观点，以提高其相关性和质量，有利于研究人员和社区。确定这些优先事项将使研究人员，资助者,和理事机构有效利用稀缺的资金和资源。我们的目标是确定澳大利亚围手术期医学研究中的十大研究重点。
■混合方法，将进行探索性顺序设计。该研究将包括五个阶段。最初，一项已发表的开放式调查收集了来自人群的回应(研究人员，医护人员,和消费者）关于围手术期医学研究与人群相关的不确定性/问题。我们收集了544个问题，并根据围手术期医学标准化终点-围手术期和麻醉护理（StEP-COMPAC）终点的核心结果测量进行了定量分析和分组。使用多准则决策软件，将举办结合人群的研讨会,以确定澳大利亚人群围手术期医学研究的十大优先事项.
■进行研究的伦理批准来自AlfredHealth（澳大利亚）人类研究伦理委员会（ID：171/19）。调查结果将在同行评审出版物中传播，会议,以及围手术期研究网络的传播。十大优先事项将通知研究资助者，赠款提交，指导方针,和人口。
■混合方法，将进行探索性顺序设计。该研究将包括五个阶段。最初，一项已发表的开放式调查收集了来自人群的回应(研究人员，医护人员,和消费者）关于围手术期医学研究与人群相关的不确定性/问题。我们收集了544个问题，并根据围手术期医学标准化终点-围手术期和麻醉护理（StEP-COMPAC）终点的核心结果测量进行了定量分析和分组。使用多准则决策软件，将举办结合人群的研讨会,以确定澳大利亚人群围手术期医学研究的十大优先事项.
■进行研究的伦理批准来自AlfredHealth（澳大利亚）人类研究伦理委员会（ID：171/19）。调查结果将在同行评审出版物中传播，会议,以及围手术期研究网络的传播。十大优先事项将通知研究资助者，赠款提交，指导方针,和人口。
