{Reference Type}: Clinical Trial
{Title}: A mixed methods study protocol to identify research priorities for perioperative medicine in Australia.
{Author}: Wallace SKA;Bucknall TK;Forbes A;Myles PS;
{Journal}: BJA Open
{Volume}: 8
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2023 Dec
暂无{DOI}: 10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100235
{Abstract}: <B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Clinical research in perioperative medicine requires the perspectives of patients and caregivers to increase its relevance and quality, benefiting both researchers and the community. Identifying these priorities will enable researchers, funders, and governing bodies to efficiently use scarce funding and resources. We aim to identify the top 10 research priorities in perioperative medical research in Australia.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>A mixed-methods, exploratory-sequential design will be conducted. The study will include five phases. Initially, a published open-ended survey gathered responses from the population (researchers, healthcare workers, and consumers) regarding uncertainties/questions relevant to the population about perioperative medical research. We collected 544 questions and quantitatively analysed and grouped them according to the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine-Core Outcomes Measures in Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (StEP-COMPAC) endpoints. Using multicriteria decision-making software, workshops combining the population will be conducted to determine the top 10 priorities for perioperative medicine research for the Australian population.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Ethical approval to conduct the study was obtained from the Alfred Health (Australia) Human Research Ethics Committee (ID: 171/19). The findings will be disseminated in peer review publications, conferences, and dissemination across perioperative research networks. The top 10 priorities will be available to inform research funders, grant submissions, guidelines, and the population.