Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: The objective of the study was to assess patient-reported preferences and outcomes in patients rehabilitated with both an implant-supported single crown (ISC) and a tooth-supported fixed dental prosthesis (FDP).
UNASSIGNED: The electronic journal system at the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, was searched to find patients presenting both an ISC and an FDP replacing no more than two teeth between abutments. Identified patients that agreed answered a questionnaire followed by a clinical examination. Descriptive statistics was calculated.
UNASSIGNED: Thirty patients were included. The mean function time was 11.8 years for FDPs and 6.6 years for ISCs. All but three patients were satisfied with both rehabilitation modalities. No patients were unsatisfied with aesthetics or function of either rehabilitation. All patients reported satisfactory function of their restorations and reported chewing without problems. The self-reported post-operative complications were few, but less than observed in the clinical examinations.
UNASSIGNED: More patients reported food impaction with their FDP as compared to their ISC. Function and aesthetics of FDPs and ISCs were rated similarly, but more patients found the ISC treatment more uncomfortable. Despite this finding, most patients would prefer to undergo ISC treatment if they were to replace another missing tooth.
UNASSIGNED: The electronic journal system at the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, was searched to find patients presenting both an ISC and an FDP replacing no more than two teeth between abutments. Identified patients that agreed answered a questionnaire followed by a clinical examination. Descriptive statistics was calculated.
UNASSIGNED: Thirty patients were included. The mean function time was 11.8 years for FDPs and 6.6 years for ISCs. All but three patients were satisfied with both rehabilitation modalities. No patients were unsatisfied with aesthetics or function of either rehabilitation. All patients reported satisfactory function of their restorations and reported chewing without problems. The self-reported post-operative complications were few, but less than observed in the clinical examinations.
UNASSIGNED: More patients reported food impaction with their FDP as compared to their ISC. Function and aesthetics of FDPs and ISCs were rated similarly, but more patients found the ISC treatment more uncomfortable. Despite this finding, most patients would prefer to undergo ISC treatment if they were to replace another missing tooth.
摘要：
UNASSIGNED：该研究的目的是评估患者报告的偏好和结果，患者同时使用种植体支持的单冠（ISC）和牙齿支持的固定假牙（FDP）进行修复。
UNASSIGNED：牙科学院的电子期刊系统，奥斯陆大学,进行了搜索，以找到同时出现ISC和FDP的患者，替换了基台之间不超过两颗牙齿。确定同意回答问卷的患者，然后进行临床检查。计算描述性统计数据。
UNASSIGNED：纳入30例患者。FDP的平均功能时间为11.8年，ISC的平均功能时间为6.6年。除三名患者外，所有患者对两种康复方式均感到满意。没有患者对两者的美学或康复功能不满意。所有患者均报告其修复体功能令人满意，并报告咀嚼没有问题。自我报告的术后并发症很少，但少于临床检查中观察到的。
UNASSIGNED：更多患者报告与他们的ISC相比，他们的FDP有食物嵌塞。FDP和ISC的功能和美学评价相似，但更多的患者发现ISC治疗更不舒服。尽管有这个发现,如果要更换另一颗缺失的牙齿，大多数患者更愿意接受ISC治疗。
UNASSIGNED：牙科学院的电子期刊系统，奥斯陆大学,进行了搜索，以找到同时出现ISC和FDP的患者，替换了基台之间不超过两颗牙齿。确定同意回答问卷的患者，然后进行临床检查。计算描述性统计数据。
UNASSIGNED：纳入30例患者。FDP的平均功能时间为11.8年，ISC的平均功能时间为6.6年。除三名患者外，所有患者对两种康复方式均感到满意。没有患者对两者的美学或康复功能不满意。所有患者均报告其修复体功能令人满意，并报告咀嚼没有问题。自我报告的术后并发症很少，但少于临床检查中观察到的。
UNASSIGNED：更多患者报告与他们的ISC相比，他们的FDP有食物嵌塞。FDP和ISC的功能和美学评价相似，但更多的患者发现ISC治疗更不舒服。尽管有这个发现,如果要更换另一颗缺失的牙齿，大多数患者更愿意接受ISC治疗。
