PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
Emotion regulation is a transdiagnostic mechanism with relevance to the etiology, maintenance, and treatment of a wide range of clinically relevant outcomes. This study applied systematic review methods to summarize the existing literature examining racial and ethnic differences in emotion regulation.
We systematically searched four electronic databases (PsycINFO, Embase, MEDLINE, and CINAHL Plus) using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
Of the initial 1253 articles, 25 met the inclusion criteria. Findings for emotion regulation strategies generally provide evidence for racial/ethnic differences (71% of reviewed studies), with ethnoracial minorities largely exhibiting greater use of emotion regulation strategies. Whereas the results for emotion regulation potential were slightly more mixed (63% of reviewed studies found racial/ethnic differences), ethnoracial minorities were also largely found to report lower emotion regulation potential.
This review advances the literature by providing additional support for racial and ethnic differences in emotion regulation.
We systematically searched four electronic databases (PsycINFO, Embase, MEDLINE, and CINAHL Plus) using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
Of the initial 1253 articles, 25 met the inclusion criteria. Findings for emotion regulation strategies generally provide evidence for racial/ethnic differences (71% of reviewed studies), with ethnoracial minorities largely exhibiting greater use of emotion regulation strategies. Whereas the results for emotion regulation potential were slightly more mixed (63% of reviewed studies found racial/ethnic differences), ethnoracial minorities were also largely found to report lower emotion regulation potential.
This review advances the literature by providing additional support for racial and ethnic differences in emotion regulation.
摘要：
情绪调节是一种与病因相关的转诊机制，维护,和广泛的临床相关结果的治疗。本研究采用系统综述方法，总结了现有研究情绪调节中种族和民族差异的文献。
我们系统地搜索了四个电子数据库(PsycINFO，Embase,MEDLINE,和CINAHLPlus）使用系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。
在最初的1253篇文章中，25符合纳入标准。情绪调节策略的研究结果通常为种族/民族差异提供证据（71％的综述研究），少数民族在很大程度上表现出更多的情绪调节策略的使用。而情绪调节潜力的结果略有不同(63%的综述研究发现种族/民族差异)，在很大程度上还发现了少数民族的情绪调节潜力较低。
这篇综述通过为情绪调节中的种族和民族差异提供额外的支持来推进文献。
我们系统地搜索了四个电子数据库(PsycINFO，Embase,MEDLINE,和CINAHLPlus）使用系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。
在最初的1253篇文章中，25符合纳入标准。情绪调节策略的研究结果通常为种族/民族差异提供证据（71％的综述研究），少数民族在很大程度上表现出更多的情绪调节策略的使用。而情绪调节潜力的结果略有不同(63%的综述研究发现种族/民族差异)，在很大程度上还发现了少数民族的情绪调节潜力较低。
这篇综述通过为情绪调节中的种族和民族差异提供额外的支持来推进文献。
