PDF(Sci-hub)
Abstract：
Sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals are at increased risk for experiencing sexual violence. Bystander intervention training programs are a first-line prevention recommendation for reducing sexual and dating violence on college campuses. Little is known regarding the extent to which SGM individuals are represented in the content of bystander intervention programs or are included in studies examining the effectiveness of bystander intervention programs. The present critical review aimed to fill this gap in knowledge. Twenty-eight empirical peer-reviewed evaluations of bystander intervention programs aimed at reducing dating violence or sexual assault on college campuses were examined. Three studies (10.7%) described including content representing SGM individuals in the program. Personal communication with study authors indicated that-although not mentioned in the publication-many programs describe rates of violence among SGM students. When describing the study sample, six studies (21.4%) indicated that transgender, nonbinary, or students classified as \"other\" were included in the research. Approximately two thirds of studies (67.9%) did not describe participants\' sexual orientation. No studies reported outcomes specifically among SGM individuals, and two (7.1%) mentioned a lack of SGM inclusion as a study limitation. Work is needed to better represent SGM individuals in the content of bystander intervention programs and ensure adequate representation of SGM individuals in studies examining the effectiveness of bystander intervention programs.
摘要：
性和性别少数（SGM）个人遭受性暴力的风险增加。旁观者干预培训计划是减少大学校园性暴力和约会暴力的一线预防建议。关于SGM个人在旁观者干预计划内容中的代表程度或被纳入研究旁观者干预计划有效性的研究中的程度知之甚少。本关键审查旨在填补这一知识空白。研究了28项针对旁观者干预计划的经验性同行评审评估，旨在减少大学校园中的约会暴力或性侵犯。三项研究（10.7％）描述了代表该计划中SGM个体的内容。与研究作者的个人交流表明，尽管出版物中没有提到，但许多程序描述了SGM学生的暴力发生率。在描述研究样本时，六项研究(21.4%)表明变性者，非二进制,或归类为“其他”的学生被纳入研究。大约三分之二的研究（67.9%）没有描述参与者的性取向。没有研究报告特别是SGM个体的结果，2人(7.1%)提到缺乏SGM纳入作为研究限制.需要开展工作，以在旁观者干预计划的内容中更好地代表SGM个人，并确保SGM个人在研究旁观者干预计划有效性的研究中得到充分代表。
