PDF(Sci-hub)
Abstract：
Although impulsiveness has been recognized as a risk factor for suicide, few studies have explored how to protect offenders with impulsiveness from the risk of suicide. This study aims to examine the relationships among impulsiveness, suicide risk, regulatory emotional self-efficacy (RESE), and flourishing, focusing on the moderating effects of RESE and flourishing in the relationship between impulsiveness and suicide risk.
This is a cross-sectional study of 941 male offenders. All participants were requested to provide some items of demographic information and to complete a package of self-reported questionnaires measuring impulsiveness, suicide risk, RESE, and flourishing.
The results indicate that impulsiveness is positively correlated with suicide risk, while RESE and flourishing are negatively correlated with impulsiveness and suicide risk. Most importantly, both RESE and its dimension managing negative affect (NEG) negatively moderate the relationship between impulsiveness and suicide risk. Flourishing and the RESE dimension expressing positive affect (POS) show no significant moderating effect on impulsiveness-suicide risk link.
Regulatory emotional self-efficacy, especially its NEG dimension, can buffer the impact of impulsiveness on suicide risk in male offenders, indicating that these factors might be useful supplements in suicide prevention.
Offender with higher level of RESE and flourishing show lower level of impulsiveness and suicide risk. High level of RESE and its NEG dimension can buffer the effect of impulsiveness on suicide risk. RESE, especially its NEG dimension might be a useful supplement for suicide prevention in offenders with high impulsiveness.
This is a cross-sectional study of 941 male offenders. All participants were requested to provide some items of demographic information and to complete a package of self-reported questionnaires measuring impulsiveness, suicide risk, RESE, and flourishing.
The results indicate that impulsiveness is positively correlated with suicide risk, while RESE and flourishing are negatively correlated with impulsiveness and suicide risk. Most importantly, both RESE and its dimension managing negative affect (NEG) negatively moderate the relationship between impulsiveness and suicide risk. Flourishing and the RESE dimension expressing positive affect (POS) show no significant moderating effect on impulsiveness-suicide risk link.
Regulatory emotional self-efficacy, especially its NEG dimension, can buffer the impact of impulsiveness on suicide risk in male offenders, indicating that these factors might be useful supplements in suicide prevention.
Offender with higher level of RESE and flourishing show lower level of impulsiveness and suicide risk. High level of RESE and its NEG dimension can buffer the effect of impulsiveness on suicide risk. RESE, especially its NEG dimension might be a useful supplement for suicide prevention in offenders with high impulsiveness.
摘要：
尽管冲动已被认为是自杀的危险因素，很少有研究探讨如何保护冲动罪犯免受自杀风险。这项研究旨在检验冲动之间的关系，自杀风险,调节情绪自我效能感（RESE），蓬勃发展，关注RESE的调节作用和繁荣在冲动性和自杀风险之间的关系。
这是一项针对941名男性罪犯的横断面研究。要求所有参与者提供一些人口统计信息，并填写一套自我报告的问卷，测量冲动，自杀风险,RESE,和繁荣。
结果表明，冲动与自杀风险呈正相关，而RESE和繁荣与冲动和自杀风险呈负相关。最重要的是,RESE及其管理消极影响（NEG）的维度均对冲动性和自杀风险之间的关系产生负面影响。繁荣和表达积极情感的RESE维度（POS）对冲动-自杀风险联系没有显着调节作用。
情绪调节自我效能感，尤其是它的NEG维度，可以缓冲冲动对男性罪犯自杀风险的影响，表明这些因素可能是预防自杀的有用补充。
RESE水平较高和繁荣的罪犯表现出较低的冲动和自杀风险。高水平的RESE及其NEG维度可以缓冲冲动性对自杀风险的影响。RESE,特别是其NEG维度可能是高冲动罪犯自杀预防的有用补充。
这是一项针对941名男性罪犯的横断面研究。要求所有参与者提供一些人口统计信息，并填写一套自我报告的问卷，测量冲动，自杀风险,RESE,和繁荣。
结果表明，冲动与自杀风险呈正相关，而RESE和繁荣与冲动和自杀风险呈负相关。最重要的是,RESE及其管理消极影响（NEG）的维度均对冲动性和自杀风险之间的关系产生负面影响。繁荣和表达积极情感的RESE维度（POS）对冲动-自杀风险联系没有显着调节作用。
情绪调节自我效能感，尤其是它的NEG维度，可以缓冲冲动对男性罪犯自杀风险的影响，表明这些因素可能是预防自杀的有用补充。
RESE水平较高和繁荣的罪犯表现出较低的冲动和自杀风险。高水平的RESE及其NEG维度可以缓冲冲动性对自杀风险的影响。RESE,特别是其NEG维度可能是高冲动罪犯自杀预防的有用补充。
