METHODS: Cross-sectional explorative observational study using survey data.
METHODS: A total of 1,479 persons with spinal cord injury aged 18 years and older.
METHODS: After descriptive analyses, exploratory factor analysis was used to build groups of environmental barriers. Logistic regressions were performed to assess correlates of perceived environmental barriers. Spearman\'s correlations were used to analyse the association between perceived barriers and quality of life.
RESULTS: Barriers regarding infrastructure had a relatively large impact. Barriers in relation to people\'s attitudes towards spinal cord injury and the equipment of people with spinal cord injury had a relatively small impact on the lives of people with spinal cord injury. Several subpopulations showed a higher risk in experiencing barriers. Quality of life decreased with increasing experience of barriers.
CONCLUSIONS: The most life-hardening barriers were identified related to infrastructure, a category in which most barriers are modifiable, for example, buildings or transportation.