关键词: Antioxidant levels Chlorhexidine mouth rinse Chronic gingivitis Guava mouth rinse Microbial CFU counts

Mesh : Adolescent Adult Anti-Infective Agents, Local / pharmacology therapeutic use Antioxidants / analysis Chlorhexidine / pharmacology therapeutic use Colony Count, Microbial Dental Plaque / microbiology Female Gingivitis / drug therapy microbiology Humans Male Mouthwashes / pharmacology therapeutic use Oral Hygiene / methods Plant Extracts / pharmacology therapeutic use Plant Leaves / chemistry Psidium Saliva / chemistry drug effects microbiology Young Adult

来  源:   DOI:10.1186/s12906-019-2745-8   PDF(Sci-hub)   PDF(Pubmed)

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The control of biofilm adherence on tooth surface has always been the keystone of periodontal therapeutic systems. However, prevalence of gingivitis suggest inadequacy of self-performed oral hygiene measures and need for adjunctive aid for mechanical plaque control. Oral rinses containing chlorhexidine, has been widely used however, with certain limitations. Herbal products have been used widely reflecting its action as alternative and complementary remedy. Hence, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate the antimicrobial and antioxidant efficacy of a Guava leaf extract based mouthrinse in patients with chronic generalized gingivitis as an adjunct to oral prophylaxis.
METHODS: Sixty subjects (n = 20) in compliance with the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to one of the 3 study groups i.e. Group A- 0.15%Guava mouth rinse, Group B- 0.2% Chlorhexidine (CHX) mouth rinse, Group C- Distilled water (placebo). All the participants received professional oral prophylaxis and were dispensed with experimental mouth rinses and instructed to use for period of 30 days. Clinical parameters such as gingival index, plaque index along with microbial colony forming units using plaque samples and antioxidant levels in saliva were estimated at baseline, 30 and 90 days\' time intervals.
RESULTS: All 3 groups showed gradual reduction in GI, PI and microbial counts. Considering the mean scores of recorded parameters at the scheduled time intervals, notable changes were observed between chlorhexidine and guava mouth rinse compared to placebo group. Although there was improvement in the antioxidant status in all study participants, yet there was no statistically significant difference observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Guava mouth rinse can be used as an empirical adjunct to professional oral prophylaxis owing to its multifactorial properties and favourable acceptance. However, long term studies need to be conducted to validate its use for an extended period of time.
BACKGROUND: The clinical trial has been prospectively registered on 17th February 2017 by the Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI/2017/02/007898).
摘要:
暂无翻译
公众号