PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: The authors present efforts to build capacity at our institution for conducting systematic reviews and other forms of evidence synthesis through partnerships and a recharge model. This report describes how we successfully created and launched a for-fee systematic review core at our library.
METHODS: Throughout 2014 and 2015, library leadership proposed different models for getting institutional and financial support for librarians and staff to better support university researchers conducting systematic reviews. Though well received, initial requests for financial support were not funded. The executive director of the Health Sciences Library released two years\' worth of salary and benefits to fund an evidence synthesis and retrieval librarian position. With this new position, the team formed a charge-back core facility in partnership with our university\'s Clinical Translation and Science Award hub. A series of procedural decisions and operational changes helped the group achieve success. Within eighteen months after launching the Systematic Review Core, we reached maximum capacity with more than twenty ongoing reviews.
CONCLUSIONS: Assigning a dollar value to our expertise put us on par with other subject matter experts on campus and actually drove demand. We could act as paid consultants in research projects and shifted the perception of librarians from service providers to research partners. Affiliating with our partners was key to our success and boosted our ability to strengthen our campus\' research infrastructure.
METHODS: Throughout 2014 and 2015, library leadership proposed different models for getting institutional and financial support for librarians and staff to better support university researchers conducting systematic reviews. Though well received, initial requests for financial support were not funded. The executive director of the Health Sciences Library released two years\' worth of salary and benefits to fund an evidence synthesis and retrieval librarian position. With this new position, the team formed a charge-back core facility in partnership with our university\'s Clinical Translation and Science Award hub. A series of procedural decisions and operational changes helped the group achieve success. Within eighteen months after launching the Systematic Review Core, we reached maximum capacity with more than twenty ongoing reviews.
CONCLUSIONS: Assigning a dollar value to our expertise put us on par with other subject matter experts on campus and actually drove demand. We could act as paid consultants in research projects and shifted the perception of librarians from service providers to research partners. Affiliating with our partners was key to our success and boosted our ability to strengthen our campus\' research infrastructure.
摘要：
背景：作者介绍了我们机构通过伙伴关系和补给模型进行系统评价和其他形式的证据综合的能力建设的努力。本报告描述了我们如何在我们的图书馆成功创建并启动了收费的系统审查核心。
方法：在整个2014年和2015年，图书馆领导层提出了不同的模式，为图书馆员和工作人员提供机构和财政支持，以更好地支持大学研究人员进行系统评价。虽然很受欢迎，最初的财政支持请求没有得到资助。健康科学图书馆的执行主任发布了两年的薪水和福利，以资助证据综合和检索图书馆员的职位。有了这个新职位，该团队与我们大学的临床翻译和科学奖中心合作，形成了一个收费核心设施。一系列程序决定和运营变化帮助该集团取得了成功。在推出系统审查核心后的18个月内，我们通过20多次正在进行的审查达到了最大容量。
结论：为我们的专业知识分配美元价值使我们与校园中的其他主题专家相提并论，并实际上推动了需求。我们可以在研究项目中担任有偿顾问，并将图书馆员的观念从服务提供商转移到研究合作伙伴。与合作伙伴的关系是我们成功的关键，并提高了我们加强校园研究基础设施的能力。
方法：在整个2014年和2015年，图书馆领导层提出了不同的模式，为图书馆员和工作人员提供机构和财政支持，以更好地支持大学研究人员进行系统评价。虽然很受欢迎，最初的财政支持请求没有得到资助。健康科学图书馆的执行主任发布了两年的薪水和福利，以资助证据综合和检索图书馆员的职位。有了这个新职位，该团队与我们大学的临床翻译和科学奖中心合作，形成了一个收费核心设施。一系列程序决定和运营变化帮助该集团取得了成功。在推出系统审查核心后的18个月内，我们通过20多次正在进行的审查达到了最大容量。
结论：为我们的专业知识分配美元价值使我们与校园中的其他主题专家相提并论，并实际上推动了需求。我们可以在研究项目中担任有偿顾问，并将图书馆员的观念从服务提供商转移到研究合作伙伴。与合作伙伴的关系是我们成功的关键，并提高了我们加强校园研究基础设施的能力。
