关键词: 3D echocardiography Children Left heart Nomogram Pediatric Volumetry

Mesh : Adolescent Algorithms Child Child, Preschool Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional / methods Female Follow-Up Studies Heart Ventricles / diagnostic imaging Humans Infant Infant, Newborn Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine Male Prospective Studies ROC Curve Reference Values Reproducibility of Results Stroke Volume / physiology Ventricular Function, Left / physiology

来  源:   DOI:10.1016/j.echo.2018.01.018   PDF(Sci-hub)

Abstract:
Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) is a promising method for accurate assessment of left ventricular (LV) volumes and function, however, pediatric reference values are scarce. The aim of the study was to establish pediatric percentiles in a large population and to compare the inherent influence of different evaluation software on the resulting measurements.
In a multicenter prospective-design study, 497 healthy children (ages 1 day to 219 months) underwent RT3DE imaging of the LV (ie33, Philips, Andover, MA). Volume analysis was performed using QLab 9.0 (Philips) and TomTec 4DLV2.7 (vendor-independent; testing high (TomTec75) and low (TomTec30) contour-finding activity). Reference percentiles were computed using Cole\'s LMS method. In 22 subjects, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was used as the reference.
A total of 370/497 (74.4%) of the subjects provided adequate data sets. LV volumes had a significant association with age, body size, and gender; therefore, sex-specific percentiles were indexed to body surface area. Intra- and interobserver variability for both workstations was good (relative bias ± SD for end-diastolic volume [EDV] in %: intraobserver: QLab = -0.8 ± 2.4; TomTec30 = -0.7 ± 7.2; TomTec75 = -1.9 ± 6.7; interobserver: QLab = 2.4 ± 7.5; TomTec30 = 1.2 ± 5.1; TomTec75 = 1.3 ± 4.5). Intervendor agreement between QLab and TomTec30 showed larger bias and wider limits of agreement (bias: QLab vs TomTec30: end-systolic volume [ESV] = 0.8% ± 23.6%; EDV = -2.2% ± 17.0%) with notable individual differences in small children. QLab and TomTec underestimated CMR values, with the highest agreement between CMR and QLab.
RT3DE allows reproducible noninvasive assessment of LV volumes and function. However, intertechnique variability is relevant. Therefore, our software-specific percentiles, based on a large pediatric population, serve as a reference for both commonly used quantification programs.
摘要:
暂无翻译
公众号