%0 Comparative Study
%T Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography of the Left Ventricle-Pediatric Percentiles and Head-to-Head Comparison of Different Contour-Finding Algorithms: A Multicenter Study.
%A Krell K
%A Laser KT
%A Dalla-Pozza R
%A Winkler C
%A Hildebrandt U
%A Kececioglu D
%A Breuer J
%A Herberg U
%J J Am Soc Echocardiogr
%V 31
%N 6
%D 06 2018
%M 29605473
%F 7.722
%R 10.1016/j.echo.2018.01.018
%X Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) is a promising method for accurate assessment of left ventricular (LV) volumes and function, however, pediatric reference values are scarce. The aim of the study was to establish pediatric percentiles in a large population and to compare the inherent influence of different evaluation software on the resulting measurements.<BR>In a multicenter prospective-design study, 497 healthy children (ages 1 day to 219 months) underwent RT3DE imaging of the LV (ie33, Philips, Andover, MA). Volume analysis was performed using QLab 9.0 (Philips) and TomTec 4DLV2.7 (vendor-independent; testing high (TomTec75) and low (TomTec30) contour-finding activity). Reference percentiles were computed using Cole's LMS method. In 22 subjects, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was used as the reference.<BR>A total of 370/497 (74.4%) of the subjects provided adequate data sets. LV volumes had a significant association with age, body size, and gender; therefore, sex-specific percentiles were indexed to body surface area. Intra- and interobserver variability for both workstations was good (relative bias ± SD for end-diastolic volume [EDV] in %: intraobserver: QLab = -0.8 ± 2.4; TomTec30 = -0.7 ± 7.2; TomTec75 = -1.9 ± 6.7; interobserver: QLab = 2.4 ± 7.5; TomTec30 = 1.2 ± 5.1; TomTec75 = 1.3 ± 4.5). Intervendor agreement between QLab and TomTec30 showed larger bias and wider limits of agreement (bias: QLab vs TomTec30: end-systolic volume [ESV] = 0.8% ± 23.6%; EDV = -2.2% ± 17.0%) with notable individual differences in small children. QLab and TomTec underestimated CMR values, with the highest agreement between CMR and QLab.<BR>RT3DE allows reproducible noninvasive assessment of LV volumes and function. However, intertechnique variability is relevant. Therefore, our software-specific percentiles, based on a large pediatric population, serve as a reference for both commonly used quantification programs.