• 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:外周插入的中央导管(PICC)有助于医疗保健中的诊断和治疗干预。PICC可能由于感染性和非感染性并发症而失败,PICC材料和设计可能有助于,导致患者和医疗系统的负面后遗症。
    目的:评估PICC材料和设计在减少导管失效和并发症方面的有效性。
    方法:昆士兰大学和Cochrane血管信息专家搜索了Cochrane血管专业注册,中部,MEDLINE,Embase,和CINAHL数据库以及WHOICTRP和ClinicalTrials.gov试验注册至2023年5月16日。我们旨在通过搜索检索到的纳入试验的参考列表来确定其他可能符合条件的试验或辅助出版物。以及相关的系统评价,荟萃分析,和卫生技术评估报告。我们联系了该领域的专家,以确定其他相关信息。
    方法:我们纳入了评价PICC设计和材料的随机对照试验(RCT)。
    方法:我们使用标准Cochrane方法。我们的主要结果是静脉血栓栓塞(VTE),PICC相关血流感染(BSI),遮挡,和全因死亡率。次要结果为导管失效,与PICC相关的BSI,导管断裂,PICC停留时间,和安全端点。我们使用GRADE评估了证据的确定性。
    结果:我们纳入了12项RCT,涉及约2913名参与者(一项多臂研究)。除一项研究外,所有研究在一个或多个偏倚风险领域都有较高的偏倚风险。与无瓣膜技术相比,集成瓣膜技术与无瓣膜技术相比,与无瓣膜的PICC相比,集成瓣膜技术对VTE风险的影响很小或没有差异(风险比(RR)0.71,95%置信区间(CI)0.19至2.63;I²=0%;3项研究;437名参与者;低确定性证据)。我们不确定集成阀门技术是否降低了与PICC相关的BSI风险,证据的确定性非常低(RR0.20,95%CI0.01~4.00;I²=不适用;2项研究(1项研究中无事件);257名参与者).与无瓣膜的PICC相比,集成瓣膜技术可能对闭塞风险影响很小或没有影响(RR0.86,95%CI0.53至1.38;I²=0%;5项研究;900名参与者;低确定性证据)。我们不确定使用集成阀门技术是否降低了全因死亡风险,因为证据的确定性非常低(RR0.85,95%CI0.44~1.64;I²=0%;2项研究;473名参与者)。与无瓣膜的PICC相比,集成瓣膜技术对导管失效风险影响很小或没有影响(RR0.80,95%CI0.62至1.03;I²=0%;4项研究;720名参与者;低确定性证据)。我们不确定集成瓣膜技术是否降低了与PICC相关的BSI风险(RR0.51,95%CI0.19至1.32;I²=不适用;2项研究(1项研究中无事件);542名参与者)或导管断裂,因为证据的确定性非常低(RR1.05,95%CI0.22~5.06;I²=20%;4项研究;799名参与者).我们不确定使用抗血栓形成表面修饰的导管是否可降低VTE风险(RR0.67,95%CI0.13至3.54;I²=15%;2项研究;257名参与者)或PICC相关BSI,因为证据的确定性非常低(RR0.20,95%CI0.01~4.00;I²=不适用;2项研究(1项研究无事件);257名参与者).我们不确定使用抗血栓形成表面修饰导管是否能减少闭塞(RR0.69,95%CI0.04-11.22;I²=70%;2项研究;257名参与者)或全因死亡风险,因为证据的确定性非常低(RR0.49,95%CI0.05至5.26;I²=不适用;1项研究;111名参与者)。使用抗血栓形成表面改性导管可能对导管失效风险影响很小或没有影响(RR0.76,95%CI0.37至1.54;I²=46%;2项研究;257名参与者;低确定性证据)。在一项研究中没有PICC相关BSI的报道(111名参与者)。因此,我们不确定使用抗血栓形成表面修饰导管是否能降低PICC相关BSI风险(RR不可估计;I²=不适用;确定性证据非常低).我们不确定使用抗血栓形成表面改性导管是否能降低导管断裂的风险。证据的确定性非常低(RR0.15,95%CI0.01~2.79;I²=不适用;2项研究(1项研究中无事件);257名参与者).我们不确定抗菌浸渍导管的使用是否能降低VTE风险(RR0.54,95%CI0.05至5.88;I²=不适用;1项研究;167名参与者)或PICC相关的BSI风险,因为证据的确定性非常低(RR2.17,95%CI0.20至23.53;I²=不适用;1项研究;167名参与者)。抗菌药物浸渍导管可能对闭塞风险影响很小或没有影响(RR1.00,95%CI0.57至1.74;I²=0%;2项研究;1025名参与者;中度确定性证据)或全因死亡率(RR1.12,95%CI0.71至1.75;I²=0%;2项研究;1082名参与者;中度确定性证据)。浸渍抗菌药物的导管可能对导管失效风险影响很小或没有影响(RR1.04,95%CI0.82至1.30;I²=不适用;1项研究;221名参与者;低确定性证据)。抗菌药物浸渍的导管可能对PICC相关的BSI风险影响很小或没有影响(RR1.05,95%CI0.71至1.55;I²=不适用;2项研究(1项研究中无事件);1082名参与者;中度确定性证据)。浸渍抗菌药物的导管可能对导管断裂的风险影响很小或没有影响(RR0.86,95%CI0.19至3.83;I²=不适用;1项研究;804名参与者;低确定性证据)。
    结论:可用于指导临床医生对PICC材料和设计决策的高质量RCT证据有限。当前证据的局限性包括样本量小,罕见事件,和偏见的风险。静脉血栓栓塞的风险可能几乎没有差异,PICC相关BSI,遮挡,或PICC材料和设计的死亡率。需要进一步严格的RCT来减少不确定性。
    BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) facilitate diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in health care. PICCs can fail due to infective and non-infective complications, which PICC materials and design may contribute to, leading to negative sequelae for patients and healthcare systems.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of PICC material and design in reducing catheter failure and complications.
    METHODS: The University of Queensland and Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases and the WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 16 May 2023. We aimed to identify other potentially eligible trials or ancillary publications by searching the reference lists of retrieved included trials, as well as relevant systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and health technology assessment reports. We contacted experts in the field to ascertain additional relevant information.
    METHODS: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating PICC design and materials.
    METHODS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were venous thromboembolism (VTE), PICC-associated bloodstream infection (BSI), occlusion, and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were catheter failure, PICC-related BSI, catheter breakage, PICC dwell time, and safety endpoints. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE.
    RESULTS: We included 12 RCTs involving approximately 2913 participants (one multi-arm study). All studies except one had a high risk of bias in one or more risk of bias domain. Integrated valve technology compared to no valve technology for peripherally inserted central catheter design Integrated valve technology may make little or no difference to VTE risk when compared with PICCs with no valve (risk ratio (RR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 2.63; I² = 0%; 3 studies; 437 participants; low certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether integrated valve technology reduces PICC-associated BSI risk, as the certainty of the evidence is very low (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.00; I² = not applicable; 2 studies (no events in 1 study); 257 participants). Integrated valve technology may make little or no difference to occlusion risk when compared with PICCs with no valve (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.38; I² = 0%; 5 studies; 900 participants; low certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether use of integrated valve technology reduces all-cause mortality risk, as the certainty of evidence is very low (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.64; I² = 0%; 2 studies; 473 participants). Integrated valve technology may make little or no difference to catheter failure risk when compared with PICCs with no valve (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.03; I² = 0%; 4 studies; 720 participants; low certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether integrated-valve technology reduces PICC-related BSI risk (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.32; I² = not applicable; 2 studies (no events in 1 study); 542 participants) or catheter breakage, as the certainty of evidence is very low (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.22 to 5.06; I² = 20%; 4 studies; 799 participants). Anti-thrombogenic surface modification compared to no anti-thrombogenic surface modification for peripherally inserted central catheter design We are uncertain whether use of anti-thrombogenic surface modified catheters reduces risk of VTE (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.13 to 3.54; I² = 15%; 2 studies; 257 participants) or PICC-associated BSI, as the certainty of evidence is very low (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.00; I² = not applicable; 2 studies (no events in 1 study); 257 participants). We are uncertain whether use of anti-thrombogenic surface modified catheters reduces occlusion (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.04 to 11.22; I² = 70%; 2 studies; 257 participants) or all-cause mortality risk, as the certainty of evidence is very low (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.26; I² = not applicable; 1 study; 111 participants). Use of anti-thrombogenic surface modified catheters may make little or no difference to risk of catheter failure (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.54; I² = 46%; 2 studies; 257 participants; low certainty evidence). No PICC-related BSIs were reported in one study (111 participants). As such, we are uncertain whether use of anti-thrombogenic surface modified catheters reduces PICC-related BSI risk (RR not estimable; I² = not applicable; very low certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether use of anti-thrombogenic surface modified catheters reduces the risk of catheter breakage, as the certainty of evidence is very low (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.79; I² = not applicable; 2 studies (no events in 1 study); 257 participants). Antimicrobial impregnation compared to non-antimicrobial impregnation for peripherally inserted central catheter design We are uncertain whether use of antimicrobial-impregnated catheters reduces VTE risk (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.88; I² = not applicable; 1 study; 167 participants) or PICC-associated BSI risk, as the certainty of evidence is very low (RR 2.17, 95% CI 0.20 to 23.53; I² = not applicable; 1 study; 167 participants). Antimicrobial-impregnated catheters probably make little or no difference to occlusion risk (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.74; I² = 0%; 2 studies; 1025 participants; moderate certainty evidence) or all-cause mortality (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.75; I² = 0%; 2 studies; 1082 participants; moderate certainty evidence). Antimicrobial-impregnated catheters may make little or no difference to risk of catheter failure (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.30; I² = not applicable; 1 study; 221 participants; low certainty evidence). Antimicrobial-impregnated catheters probably make little or no difference to PICC-related BSI risk (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.55; I² = not applicable; 2 studies (no events in 1 study); 1082 participants; moderate certainty evidence). Antimicrobial-impregnated catheters may make little or no difference to risk of catheter breakage (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.19 to 3.83; I² = not applicable; 1 study; 804 participants; low certainty evidence).
    CONCLUSIONS: There is limited high-quality RCT evidence available to inform clinician decision-making for PICC materials and design. Limitations of the current evidence include small sample sizes, infrequent events, and risk of bias. There may be little to no difference in the risk of VTE, PICC-associated BSI, occlusion, or mortality across PICC materials and designs. Further rigorous RCTs are needed to reduce uncertainty.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于心房颤动(AF)和静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)之间关联的数据存在争议。
    本研究的目的是根据房颤诊断的时间调查房颤患者的VTE风险。
    MEDLINE(PubMed)的系统评价,Embase,护理和相关健康文献累积指数(EBSCO主机),Cochrane中央对照试验登记册(2020年)在Cochrane图书馆,以及世界卫生组织全球指数医学数据库和观察性研究的荟萃分析。静脉血栓栓塞的风险,深静脉血栓(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE)根据房颤发作时间进行分析:1)短(≤3个月);2)中(≤6个月);3)长(>6个月时间组。
    纳入了4,170,027名患者的8项研究,其中650,828人患有AF。短期组,房颤与PE(HR:9.62;95%CI:7.07-13.09;I2=0%)或DVT(HR:6.18;95%CI:4.51-8.49,I2=0%)的最高风险相关。即使在较小的程度上,房颤与较高的VTE风险相关(HR:3.69;95%CI:1.65-8.27;I2=79%),DVT(HR:1.75;95%CI:1.43-2.14;I2=0%),在长达6个月的长期风险组和>6个月的长期风险组(HR:1.39;95%CI:1.00-1.92;I2=72%)和PE(HR:1.08;95%CI:1.00-1.16;I2=0%)。
    在房颤诊断后的前3至6个月,VTE的风险最高,并且随着时间的推移而降低。房颤患者早期开始抗凝治疗可能会降低VTE的风险。
    UNASSIGNED: Data on the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) are controversial.
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk of VTE in patients with AF according to the time from AF diagnosis.
    UNASSIGNED: Systematic review of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (EBSCO host), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2020) in the Cochrane Library, and World Health Organization Global Index Medicus databases and meta-analysis of observational studies. The risk of VTE, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) was analyzed according to the time of AF onset: 1) short (≤3 months); 2) medium (≤6 months); and 3) long (>6 months) time groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Eight studies were included with 4,170,027 patients, of whom 650,828 with AF. In the short-term group, AF was associated with the highest risk of either PE (HR: 9.62; 95% CI: 7.07-13.09; I2 = 0%) or DVT (HR: 6.18; 95% CI: 4.51-8.49, I2 = 0%). Even if to a lesser extent, AF was associated with a higher risk of VTE (HR: 3.69; 95% CI: 1.65-8.27; I2 = 79%), DVT (HR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.43-2.14; I2 = 0%), and PE (HR: 4.3; 95% CI: 1.61-11.47; I2 = 68%) in the up to 6 months and long-term risk group >6 months groups (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.00-1.92; I2 = 72%) and PE (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.00-1.16; I2 = 0%).
    UNASSIGNED: The risk of VTE is highest in the first 3 to 6 months after AF diagnosis and decreases over time. The early initiation of anticoagulation in patients with AF may reduce the risk of VTE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已知COVID-19与急性心肌梗死(MI)有关。
    本研究的目的是评估COVID-19住院幸存者中心肌梗死再入院30天的结果。
    我们使用美国全国再入院数据库识别2020年4月1日至2020年11月30日的COVID-19入院,使用国际疾病分类-第10修订版-临床修改(ICD-10-CM)索赔。主要结果是MI的30天再入院发生率。共纳入521251例COVID-19病例,其中11.6%在出院后30天内再次入院。MI的30天再入院发生率为0.6%。30天全因再入院死亡率为1.3%。再次入院的MI患者更常见的是男性(61.6%vs38.4%),并且Charlson合并症负担评分更高(7vs4)。30天MI再入院中最常见的诊断是2型MI(51.1%),随后诊断为1型非ST段抬高MI(41.7%)。ST段抬高MI病例占所有MI再入院的7.6%,而0.6%的患者患有不稳定型心绞痛。复发诊断为COVID-19的30天MI再入院死亡率和并发症发生率较高。相反,对于复发COVID-19的MI,进行血运重建手术的几率较低.此外,与非COVID-19心肌梗死再入院相比,复发性COVID-19心肌梗死再入院的住院时间(7天比5天)和住院费用(18,398美元比16,191美元)更高。
    在COVID-19住院的幸存者中,5.2%的全因30天再入院和12%的全因再入院死亡率归因于MI。与MI相关的再入院是死亡的重要来源,发病率,和资源利用。
    UNASSIGNED: COVID-19 is known to be associated with acute myocardial infarction (MI).
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of 30-day readmissions for MI among survivors of COVID-19 hospitalization.
    UNASSIGNED: We used the U.S. Nationwide Readmission Database to identify COVID-19 admissions from April 1, 2020, to November 30, 2020, using International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision-Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) claims. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission incidence for MI. A total of 521,251 cases of COVID-19 were included, of which 11.6% were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. The 30-day readmission incidence for MI was 0.6%. The 30-day all-cause readmission mortality incidence was 1.3%. Patients readmitted for MI were more frequently males (61.6% vs 38.4%) and had a higher Charlson comorbidity burden score (7 vs 4). The most common diagnosis among 30-day MI readmission was type 2 MI (51.1%), followed by a diagnosis of a type 1 non-ST-segment elevation MI (41.7%). ST-segment elevation MI cases constituted 7.6% of all MI-readmission whereas 0.6% of patients had unstable angina. 30-day MI readmissions with a recurrent diagnosis of COVID-19 had higher readmission mortality and incidence of complications. Conversely, the odds of performing revascularization procedures were lower for MI with recurrent COVID-19. Furthermore, MI readmissions with recurrent COVID-19 had a higher length of stay (7 vs 5 days) and cost of hospitalization ($18,398 vs $16,191) when compared with non-COVID-19 MI readmissions.
    UNASSIGNED: Among survivors of COVID-19 hospitalization, 5.2% of all-cause 30-day readmissions and 12% of all-cause readmission mortality were attributed to MI. MI-related readmissions were a significant source of mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在诊断为静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的重症监护病房(ICU)患者中,血尿素氮与肌酐比值(BCR)与院内死亡风险之间的关系仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估重症VTE患者入住ICU时的BCR与院内死亡率之间的关系。
    这项回顾性队列研究纳入了重症监护医学信息集市(MIMIC-IV)数据库中诊断为VTE的患者。主要终点是住院死亡率。进行单因素和多因素logistic回归分析以评估BCR的预后意义。利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析来确定BCR的最佳截止值。此外,采用Kaplan-Meier曲线进行生存分析.
    共纳入2,560名患者,平均年龄为64.5岁,55.5%为男性。总的来说,住院死亡率为14.6%.BCR预测重症VTE患者院内死亡率的最佳临界值为26.84。与低BCR组相比,高BCR组患者的住院死亡率明显更高(22.6%vs.12.2%,P<0.001)。多变量Logistic回归分析结果表明,即使在考虑了潜在的混杂因素之后,与BCR水平较低的患者相比,BCR升高的患者的院内死亡率显着增加(所有P<0.05),不管使用的模型。高BCR组患者的住院死亡率比低BCR组患者高77.77%[风险比(HR):1.7777;95%CI:1.4016-2.2547]。
    在诊断为VTE的危重患者中,BCR水平升高与院内死亡风险增加独立相关。鉴于其广泛的可用性和易于测量,BCR可能是VTE患者风险分层和预后预测的有价值的工具。
    UNASSIGNED: The relationship between the blood urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio (BCR) and the risk of in-hospital mortality among intensive care unit (ICU) patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the relationship between BCR upon admission to the ICU and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with VTE.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with VTE from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the prognostic significance of the BCR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was utilized to determine the optimal cut-off value of BCR. Additionally, survival analysis using a Kaplan-Meier curve was performed.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 2,560 patients were included, with a median age of 64.5 years, and 55.5% were male. Overall, the in-hospital mortality rate was 14.6%. The optimal cut-off value of the BCR for predicting in-hospital mortality in critically ill VTE patients was 26.84. The rate of in-hospital mortality among patients categorized in the high BCR group was significantly higher compared to those in the low BCR group (22.6% vs. 12.2%, P < 0.001). The multivariable logistic regression analysis results indicated that, even after accounting for potential confounding factors, patients with elevated BCR demonstrated a notably increased in-hospital mortality rate compared to those with lower BCR levels (all P < 0.05), regardless of the model used. Patients in the high BCR group exhibited a 77.77% higher risk of in-hospital mortality than those in the low BCR group [hazard ratio (HR): 1.7777; 95% CI: 1.4016-2.2547].
    UNASSIGNED: An elevated BCR level was independently linked with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality among critically ill patients diagnosed with VTE. Given its widespread availability and ease of measurement, BCR could be a valuable tool for risk stratification and prognostic prediction in VTE patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    住院期间和出院后的内科疾病患者的血栓预防仍未得到充分利用。临床决策支持(CDS)如果嵌入工作流程中,可以满足这一需求,在电子健康记录(EHR)之间可互换,并锚定在一个经过验证的模型上。
    本研究的目的是评估基于静脉血栓栓塞加D-二聚体静脉血栓栓塞模型的国际医学预防注册的通用EHR整合CDS工具的临床影响。
    这是一项从2020年12月21日至2022年1月21日对4家三级学术医院进行的整群随机试验。60岁以上有主要医疗疾病的住院患者符合资格。我们在入院和出院时嵌入了CDS。医院被随机分为干预组(CDS;n=2)和常规护理组(n=2)。主要结果是适当的血栓预防率。次要结果包括静脉,动脉,和总血栓栓塞,大出血,以及出院后30天的全因死亡率。
    排除后,对19,823例患者中的10,699例进行了分析。干预组工具采用率为77.8%。干预医院增加了适当的血栓预防,均为住院患者(80.1%vs72.5%,OR:1.52,95%CI:1.39-1.67)和出院时(13.6%vs7.5%,OR:1.93,95%CI:1.60-2.33)。静脉较少(2.7%vs3.3%,OR:0.80,95%CI:0.64-1.00),动脉(0.25%vs0.70%,OR:0.35,95%CI:0.19-0.67),和总血栓栓塞(2.9%vs4.0%,OR:0.71,95%CI:0.58-0.88)在干预医院。大出血很少见,组间没有差异。干预医院的死亡率更高(9.1%vs7.0%,OR:1.32,95%CI:1.15-1.53)。
    在内科住院患者中,嵌入EHR的CDS增加了适当的血栓预防并减少了血栓栓塞,而不增加大出血。干预医院的死亡率较高。
    UNASSIGNED: Thromboprophylaxis for medically ill patients during hospitalization and postdischarge remains underutilized. Clinical decision support (CDS) may address this need if embedded within workflow, interchangeable among electronic health records (EHRs), and anchored on a validated model.
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical impact of a universal EHR-integrated CDS tool based on the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism plus D-Dimer venous thromboembolism model.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a cluster randomized trial of 4 tertiary academic hospitals from December 21, 2020 to January 21, 2022. Inpatients over age 60 with key medical illnesses were eligible. We embedded CDS at admission and discharge. Hospitals were randomized to intervention (CDS; n = 2) vs usual care (n = 2) groups. The primary outcome was rate of appropriate thromboprophylaxis. Secondary outcomes included venous, arterial, and total thromboembolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality through 30 days postdischarge.
    UNASSIGNED: After exclusions, 10,699 of 19,823 patients were analyzed. Intervention group tool adoption was 77.8%. Appropriate thromboprophylaxis was increased at intervention hospitals, both inpatient (80.1% vs 72.5%, OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.39-1.67) and at discharge (13.6% vs 7.5%, OR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.60-2.33). There were fewer venous (2.7% vs 3.3%, OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.64-1.00), arterial (0.25% vs 0.70%, OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.19-0.67), and total thromboembolisms (2.9% vs 4.0%, OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.58-0.88) at intervention hospitals. Major bleeding was rare and did not differ between groups. Mortality was higher at intervention hospitals (9.1% vs 7.0%, OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.15-1.53).
    UNASSIGNED: EHR-embedded CDS increased appropriate thromboprophylaxis and reduced thromboembolism without increasing major bleeding in medically ill inpatients. Mortality was higher at intervention hospitals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在孕妇和中国人群中都没有进行过血压(BP)与静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)风险的相关性研究。这项研究包括来自回顾性多中心队列的孕妇参与者,2020年5月至2023年4月。在妊娠晚期测量参与者的收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)。随访产后42天的VTE(包括深静脉血栓形成和/或肺栓塞)的发生率。关于SBP,孕妇在Q1(≤114mmHg),Q2(115-122mmHg),Q4组(≥131mmHg)的VTE风险比Q3组(123-130mmHg)增加,ORs为4.48[1.69,11.85],3.52[1.30,9.59],和3.17[1.12,8.99],分别。与DBP(≥85mmHg)的Q4孕妇相比,研究发现Q1(≤71mmHg)的女性VTE风险升高(OR2.73[1.25,5.96]).DBP(9mmHg)降低一个标准差与VTE的37%升高的风险相关(OR1.37[1.05,1.79])。这项研究表明,妊娠晚期和VTE产后的SBP呈U形相关,妊娠晚期和VTE产后的DBP呈负相关。
    Studies on the associations of blood pressure (BP) and the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) had been performed neither among pregnant women nor in Chinese population. This study included participants of pregnant women from a retrospective multicenter cohort, between May 2020 and April 2023. Systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) of the participants were measured in the third trimester. The incidences of VTE (including deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism) at 42 days postpartum were followed. With regards to SBP, pregnant women in the Q1 (≤114 mmHg), Q2 (115-122 mmHg), and Q4 group (≥131 mmHg) had increased risk of VTE than those in Q3 group (123-130 mmHg), with ORs 4.48 [1.69, 11.85], 3.52 [1.30, 9.59], and 3.17 [1.12, 8.99], respectively. Compared with pregnant women with the Q4 of DBP (≥85 mmHg), women of Q1 (≤71 mmHg) were found to have elevated risk of VTE (OR 2.73 [1.25, 5.96]). A one standard deviation decrease of DBP (9 mmHg) was related with 37% elevated risk of VTE (OR 1.37 [1.05, 1.79]). This study demonstrated a U-shaped association of SBP in the third trimester and VTE postpartum and inverse association of DBP in the third trimester and VTE postpartum.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肺栓塞(PE)是静脉血栓栓塞的严重且危及生命的并发症。然而,缺乏关于女性和男性PE患者之间差异的系统研究。本文旨在比较精神病性PE患者临床特征和实验室指标的性别差异。
    方法:本回顾性研究纳入2018年6月至2022年6月深圳市康宁医院(深圳市精神卫生中心)收治的PE精神病患者。人口特征,与PE相关的因素,并收集实验室指标以评估性别差异.
    结果:在168例患者中,87(51.8%)为女性,81(48.2%)为男性,女性患者平均年龄58岁,男性患者平均年龄46岁。男性组高泌乳素血症比例较高,更多使用抗精神病药物的患者,PE发作时D-二聚体水平较高,更大的D-二聚体差异,D-二聚体升高率高于女性组(p<0.05)。女性患者明显年龄较大,表现出更高的糖尿病患病率,与男性患者相比,服用抗抑郁药和催眠药/镇静药的患者数量更多(p<0.05)。精神分裂症谱系障碍在男性患者中更为普遍,而女性患者的情绪障碍发生率较高(p<0.05)。在年龄<45岁的患者中,男性组PE发病时D-二聚体水平较高,D-二聚体差异较大(p<0.05).在所有112名年龄≥45岁的患者中,男性患者比女性患者更容易发生呼吸道感染,PE发作时D-二聚体水平较高,更大的D-二聚体差异,D-二聚体升高率较高(p<0.05)。多元线性回归分析显示高泌乳素血症和第一代抗精神病药(FGA)的使用与男性患者PE发病时D-二聚体水平相关,女性患者PE发病时间和保护性约束与PE发病时D-二聚体水平相关(p<0.05)。
    结论:男性和女性患者与PE相关的临床特征不同。这些差异可能暗示PE发病的过程和机制是性别特异性的。与女性患者相比,男性患者在PE发作时更容易发生呼吸道感染和更高的D-二聚体水平。FGA的使用可能与男性精神病患者的D-二聚体增加有关,而保护性约束可能与女性精神病患者的D-二聚体升高有关。
    BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a severe and life-threatening complication of venous thromboembolism. However, there is a lack of systematic studies on differences between female and male PE patients. This paper aimed to compare the sex-specific differences in clinical characteristics and laboratory indicators in psychotic patients with PE.
    METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled psychiatric patients with PE from June 2018 to June 2022 at Shenzhen Kangning Hospital (Shenzhen Mental Health Center). Demographic characteristics, factors associated with PE, and laboratory indices were collected to assess sex-specific differences.
    RESULTS: Of the 168 patients, 87 (51.8%) were female and 81 (48.2%) were male, with a mean age of 58 years for females and 46 years for male patients. The male group had higher ratio of hyperprolactinemia, more patients using antipsychotic medications, higher D-dimer levels at PE onset, greater D-dimer difference, and a higher rate of D-dimer elevation than the female group (p < 0.05). Female patients were significantly older, exhibited a higher prevalence of diabetes, and had a greater number of patients taking antidepressants and hypnotics/sedatives than male patients (p < 0.05). Schizophrenia spectrum disorders were more prevalent in male patients, while female patients had a higher incidence of mood disorders (p < 0.05). Among patients aged < 45 years, the male group had higher D-dimer levels at PE onset and greater D-dimer difference (p < 0.05). Among all 112 patients aged ≥ 45 years, male patients were more likely than female patients to have respiratory tract infections, higher D-dimer levels at PE onset, greater D-dimer difference, and a higher rate of D-dimer elevation (p < 0.05). The multiple linear regression analysis indicated that hyperprolactinemia and the use of first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) were associated with D-dimer levels at PE onset in male patients, while the time of PE onset and protective restraints were associated with D-dimer levels at PE onset in female patients (p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: PE-associated clinical features differ between male and female patients. These differences may imply that the processes and mechanisms of PE onset are sex specific. Male patients are more likely to have respiratory tract infections and higher D-dimer levels at PE onset than female patients. The use of FGAs may be associated with increased D-dimer in male psychiatric patients, while protective restraints may be associated with increased D-dimer in female psychiatric patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们描述了一名30多岁的孕妇双侧肺静脉血栓形成的不寻常病例,在妊娠34周时出现突然发作的胸痛症状,呼吸急促和近乎晕厥的发作。患者接受依诺肝素治疗,临床和血流动力学恢复良好。
    We describe an unusual case of bilateral pulmonary venous thrombosis in a pregnant woman in her mid 30s, who presented at 34 weeks of gestation with symptoms of sudden onset chest pain, shortness of breath and near syncope attacks. The patient was treated with enoxaparin and made an excellent clinical and hemodynamic recovery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着大麻的普及及其使用的增加以及缺乏有关大麻使用以及静脉血栓栓塞和肺栓塞(PE)的大规模数据,我们使用了具有全国代表性的年轻人(年龄18~44岁)队列,比较了有和没有大麻使用障碍(CUD)的PE的入院几率和住院死亡率.
    结果:比较了使用国家住院样本(2018年)确定的PE患者的基线,合并症,和结果。多元回归分析,对协变量进行调整,用于比较患有CUD(CUD)的年轻患者与没有CUD(CUD-)和先前有静脉血栓栓塞的年轻患者的PE几率。还进行了倾向得分匹配分析(1:6)来评估住院结局。2018年8438858名年轻成年人中,共有61965名(0.7%)与PE相关,其中1705例(0.6%)有CUD+。两者都未经调整(赔率比,0.80[95%CI,0.71-0.90];P<0.001)和调整后的回归分析,CUD+队列的PE入院风险较低.CUD+队列的常规出院较少(58.3%对68.3%),短期转移(7.9%对4.8%)和护理/中间护理(12.6%对9.5%)较高(P<0.001)。PE-CUD+住院死亡率队列与CUD-队列没有差异。倾向得分匹配(1:6)分析显示,在CUD+队列中,死亡率与住院天数和费用中位数较高具有可比性。
    结论:患有CUD的年轻成年人PE住院的几率较低,与随后的住院死亡率无任何关联。CUD+队列的中位住院时间更长,他们经常被转移到其他设施,他们的成本更高。
    BACKGROUND: With the increase in popularity of cannabis and its use and the lack of large-scale data on cannabis use and venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism (PE), we used a nationally representative cohort of young adults (aged 18-44 years) to compare the odds of admissions and in-hospital mortality of PE with and without cannabis use disorder (CUD).
    RESULTS: Identified patients with PE using the National Inpatient Sample (2018) were compared for baseline, comorbidities, and outcomes. Multivariable regression analysis, adjusted for covariates, was used to compare the odds of PE in young patients with CUD (CUD+) versus those without (CUD-) and those with prior venous thromboembolism. Propensity score-matched analysis (1:6) was also performed to assess in-hospital outcomes. A total of 61 965 (0.7%) of 8 438 858 young adult admissions in 2018 were PE related, of which 1705 (0.6%) had CUD+. On both unadjusted (odds ratio, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.71-0.90]; P<0.001) and adjusted regression analyses, the CUD+ cohort had a lower risk of PE admission. The CUD+ cohort had fewer routine discharges (58.3% versus 68.3%) and higher transfers to short-term (7.9% versus 4.8%) and nursing/intermediate care (12.6% versus 9.5%) (P<0.001). The PE-CUD+ cohort of in-hospital mortality did not differ from the CUD- cohort. Propensity score-matched (1:6) analysis revealed comparable mortality odds with higher median hospital stay and cost in the CUD+ cohort.
    CONCLUSIONS: Young adults with CUD demonstrated lower odds of PE hospitalizations without any association with subsequent in-hospital mortality. The median hospital stay of the CUD+ cohort was longer, they were often transferred to other facilities, and they had a higher cost.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号