UNASSIGNED: Changes in land use and climate change have been reported to reduce biodiversity of both the environment and human microbiota. These reductions in biodiversity may lead to inadequate and unbalanced stimulation of immunoregulatory circuits and, ultimately, to clinical diseases, such as asthma and allergies.
UNASSIGNED: We summarized available empirical evidence on the role of inner (gut, skin, and airways) and outer (air, soil, natural waters, plants, and animals) layers of biodiversity in the development of asthma, wheezing, and allergic sensitization.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a systematic search in SciVerse Scopus, PubMed MEDLINE, and Web of Science up to 5 March 2024 to identify relevant human studies assessing the relationships between inner and outer layers of biodiversity and the risk of asthma, wheezing, or allergic sensitization. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022381725).
UNASSIGNED: A total of 2,419 studies were screened and, after exclusions and a full-text review of 447 studies, 82 studies were included in the comprehensive, final review. Twenty-nine studies reported a protective effect of outer layer biodiversity in the development of asthma, wheezing, or allergic sensitization. There were also 16 studies suggesting an effect of outer layer biodiversity on increasing asthma, wheezing, or allergic sensitization. However, there was no clear evidence on the role of inner layer biodiversity in the development of asthma, wheezing, and allergic sensitization (13 studies reported a protective effect and 15 reported evidence of an increased risk).
UNASSIGNED: Based on the reviewed literature, a future systematic review could focus more specifically on outer layer biodiversity and asthma. It is unlikely that association with inner layer biodiversity would have enough evidence for systematic review. Based on this comprehensive review, there is a need for population-based longitudinal studies to identify critical periods of exposure in the life course into adulthood and to better understand mechanisms linking environmental exposures and changes in microbiome composition, diversity, and/or function to development of asthma and allergic sensitization. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13948.

Cannabis allergy is a relatively new phenomenon described in the 1970s. Its increased frequency has been observed over the last years due to the increasing therapeutic and recreational use of cannabis-based products. Sensitization possibly leading to allergy symptoms can occur not only through the smoking of cannabis, but also through ingestion, the inhalation of pollen, or direct contact. The severity of symptoms varies from benign pruritus to anaphylaxis. There is scant information available to support clinicians throughout the entire therapeutic process, starting from diagnosis and ending in treatment. In this review, we present six cases of patients in whom molecular in vitro testing revealed sensitization to cannabis extract and/or cannabis-derived nsLTP molecules (Can s 3). Based on these cases, we raise important questions regarding this topic. The article discusses current proposals and highlights the importance of further research not only on cannabis allergy but also on asymptomatic sensitization to cannabis allergens, which may be ascertained in some percentage of the population.

The impact of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) on pediatric maxillary growth is a subject of ongoing research considering its increased use in the pediatric population due to technological advancements and broader indications. This review examines the existing literature, encompassing original articles, case reports, and reviews, to evaluate the effects of NIV on maxillary development and explore potential treatment options. Although the majority of studies agree on the adverse effects of prolonged NIV on maxillary development, techniques for its correction remain understudied. Introducing a novel treatment protocol, we addressed the challenge of correcting severe midfacial hypoplasia in a child with congenital central hypoventilation syndrome (CCHS) undergoing NIV therapy, thus sidestepping the necessity for osteotomies. This proposed protocol holds promise in correcting the adverse impact of NIV on maxillary growth, emphasizing the need for further exploration into innovative treatment modalities.

Sepsis, a life-threatening condition caused by the body\'s dysregulated response to infection, presents a significant challenge in clinical management. Timely and accurate diagnosis is paramount for initiating appropriate interventions and improving patient outcomes. In recent years, there has been growing interest in identifying biomarkers that can aid in the early detection and prognostication of sepsis. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as potential biomarkers for sepsis due to their involvement in the regulation of gene expression and their stability in various biological fluids, including blood. MiRNAs are small non-coding RNA molecules that play crucial roles in post-transcriptional gene regulation by binding to target messenger RNAs (mRNAs), leading to mRNA degradation or translational repression. The diagnostic and prognostic potential of miRNAs in sepsis stems from their ability to serve as sensitive and specific biomarkers reflective of the underlying pathophysiological processes. Compared to traditional biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT), miRNAs offer several advantages, including their early and sustained elevation during sepsis, as well as their stability in stored samples, making them attractive candidates for clinical use. However, despite their promise, the clinical translation of miRNAs as sepsis biomarkers faces several challenges. These include the need for standardized sample collection and processing methods, the identification of optimal miRNA panels or signatures for differentiating sepsis from other inflammatory conditions, and the validation of findings across diverse patient populations and clinical settings. In conclusion, miRNAs hold great promise as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for sepsis, offering insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. However, further research is needed to overcome existing challenges and realize the full clinical utility of miRNAs in improving sepsis outcomes.

Fluid resuscitation during diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is most frequently performed with 0.9% saline despite its high chloride and sodium concentration. Balanced Electrolyte Solutions (BES) may prove a more physiological alternative, but convincing evidence is missing. We aimed to compare the efficacy of 0.9% saline to BES in DKA management. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies using predefined keywords (from inception to 27 November 2021). Relevant studies were those in which 0.9% saline (Saline-group) was compared to BES (BES-group) in adults admitted with DKA. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome was time to DKA resolution (defined by each study individually), while the main secondary outcomes were changes in laboratory values, duration of insulin infusion, and mortality. We included seven randomized controlled trials and three observational studies with 1006 participants. The primary outcome was reported for 316 patients, and we found that BES resolves DKA faster than 0.9% saline with a mean difference (MD) of -5.36 [95% CI: -10.46, -0.26] hours. Post-resuscitation chloride (MD: -4.26 [-6.97, -1.54] mmoL/L) and sodium (MD: -1.38 [-2.14, -0.62] mmoL/L) levels were significantly lower. In contrast, levels of post-resuscitation bicarbonate (MD: 1.82 [0.75, 2.89] mmoL/L) were significantly elevated in the BES-group compared to the Saline-group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the duration of parenteral insulin administration (MD: 0.16 [-3.03, 3.35] hours) or mortality (OR: -0.67 [0.12, 3.68]). Studies showed some concern or a high risk of bias, and the level of evidence for most outcomes was low. This meta-analysis indicates that the use of BES resolves DKA faster than 0.9% saline. Therefore, DKA guidelines should consider BES instead of 0.9% saline as the first choice during fluid resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence and machine learning are the new frontier in urology; they can assist the diagnostic work-up and in prognostication bring superior to the existing nomograms. Infectious events and in particular the septic risk, are one of the most common and in some cases life threatening complication in patients with urolithiasis. We performed a scoping review to provide an overview of the current application of AI in prediction the infectious complications in patients affected by urolithiasis.
METHODS: A systematic scoping review of the literature was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines by screening Medline, PubMed, and Embase to detect pertinent studies.
RESULTS: A total of 467 articles were found, of which nine met the inclusion criteria and were considered. All studies are retrospective and published between 2021 and 2023. Only two studies performed an external validation of the described models. The main event considered is urosepsis in four articles, urinary tract infection in two articles and diagnosis of infection stones in three articles. Different AI models were trained, each of which exploited several types and numbers of variables. All studies reveal good performance. Random forest and artificial neural networks seem to have higher AUC, specificity and sensibility and perform better than the traditional statistical analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Further prospective and multi-institutional studies with external validation are needed to better clarify which variables and AI models should be integrated in our clinical practice to predict infectious events.

OBJECTIVE: Older adults may be under-represented in critical care research, and results may not apply to this specific population. Our primary objective was to evaluate the prevalence of inclusion of older adults across critical care trials focused on common ICU conditions or interventions. Our secondary objective was to evaluate whether older age was used as a stratification variable for randomization or outcome analysis.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review of previously published systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in critical care. We searched PubMed, Ovid, CENTRAL, and Cochrane from 2009 to 2022. Systematic reviews of any interventions across five topics: acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis/shock, nutrition, sedation, and mobilization were eligible.
RESULTS: We identified 216 systematic reviews and included a total of 253 RCTs and 113,090 patients. We extracted baseline characteristics and the reported proportion of older adults. We assessed whether any upper age limit was an exclusion criterion for trials, whether age was used for stratification during randomization or data analysis, and if age-specific subgroup analysis was present. The most prevalent topic was sepsis (78 trials, 31%), followed by nutrition (62 trials, 25%), ARDS (39 trials, 15%), mobilization (38 trials, 15%), and sedation (36 trials, 14%). Eighteen trials (7%) had exclusion criteria based on older age. Age distribution with information on older adults prevalence was given in six trials (2%). Age was considered in the analysis of ten trials (5%) using analytic methods to evaluate the outcome stratified by age.
UNASSIGNED: In this systematic review, the proportion of older critically ill patients is undetermined, and it is unclear how age is or is not an effect modifier or to what extent the results are valid for older adult groups. Reporting age is important to guide clinicians in personalizing care. These results highlight the importance of incorporating older critically ill patients in future trials to ensure the results are generalizable to this growing population.

This study aimed to evaluate the current evidence on various aspects of fluid therapy such as type, volume, and timing of fluid bolus administration in children with septic shock. Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials including children less than 18 years of age admitted to the pediatric emergency and intensive care unit with severe infection and shock requiring fluid resuscitation. The intervention included balanced crystalloids (BC) vs normal saline (NS), colloids vs NS, restricted vs liberal fluid bolus, and slow vs fast fluid bolus. The primary outcome was mortality rate. Of the 219 citations retrieved, 12 trials (3526 children with severe infection with or without malaria and shock) were included. The pooled results found no significant difference in the mortality rate between groups comparing balanced crystalloids (BC) vs normal saline (NS), colloids vs NS, restricted vs liberal fluid bolus, and slow vs fast fluid bolus. The risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) was significantly less in the BC group compared to the NS group. The certainty of evidence for mortality was of \"moderate certainty\" in the BC vs NS group, and was of \"very low certainty\" for the other two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis found no significant difference in the mortality rate between the types of resuscitation fluid, and their speed or volume of administration. However, a significantly decreased risk of AKI was found in the BC group. More evidence is needed regarding the speed and volume of administration of fluid boluses in critically ill children.Prospero registration: CRD42020209066.
BACKGROUND: • Balanced crystalloids (BC) may be better than normal saline (NS) for fluid resuscitation in critically ill children.
BACKGROUND: • BC are better than NS for fluid resuscitation in critically ill children as they decrease AKI and hyperchloremia.

OBJECTIVE: In critically ill children with severe sepsis, septic cardiomyopathy (SCM) denotes the subset of patients who have myocardial dysfunction with poor response to fluid and inotropic support, and higher mortality risk. The objective of this review was to evaluate the role of speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) in the diagnosis and prognosis of pediatric SCM in the PICU setting.
METHODS: We performed detailed searches using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Reference lists of all included studies were also examined for further identification of potentially relevant studies.
METHODS: Studies with the following medical subject headings and keywords were selected: speckle-tracking echocardiography, strain imaging, global longitudinal strain, echocardiography, sepsis, severe sepsis, septic shock, septic cardiomyopathy, and myocardial dysfunction.
METHODS: The following data were extracted from all included studies: demographics, diagnoses, echocardiographic parameters, severity of illness, PICU management, and outcomes.
RESULTS: STE is a relatively new echocardiographic technique that directly quantifies myocardial contractility. It has high sensitivity in diagnosing SCM, correlates well with illness severity, and has good prognosticating value as compared with conventional echocardiographic parameters. Further studies are required to establish its role in evaluating biventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction, and to investigate whether it has a role in individualizing treatment and improving treatment outcomes in this group of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: STE is a useful adjunct to conventional measures of cardiac function on 2D-echocardiography in the assessment of pediatric SCM in the PICU.

UNASSIGNED: To examine speed and accuracy of newborn heart rate measurement by various assessment methods employed at birth.
UNASSIGNED: A search of Medline, SCOPUS, CINAHL and Cochrane was conducted between January 1, 1946, to until August 16, 2023. (CRD 42021283364) Study selection was based on predetermined criteria. Reviewers independently extracted data, appraised risk of bias and assessed certainty of evidence.
UNASSIGNED: Pulse oximetry is slower and less precise than ECG for heart rate assessment. Both auscultation and palpation are imprecise for heart rate assessment. Other devices such as digital stethoscope, Doppler ultrasound, an ECG device using dry electrodes incorporated in a belt, photoplethysmography and electromyography are studied in small numbers of newborns and data are not available for extremely preterm or bradycardic newborns receiving resuscitation. Digital stethoscope is fast and accurate. Doppler ultrasound and dry electrode ECG in a belt are fast, accurate and precise when compared to conventional ECG with gel adhesive electrodes.
UNASSIGNED: Certainty of evidence was low or very low for most comparisons.
UNASSIGNED: If resources permit, ECG should be used for fast and accurate heart rate assessment at birth. Pulse oximetry and auscultation may be reasonable alternatives but have limitations. Digital stethoscope, doppler ultrasound and dry electrode ECG show promise but need further study.