• 文章类型: Journal Article
    用于自我管理的智能手机应用程序是帮助管理下腰痛(LBP)患者的宝贵工具。本系统评价的目的是(a)总结有关智能手机应用程序对LBP自我管理的有效性的现有研究,以及(b)确定意大利可用的免费应用程序,这些应用程序为LBP自我管理提供策略,并提供定性评估使用移动应用程序评定量表(MARS)。根据Prisma清单,搜索了六个书目数据库,关键词是“腰背痛”,\'移动应用程序\',\'智能手机\',和“远程医疗”。总的来说,筛选了852条记录,16项纳入了系统审查。在包括的六个RCT中,四个人报告了疼痛的统计学显着下降,有利于应用程序组,两个RCT没有。仅在非RCT中,残疾评分才增加。在对移动商店进行的应用研究中,我们通过MARS确定并评估了25个应用程序。IOS应用程序的总分从1.93到3.92不等,Play商店应用程序的总分从1.73到4.25不等。研究结果表明,很少有应用程序达到令人满意的质量,内容,和LBP自我管理的功能标准。
    Smartphone apps for self-management are valuable tools to help manage low back pain (LBP) patients. The purposes of this systematic review were to (a) summarize the available studies on the efficacy of smartphone apps for self-management of LBP and (b) identify free applications available in Italy that offer strategies for LBP self-management and provide a qualitative assessment using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). According to the Prisma Checklist, six bibliographic databases were searched with the keywords \'low back pain\', \'mobile application\', \'smartphone\', and \'telemedicine\'. In total, 852 records were screened, and 16 were included in the systematic review. Of the six RCTs included, four reported a statistically significant decrease in pain in favor of the app group, and two RCTs did not. Only in a non-RCT was there an increase in the disability score. In the application research conducted on mobile stores, we identified and rated 25 applications through MARS. The overall scores ranged from 1.93 to 3.92 for the IOS app and 1.73 to 4.25 for the Play Store app. The findings suggest that few apps meet satisfying quality, content, and functionality criteria for LBP self-management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:物理治疗方法用于消除由宫颈源性头痛(CHA)引起的问题,与上颈部结构相关的继发性头痛。本研究旨在探讨颈椎松动术(CM)配合临床普拉提练习(CPE)对疼痛的影响,CGH中的肌肉僵硬和头颈部血流量。材料和方法:共有25例患者参加了这项随机对照研究,并随机分为CM组和CMCPE组。所有治疗方法每周应用3天,共6周。结果测量为头痛强度和频率,镇痛药的数量,肌肉僵硬度和椎动脉(VA)和颈内动脉(ICA)血流量。通过视觉模拟量表测量头痛强度,肌压计的肌肉僵硬度和多普勒超声的血流。治疗6周后重复评估。组内比较通过Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行,组间比较采用Mann-WhitneyU检验。结果:两组治疗后,头痛的强度和频率以及镇痛药的数量减少,枕下的肌肉僵硬,上斜方肌和胸锁乳突肌(SCM)减少,ICA和VA的血流量增加(p<0.05)。在SKM的头痛强度(p=0.025)和肌肉僵硬度(p=0.044)方面,两组之间存在显着差异,有利于CMCPE组。结论:非药物治疗方法在与上颈部相关的CHA中具有重要作用。这项研究表明,将CM与CPE组合添加到CHA患者的非药物治疗中是有益的。
    Background and Objectives: Physiotherapy approaches are used to eliminate the problems caused by cervicogenic headache (CHA), known as secondary headache associated with the structures of the upper cervical region. This study aimed to investigate the effects of cervical mobilization (CM) with clinical Pilates exercises (CPE) on pain, muscle stiffness and head-neck blood flow in CGH. Materials and Methods: A total of 25 patients participated in this randomized controlled study and were randomized into either the CM group or the CM+CPE group. All treatment methods were applied 3 days a week for 6 weeks. The outcome measure was headache intensity and frequency, the number of analgesics, muscle stiffness and vertebral artery (VA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) blood flow. Headache intensity was measured by a visual analogue scale, muscle stiffness by a myotonometer and blood flow by Doppler US. Evaluations were repeated after 6 weeks of treatment. Within-group comparisons were made by the Wilcoxon signed rank test, and between-group comparisons were made by the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: After treatments in the two groups, headache intensity and frequency and the number of analgesics decreased, the muscle stiffness of the suboccipital, upper trapezius and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles decreased, and the blood flow of the ICA and VA increased (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of headache intensity (p = 0.025) and muscle stiffness in SKM (p = 0.044) in favor of the CM+CPE group. Conclusions: Non-pharmacological treatment approaches have an important role in CHA related to the upper cervical region. This study suggests that it would be beneficial to add CM in combination with CPE to the non-pharmacological treatment of patients with CHA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对与工作有关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WMSDs)的关注涉及统计调查,显示WMSDs的发病率呈上升趋势。技术发展导致了评估工作中物理负荷的新工具和方法。这些方法大多基于对适当参数的直接感知,这允许更精确的量化。本文的目的是比较斯洛伐克的几种常用方法,以评估反映当前欧盟和斯洛伐克立法法规的人体工程学风险。Captiv无线传感系统用于汽车前照灯质量控制总成工作场所进行传感,数据采集和数据处理。在评估工作中的姿势和动作时,我们发现了适用标准的差异:第542/2007号法令Coll。(斯洛伐克立法),STNEN1005-4+A1以及Captiv系统中默认的法国标准。标准定义了危险姿势的阈值,在几个评估的身体部分有显著差异,这影响了测量的最终评估。我们应用改进的风险评估方法的经验可能会对斯洛伐克的工业工作场所产生影响。证实有必要为人体姿势的人体工程学风险评估建立统一标准,包括各个身体部分的阈值的详细描述。
    Attention on work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) involves statistical surveys showing an increasing trend in the incidence of WMSDs. Technological development has led to new tools and methods for the assessment of physical load at work. These methods are mostly based on the direct sensing of appropriate parameters, which allows more precise quantification. The aim of this paper is to compare several commonly used methods in Slovakia for the assessment of ergonomic risk reflecting current EU and Slovak legislative regulations. A Captiv wireless sensory system was used at a car headlight quality control assembly workplace for sensing, data acquisition and data processing. During the evaluation of postures and movements at work, we discovered differences in the applicable standards: Decree 542/2007 Coll. (Slovak Legislation), the STN EN 1005-4+A1, and the French standards default in the Captiv system. Standards define the thresholds for hazardous postures with significant differences in several evaluated body segments, which affects the final evaluation of the measurements. Our experience from applying improved risk assessment methodology may have an impact on Slovak industrial workplaces. It was confirmed that there is a need to create uniform standards for the ergonomic risk assessment of body posture, including a detailed description of the threshold values for individual body segments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估对间充质基质细胞(MSCs)治疗肌肉骨骼疾病的介入试验登记和报告结果的法定要求的遵守情况,并描述试验的临床和设计特点。
    方法:对已发表的试验和提交给公共登记处的试验的系统评价。
    方法:数据库Medline,科克伦图书馆和麦克马斯特;六个公共临床登记处。所有搜索都进行到2023年1月31日。
    方法:提交给注册管理机构并在2021年1月之前完成的试验。发表在同行评审期刊上的前瞻性介入试验。
    方法:第一作者搜索了那些(1)在公共注册表中发布了试验结果的试验,(2)在同行评审的出版物中介绍了结果,以及(3)在发布前向注册表提交了审前协议。其他提取的变量包括试验设计,参与人数,资金来源,随访持续时间和细胞类型。
    结果:在登记处和文献数据库中发现了总共124项试验。膝关节骨性关节炎是最常见的适应症。在100项注册试验中,52项试验,共有2993名参与者既没有在注册登记中公布结果,也没有公布结果。52项注册试验回顾性地提交了协议。在已发表的67项试验中,有43项(64%)注册了审前方案。资金来源与遵守报告要求无关。在25项试验中的16项发现了注册和出版物中主要终点之间的差异。在28%的试验中,治疗组采用辅助治疗.只有39%的对照试验是双盲的。
    结论:很大一部分试验不符合注册和报告结果的法定要求,从而增加了结果评估中偏差的风险。为了提高对MSCs在肌肉骨骼疾病中的作用的信心,注册管理机构和医学期刊应更严格地执行现有的注册和报告要求。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess compliance with statutory requirements to register and report outcomes in interventional trials of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for musculoskeletal disorders and to describe the trials\' clinical and design characteristics.
    METHODS: A systematic review of published trials and trials submitted to public registries.
    METHODS: The databases Medline, Cochrane Library and McMaster; six public clinical registries. All searches were done until 31 January 2023.
    METHODS: Trials submitted to registries and completed before January 2021. Prospective interventional trials published in peer-reviewed journals.
    METHODS: The first author searched for trials that had (1) posted trial results in a public registry, (2) presented results in a peer-reviewed publication and (3) submitted a pretrial protocol to a registry before publication. Other extracted variables included trial design, number of participants, funding source, follow-up duration and cell type.
    RESULTS: In total 124 trials were found in registries and literature databases. Knee osteoarthritis was the most common indication. Of the 100 registry trials, 52 trials with in total 2 993 participants had neither posted results in the registry nor published results. Fifty-two of the registry trials submitted a protocol retrospectively. Forty-three of the 67 published trials (64%) had registered a pretrial protocol. Funding source was not associated with compliance with reporting requirements. A discrepancy between primary endpoints in the registry and publication was found in 16 of 25 trials. In 28% of trials, the treatment groups used adjuvant therapies. Only 39% of controlled trials were double-blinded.
    CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of trials failed to comply with statutory requirements for the registration and reporting of results, thereby increasing the risk of bias in outcome assessments. To improve confidence in the role of MSCs for musculoskeletal disorders, registries and medical journals should more rigorously enforce existing requirements for registration and reporting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)影响全球人群,导致职业病,降低生产力。运动疗法是MSD的黄金标准治疗,可以由物理治疗师和/或通过移动应用程序提供。除了物理治疗师和移动应用程序之间在沟通方面的明显差异,同理心和身体接触,移动应用程序可能提供较少的个性化练习。人工智能(AI)的使用可以通过处理不同的疼痛参数来克服这个问题,合并症和患者特定的生活方式因素,从而使个人适应运动疗法。这项研究的目的是调查AI推荐强度的风险,为拥有MSD的人进行的移动性和释放练习,使用物理治疗师风险评估和回顾性考虑患者对风险和非风险运动的反馈。80名患有各种MSD的患者接受了AI系统的运动建议。物理治疗师将锻炼分为有风险或无风险,根据患者信息,例如疼痛强度(NRS),疼痛质量,疼痛位置,工作类型。对物理治疗师协议的分析是基于上述风险的频率,百分比分布和弗莱斯-或科恩斯-卡帕。练习完成后,患者以11点Likert量表为每次锻炼提供反馈.,例如,释放练习的反馈问题是“你感觉如何?”,答案选项从“痛苦(0分)”到“不明显(10分)”。分别对三种类型的练习进行统计分析。为此,进行独立t检验.20名物理治疗师评估了80例患者,共接受944次练习。在物理治疗师的三方协议中,0.08%的锻炼被认为具有增加患者疼痛的潜在风险。评估显示90.5%的一致性,演习没有风险。物理治疗师认为对患者有潜在风险的锻炼也收到了较低的患者反馈评分。对于\'release\'练习类型,风险练习收到的反馈较低,表明患者感到更多疼痛(风险:4.65(1.88),无风险:5.56(1.88))。研究表明,AI可以为MSD患者推荐几乎无风险的运动,这是创建个性化运动计划的有效方法,而不会使患者面临更高的疼痛强度或不适的风险。此外,该研究表明,物理治疗师在AI推荐锻炼的风险评估方面达成了显著一致,并强调了在治疗计划中考虑个体患者观点的重要性.面对面理疗的其他方面的程度,比如沟通和教育,与AI和基于应用程序的练习相比,应进一步研究除了练习的个性化之外的其他好处。试用注册:30.12.2021通过OSF注册局,https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YCNJQ。
    Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) impact people globally, cause occupational illness and reduce productivity. Exercise therapy is the gold standard treatment for MSDs and can be provided by physiotherapists and/or also via mobile apps. Apart from the obvious differences between physiotherapists and mobile apps regarding communication, empathy and physical touch, mobile apps potentially offer less personalized exercises. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) may overcome this issue by processing different pain parameters, comorbidities and patient-specific lifestyle factors and thereby enabling individually adapted exercise therapy. The aim of this study is to investigate the risks of AI-recommended strength, mobility and release exercises for people with MSDs, using physiotherapist risk assessment and retrospective consideration of patient feedback on risk and non-risk exercises. 80 patients with various MSDs received exercise recommendations from the AI-system. Physiotherapists rated exercises as risk or non-risk, based on patient information, e.g. pain intensity (NRS), pain quality, pain location, work type. The analysis of physiotherapists\' agreement was based on the frequencies of mentioned risk, the percentage distribution and the Fleiss- or Cohens-Kappa. After completion of the exercises, the patients provided feedback for each exercise on an 11-point Likert scale., e.g. the feedback question for release exercises was \"How did the stretch feel to you?\" with the answer options ranging from \"painful (0 points)\" to \"not noticeable (10 points)\". The statistical analysis was carried out separately for the three types of exercises. For this, an independent t-test was performed. 20 physiotherapists assessed 80 patient examples, receiving a total of 944 exercises. In a three-way agreement of the physiotherapists, 0.08% of the exercises were judged as having a potential risk of increasing patients\' pain. The evaluation showed 90.5% agreement, that exercises had no risk. Exercises that were considered by physiotherapists to be potentially risky for patients also received lower feedback ratings from patients. For the \'release\' exercise type, risk exercises received lower feedback, indicating that the patient felt more pain (risk: 4.65 (1.88), non-risk: 5.56 (1.88)). The study shows that AI can recommend almost risk-free exercises for patients with MSDs, which is an effective way to create individualized exercise plans without putting patients at risk for higher pain intensity or discomfort. In addition, the study shows significant agreement between physiotherapists in the risk assessment of AI-recommended exercises and highlights the importance of considering individual patient perspectives for treatment planning. The extent to which other aspects of face-to-face physiotherapy, such as communication and education, provide additional benefits beyond the individualization of exercises compared to AI and app-based exercises should be further investigated.Trial registration: 30.12.2021 via OSF Registries, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YCNJQ .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    如果您在年轻患者中遇到无法解释的骨髓水肿病例,考虑骨样骨瘤(OO)的可能性。即使在重要结构附近有一个nidus,RFA可以安全地用于治疗OO。
    If you encounter an unexplained case of bone marrow edema in a young patient, consider the possibility of osteoid osteoma (OO). Even in the presence of a nidus near vital structures, RFA can safely be used to treat OO.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较有和没有风湿性和肌肉骨骼疾病(RMDs)的人之间的多发病模式,并描述这些模式如何随年龄和性别而变化。2010年至2019年。
    方法:在395个威尔士一般惯例(GP)中注册了103426名RMD和290万比较者。2010年1月至2019年12月在临床实践研究威尔士实践中注册的每位年龄为0-100岁的RMD患者与多达五名没有RMD的比较者相匹配。根据年龄,性别和GP代码。
    方法:患有RMD和按年龄分类的比较者的29种Elixhauser定义的合并症的患病率,性别和GP实践。拟合条件逻辑回归模型以计算差异(OR,95%CI)与队列之间的合并症相关。
    结果:最普遍的合并症是心血管危险因素,高血压和糖尿病。诊断为RMD与许多疾病(包括缺乏性贫血)的几率显着升高(OR1.39,95%CI(1.32至1.46)),甲状腺功能减退(OR1.34,95%CI(1.19至1.50)),肺循环障碍(OR1.39,95%CI1.12~1.73)糖尿病(OR1.17,95%CI(1.11~1.23))和液体和电解质紊乱(OR1.27,95%CI(1.17~1.38)).与非RMD组相比,RMD具有更高比例的多浊度(除RMD外还有两种或更多种条件)(81%和73%,分别在2019年),25岁以上女性和50岁以上男性的平均合并症数量高于非RMDs组。
    结论:患有RMD的人群多发病的可能性是普通人群的1.5倍,为有针对性的干预研究提供了高危人群。患有RMD的人经历了更多的共存健康状况,往往表现在早期。这种现象在妇女中尤为明显。此外,RMD患者的合并症报告不足。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the patterns of multimorbidity between people with and without rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) and to describe how these patterns change by age and sex over time, between 2010 and 2019.
    METHODS: 103 426 people with RMDs and 2.9 million comparators registered in 395 Wales general practices (GPs). Each patient with an RMD aged 0-100 years between January 2010 and December 2019 registered in Clinical Practice Research Welsh practices was matched with up to five comparators without an RMD, based on age, gender and GP code.
    METHODS: The prevalence of 29 Elixhauser-defined comorbidities in people with RMDs and comparators categorised by age, gender and GP practices. Conditional logistic regression models were fitted to calculate differences (OR, 95% CI) in associations with comorbidities between cohorts.
    RESULTS: The most prevalent comorbidities were cardiovascular risk factors, hypertension and diabetes. Having an RMD diagnosis was associated with a significantly higher odds for many conditions including deficiency anaemia (OR 1.39, 95% CI (1.32 to 1.46)), hypothyroidism (OR 1.34, 95% CI (1.19 to 1.50)), pulmonary circulation disorders (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.73) diabetes (OR 1.17, 95% CI (1.11 to 1.23)) and fluid and electrolyte disorders (OR 1.27, 95% CI (1.17 to 1.38)). RMDs have a higher proportion of multimorbidity (two or more conditions in addition to the RMD) compared with non-RMD group (81% and 73%, respectively in 2019) and the mean number of comorbidities was higher in women from the age of 25 and 50 in men than in non-RMDs group.
    CONCLUSIONS: People with RMDs are approximately 1.5 times as likely to have multimorbidity as the general population and provide a high-risk group for targeted intervention studies. The individuals with RMDs experience a greater load of coexisting health conditions, which tend to manifest at earlier ages. This phenomenon is particularly pronounced among women. Additionally, there is an under-reporting of comorbidities in individuals with RMDs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究介绍了一种新颖的可穿戴式惯性测量单元(IMU)系统,用于客观,全面地评估与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WMSD),从而提高工作场所的安全性。该系统集成了可穿戴技术与用户友好的界面,提供无磁力计的方向估计,关节角度测量,和WMSDs风险评估。在电缆制造工厂测试,对10名女员工进行了评估。评估涉及工作周期识别,主体间比较,并以RULA等标准WMSD风险评估为基准,REBA,应变指数,和罗杰斯肌肉疲劳分析。评估显示参与者之间的关节模式一致(ICC=0.72±0.23),并显示需要进一步调查的姿势发生率较高,用RULA等传统方法不易检测到。实验结果表明,所提出的系统的风险评估与建立的方法密切相关,并使详细和有针对性的风险评估,精确定位特定的身体区域,以便立即进行人体工程学干预。这种方法不仅增强了对人体工程学风险的检测,而且还支持制定个性化干预策略,解决常见的工作场所问题,如肌腱炎,腰痛,腕管综合症.结果强调了系统在识别人体工程学危害方面的敏感性和特异性。未来的工作应集中在更广泛的验证和探索各种WMSDs风险因素的相对影响,以完善风险评估和干预策略,以改善职业健康的适用性。
    This study introduces a novel wearable Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU)-based system for an objective and comprehensive assessment of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs), thus enhancing workplace safety. The system integrates wearable technology with a user-friendly interface, providing magnetometer-free orientation estimation, joint angle measurements, and WMSDs risk evaluation. Tested in a cable manufacturing facility, the system was evaluated with ten female employees. The evaluation involved work cycle identification, inter-subject comparisons, and benchmarking against standard WMSD risk assessments like RULA, REBA, Strain Index, and Rodgers Muscle Fatigue Analysis. The evaluation demonstrated uniform joint patterns across participants (ICC=0.72±0.23) and revealed a higher occurrence of postures warranting further investigation, which is not easily detected by traditional methods such as RULA. The experimental results showed that the proposed system\'s risk assessments closely aligned with the established methods and enabled detailed and targeted risk assessments, pinpointing specific bodily areas for immediate ergonomic interventions. This approach not only enhances the detection of ergonomic risks but also supports the development of personalized intervention strategies, addressing common workplace issues such as tendinitis, low back pain, and carpal tunnel syndrome. The outcomes highlight the system\'s sensitivity and specificity in identifying ergonomic hazards. Future efforts should focus on broader validation and exploring the relative influence of various WMSDs risk factors to refine risk assessment and intervention strategies for improved applicability in occupational health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非创伤性骨科疾病是涉及包括肌肉在内的肌肉骨骼系统的病理状况,肌腱,骨和关节,并与频繁的医疗和手术护理和高治疗成本相关。关于低收入和中等收入国家非创伤性骨科疾病模式的信息很少。这项研究的目的是确定肯尼亚肯雅塔国家医院住院患者非创伤性骨科疾病的流行病学。这是一项横断面研究,审查了175张图表的样本。大约,70.3%的住院患者年龄在25至64岁之间,平均年龄为39.97岁(STD18.78)。已婚的年龄往往比其他婚姻状况大53.5岁(95%CI:46.8-60.2岁)。大约,60.6%是男性,38.9%有合并症,49.1%是临时工或失业者。所有住院患者均为肯尼亚人,内罗毕县占所有住院患者的52.6%。大约,77.7%为自我推荐。最常见的非创伤骨科疾病是感染和不愈合(35.4%)和脊柱退行性疾病(20.60%),最少的是肢体畸形(1.70%)。与女性相比,男性感染和不愈合的可能性是男性的3.703倍(p<0.001)。原发性患者,中等和高等教育为88.2%(p<0.001),75.6%(p<0.001)和68.1%(p=0.016)与没有受过学前教育的人相比,感染和不愈合的可能性较小。寡妇患脊柱退行性疾病的可能性是已婚的8.500倍(p=0.028)。男性患骨关节炎的可能性比女性低70.8%(p=0.031)。受过中等教育的住院患者患骨关节炎的可能性是没有受过教育或学前教育的患者的5.250倍(p=0.040)。总之,大多数住院病人是年轻人和中年人。感染和不愈合和脊柱退行性疾病是最常见的非创伤骨科疾病。虽然男性和受教育程度低的人更有可能感染和不结合,已婚患者更有可能患有脊柱退行性疾病。女性入院者更容易患骨关节炎。
    Non-traumatic orthopedic conditions are pathological conditions involving musculoskeletal system that includes muscles, tendons, bone and joints and associated with frequent medical and surgical care and high treatment costs. There is paucity of information on the pattern of non-traumatic orthopedic conditions in low and middle income countries. The purpose of this study was to determine the epidemiology of non-traumatic orthopedic conditions among inpatients at the Kenyatta National Hospital in Kenya. This was a cross-sectional study with a sample of 175 charts reviewed. Approximately, 70.3% of the inpatients were aged between 25 to 64 years of age with the mean age of 39.97 years (STD 18.78). Ever married tended to be older 53.5 (95% CI: 46.8-60.2) years than other marital statuses. Approximately, 60.6% were males, 38.9% had comorbidities and 49.1% were casuals or unemployed. All inpatients were Kenyans with Nairobi County comprising 52.6% of all inpatients. Approximately, 77.7% were self-referrals. The commonest non-trauma orthopaedic conditions were infection and non-union (35.4%) and spinal degenerative diseases (20.60%) and the least was limb deformities (1.70%). Compared to females, males were 3.703 (p<0.001) times more likely to have infection and non-union. Patients with primary, secondary and tertiary education were 88.2% (p<0.001), 75.6% (p<0.001) and 68.1% (p = 0.016) less likely to have infection and non-union compared to those with no or preschool education. Widows were 8.500 (p = 0.028) times more likely to have spinal degenerative disease than married. Males were 70.8% (p = 0.031) less likely to have osteoarthritis than females. Inpatients with secondary education were 5.250 (p = 0.040) times more likely to have osteoarthritis than those with no or preschool education. In conclusion, majority of inpatients were young and middle aged adults. Infection and non-union and spinal degenerative diseases were the most common non-trauma orthopedic conditions. While males and those with low education were more likely to have infection and non-union, married were more likely to have spinal degenerative disease. Osteoarthritis was more likely among female admissions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抑郁症与肌肉骨骼疾病之间的关联长期以来一直是有争议的话题。然而,两者之间的因果关系仍然不确定。本研究采用双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析来研究抑郁症与六种肌肉骨骼疾病之间的因果关系。
    在这项研究中,我们进行了MR分析,系统地探讨了抑郁症与6种肌肉骨骼疾病之间的因果关系.与抑郁症相关的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)被用作工具变量。为了确保结论可靠可靠,利用了多种分析方法,包括方差逆加权(IVW),加权中位数,和MR-Egger回归。此外,敏感性分析方法,如MR-Egger截距测试,Cochran的Q测试,遗漏分析,和漏斗图被采用。
    我们的MR分析显示抑郁症与颈椎病之间存在显着关联(抑郁症:OR1.003,95%CI1.002-1.005,P=8.32E-05;重度抑郁症:OR1.003,95%CI1.001-1.005,P=0.0052)。此外,重度抑郁障碍(MDD)和膝骨关节炎(KOA)之间有很强的相关性(OR1.299,95%CI1.154-1.463,P=1.50E-5).敏感性分析证实了这些发现的稳健性。我们的独立验证研究也证实了这些结果。
    本研究中进行的MR分析提供了支持抑郁症和颈椎病之间遗传联系的证据。还有KOA。在易感人群中,有针对性的干预措施可能有助于降低这些人群中颈椎病和KOA的风险。
    UNASSIGNED: The association between depression and musculoskeletal diseases has long been a subject of contentious debate. However, the causal relationship between the two remains uncertain. This study employs a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the causality between depression and six musculoskeletal diseases.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, we performed MR analysis to systematically explore the causal relationship between depression and six musculoskeletal disorders. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are linked to depression were employed as instrumental variables. To ensure robust and reliable conclusions, multiple analytical approaches were utilized, including inverse variance weighting(IVW), weighted median, and MR-Egger regression. Additionally, sensitivity analysis methods such as the MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran\'s Q test, leave-one-out analysis, and funnel plot were employed.
    UNASSIGNED: Our MR analysis revealed a significant association between depression and cervical spondylosis (depression: OR 1.003, 95% CI 1.002-1.005, P = 8.32E-05; major depressive disorder: OR 1.003, 95% CI 1.001-1.005, P = 0.0052). Furthermore, a strong correlation was noted between major depressive disorder (MDD) and knee osteoarthritis (KOA) (OR 1.299, 95% CI 1.154-1.463, P = 1.50E-5). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these findings. Our independent validation study also corroborated these results.
    UNASSIGNED: The MR analysis conducted in this study provides evidence supporting a genetic link between depression and cervical spondylosis, as well as KOA. Targeted interventions to manage depression in susceptible populations may contribute to lowering the risk of cervical spondylosis and KOA in these cohorts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号