BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), the mechanisms underlying BPH development and progression remain elusive and lacks a one-size-fits-all therapeutic solution. Prostatic inflammation contributes to BPH and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), but the initial trigger remains unknown. Current research suggests dysbiosis of the urinary microbiome as a potential culprit. This systematic review explores the emerging field of the male urinary and prostatic microbiome and its relationship with BPH/LUTS.
METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. A systematic search in the Pubmed and Scopus databases was performed using specific terms. Inclusion criteria considered male non-neurogenic patients with LUTS due to BPH with analyses of urinary microbiome, concerning evaluation of English-language publications with relevance.
RESULTS: Among seven articles involving 542 patients, there was an association between male LUTS/BPH and the urinary microbiome. Findings indicate a correlation between urinary microbiome dysbiosis and LUTS severity, with specific bacterial genera such as Streptococcus and Haemophilus linked to higher International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) scores and PSA levels. The fecal microbiome may be associated with LUTS, although contradictory findings are reported. The review also highlights methodological inconsistencies, small sample sizes, few negative controls and a lack of comprehensive clinical data as major limitations.
CONCLUSIONS: While there is an undeniable correlation between the microbiome and LUTS/BPH, future research should aim to standardize sampling techniques and expand the score to include functional microbiome characterization, potentially leading to novel, microbiome-targeted therapeutic strategies for BPH.

UNASSIGNED: Patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia are generally treated holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP). Therefore, it is important to analyze the several surgical procedures used for benign prostatic hyperplasia in terms of their role, effectiveness and safety.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a meta-analysis by searching databases of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Finally, we selected 10 papers including 2,456 patients treated with of thulium laser and holmium laser in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. We did the analysis using RevMan 5.0 with the selected studies until 26 October 2023.
UNASSIGNED: ThuLEP resulted in a smaller reduction in haemoglobin (MD: -0.22, 95%CI -0.32 to -0.13, P<0.001) and a shorter hospital stay (MD: -0.29, 95%CI -0.38 to -0.20, P <0.001). During the postoperative follow-ups, only the IPSS (MD: -0.03; 95%CI -0.11 to -0.06; P 0.58) at the six-month showed statistically significant differences.
UNASSIGNED: ThuLEP has greater security and faster growth than HoLEP.

Finasteride and dutasteride are 5a Reductase Inhibitors (5a-RIs) and comprise the mainstay of treatment for the management of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. 5a-RIs are expressed in a variety of tissues, such as adipose tissues and liver, resulting in a reduction of glucocorticoid levels and affecting androgen regulation and metabolic function. As a result, the administration of these regimens may generate adverse metabolic events, such as liver disease, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus. Although several studies have tried to record these adverse metabolic events both in human subjects and animal models, the exact mechanisms of these actions have not been well described yet in the literature. Further well-designed clinical trials are needed to elucidate the exact role of 5a reductase inhibitors in the progression of the metabolic syndrome. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature concerning the role of dutasteride or finasteride in the progression of metabolic adverse events and further investigate possible pathophysiologic mechanisms.

Background: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is prevalent among the aging male population and often presents with distressing lower urinary tract symptoms. There is emerging evidence that commercial oral poly-herbal traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formulation combined with Western medicine (WM) may offer enhanced therapeutic effects compared to WM alone in BPH treatment. Nevertheless, determining the optimal formulations for BPH remains controversial. We aimed to employ a network meta-analysis to compare and assess differences among commonly used and recommended poly-herbal TCM formulations outlined in the Chinese guidelines for BPH treatment, providing clinical medication recommendations and guidance. Methods: We extensively searched for RCTs of BPH patients that had oral poly-herbal TCM formulations and WM treatment, covering both English and Chinese databases up to 31 October 2023. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool Version 2 (ROB2). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness of various formulations, followed by sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Results: Our meta-analysis included 107 RCTs involving 11,037 patients across 16 oral poly-herbal TCM formulations. The quality of the selected studies was assessed as \"Some concerns\". Most formulations combined with WM demonstrated superior therapeutic efficacy compared to WM alone. For clinical effective rate, Jingui Shenqi pill (JGSQ) + WM had the highest-ranking probability (87.38%). Concerning International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and maximum flow rate of urine, Guizhi Fuling capsule (GZFL) + WM was most effective (91.10% and 98.55%). Regarding the quality of life score and postvoid residual urine, Pulean tablet (PLA) + WM ranked first (86.71% and 91.81%). In controlling prostate volume, Huange capsule (HE) + WM demonstrated the highest efficacy (95.65%). Additionally, among the interventions, Lingze (LZ) + WM capsule exhibited the lowest incidence of adverse drug reactions (2.32%). Conclusion: Combining oral poly-herbal TCM formulations with WM may provide greater therapeutic benefits in BPH treatment compared to WM alone. JGSQ, GZFL, PLA, and HE emerged as promising treatment options. However, further rigorous empirical studies are essential to substantiate these findings. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=459651, CRD 42023459651.

UNASSIGNED: Recent studies have tried to establish an association between the use of alpha-1-adrenergic receptor antagonists (A1ARAs) used in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and the risk of PD. The objective of the study is to compare the risk of Parkinson\'s disease (PD) between terazosin/alfuzosin/doxazosin (TZ/AZ/DZ) users and tamsulosin users.
UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase were systematically searched from inception to April 2023. Observational studies comparing the risk of PD among patients using different types of A1ARAs were included in the meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% CI for the risk of occurrence of PD among A1ARAs users of two different classes.
UNASSIGNED: This study was based on a total of 678 433 BPH patients, out of which 287 080 patients belonged to the TZ/AZ/DZ cohort and 391 353 patients belonged to the tamsulosin cohort. The pooled incidence of PD was higher in tamsulosin users (1.28%, 95% CI: 1.04-1.55%) than in TZ/AZ/DZ drug users (1.11%, 95% CI: 0.83-1.42%). The risk of occurrence of PD was significantly lower in patients taking TZ/AZ/DZ than tamsulosin (n= 610,363, HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.71-0.94, P = 0.01; I2 = 87.4%).
UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis demonstrated that patients with BPH who take TZ/AZ/DZ have a lower risk for developing PD than those who take tamsulosin.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common chronic urologic condition affecting approximately 50% of men above the age of 60. As per European Association of Urology Guidelines, BPH can be treated according to a stepwise approach starting from a conservative management, a pharmacologic approach, and finally surgery. Both medical and surgical therapies have side effects, impacting on ejaculation and sexual function and patients with multiple comorbidities might not be considered surgically suitable candidates. Prostatic stents offer a minimally invasive procedures in an out-patient setting, possibly under local anaesthesia. Utilized since the 1980s, the past stents encompassed permanent (epithelializing) or temporary (non-epithelializing) devices, like the Uro-Lume (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN, USA) and the Memokath, or Memotherm (Engineers & Doctors A/S, Denmark), and the biodegradable stents made of self-reinforced poly-L-lactide or braided poly lactic-co-glycolic acid. Previous stents however showed a quite high rate of complications among which pain, incontinence, infections, stent migration or blockage, and incomplete degradation that might lead to premature removal of stent. The stents currently available on the market instead are the temporary device Allium Triangular Prostatic Urethral Stent (Allium Urological Solutions, Caesarea, Israel) and the temporary stent SPANNER (AbbeyMoor Medical, Inc., Parkers Prairie, MN, USA), which might be used in case of bladder outflow obstruction, post-operatively, or for acute urinary retention. Studies showed encouraging results, in terms of effectiveness and safety improving patients\' quality of life and International Prostate Symptom Score, but longer-term studies are needed to identify the most suitable patients who might benefit from their use. Newer stents and nitinol devices are currently investigated, and we are waiting for the results of the ongoing clinical trials.

Prostatic stromal tumors, encompassing prostatic sarcoma and stromal tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP), represent an exceedingly rare category of prostatic diseases, with a prevalence of less than 1%. We present a rare case involving a man in his early 40s diagnosed with STUMP. Despite presenting with normal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations, the patient experienced persistent dysuria and gross hematuria for >7 months, leading to an initial misdiagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Persistent symptoms prompted further investigation, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealing a suspicious lesion on the left side of the prostate, initially thought to be malignant. Transrectal prostatic biopsy subsequently confirmed the presence of mucinous liposarcoma, with no medical history of diabetes, coronary heart disease, or hypertension. The treatment approach comprised robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, culminating in a postoperative pathological definitive diagnosis of STUMP. This case underscores the indispensable role of early MRI in the diagnostic process, highlighting the necessity of detailed pathological examination for a conclusive diagnosis. Our report aims to illuminate the diagnostic challenges and potential treatment pathways for STUMP, emphasizing its consideration in the differential diagnosis of prostatic tumors to advance clinical outcomes in this rare but important condition.

Despite the availability of various drugs for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), alpha(α)-blockers are the preferred first-line treatment. However, there remains a scarcity of direct comparisons among various α-blockers. Therefore, this network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of α-blockers in the management of BPH. A comprehensive electronic search covered PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library until August 2023. The primary endpoints comprised international prostate symptom score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax), quality of life (QoL), and post-void residual volume (PVR), while treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were considered as secondary endpoints. This NMA synthesized evidence from 22 studies covering 3371 patients with six kinds of α-blockers with 12 dose categories. IPSS has been considerably improved by tamsulosin 0.4 mg, naftopidil 50 mg and silodosin 8 mg as compared to the placebo. Based on the p-score, tamsulosin 0.4 mg had the highest probability of ranking for IPSS, PVR, and Qmax, whereas doxazosin 8 mg had the highest probability of improving QoL. A total of 297 adverse events were reported among all the α-blockers, silodosin has reported a notable number of TEAEs. Current evidence supports α-blockers are effective in IPSS reduction and are considered safer. Larger sample size with long-term studies are needed to refine estimates of IPSS, QoL, PVR, and Qmax outcomes in α-blocker users.

OBJECTIVE: Symptomatic benefit and urodynamic obstruction relief represent relevant outcomes of therapies for lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). We summarized evidence from studies concurrently assessing variations in terms of symptoms severity and invasive urodynamic measures of obstruction following medical and surgical therapies for LUTS/BPH.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science in June 2023.
UNASSIGNED: We identified 29 publications: 14 (872 patients) and 15 (851 patients) studies addressing medical and surgical therapies, respectively. The mean percentage total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) improvements ranged from -2.5% to 56.3% and from 35.1% to 82.1% following medical and surgical therapies, respectively. The corresponding mean percentage Bladder Outlet Obstruction Index (BOOI) improvements ranged from 7.8% to 53.5% and from 22.4% to 138.6%, respectively. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) provided IPSS improvements in the higher range and the greatest BOOI reduction.
CONCLUSIONS: Globally, based on available evidence, more pronounced symptomatic benefits are observed following treatments providing greater deobstructive effect. In detail, patients undergoing surgery exhibit greater IPSS and BOOI improvements than those receiving medical therapy.
RESULTS: Treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia providing greater urodynamic improvements also provide greater symptomatic benefit. Surgical procedures provide greater symptomatic and urodynamic outcomes than medical therapies. Maximal obstruction relief, together with symptomatic benefits in the higher ranges, is observed following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

BACKGROUND: One recent addition to different lasers used for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate is the thulium fiber laser (TFL). The purpose of this systematic review is to present the feasibility, safety and efficacy of TFL Enucleation of the Prostate (ThuFLEP).
METHODS: PubMed®, Scopus® and Cochrane® primary databases were systematically screened. The search strategy used the PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) criteria. Patients should be adults with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) undergoing ThuFLEP. While comparative studies reporting comparison of ThuFLEP to other BPO treatments were included, cohort studies with no comparison group were also accepted. Outcomes including enucleation time and complication rates were reported.
RESULTS: Twelve studies met all the predefined criteria and were included in the final qualitative synthesis. Mean operative time and enucleation time ranged from 46.6±10.2 to 104.5±33.6 and from 38.8±17.9 to 66.0±24.9 minutes, respectively. Most of the complications were Grade I or Grade II ones. Although TFL was found to present some advantages over older BPO treatments, its outcomes were comparable with other endoscopic enucleation approaches.
CONCLUSIONS: ThuFLEP seems to be a feasible, safe and efficient approach for BPO symptoms management. Limited evidence showed that although ThuFLEP was associated with a reduced total operative time, it was also associated with worse IPSS improvement at 1-year follow-up, when compared with MOSESTM Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP). These findings confirm the well-established opinion that the enucleation technique itself is more important than the technology which is used.