背景:痛风是最常见的炎症性关节炎,患病率和负担不断增加。在风湿性疾病中,痛风是最容易理解和可能最容易控制的疾病。然而,它经常得不到治疗或管理不善。本系统评价的目的是确定有关痛风管理的临床实践指南(CPG),评估他们的质量,并提供高质量CPG中一致建议的综合。
方法:痛风管理CPG如果(1)以英语编写并在2015年1月至2022年2月之间发布,则有资格入选;重点关注18岁以上的成年人;符合医学研究所定义的CPG标准;(2)在《研究与评估指南》(AGREE)II文书中被评为高质量。如果痛风CPG需要额外付费才能访问,则将其排除在外;仅解决了针对护理系统/组织的建议,而不包括介入管理建议;和/或包括其他关节炎状况。OvidSPMEDLINE,科克伦,CINAHL,检索了Embase和物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)和四个在线指南库。
结果:六个CPG被评价为高质量,并包括在合成中。临床实践指南始终如一地推荐教育,非甾体抗炎药的开始,秋水仙碱或皮质类固醇(除非禁忌),和心血管危险因素的评估,肾功能,和急性痛风管理的共病条件。慢性痛风管理的一致建议是降尿酸治疗(ULT)和基于个体患者特征的持续预防建议。临床实践指南建议在何时启动ULT和ULT长度上不一致,维生素C的摄入量,和使用pegloticase,非诺贝特和氯沙坦。
结论:急性痛风的治疗在所有CPG中是一致的。尽管关于ULT和其他药物治疗的建议不一致,但慢性痛风的管理大多是一致的。此综合提供了明确的指导,可以帮助卫生专业人员提供标准化,循证痛风护理.
背景:本次审查的协议已在OpenScienceFramework(DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17605/OSF)中注册。IO/UB3Y7)。
BACKGROUND: Gout is the most common inflammatory arthritis, increasing in prevalence and burden. Of the rheumatic diseases, gout is the best-understood and potentially most manageable condition. However, it frequently remains untreated or poorly managed. The purpose of this systematic review is to identify Clinical Practice
Guidelines (CPG) regarding
gout management, evaluate their quality, and to provide a synthesis of consistent recommendations in the high-quality CPGs.
METHODS: Gout management CPGs were eligible for inclusion if they were (1) written in English and published between January 2015-February 2022; focused on adults aged ≥ 18 years of age; and met the criteria of a CPG as defined by the Institute of Medicine; and (2) were rated as high quality on the Appraisal of
Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Gout CPGs were excluded if they required additional payment to access; only addressed recommendations for the system/organisation of care and did not include interventional management recommendations; and/or included other arthritic conditions. OvidSP MEDLINE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Embase and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and four online
guideline repositories were searched.
RESULTS: Six CPGs were appraised as high quality and included in the synthesis. Clinical practice
guidelines consistently recommended education, commencement of non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, colchicine or corticosteroids (unless contraindicated), and assessment of cardiovascular risk factors, renal function, and co-morbid conditions for acute gout management. Consistent recommendations for chronic gout management were urate lowering therapy (ULT) and continued prophylaxis recommended based on individual patient characteristics. Clinical practice
guideline recommendations were inconsistent on when to initiate ULT and length of ULT, vitamin C intake, and use of pegloticase, fenofibrate and losartan.
CONCLUSIONS: Management of acute gout was consistent across CPGs. Management of chronic gout was mostly consistent although there were inconsistent recommendations regarding ULT and other pharmacological therapies. This synthesis provides clear guidance that can assist health professionals to provide standardised, evidence-based gout care.
BACKGROUND: The protocol for this review was registered with Open Science Framework (DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/UB3Y7 ).