• 文章类型: Journal Article
    非囊性纤维化支气管扩张是一种慢性呼吸系统疾病,具有很高的社会经济和医疗负担,并由多种呼吸系统疾病引起。为了改善临床结果,早期识别,积极治疗恶化,预防进一步恶化至关重要。然而,治疗和预防非囊性纤维化支气管扩张急性加重的证据,尤其是在儿童中,缺乏。因此,针对儿童和青少年非囊性纤维化支气管扩张症的医学和非医学治疗策略的基于证据和共识的指南是由韩国儿科过敏和呼吸道疾病研究院使用推荐的推荐方法进行的。发展,和评估工作组,证据公布至2020年7月2日。本指南包括基于证据的治疗建议以及专家意见,解决儿童非囊性纤维化支气管扩张症的治疗和管理的关键方面。这包括抗生素和气道清除策略的考虑,特别是在证据可能有限的领域。大,精心设计,需要进行对照研究,以进一步积累儿童和青少年非囊性纤维化支气管扩张治疗策略的证据.
    Noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory disease that carries high socioeconomic and medical burdens and is caused by diverse respiratory illnesses. To improve clinical outcomes, early recognition, active treatment of exacerbations, and prevention of further exacerbations are essential. However, evidence for the treatment and prevention of acute exacerbation of noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, especially in children, is lacking. Therefore, the evidence- and consensus-based guidelines for medical and nonmedical treatment strategies for noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in children and adolescents were developed by the Korean Academy of Pediatric Allergy and Respiratory Disease using the methods recommended by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation working group with evidence published through July 2, 2020. This guideline encompasses evidence-based treatment recommendations as well as expert opinions, addressing crucial aspects of the treatment and management of noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in children. This includes considerations for antibiotics and airway clearance strategies, particularly in areas where evidence may be limited. Large, well-designed, and controlled studies are required to accumulate further evidence of management strategies for noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in children and adolescents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:非结核分枝杆菌是越来越多地引起慢性和衰弱性肺部感染的环境生物,其中鸟分枝杆菌复合体(MAC)是最常见的病原体。MAC肺病(MAC-PD)通常难以治疗,通常需要长期的多药抗生素治疗。
    目的:各种基于指南的三药治疗(GBT)方案与治疗相关的不良事件或方案改变/停药之间是否存在关联?
    方法:在一项回顾性队列研究中,我们在4,626名美国医疗保险患者支气管扩张患者中检查了GBT方案对MAC-PD的耐受性结果,在2006年至2014年期间,他们被处方GBT作为推定的MAC-PD的初始抗生素治疗。使用多变量Cox比例风险回归,我们估计了校正风险比(aHRs),以比较各种GBT方案在开始治疗后12个月内发生不良事件的风险和方案改变/停药的风险.
    结果:该队列在治疗开始时的平均年龄±SD为77.9±6.1岁,大部分是女性(77.7%),大部分是非西班牙裔白人(87.2%)。基于克拉霉素的方案在治疗12个月内改变/停药的风险高于基于阿奇霉素的方案(aHR,1.12;95%CI,利福平1.04-1.20;AHR,1.11;95%CI,0.93-1.32,以利福布丁为伴侣利福霉素),对于含有利福布汀的方案,而不是含有利福平的方案(AHR,1.49;95%CI,阿奇霉素为1.33-1.68;aHR,1.47;95%CI,1.27-1.70,克拉霉素作为伴侣大环内酯)。与克拉霉素-乙胺丁醇-利福布汀和阿奇霉素-乙胺丁醇-利福平的方案改变/停药比较的aHR为1.64(95%CI,1.43-1.64)。
    结论:总体而言,基于阿奇霉素的方案比基于克拉霉素的方案更不可能改变或停用,在治疗开始后12个月内,与含利福布汀的方案相比,含利福平的方案改变或停用的可能性较小.我们的工作提供了对用于治疗MAC-PD的多药抗生素方案的耐受性的基于人群的评估。
    BACKGROUND: Nontuberculous mycobacteria are environmental organisms that are increasingly causing chronic and debilitating pulmonary infections, of which Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) is the most common pathogen. MAC pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) is often difficult to treat, often requiring long-term multidrug antibiotic therapy.
    OBJECTIVE: Is there an association between various guideline-based three-drug therapy (GBT) regimens and (1) therapy-associated adverse events or (2) regimen change/discontinuation, within 12 months of therapy initiation?
    METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, we examined tolerability outcomes of GBT regimens for MAC-PD in 4,626 US Medicare beneficiaries with bronchiectasis, who were prescribed a GBT as initial antibiotic treatment for presumed MAC-PD during 2006 to 2014. Using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression, we estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) to compare the risk of adverse events and regimen change/discontinuations within 12 months of therapy initiation in various GBT regimens.
    RESULTS: The cohort had a mean age ± SD of 77.9 ± 6.1 years at treatment start, were mostly female (77.7%), and were mostly non-Hispanic White (87.2%). The risk of regimen change/discontinuation within 12 months of therapy was higher for clarithromycin-based regimens than azithromycin-based regimens (aHR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04-1.20 with rifampin; aHR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.93-1.32 with rifabutin as the companion rifamycin), and for rifabutin-containing regimens than rifampin-containing regimens (aHR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.33-1.68 with azithromycin; aHR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.27-1.70 with clarithromycin as the companion macrolide). The aHR comparing regimen change/discontinuation with clarithromycin-ethambutol-rifabutin and azithromycin-ethambutol-rifampin was 1.64 (95% CI, 1.43-1.64).
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall, an azithromycin-based regimen was less likely to be changed or discontinued than a clarithromycin-based regimen, and a rifampin-containing regimen was less likely to be changed or discontinued than a rifabutin-containing regimen within 12 months of therapy start. Our work provides a population-based assessment on the tolerability of multidrug antibiotic regimens used for the treatment of MAC-PD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    改善儿童和青少年非囊性纤维化支气管扩张症的治疗需要高质量的研究,其结果符合研究目标,对患者及其父母和护理人员有意义。在缺乏系统评价或就儿科支气管扩张应测量的健康结果达成一致的情况下,我们建立了一个国际,多学科专家小组,以开发纳入患者和父母观点的核心结果集(COS)。我们进行了系统的审查,从中构建了21个结果的列表;这些结果用于为父母和患者以及医疗保健专业人员进行单独的排名调查提供信息。562名参与者(来自17个国家的201名父母和患者,来自58个国家/地区的361名卫生保健专业人员)完成了调查。在两次协商一致会议之后,就十项COS达成了协议,其中五项结果被认为是必不可少的:生活质量,症状,恶化频率,非计划的医疗保健访问,和住院治疗。使用这种基于国际共识的COS将确保研究具有一致性,以患者为中心的结果,促进全球研究,反过来,制定循证指南以改善临床护理和结局。需要进一步的研究来开发验证,本COS中几种结果的可访问测量仪器。
    Improving the treatment of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in children and adolescents requires high-quality research with outcomes that meet study objectives and are meaningful for patients and their parents and caregivers. In the absence of systematic reviews or agreement on the health outcomes that should be measured in paediatric bronchiectasis, we established an international, multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop a core outcome set (COS) that incorporates patient and parent perspectives. We undertook a systematic review from which a list of 21 outcomes was constructed; these outcomes were used to inform the development of separate surveys for ranking by parents and patients and by health-care professionals. 562 participants (201 parents and patients from 17 countries, 361 health-care professionals from 58 countries) completed the surveys. Following two consensus meetings, agreement was reached on a ten-item COS with five outcomes that were deemed to be essential: quality of life, symptoms, exacerbation frequency, non-scheduled health-care visits, and hospitalisations. Use of this international consensus-based COS will ensure that studies have consistent, patient-focused outcomes, facilitating research worldwide and, in turn, the development of evidence-based guidelines for improved clinical care and outcomes. Further research is needed to develop validated, accessible measurement instruments for several of the outcomes in this COS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在巴基斯坦,慢性呼吸系统疾病造成了很大的发病率和死亡率负担.造成这种情况的主要原因是巴基斯坦缺乏当地循证临床实践指南(EBCPG),特别是在初级保健方面。因此,我们开发了EBCPGs,并为巴基斯坦慢性呼吸系统疾病的初级保健管理创建了临床诊断和转诊途径.
    方法:在2010年至2021年12月对PubMed和GoogleScholar进行了全面的文献综述后,由两名当地专家肺科医师选择了源指南。来源指南涵盖了特发性肺纤维化,哮喘,慢性阻塞性肺疾病,还有支气管扩张.GRADE-ADOLOPMENT过程包括三个关键要素:采用(按原样使用建议或稍作改动),适应(对建议进行有效的特定环境更改)或增加(包括填补EBCPG空白的新建议)。我们采用了等级制程序,适应,采用微小的变化,或从来源指南中排除建议。根据最佳证据审查过程,在临床路径中增加了其他建议。
    结果:46项建议被排除,主要是由于巴基斯坦没有推荐的管理方法,而且范围超出了普通医师的实践范围。针对四种慢性呼吸系统疾病设计了临床诊断和转诊途径,明确描述初级保健医生在诊断中的作用,基础管理,并及时转诊患者。在四个条件下,增加了18项建议(针对IPF,三种治疗支气管扩张,四个慢性阻塞性肺病,和四个哮喘)。
    结论:新创建的EBCPG和临床路径在巴基斯坦初级卫生保健系统中的广泛使用可以帮助减轻该国与慢性呼吸系统疾病相关的发病率和死亡率。
    BACKGROUND: In Pakistan, chronic respiratory conditions contribute a large burden of morbidity and mortality. A major reason for this is the lack of availability of local evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (EBCPGs) in Pakistan, particularly at the primary care level. Thus, we developed EBCPGs and created clinical diagnosis and referral pathways for the primary care management of chronic respiratory conditions in Pakistan.
    METHODS: The source guidelines were selected by two local expert pulmonologists after a thorough literature review on PubMed and Google Scholar from 2010 to December 2021. The source guidelines covered idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorders, and bronchiectasis. The GRADE-ADOLOPMENT process consists of three key elements: adoption (using recommendations as is or with minor changes), adaptation (effective context-specific changes to recommendations) or additions (including new recommendations to fill a gap in the EBCPG). We employed the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT process to adopt, adapt, adopt with minor changes, or exclude recommendations from a source guideline. Additional recommendations were added to the clinical pathways based on a best-evidence review process.
    RESULTS: 46 recommendations were excluded mainly due to the unavailability of recommended management in Pakistan and scope beyond the practice of general physicians. Clinical diagnosis and referral pathways were designed for the four chronic respiratory conditions, explicitly delineating the role of primary care practitioners in the diagnosis, basic management, and timely referral of patients. Across the four conditions, 18 recommendations were added (seven for IPF, three for bronchiectasis, four for COPD, and four for asthma).
    CONCLUSIONS: The widespread use of the newly created EBCPGs and clinical pathways in the primary healthcare system of Pakistan can help alleviate the morbidity and mortality related to chronic respiratory conditions disease in the country.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经批准:长期高流量鼻套管(LT-HFNC),定义为在稳定期为慢性肺部疾病患者提供的高流量鼻插管治疗,近年来,已成为不同类别的慢性肺病患者的家庭治疗方法。
    UNASSIGNED:本文总结了LT-HFNC的生理作用,并评估了迄今为止对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者治疗的临床知识,间质性肺病和支气管扩张.该指南在本文中进行了翻译和总结,并作为论文的附录进行了摘录。
    UNASSIGNED:本文描述了丹麦呼吸学会国家稳定疾病治疗指南背后的工作过程,该文件旨在支持临床医生进行循证决策和有关治疗的实际问题。
    UNASSIGNED: Long-term High Flow Nasal Cannula (LT-HFNC), defined as High Flow Nasal Cannula treatment provided to patients with chronic pulmonary conditions during stable phases, has emerged as a home treatment in different categories of patients with chronic lung diseases in recent years.
    UNASSIGNED: This paper summarizes the physiological effects of LT-HFNC and evaluates the clinical knowledge to date about treatment in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease, interstitial lung disease and bronchiectasis. The guideline is translated and summarized in this paper and presented unabridged as an appendix to the paper.
    UNASSIGNED: The paper describes the working process behind the Danish Respiratory Society\'s National guideline for treatment of stable disease, which has been written to support clinicians in both evidence-based decision making and practical issues concerning the treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在美国支气管扩张症和NTM研究注册登记的1038名患有肺分枝杆菌复合体和120名患有脓肿分枝杆菌的参与者中,不到一半的人在注册登记前24个月接受了抗生素治疗,其中不到一半是基于指南的。21%的治疗接受者出现不良反应,其中33%的人停止治疗。
    Among 1038 participants with pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex and 120 with Mycobacterium abscessus enrolled in the US Bronchiectasis and NTM Research Registry, less than half received antibiotic therapy in the 24 months before registry enrollment, of which less than half were guideline based. Adverse effects occurred in 21% of therapy recipients, of whom 33% discontinued therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    铜绿假单胞菌(PA)是我国第二常见的医院获得性肺炎(HAP)革兰阴性菌(16.9%-22.0%)。PA在社区获得性肺炎(CAP)中的比例约为1.0%,而在严重CAP中增加到1.8%-8.3%。有PA感染史的患者中PA占CAP的67.0%,支气管扩张,非常严重的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或气管切开术。考虑到PA引起的下呼吸道感染(LRTIs)的高疾病负担,加上近年来在这一领域的进展,中国胸科学会肺部感染大会更新了《中国成人下呼吸道铜绿假单胞菌感染管理专家共识(2014版)》,专注于病原体检测,诊断,抗菌治疗,综合管理,感染预防和控制。PA引起急性和慢性LTRI。急性LRTIs主要包括肺炎(CAP,HAP和呼吸机相关性肺炎),气管支气管炎,肺脓肿和脓胸。慢性LTRI的诊断应基于对(1)潜在的慢性结构性肺疾病的综合评估,比如支气管扩张,囊性纤维化,COPD,(2)存在LRTIs的临床表现;(3)在1年内从合格的下呼吸道标本中检测到的PA≥2次(至少间隔3个月)。当从下呼吸道标本中分离出PA时,区分感染与定植很重要。药物敏感性试验是PA耐药性检测的常规方法,是靶向治疗的基础。当药物敏感性试验显示可用药物的活性有限时,联合药敏试验建议选择体外具有累加或协同作用的抗菌药物进行联合治疗。PA分离株抗性机制的快速检测,如碳青霉烯酶表型确认试验,如果有建议。建议不要常规检测抗性基因以选择治疗剂。对于病情危重或有PA感染高危因素的急性LRTIs患者,在采集标本进行微生物学试验后,应启动涵盖PA的经验性抗菌治疗.在非危重的疑似PA肺炎患者中,应选择具有高肺脏浓度的抗PA活性的单一抗菌药物进行经验性治疗。然而,对于患有严重疾病(如败血症)或具有多药耐药(MDR)PA危险因素的患者,应使用两种不同类型的抗微生物药物的组合,这两种药物都可能敏感。抗菌方案应遵循药代动力学/药效学原则,以确保足够的剂量和给药频率。对于已确认的PALRTI,应根据药物敏感性选择抗生素。在没有重大基础疾病的患者中,建议使用具有足够肺部浓度的活性抗菌药物的单一治疗,而不是联合治疗;当所有可用的活性剂的肺内浓度都较差时,联合治疗是必须的。对于耐碳青霉烯PA(CRPA)或难以治疗的耐药性PA(DTR-PA)引起的LRTI,如果是一种新的酶抑制剂,例如头孢特洛赞/他唑巴坦,头孢他啶/阿维巴坦,亚胺培南/西司他丁/来巴坦显示体外敏感性,建议将其作为一线治疗;头孢地洛可以作为二线治疗。也可以考虑基于多粘菌素的联合疗法。耐药PALRTI的其他潜在成功方法包括延长β-内酰胺的输注时间,联合治疗和吸入抗菌治疗。在患有潜在慢性结构性肺病的患者中,抗菌方案(药物,剂量,给药途径,和治疗持续时间)应根据临床特征决定,药物敏感性,和治疗目标(控制加剧的症状,根除新兴的PA,或预防频繁恶化的患者的突然发作)。除了抗菌治疗,包括气道清除治疗(ACT)在内的综合护理,氧疗,应提供营养支持和器官功能保护。从医院感染预防和控制的角度,除了标准预防措施外,建议隔离和预防接触传输以阻止PA传输。有针对性的主动筛查,及时监测和反馈有助于MDR-PA的预防和控制。不建议全身和局部使用预防性抗菌药物。食病病上食病病患和戒病病患是经上口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口声声口口口声声口口口口声声口口声声口声声口声声口声声口口
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is the second common Gram-negative bacterium for hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) in China (16.9%-22.0%). The proportion of PA in community acquired pneumonia (CAP) was about 1.0%, while increased to 1.8%-8.3% in severe CAP. PA accounted for 67.0% of CAP in patients with a history of PA infection, bronchiectasis, very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or tracheotomy. Considering the high disease burden of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) caused by PA, together with the progress in this field in recent years, the Pulmonary Infection Assembly of Chinese Thoracic Society updated the \"Chinese expert consensus on the management of lower respiratory tract infections of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in adults (2014 version)\", focusing on pathogen detection, diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, comprehensive management, infection prevention and control.PA causes both acute and chronic LTRIs. Acute LRTIs mainly include pneumonia (CAP, HAP and ventilator-associated pneumonia), tracheobronchitis, lung abscess and empyema. The diagnosis of chronic LTRIs should be based on a comprehensive assessment of (1) underlying chronic structural lung diseases, such as bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, COPD, or immunocompromised conditions; (2) the presence of clinical manifestations of LRTIs; and (3) ≥ two times (at least 3 months apart) of PA detected from eligible lower respiratory tract specimens within 1 year. It is important to distinguish infection from colonization when PA is isolated from lower respiratory tract specimens. Drug susceptibility test is a conventional method for PA resistance detection and serves as a basis for target therapy. When drug susceptibility test shows limited activity of available agents, combined susceptibility test is suggested to select antimicrobial drugs with additive or synergistic effect in vitro for combination therapy. Rapid test of resistance mechanisms of PA isolates, such as carbapenemase phenotype confirmation tests, is recommended if available. It is recommended not to routinely detect resistance genes for choosing therapeutic agents.For patients with acute LRTIs in critical condition or with high risk factors for PA infection, empirical antimicrobial therapy covering PA should be initiated after collecting specimens for microbiological tests. In patients with suspected PA pneumonia who are not critically ill, single antimicrobial drug of anti-PA activity with high lung concentration should be selected for empirical treatment. However, for patients with a serious condition such as sepsis or with risk factors for multidrug-resistant (MDR) PA, a combination of two different classes of antimicrobial drugs that are both potentially susceptible should be used. The antimicrobial regimen should follow pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics principles to ensure adequate dosage and administration frequency. For confirmed PA LRTIs, antibiotics should be selected based on drug sensitivity. In patients without significant underlying diseases, single therapy of an active antimicrobial with adequate pulmonary concentration is recommended rather than combination therapy; when all the available active agents have poor intrapulmonary concentrations, combination therapy is obligatory. For LRTIs caused by carbapenem-resistant PA (CRPA) or difficult-to-treat resistance PA (DTR-PA), if an agent of new enzyme inhibitor, such as ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, and imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam shows in vitro sensitivity, it is recommended as the first-line choice; cefiderocol may serve as the second-line treatment. Combination therapy based on polymyxins may also be considered. Other potentially successful approaches for drug-resistant PA LRTIs include extended infusion time of β-lactams, combination therapy and inhaled antimicrobial therapy.In patients with underlying chronic structural lung diseases, the antimicrobial regimen (drug, dosage, route of administration, and duration of therapy) should be decided according to clinical features, drug sensitivity, and treatment goals (control of exacerbated symptoms, eradication of new-emerging PA, or prevention of flare-ups in patients with frequent exacerbation).Along with antimicrobial therapy, comprehensive care including airway clearance therapy (ACT), oxygen therapy, nutritional support and organ function protection should be provided. From the perspective of nosocomial infection prevention and control, isolation and prophylaxis of contact transmission are recommended to block PA transmission in addition to standard prevention measures. Targeted active screening, timely monitoring and feedback can help the prevention and control of MDR-PA. The systemic and topical use of prophylactic antimicrobials is not recommended.
    铜绿假单胞菌是难治性下呼吸道感染最常见致病菌之一,由于其耐药严重和易形成生物被膜,特别是近10多年来碳青霉烯类耐药株的出现,使其治疗更为困难;同时新的治疗药物和治疗策略不断问世,有必要加以评估以指导临床合理应用。中华医学会呼吸病学分会感染学组在《铜绿假单胞菌下呼吸道感染诊治专家共识(2014年版)》的基础上进行更新,并以临床诊治和预防的思路和技术为重点,以期为临床医生规范化诊治铜绿假单胞菌下呼吸道感染提供切实可行的参考。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:指南旨在规范和优化诊断和管理。我们评估了支持不同国际成人支气管扩张指南建议的证据质量,并按等级制度分类。
    方法:使用AGREEII工具评估六个领域的合格临床实践指南的质量,评级≥80%为优秀。
    结果:分析了七个指南(283个建议),其中4个被认为“推荐使用”(3个在2017年后报告为优秀)。总的来说,144(50.9%)建议基于低质量证据,占81.5%的诊断和36.2%的治疗。相比之下,关于诊断和治疗的5/92(5.4%)和40/191(20.9%)建议(分别)基于高质量的证据。2015年后发布的指南的质量协议评级显着提高(p<0.05),从27.7%提高到58.3%,资格是优秀的。最高分数记录在“范围和目的”领域,然后是“演示文稿的澄清”和“编辑独立性”。
    结论:2017年后报告的更新指南提高了质量,尽管设计良好的随机临床试验仍未满足需求.AGREEII质量评估确定了四个合格的指南,建议使用。需要改进利益相关者的参与和适用性。
    BACKGROUND: Guidelines aim to standardize and optimize diagnosis and management. We evaluated the quality of evidence supporting recommendations from different international adult guidelines on bronchiectasis, and classified with the GRADE system.
    METHODS: Quality of eligible clinical practice guidelines was assessed for six domains using the AGREE II tool, with ≥ 80% rating as excellent.
    RESULTS: Seven guidelines (283 recommendations) were analyzed, and four of them were considered \"recommended for use\" (three reported after 2017 as excellent). Overall, 144 (50.9%) recommendations were based on low-quality evidence, representing 81.5% in diagnosis and 36.2% in therapy. In contrast, 5/92 (5.4%) and 40/191 (20.9%) recommendations regarding diagnostic and treatment (respectively) were based on high-quality evidence. Quality agreement ratings were significantly (p< 0.05) higher for guidelines delivered after 2015, progressing from 27.7% to 58.3%, qualifying as excellent. Highest scores were documented in the domains of \"scope and purpose\" followed by \"clarifying of presentation\" and \"editorial independence\".
    CONCLUSIONS: Updated guidelines reported after 2017 improved quality, although well-designed randomized clinical trials remain an unmet need. AGREE II quality assessment identified four guidelines qualified as recommended for use. Improvements are required in stakeholder involvement and applicability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: A diagnostic bundle for bronchiectasis in South Korea is necessary because the etiologies of bronchiectasis and related diseases vary significantly among different regions and ethnicities.
    UNASSIGNED: A modified Delphi method was used to develop expert consensus statements on a diagnostic bundle for bronchiectasis in South Korea. Initial statements proposed by a core panel, based on international bronchiectasis guidelines, were discussed over one online meeting and two email surveys by a panel of experts (≥70% agreement).
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-one experts participated in the study, and 30 statements on a diagnostic bundle for bronchiectasis were classified as recommended, conditional, or not recommended. The expert panel agreed that 1) a standardized diagnostic bundle is useful in clinical practice, 2) diagnostic tests for specific diseases, including immunodeficiency and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, are necessary when clinically suspected, 3) initial diagnostic tests, including sputum microbiology and spirometry, are essential in all bronchiectasis patients, and 4) patients should be referred to specialized centers when rare causes such as primary ciliary dyskinesia are suspected.
    UNASSIGNED: In this Delphi survey, expert consensus statements were generated on which specific diagnostic, laboratory, microbiologic, and pulmonary function tests to obtain when managing patients with bronchiectasis in South Korea.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号