UNASSIGNED: In Head and Neck surgery Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) is evolving as a key treatment option for benign and malignant lesions in the oropharynx. Even so, postoperative pain is one of the primary early complaints following TORS. Well established evidence-based procedure specific pain treatment guidelines are available for a variety of other surgical specialties. However, there are no guidelines for TORS.
UNASSIGNED: This review describes the available data of early pain intensity following TORS during rest and procedure related activity.
UNASSIGNED: Literature concerning pain in the immediate postoperative phase following TORS were obtained from two literature databases.
UNASSIGNED: Most data on pain intensity following TORS are based upon a numeric rating scale, e.g. the Visual Analogue Scale and/or analgesic demands. Only one randomized clinical trial is available reflecting that the literature is mainly based on retrospective and a few prospective studies. Only one study analyzed pain during relevant functionality, i.e. swallowing. Overall, the studies suffer from a non-standardized approach and there is a need for transparent information concerning the timing of pain ratings and methodology.
UNASSIGNED: The evidence for optimal pain control is limited, particularly during surgical relevant activity. Postoperative pain rating during activity is a fundamental element in pain trials in order to enhance recovery thereby calling for future consensus on assessment methodology.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

Human papilloma virus testing for oropharyngeal squamous-cell carcinoma has been recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network since 2012. We examine disparities, reported rates of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, and the impact on these findings of limitations with the variable in database registries.
The HPV variable was queried for patients with oropharyngeal squamous carcinoma (OPSCC) from 2013 to 2016 in National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER). Multivariable regression was used to identify disparities based on sociodemographic variables. Sensitivity analyses were used to investigate limitations of the variable.
Despite limitations in the HPV variable in the databases, there was less than 100% adherence to recommended testing, and there were significant disparities in multiple sociodemographic variables. For example, in NCDB 70% of white versus 60.4% of black patients were tested (odds ratio [OR] 0.75, confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.85, p ≤ 0.0001); in SEER 59.8% of white and 47.6% of black patients were tested (OR 0.73, CI 0.67-0.81; p ≤ 0.0001).
Disparities exist among patients undergoing testing for HPV-associated OPSCC and adherence to guideline recommended HPV testing has been suboptimal. In addition, the HPV variable definition, especially as it relates to p16 positivity, and use in these two registries should be improved.

Head and neck cancers (HNC) are defined as malignant tumours located in the upper aerodigestive tract and represents 5% of oncologic cases in adults in Spain. More than 90% of these tumours have squamous histology. In an effort to incorporate evidence obtained since 2017 publication, the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) presents an update of the squamous cell HNC diagnosis and treatment guideline. Most relevant diagnostic and therapeutic changes from the last guideline have been updated: introduction of sentinel node biopsy in early oral/oropharyngeal cancer treated with surgery, concomitant radiotherapy with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 in the adjuvant setting, new approaches for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer and new treatments with immune-checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent/metastatic disease.

Recent historical management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma typically includes radiotherapy with/without chemotherapy. Novel surgical techniques such as robotic surgery have made primary surgery more frequent; however, postoperative radiotherapy may be recommended. We aimed to assess adherence to guidelines for postoperative therapy following robotic surgery.
Using the National Cancer Database, we analyzed the frequency of radiotherapy following robotic surgery for cT1-3cN0-2cM0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, specifically in the presence of widely accepted indications for postoperative radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy.
Approximately two-thirds of patients received radiotherapy after robotic surgery for early-intermediate stage oropharyngeal cancer. One in five patients with an indication for adjuvant radiotherapy and 1/3 with an indication for adjuvant chemotherapy did not receive recommended adjuvant therapy.
A high proportion of patients require radiotherapy after robotic surgery for early-intermediate stage oropharyngeal cancer. Patients with an indication for further adjuvant therapy commonly do not receive it.

Oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas are the most common malignant tumours of the oral and maxillofacial region. A standardized pathological diagnosis report for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma should provide not only the pathological diagnosis itself as much accurate as possible, but also the information related to assessment of prognosis and strategy of treatment for the patient. An expert group organized by Society of Oral Pathology, Chinese Stomatological Association has set a guideline for the tissue fixation, gross examination and format of the pathological diagnosis report of oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. The guideline covers the important changes in clinical and pathological aspects of oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas in recent years, such as depth of invasion in T category, extranodal extension in N category and human papilloma virus-associated squamous cell carcinoma in oropharyngeal carcinomas. Hopefully the guideline will improve the quality of pathological reports of oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas and provide reliable data on clinical therapy and prognosis evaluation of patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas in China.
口腔癌及口咽癌是口腔颌面部最常见的恶性肿瘤。规范化的口腔癌及口咽癌病理诊断报告不仅应提供给临床准确的病理诊断，还应包括与患者预后评估、治疗策略选择相关的信息。由中华口腔医学会口腔病理学专业委员会牵头组织成立专家组，对口腔癌及口咽癌病理标本固定、取材及报告内容等进行研讨与规范，形成《口腔癌及口咽癌病理诊断规范》。此规范涵盖了近年来在口腔癌和口咽癌临床病理方面的一些重要变化，如口腔癌肿瘤T分期应考虑肿瘤侵袭深度、肿瘤N分期应考虑有无淋巴结外扩展、口咽癌中新亚型人乳头状瘤病毒相关性鳞状细胞癌等。希望通过本规范的制定，提高我国口腔癌及口咽癌病理报告质量，为临床治疗及预后评估提供依据。.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: A multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach to cancer management is gold-standard. With an increasing disease incidence and growing research into human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), updated UK management guidelines were recently published. This study aimed to evaluate the MDT decision-making process among OPC patients at a tertiary centre.
METHODS: MDT meetings over a 12-month period were analysed retrospectively. MDT decisions were compared with guidelines and patient records examined to identify decision implementation. Reasons behind any discordant decisions were explored.
RESULTS: This study included 140 OPC patients. Thirty-three (23.6%) were not tested for HPV. Patients over 70 years with a smoking history treated palliatively were less likely to be tested (P = 0.017). Eighty-five percent of MDT decisions followed guidelines with the majority not complying (76.2%) related to patient comorbidity. Ten decisions (7.1%) were not implemented. Reasons included: Seven due to patient choice, of which four patients (57.1%) were only seen following the MDT meeting, and three due to clinician decisions as new clinical information emerged.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of MDT decisions followed guidelines and any discordant decisions were justifiable. Discussing management options with patients beforehand facilitates decision implementation as decisions can potentially change after seeing the patient. Progress is still needed with regards to HPV testing. Reasons for not testing could include subliminal decision-making among clinicians, and patients falling between centres. Crucially, the role of the MDT in head and neck cancer should be to ratify decisions rather than making them, hence the need to see patients prior to MDT discussion.

OBJECTIVE: The authors present the guidelines of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Society on diagnostic procedures for lymphadenopathy in case of a cervical mass with cystic aspect.
METHODS: A multidisciplinary work-group was entrusted with a review of the scientific literature on the topic. Guidelines were drawn up, then read over by an editorial group independent of the work-group, and the final version was drawn up. Guidelines were graded as A, B, C or expert opinion, by decreasing level of evidence.
RESULTS: In adults presenting a cystic cervical mass, it is recommended to suspect cervical lymphadenopathy: in order of decreasing frequency, cystic metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, of undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and of thyroid papillary carcinoma (Grade C). On discovery of a cystic cervical mass on ultrasound, architectural elements indicating a lymph node and a thyroid nodule with signs of malignancy should be screened for, especially if the mass is located in levels III, IV or VI (Grade A). Malignant lymphadenopathy should be suspected in case of cervical mass with cystic component on CT (Grade B), but benign or malignant status cannot be diagnosed only on radiological data (CT or MRI) (Grade A), and 18-FDG PET-CT should be performed, particularly in case of inconclusive ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (Grade C).