• 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝细胞癌(HCC)是肝脏中最常见的原发性恶性肿瘤,是全球癌症相关死亡的第三大原因。应向发生HCC的高风险个体提供腹部超声监测。准确的诊断,分期,在确定最佳治疗方法时,肝功能至关重要。BCLC分期系统在西方国家得到广泛认可。管理这种病理学需要多学科,个性化的方法,通常采用多式联运策略。手术仍然是唯一的治疗选择,尽管局部和全身治疗也可能在手术不适合时增加生存率.在晚期疾病中,ECOG/PS0-1和Child-PughA级患者应接受全身治疗。
    Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignancy in the liver and is the third cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Surveillance with abdominal ultrasound should be offered to individuals at high risk for developing HCC. Accurate diagnosis, staging, and liver function are crucial when determining the optimal therapeutic approach. The BCLC staging system is widely endorsed in Western countries. Managing this pathology requires a multidisciplinary, personalized approach, generally with a multimodal strategy. Surgery remains the only curative option, albeit local and systemic therapy may also increase survival when surgery is not suitable. In advanced disease, systemic treatment should be offered to patients with ECOG/PS 0-1 and Child-Pugh class A.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病(MASLD),以前称为非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD),定义为在存在一种或多种心脏代谢危险因素和不存在有害酒精摄入的情况下的脂肪变性肝病(SLD)。MASLD的频谱包括脂肪变性,代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝炎(MASH,以前是NASH),纤维化,肝硬化和MASH相关的肝细胞癌(HCC)。EASL-EASD-EASO联合指南更新了定义,预防,筛选,MASLD的诊断和治疗。肝纤维化MASLD的病例发现策略,使用非侵入性测试,应应用于有心脏代谢危险因素的个体,肝脏酶异常和/或肝脏脂肪变性的放射学体征,特别是在存在2型糖尿病或肥胖以及其他代谢危险因素的情况下。使用基于血液的评分(如纤维化-4指数[FIB-4])和,顺序,成像技术(如瞬时弹性成像)适用于排除/晚期纤维化,这是肝脏相关结果的预测。在患有MASLD的成年人中,改变生活方式-包括减肥,饮食变化,体育锻炼和抑制饮酒-以及对合并症的最佳管理-包括使用基于肠促胰岛素的疗法(例如,tirzepatide)用于2型糖尿病或肥胖症,如果指示-建议。减肥手术也是MASLD和肥胖症患者的一种选择。如果当地批准并依赖于标签,非肝硬化MASH和显着肝纤维化(阶段≥2)的成年人应考虑使用resmetirom进行MASH靶向治疗,这证明了对脂肪性肝炎和纤维化的组织学有效性,具有可接受的安全性和耐受性。目前,肝硬化阶段没有推荐MASH靶向药物治疗。MASH相关肝硬化的管理包括代谢药物的适应,营养咨询,门脉高压和肝癌的监测,以及失代偿期肝硬化的肝移植。
    Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), previously termed non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is defined as steatotic liver disease (SLD) in the presence of one or more cardiometabolic risk factor(s) and the absence of harmful alcohol intake. The spectrum of MASLD includes steatosis, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH, previously NASH), fibrosis, cirrhosis and MASH-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This joint EASL-EASD-EASO guideline provides an update on definitions, prevention, screening, diagnosis and treatment for MASLD. Case-finding strategies for MASLD with liver fibrosis, using non-invasive tests, should be applied in individuals with cardiometabolic risk factors, abnormal liver enzymes and/or radiological signs of hepatic steatosis, particularly in the presence of type 2 diabetes or obesity with additional metabolic risk factor(s). A stepwise approach using blood-based scores (such as the fibrosis-4 index [FIB-4]) and, sequentially, imaging techniques (such as transient elastography) is suitable to rule-out/in advanced fibrosis, which is predictive of liver-related outcomes. In adults with MASLD, lifestyle modification-including weight loss, dietary changes, physical exercise and discouraging alcohol consumption-as well as optimal management of comorbidities-including use of incretin-based therapies (e.g. semaglutide, tirzepatide) for type 2 diabetes or obesity, if indicated-is advised. Bariatric surgery is also an option in individuals with MASLD and obesity. If locally approved and dependent on the label, adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and significant liver fibrosis (stage ≥2) should be considered for a MASH-targeted treatment with resmetirom, which demonstrated histological effectiveness on steatohepatitis and fibrosis with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. No MASH-targeted pharmacotherapy can currently be recommended for the cirrhotic stage. Management of MASH-related cirrhosis includes adaptations of metabolic drugs, nutritional counselling, surveillance for portal hypertension and HCC, as well as liver transplantation in decompensated cirrhosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝细胞癌,历史上,预后不良,系统选择很少。此外,大多数诊断患者不是手术候选人。因此,局部治疗(LRT)已被广泛使用,有强大的数据支持它的使用。在过去的15年里,在可用的全身药物方面取得了进展.这导致了更新的巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)算法纳入这些新的全身药物,倡导在LRT上取得进展或具有肿瘤特征的人中早期使用,使他们不太可能从LRT中受益。然而,无论是LRT的辅助功能,还是联合治疗的具体排序都没有直接解决.该研究共识小组旨在强调与LRT和全身治疗的组合和最佳测序有关的研究重点。评估BCLC各阶段的最大需求。
    Hepatocellular carcinoma, historically, has had a poor prognosis with very few systemic options. Furthermore, most patients at diagnosis are not surgical candidates. Therefore, locoregional therapy (LRT) has been widely used, with strong data supporting its use. Over the last 15 years, there has been progress in the available systemic agents. This has led to the updated Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) algorithm\'s inclusion of these new systemic agents, with advocacy of earlier usage in those who progress on LRT or have tumor characteristics that make them less likely to benefit from LRT. However, neither the adjunct of LRT nor the specific sequencing of combination therapies is addressed directly. This Research Consensus Panel sought to highlight research priorities pertaining to the combination and optimal sequencing of LRT and systemic therapy, assessing the greatest needs across BCLC stages.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景肝细胞癌(HCC)的非侵入性诊断指南因全球不同地理区域而异。特别是关于gadoxetic酸增强MRI的标准。目的比较四种不同的国际HCC诊断指南的诊断性能和读者的判断,在HCC高危患者中使用gadoxetic酸增强MRI诊断HCC。材料与方法这项回顾性研究包括未接受治疗的患者,有肝癌的风险,2015年1月至2018年6月在韩国11家三级医院接受了gadoxetic酸增强MRI检查.四位放射科医生根据四项指南独立审查了肝脏局灶性病变(FLL):美国肝病研究协会(AASLD)/肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS),韩国肝癌协会-国家癌症中心(KLCA-NCC),欧洲肝脏研究协会(EASL)亚太肝脏研究协会(APASL)。还记录了读者的判断(HCC或非HCC)。病理证实恶性FLL,组织学和临床随访数据用于良性FLL。使用广义估计方程比较了指南的诊断性能。此外,评估了诊断比值比.结果共2445个FLL(中值大小,27.4毫米)在2237例患者中进行了分析(平均年龄,59岁±11[SD];1666例男性患者);69.3%(2445个中的1694个)为HCC。KLCA-NCC显示出最高的准确性(80.0%;95%CI:78.7,81.2;P=.001),在东方指南中具有很高的敏感性(APASL,89.1%[95%CI:87.8,90.3];KLCA-NCC,78.2%[95%CI:76.6,79.7])和西方指南的高特异性(AASLD/LI-RADS,89.6%[95%CI:87.8,91.2];EASL,88.1%[95%CI:86.2,89.9])(P=.001)。AASLD/LI-RADS的诊断比值比为20.7(95%CI:17.0,25.3),KLCA-NCC的18.9(95%CI:15.8,22.6),EASL为16.8(95%CI:13.8,20.4),APASL为8.9(95%CI:7.4,10.7)。读者的判断显示出比指南更高的准确性(准确性,86.0%;95%CI:84.9,86.9;P=.001)。结论在四个不同的国际HCC诊断指南中,东方指南显示出更高的敏感性,而西方指南显示更高的特异性。KLCA-NCC实现了最高的精度,和AASLD/LI-RADS表现出最高的诊断比值比。©RSNA,2024补充材料可用于本文。
    Background Noninvasive diagnostic guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) vary across different global geographic areas, especially regarding criteria about gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of four different international HCC diagnosis guidelines and readers\' judgment in diagnosing HCC using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in patients at high risk for HCC. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients who had not undergone treatment, were at risk for HCC, and who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI from January 2015 to June 2018 from 11 tertiary hospitals in South Korea. Four radiologists independently reviewed focal liver lesions (FLLs) according to four guidelines: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD)/Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center (KLCA-NCC), European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), and Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL). Reader judgment (HCC or not HCC) was also recorded. Malignant FLLs were confirmed at pathology, and histologic and clinical follow-up data were used for benign FLLs. The guidelines\' diagnostic performance was compared using generalized estimating equations. Additionally, the diagnostic odds ratio was assessed. Results A total of 2445 FLLs (median size, 27.4 mm) were analyzed in 2237 patients (mean age, 59 years ± 11 [SD]; 1666 male patients); 69.3% (1694 of 2445) were HCCs. KLCA-NCC showed the highest accuracy (80.0%; 95% CI: 78.7, 81.2; P = .001), with high sensitivity in Eastern guidelines (APASL, 89.1% [95% CI: 87.8, 90.3]; KLCA-NCC, 78.2% [95% CI: 76.6, 79.7]) and high specificity in Western guidelines (AASLD/LI-RADS, 89.6% [95% CI: 87.8, 91.2]; EASL, 88.1% [95% CI: 86.2, 89.9]) (P = .001). The diagnostic odds ratios were 20.7 (95% CI: 17.0, 25.3) for AASLD/LI-RADS, 18.9 (95% CI: 15.8, 22.6) for KLCA-NCC, 16.8 (95% CI: 13.8, 20.4) for EASL, and 8.9 (95% CI: 7.4, 10.7) for APASL. The readers\' judgment demonstrated higher accuracy than that of the guidelines (accuracy, 86.0%; 95% CI: 84.9, 86.9; P = .001). Conclusion Among four different international HCC diagnosis guidelines, Eastern guidelines demonstrated higher sensitivity, whereas Western guidelines displayed higher specificity. KLCA-NCC achieved the highest accuracy, and AASLD/LI-RADS exhibited the highest diagnostic odds ratio. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Image-guided ablation for primary liver cancer has many advantages, including high efficacy, minimal invasion, easy operation, high tolerance, short hospitalization, fast recovery, and few complications. Percutaneous radiofrequency and microwave ablation are the most mature technologies, which have been recognized by many domestic and foreign guidelines as the first-line treatment for small liver cancers. As a large country with large numbers of liver cancers, Chinese doctors have accumulated rich experience in ablation therapy for liver cancer and achieved systematic research results. This guideline focused on the standardization of the puncture path, guidance techniques, indications, preoperative preparation, operation methods, postoperative treatment and follow-up, and complication prevention and treatment strategies for liver cancer ablation, and elaborates on the technical comparisons of image-guided ablation modalities and their status in comprehensive management of primary liver cancer.
    影像引导的原发性肝癌消融治疗具有疗效肯定、创伤小、操作简便、患者易耐受、住院时间短、恢复快、并发症少等优点,其中又以射频和微波经皮消融应用最为成熟,已被多个国内外指南认定为小肝癌的一线治疗方法。中国在消融治疗肝癌上积累了丰富经验,取得了体系化研究成果。该指南规范了肝癌消融治疗的穿刺路径、引导技术、适应证、术前准备、操作方法、术后处理及随访、并发症防治策略等内容,并就影像引导原发性肝癌消融方式进行技术对比及其在综合治理中的地位进行阐述。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:更新循证指南以协助晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的临床决策。
    方法:ASCO召集了一个专家小组,以更新关于HCC全身治疗的2020指南。小组更新了系统评价,包括截至2023年10月发表的随机对照试验(RCTs)和更新的建议。
    结果:10个新的RCT符合纳入标准,并被添加到证据基础中。
    结论:阿特珠单抗+贝伐单抗(atezo+bev)或durvalumab+treelimumab(durva+treme)可作为晚期HCC患者的一线治疗方案,Child-PughA级肝病,和东部肿瘤协作组的表现状态0-1。如果这些疗法有禁忌症,索拉非尼,lenvatinib,或durvalumab可以提供一线。用atezo+bev一线治疗后,酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)的二线治疗,雷莫鲁单抗(用于甲胎蛋白[AFP]≥400ng/mL的患者),durva+treme,或nivolumab+ipilimumab(nivo+ipi)可能被推荐用于适当的候选人。在用durva+treme进行一线治疗后,建议使用TKI进行二线治疗.索拉非尼或乐伐替尼一线治疗后,二线治疗选择包括卡博替尼,瑞戈非尼用于以前耐受索拉非尼的患者,雷莫珠单抗(AFP≥400ng/mL),尼沃+ipi,或durvalumab;对于一线无法获得这些治疗的患者,可以考虑使用atezo+bev或durva+treme,并且没有禁忌症。Pembrolizumab或nivolumab也是索拉非尼或lenvatinib后适当患者的选择。对于PS良好的Child-PughA级患者,可考虑进行三线治疗,使用之前列出的一种与之前接受的治疗具有不同作用机制的药物。对于Child-PughB级晚期HCC患者,建议采取谨慎的全身治疗方法。指南中包含有关在选项之间进行选择的进一步指导。其他信息可在www上获得。asco.org/胃肠道癌症指南。
    OBJECTIVE: To update an evidence-based guideline to assist in clinical decision-making for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
    METHODS: ASCO convened an Expert Panel to update the 2020 guideline on systemic therapy for HCC. The panel updated the systematic review to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published through October 2023 and updated recommendations.
    RESULTS: Ten new RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were added to the evidence base.
    CONCLUSIONS: Atezolizumab + bevacizumab (atezo + bev) or durvalumab + tremelimumab (durva + treme) may be offered first-line for patients with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh class A liver disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. Where there are contraindications to these therapies, sorafenib, lenvatinib, or durvalumab may be offered first-line. Following first-line treatment with atezo + bev, second-line therapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), ramucirumab (for patients with alpha-fetoprotein [AFP] ≥400 ng/mL), durva + treme, or nivolumab + ipilimumab (nivo + ipi) may be recommended for appropriate candidates. Following first-line therapy with durva + treme, second-line therapy with a TKI is recommended. Following first-line treatment with sorafenib or lenvatinib, second-line therapy options include cabozantinib, regorafenib for patients who previously tolerated sorafenib, ramucirumab (AFP ≥400 ng/mL), nivo + ipi, or durvalumab; atezo + bev or durva + treme may be considered for patients who did not have access to these therapies in the first-line setting, and do not have contraindications. Pembrolizumab or nivolumab are also options for appropriate patients following sorafenib or lenvatinib. Third-line therapy may be considered in Child-Pugh class A patients with good PS, using one of the agents listed previously that has a nonidentical mechanism of action with previously received therapy. A cautious approach to systemic therapy is recommended for patients with Child-Pugh class B advanced HCC. Further guidance on choosing between options is included within the guideline.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,系统性进展型肝细胞癌(HCC)的治疗选择已大大增加。在这项研究中,我们的目的是评估谷歌搜索的潜力,以反映美国(US)HCC药物的处方率。
    我们对2017年1月至2022年12月从IQVIA国家处方审核(NPA)获得的美国处方数据和相应的Google趋势数据进行了深入分析。我们专注于用于HCC的一线和第二或更晚治疗线的药物,收集有关其处方和搜索率的数据。收集搜索量作为通用药品及其各自品牌名称的汇总搜索查询。
    在2017年第一季度至2022年第四季度的研究期间,用于HCC治疗的药物的每月处方显示增加了173%(从1253增加到3422)。相反,在线搜索增加了3.5%(从每1000万次搜索的173个增加到179个)。值得注意的是,在搜索兴趣和新药处方之间观察到很强的相关性,这表明使用量增加,而使用减少的较旧药物显示出有限的相关性。我们的研究结果表明,非医师职业在美国医疗保健系统内管理系统进展肝癌的作用越来越大。尽管肿瘤学家仍然主要负责药物处方。
    总而言之,在线搜索监测可以提供反映与HCC治疗特别相关的处方趋势的潜力。这种方法提供了一种快速和可访问的方法来评估HCC治疗的不断发展的景观。
    UNASSIGNED: The treatment options for systemically progressed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have significantly expanded in recent years. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the potential of Google searches as a reflection of prescription rates for HCC drugs in the United States (US).
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted an in-depth analysis of US prescription data obtained from the IQVIA National Prescription Audit (NPA) and corresponding Google Trends data from January 2017 to December 2022. We focused on drugs used in the first line and second or later treatment lines for HCC, collecting data on their prescriptions and search rates. Search volumes were collected as aggregated search queries for both generic drugs and their respective brand names.
    UNASSIGNED: During the study period from Q1 2017 to Q4 2022, monthly prescriptions for drugs used in HCC treatment showed an 173% increase (from 1253 to 3422). Conversely online searches increased by 3.5% (from 173 to 179 per 10 million searches). Notably, strong correlations were observed between search interest and prescriptions for newer drugs, which indicates increasing usage, while older drugs with declining usage displayed limited correlation. Our findings suggest a growing role of non-physician professions in managing systemically progressed HCC within the US healthcare system, although oncologists remained primarily responsible for drug prescriptions.
    UNASSIGNED: In conclusion, online search monitoring can offer the potential to reflect prescription trends specifically related to the treatment of HCC. This approach provides a swift and accessible means of evaluating the evolving landscape of HCC treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    西班牙肝移植学会(LaSociedadEspañoladeTrasplanteHpático)的目标是通过多学科方法促进和创建有关肝移植当前主题的共识文件。为此,2022年11月,第十次共识文件会议召开,来自26个授权的西班牙肝移植项目的专家参与。本版讨论了肝移植后增强的恢复,将需要的行动分为三个阶段:术前,术中和术后。描述了每个主题的评估证据和共识结论。
    The goal of the Spanish Society for Liver Transplantation (La Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático) is to promote and create consensus documents about current topics in liver transplantation with a multidisciplinary approach. To this end, in November 2022, the 10th Consensus Document Meeting was held, with the participation of experts from the 26 authorized Spanish liver transplantation programs. This edition discusses Enhanced Recovery After Liver Transplantation, dividing needed actions into three periods: preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative. The evaluated evidence and the consensus conclusions for each of these topics are described.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Practice Guideline
    西班牙肝移植学会(SociedadEspañoladeTrasplanteHeptico)的目标是通过多学科方法促进和创建有关肝移植当前主题的共识文件。为此,2022年11月,第十次共识文件会议召开,来自26个授权的西班牙肝移植项目的专家参与。本版讨论了肝移植后增强的恢复,将需要的行动分为3个时期:术前,术中和术后。描述了每个主题的评估证据和共识结论。
    The goal of the Spanish Society for Liver Transplantation (Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático) is to promote and create consensus documents about current topics in liver transplantation with a multidisciplinary approach. To this end, in November 2022, the 10th Consensus Document Meeting was held, with the participation of experts from the 26 authorized Spanish liver transplantation programs. This edition discusses enhanced recovery after liver transplantation, dividing needed actions into 3periods: preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative. The evaluated evidence and the consensus conclusions for each of these topics are described.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号