使用经过验证的工具来评估癌症患者的营养状况,为其营养评估提供了保证的准确性和可靠性。确保信息准确并反映患者的情况。这项研究的目的是确定有效且可靠的工具,以评估诊断为接受抗肿瘤治疗(化学疗法和/或免疫疗法)的实体瘤的癌症患者的营养状况。进行了范围审查,以搜索英文在科学期刊上发表的原始文章,西班牙语,或者过去五年的葡萄牙语。为了识别潜在的相关文件,在以下数据库中进行了搜索:SCOPUS,WOS,CINAHL,MEDLINE,BVS,和pubmed。使用DECS-MeSH描述符和布尔运算符。此外,Arksey和O\'Malley协议,乔安妮·布里格斯研究所(JBI)方法,以及系统评价和荟萃分析的首选信息元素的流程图,被称为PRISMA,被跟踪。最初的搜索策略确定了总共164个参考文献,连续检查,留下十项研究的最终选择。发现用于营养评估的最常用的工具是患者生成的主观整体评估(PG-SGA)。其他问卷也很突出,如迷你营养评估(MNA),营养不良通用筛查工具(MUST),营养风险筛查(NRS2002),和厌食症/恶病质治疗的功能评估(FAACT)。所用工具的变化范围从主观评估到客观测量,因此强调需要采取全面和个性化的方法。
The use of validated tools to evaluate the nutritional status of the cancer patient provides guaranteed precision and reliability in their nutritional evaluation, ensuring that the information is accurate and reflects the patient\'s situation. The aim of this study was to identify the valid and reliable instruments in the evaluation of the nutritional status of cancer patients with a diagnosis of solid tumor undergoing antineoplastic treatment (chemotherapy and/or
immunotherapy). A scoping
review was conducted to search for original articles published in scientific journals in English, Spanish, or Portuguese in the past five years. In order to identify potentially relevant documents, searches were performed in the following databases: SCOPUS, WOS, CINAHL, MEDLINE, BVS, and PUBMED. DECS-MeSH descriptors and Boolean operators were used. In addition, the Arksey and O\'Malley protocol, the Joanne Briggs Institute (JBI) method, and the flow chart of the Preferred Information Elements for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, known as PRISMA, were followed. The initial search strategy identified a total of 164 references, which were examined successively, leaving a final selection of ten studies. It was found that the most used instrument for nutritional evaluation was the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA). Other questionnaires also stood out such as the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS 2002), and the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT). The variation in the tools used ranges from subjective assessments to objective measurements, thus underlining the need for a comprehensive and individualized approach.