• 文章类型: Journal Article
    常规进行远端胃切除术(DG)和淋巴结清扫术治疗胃癌。在这个荟萃分析中,我们提供了腹腔镜DG(LDG)和机器人DG(RDG)的围手术期和肿瘤学结局的最新概述,以比较DG患者的安全性和总体结局.使用MEDLINE进行了广泛的搜索,EMBASE,PubMed,WebofScience,从数据库建立到2023年6月,Cochrane中央对照试验登记册用于比较RDG和LDG的随机临床试验。主要结果是手术结果,术后恢复,并发症,切除的充分性,和长期生存。我们确定了20项研究,评估5,447例患者(1,968例和3,479例接受RDG和LDG治疗的患者,分别)。我们观察到两组在近端切缘方面无显著差异,解剖的淋巴结数量,主要并发症,吻合部位渗漏,时间到了第一次排气,和住院时间。RDG组手术时间较长(P<0.00001),出血较少(P=0.0001),远端切除边缘较长(P=0.02),较早的口服时间(P=0.02),总体并发症较少(P=0.004),且费用高于LDG组(P<0.0001)。由于可接受的并发症和根治性切除的可能性,RDG是改善LDG的有前途的方法。更长的手术时间和更高的成本不应该阻止研究人员探索机器人手术的新应用。
    Distal gastrectomy (DG) with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer is routinely performed. In this meta-analysis, we present an updated overview of the perioperative and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic DG (LDG) and robotic DG (RDG) to compare their safety and overall outcomes in patients undergoing DG. An extensive search was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from the establishment of the database to June 2023 for randomized clinical trials comparing RDG and LDG. The primary outcome was operative results, postoperative recovery, complications, adequacy of resection, and long-term survival. We identified twenty studies, evaluating 5,447 patients (1,968 and 3,479 patients treated with RDG and LDG, respectively). We observed no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the proximal resection margin, number of dissected lymph nodes, major complications, anastomosis site leakage, time to first flatus, and length of hospital stay. The RDG group had a longer operative time (P < 0.00001), lesser bleeding (P = 0.0001), longer distal resection margin (P = 0.02), earlier time to oral intake (P = 0.02), fewer overall complications (P = 0.004), and higher costs (P < 0.0001) than the LDG group. RDG is a promising approach for improving LDG owing to acceptable complications and the possibility of radical resection. Longer operative times and higher costs should not prevent researchers from exploring new applications of robotic surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于其快速进展到晚期和高度转移特性,胃癌(GC)是最具侵袭性的恶性肿瘤之一,也是全球癌症相关死亡的第四大原因。转移过程包括局部侵袭,转移开始,在遥远的地方移民,和逃避免疫反应。肿瘤生长涉及与免疫反应相关的抑制信号的激活,也被称为免疫检查点,包括PD-1/PD-L1(程序性死亡1/程序性死亡配体1),CTLA-4(细胞毒性T细胞抗原4),TIGIT(具有Ig和ITIM结构域的T细胞免疫受体),和其他人。免疫检查点分子(ICPM)是调节先天和适应性免疫应答的蛋白质。虽然它们在免疫细胞上的表达很突出,主要是抗原呈递细胞(APC)和其他类型的细胞,它们也在肿瘤细胞上表达。受体与配体的结合对于抑制或刺激免疫细胞至关重要,这是癌症免疫疗法的一个极其重要的方面。这篇叙述性综述探讨了免疫治疗,关注GC中的ICPM和免疫检查点抑制剂。我们还总结了当前正在评估ICPM作为GC治疗靶标的临床试验。
    Due to its rapid progression to advanced stages and highly metastatic properties, gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The metastatic process includes local invasion, metastasis initiation, migration with colonisation at distant sites, and evasion of the immune response. Tumour growth involves the activation of inhibitory signals associated with the immune response, also known as immune checkpoints, including PD-1/PD-L1 (programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1), CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T cell antigen 4), TIGIT (T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains), and others. Immune checkpoint molecules (ICPMs) are proteins that modulate the innate and adaptive immune responses. While their expression is prominent on immune cells, mainly antigen-presenting cells (APC) and other types of cells, they are also expressed on tumour cells. The engagement of the receptor by the ligand is crucial for inhibiting or stimulating the immune cell, which is an extremely important aspect of cancer immunotherapy. This narrative review explores immunotherapy, focusing on ICPMs and immune checkpoint inhibitors in GC. We also summarise the current clinical trials that are evaluating ICPMs as a target for GC treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    脑膜癌病(LC)是实体瘤中罕见的转移部位,由于致残症状和治疗方案的缺乏,它与不良预后有关。这种情况在胃癌(GC)中并不常见。我们介绍了一例偶然诊断为局部淋巴结阴性GC的患者的原发性LC表现。我们还进行了文献综述,并讨论了诊断和治疗挑战。总之,来自GC的LC代表具有戏剧性预后的罕见病症。它的诊断可能非常具有挑战性。多学科方法似乎是从GC管理LC的最佳策略。
    Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is a rare site of metastasis in solid tumors, and it is associated with poor prognosis due to disabling symptoms and a scarcity of treatment options. This condition is an uncommon entity in gastric cancer (GC). We present a case of primary LC manifestation in a patient with an incidental diagnosis of localized node-negative GC. We additionally perform a literature review and discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. In conclusion, LC from GC represents a rare condition with a dramatic prognosis. Its diagnosis might be very challenging. A multidisciplinary approach appears to be the best strategy for the management of LC from GC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗的胃癌(GC)患者中,血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)的预后相关性尚不清楚。这项荟萃分析旨在确定PLR在该特定患者队列中的预后影响。
    我们搜索了PubMed,科克伦图书馆,CNKI,和EMBASE数据库,包括截至2023年9月发表的文献,研究PLR对接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的胃癌患者的预后影响.结局指标包括总生存期(OS),无进展生存期(PFS),客观反应率(ORR),疾病控制率(DCR)。
    从包括948名合格患者的七篇文章中选择了9项研究。结果显示,PLR升高和OS降低与无进展生存期(PFS)之间存在显著相关性(OS:HR1.67,95%CI1.39-2.00,p<0.001;PFS:HR1.51,95%CI1.29-1.76,p<0.001)。进行亚组分析以验证结果的稳健性。此外,对四项研究的荟萃分析,这些研究调查了胃癌(GC)患者的PLR与客观缓解率/疾病控制率(ORR/DCR)之间的相关性,PLR与ORR/DCR之间无显著相关性(ORR:RR=1.01,p=0.960;DCR:RR=0.96,p=0.319)。
    这项荟萃分析表明,接受ICI治疗的GC患者PLR升高与OS和PFS恶化显著相关。因此,PLR可以作为接受ICIs的GC患者治疗后预后指标。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来评估这些发现的可靠性。
    https://inplasy.com/,标识符INPLASY2023120103。
    UNASSIGNED: The prognostic relevance of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in gastric cancer (GC) patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the prognostic impact of PLR in this specific patient cohort.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and EMBASE databases, including literature published up to September 2023, to investigate the prognostic implications of PLR in patients with gastric cancer undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Outcome measures encompassed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rates (DCR).
    UNASSIGNED: Nine studies from seven articles comprising 948 eligible patients were selected. The results revealed a significant correlation between elevated PLR and poorer OS and progression-free survival (PFS) (OS: HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.39-2.00, p < 0.001; PFS: HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.29-1.76, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses were performed to validate the robustness of the results. Moreover, a meta-analysis of four studies investigating the correlation between the PLR in gastric cancer (GC) patients and the objective response rate/disease control rate (ORR/DCR), showed no significant association between the PLR and ORR/DCR (ORR: RR = 1.01, p = 0.960; DCR: RR = 0.96, p = 0.319).
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis indicates that elevated PLR in GC patients undergoing ICI treatment is significantly linked to worse OS and PFS. Therefore, PLR can serve as a prognostic indicator of post-treatment outcomes in patients with GC receiving ICIs. Further prospective studies are required to assess the reliability of these findings.
    UNASSIGNED: https://inplasy.com/, identifier INPLASY2023120103.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:总结老年胃癌患者术前虚弱危险因素的现有证据。
    方法:我们全面搜索了CNKI,万方,VIP,CBM,PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,术前文章和CINAHL数据库中老年胃癌患者虚弱的危险因素。搜索是从图书馆建造之时到2024年1月27日进行的,没有语言限制。纳入研究的质量由纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和医疗保健研究和质量工具机构进行评级。
    结果:共纳入20项研究,包括16项队列研究和4项横断面研究,总样本量为51,717人。荟萃分析的结果表明,年龄,白蛋白,血红蛋白,癌症III-IV期,Charlson合并症指数评分≥3,东部肿瘤协作组评分>2,美国麻醉医师协会评分>2,吸烟,营养风险,高中或以上学历,睡眠障碍是老年胃癌患者术前虚弱发生的主要影响因素。其中,高中以上学历是保护因素。
    结论:我们的研究为老年胃癌患者术前虚弱的危险因素提供了有效的证据,并告知临床医护人员采取有针对性的干预措施。
    OBJECTIVE: To summarize the available evidence on risk factors for preoperative frailty in older gastric cancer patients.
    METHODS: We comprehensively searched the CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases for preoperative articles on risk factors for frailty in older gastric cancer patients. The search was conducted from the time of construction of the library to January 27, 2024, with no language restrictions. The quality of the included studies was rated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality tool.
    RESULTS: A total of 20 studies were included, including 16 cohort studies and 4 cross-sectional studies, with a total sample size of 51,717 individuals. The results of the meta-analysis showed that age, albumin, hemoglobin, cancer stage III-IV, Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥ 3, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score > 2, American Society of Anesthesiologists score > 2, smoking, nutritional risk, high school degree or above, and sleep disorders are the main influencing factors for the occurrence of preoperative frailty in older gastric cancer patients. Among them, high school degree or above was a protective factor.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides valid evidence of risk factors for preoperative frailty in older patients with gastric cancer and informs clinical healthcare professionals to make targeted interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    富含AT的相互作用结构域1(ARID1A)是在胃肠道肿瘤中具有重要作用的关键基因,其编码称为BAF250a或SMARCF1的蛋白质,这是SWI/SNF(SWItch/蔗糖不可发酵)染色质重塑复合物的组成部分。该复合物通过修饰染色质的结构以影响DNA的可及性来调节基因表达。已在各种胃肠道癌症中鉴定出ARID1A的突变,包括结直肠,胃,和胰腺癌。这些突变有可能破坏正常的SWI/SNF复合物功能,导致基因表达异常,并可能导致这些恶性肿瘤的发生和发展。ARID1A突变在胃癌中相对常见,特别是在特定的腺癌亚型中。此外,这种突变在特定的分子亚型中更常见,例如微卫星稳定(MSS)癌症和具有弥漫性组织学亚型的癌症。了解GC中ARID1A突变的存在和意义对于定制个性化治疗策略和评估预后至关重要。特别是考虑到它们在预测患者对包括免疫疗法在内的新型治疗策略的反应方面的潜力,聚(ADP)核糖聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂,哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白(mTOR)抑制剂,zeste2多梳抑制复合物2亚基(EZH2)抑制剂的增强剂。
    AT-rich interaction domain 1 (ARID1A) is a pivotal gene with a significant role in gastrointestinal tumors which encodes a protein referred to as BAF250a or SMARCF1, an integral component of the SWI/SNF (SWItch/sucrose non-fermentable) chromatin remodeling complex. This complex is instrumental in regulating gene expression by modifying the structure of chromatin to affect the accessibility of DNA. Mutations in ARID1A have been identified in various gastrointestinal cancers, including colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancers. These mutations have the potential to disrupt normal SWI/SNF complex function, resulting in aberrant gene expression and potentially contributing to the initiation and progression of these malignancies. ARID1A mutations are relatively common in gastric cancer, particularly in specific adenocarcinoma subtypes. Moreover, such mutations are more frequently observed in specific molecular subtypes, such as microsatellite stable (MSS) cancers and those with a diffuse histological subtype. Understanding the presence and implications of ARID1A mutations in GC is of paramount importance for tailoring personalized treatment strategies and assessing prognosis, particularly given their potential in predicting patient response to novel treatment strategies including immunotherapy, poly(ADP) ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, and enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit (EZH2) inhibitors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:加压腹膜内气溶胶化学疗法(PIPAC)是一种新兴的技术,可通过加压气溶胶将化学疗法直接输送到腹膜。其越来越多的关注源于其在治疗腹膜癌(PC)起源于各种原发性肿瘤的有效性,胃癌(GC)是最常见的。本研究旨在系统评价PIPAC对胃癌腹膜转移(GCPM)的治疗作用。方法:系统评价和荟萃分析遵循PRISMA2020指南,搜索Pubmed,WebofScience,和SCOPUS数据库。相对风险和平均差异的荟萃分析比较了接受一次或两次PIPAC治疗的患者与完成三次或更多次PIPAC治疗的患者,评估各种结果。结果:18项研究进行了定性分析,四个进行了定量分析。接受三次或更多次PIPAC手术的患者住院时间较短(MD=-1.2;95CI(-1.9;-0.5);p<0.001),组织病理学反应率较高(RR=1.77,95CI1.08;2.90;p=0.023),并显著改善总生存期(MD=6.0;95CI4.2;7.8;p<0.001)。其他结果没有显着差异。结论:PIPAC在精心挑选的患者中显示出疗效,在不延长住院时间的情况下提高组织病理学应答率和总生存期。这项研究强调了随机对照试验和精确选择标准的必要性,以完善PIPAC在临床实践中的实施。
    Background: Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an emerging technique for delivering chemotherapy directly to the peritoneum via a pressurized aerosol. Its growing attention stems from its effectiveness in treating peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) originating from various primary tumors, with gastric cancer (GC) being among the most prevalent. This study aimed to systematically investigate PIPAC\'s therapeutic role in gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis (GCPM). Methods: The systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching Pubmed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases. The meta-analysis of relative risks and mean differences compared patients undergoing one or two PIPAC sessions with those completing three or more, assessing various outcomes. Results: Eighteen studies underwent qualitative analysis, and four underwent quantitative analysis. Patients with three or more PIPAC procedures had shorter hospital stays (MD = -1.2; 95%CI (-1.9; -0.5); p < 0.001), higher rates of histopathological response (RR = 1.77, 95%CI 1.08; 2.90; p = 0.023), and significantly improved overall survival (MD = 6.0; 95%CI 4.2; 7.8; p < 0.001). Other outcomes showed no significant differences. Conclusions: PIPAC demonstrated efficacy in carefully selected patients, enhancing histopathologic response rates and overall survival without prolonging hospital stays. This study underscores the necessity for randomized controlled trials and precise selection criteria to refine PIPAC\'s implementation in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脾动脉假性动脉瘤(SAP)破裂是危及生命的疾病,通常由创伤和胰腺炎引起。SAP经常破裂进入腹腔,很少进入胃。
    方法:一名没有既往病史的70岁男性因短暂失去知觉和便便被送往我们的急救中心。入院后,患者血流动力学不稳定,上腹部明显扩张。入院时进行的对比增强计算机断层扫描显示胃溃疡底部存在脾动脉瘤(SAP)。根据临床情况和探索性试验的证据,我们对破裂的SAP胃出血进行了初步诊断,并进行了紧急剖腹手术.术中发现发现有大量腹腔内血肿破裂到胃中。当我们从破裂区域对胃前壁进行胃切开术时,我们发现暴露的SAP搏动性出血;因此,SAP从胃内结扎,用纱布填入溃疡。我们暂时关闭胃壁并进行开腹管理,作为损伤控制手术(DCS)的方法。入学的第三天,进行了全胃切除术和脾切除术,第二天进行了重建手术。胃样本的组织病理学研究表明存在中分化的管状腺癌。由于在破裂部位没有发现恶性细胞,我们的结论是,胃破裂是由腹腔内血肿引起的内压升高引起的。
    结论:我们成功治疗了一例因胃癌侵袭引起的SAP胃内破裂患者,伴有胃破裂,通过执行DCS。治疗胃出血时,必须考虑这些罕见的原因,并应根据出血原因设计适当的诊断和治疗策略。
    BACKGROUND: The rupture of splenic artery pseudoaneurysm (SAP) is life-threatening disease, often caused by trauma and pancreatitis. SAPs often rupture into the abdominal cavity and rarely into the stomach.
    METHODS: A 70-year-old male with no previous medical history was transported to our emergency center with transient loss of consciousness and tarry stools. After admission, the patient become hemodynamically unstable and his upper abdomen became markedly distended. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography performed on admission showed the presence of a splenic artery aneurysm (SAP) at the bottom of a gastric ulcer. Based on the clinical picture and evidence on explorative tests, we established a preliminary diagnosis of ruptured SAP bleeding into the stomach and performed emergency laparotomy. Intraoperative findings revealed the presence of a large intra-abdominal hematoma that had ruptured into the stomach. When we performed gastrotomy at the anterior wall of the stomach from the ruptured area, we found pulsatile bleeding from the exposed SAP; therefore, the SAP was ligated from inside of the stomach, with gauze packing into the ulcer. We temporarily closed the stomach wall and performed open abdomen management, as a damage control surgery (DCS) approach. On the third day of admission, total gastrectomy and splenectomy were performed, and reconstruction surgery was performed the next day. Histopathological studies of the stomach samples indicated the presence of moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. Since no malignant cells were found at the rupture site, we concluded that the gastric rupture was caused by increased internal pressure due to the intra-abdominal hematoma.
    CONCLUSIONS: We successfully treated a patient with intragastric rupture of the SAP that was caused by gastric cancer invasion, accompanied by gastric rupture, by performing DCS. When treating gastric bleeding, such rare causes must be considered and appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic strategies should be designed according to the cause of bleeding.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    食管癌(EC),特别是食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC),具有全球发病率高、预后差的特点,需要新的治疗方法,如免疫疗法。这篇综述探讨了免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)对ESCC的影响。特别是PD-1/PD-L1和CTLA-4抑制剂。我们的文献检索,跨数据库进行,包括PubMed,WebofScience,和EMBASE,从2010年1月到2023年12月,旨在确定进步,挑战,以及ESCC免疫治疗的未来使用方向。
    我们提供了对评估ICIs作为单药和联合化疗的疗效的临床试验的详细分析。放射治疗,和局部晚期ESCC的靶向治疗。我们的发现强调了ICIs提供的显著生存益处,尽管不同患者人群的疗效不同,强调需要精确的生物标志物来定制治疗策略。
    将免疫治疗整合到ESCC治疗范式中代表了一个重大转变,改善生存结果。未来的研究应该集中在优化联合疗法和新型免疫治疗剂。结合遗传和肿瘤微环境分析,以提高患者的选择和治疗效果。
    UNASSIGNED: Esophageal cancer (EC), particularly esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), is characterized by high incidence and poor prognosis worldwide, necessitating novel therapeutic approaches like immunotherapy. This review explores the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on ESCC, especially focusing on PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors. Our literature search, conducted across databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE, from January 2010 to December 2023, aimed at identifying advancements, challenges, and future directions in the use of immunotherapy for ESCC.
    UNASSIGNED: We provide a detailed analysis of clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of ICIs as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy for locally advanced ESCC. Our findings highlight the significant survival benefits offered by ICIs, albeit with varying efficacy across patient populations, emphasizing the need for precise biomarkers to tailor treatment strategies.
    UNASSIGNED: The integration of immunotherapy into the ESCC treatment paradigm represents a significant shift, improving survival outcomes. Future research should focus on optimizing combination therapies and novel immunotherapeutic agents, incorporating genetic and tumor microenvironment analyses to enhance patient selection and treatment efficacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阐明HIF1A与胃癌患者临床病理特征的相关性。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析.我们搜索了PubMed,Embase和WebofScience用于GC和HIF1A的研究,涵盖1月31日之前发表的研究,2022年。我们根据高和低HIF1A蛋白水平计算了临床特征的比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。我们使用随机效应和固定效应荟萃分析方法来确定OR的平均效应大小,并用τ2,I2和Q值评估出版物异质性。此外,我们生成漏斗图来检查发表偏倚.我们的荟萃分析包括20篇出版物,其中3416例GC患者,以评估高或低HIF1A表达与临床特征之间的关联。HIF1A阳性表达与T分期进展显著相关(OR:2.46;95%CI1.81-3.36;P<0.01),TNM分期进展(OR:2.50;95%CI1.61-3.87;P<0.01),淋巴结转移(OR:2.06;95%CI1.44~2.94;P<0.01),未分化状态(OR:1.83;95%CI1.45-2.32;P<0.01),M期进展(OR:2.34;95%CI1.46-3.77;P<0.01),Borrmann分期进展(OR:1.48;95%CI1.02-2.15;P=0.04),肿瘤大小较大(OR:1.27;95%CI1.06-1.52;P<0.01),血管侵犯(OR:1.94;95%CI1.38-2.72;P<0.01),在我们的荟萃分析中,血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)蛋白表达更高(OR:2.61;95%CI1.79-3.80;P<0.01)。高表达HIF1A蛋白的GC患者可能容易发生肿瘤进展,低分化GC细胞类型,和高VEGF表达。
    To elucidate the correlation of HIF1A with clinicopathologic characteristics in patients with gastric cancer (GC), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for studies on GC and HIF1A, covering studies published until January 31st, 2022. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for clinical characteristics based on high and low HIF1A protein levels. We used random-effects and fixed-effects meta-analysis methods to determine mean effect sizes of ORs and evaluated publication heterogeneity with τ2, I2, and Q values. Additionally, we generated funnel plots to inspect publication bias. Our meta-analysis included 20 publications with 3416 GC patients to estimate the association between high or low HIF1A expression and clinical characteristics. Positive HIF1A expression was significantly associated with T stage progression (OR: 2.46; 95% CI 1.81-3.36; P < 0.01), TNM stage progression (OR: 2.50; 95% CI 1.61-3.87; P < 0.01), lymph node metastasis (OR: 2.06; 95% CI 1.44-2.94; P < 0.01), undifferentiated status (OR: 1.83; 95% CI 1.45-2.32; P < 0.01), M stage progression (OR: 2.34; 95% CI 1.46-3.77; P < 0.01), Borrmann stage progression (OR: 1.48; 95% CI 1.02-2.15; P = 0.04), larger tumor size (OR: 1.27; 95% CI 1.06-1.52; P < 0.01), vascular invasion (OR: 1.94; 95% CI 1.38-2.72; P < 0.01), and higher vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) protein expression (OR: 2.61; 95% CI 1.79-3.80; P < 0.01) in our meta-analysis. GC Patients highly expressing HIF1A protein might be prone to tumor progression, poorly differentiated GC cell types, and a high VEGF expression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号