UNASSIGNED: In 2023 the American Urological Association (AUA) requested an Update Literature Review (ULR) to incorporate new evidence generated since the 2019 publication of this Guideline. The resulting 2024 Guideline Amendment addresses updated recommendations to provide guidance for the care of patients with incontinence after prostate treatment (IPT).
UNASSIGNED: In 2023, the IPT Guideline was updated through the AUA amendment process in which newly published literature is reviewed and integrated into previously published guidelines. There were 82 studies of interest initially identified in preliminary abstract review. Following full-text review, 17 studies met inclusion criteria and ultimately informed the statements of interest.
UNASSIGNED: The Panel developed evidence- and consensus-based statements based on an updated review to provide guidance for the care of patients who experience IPT. These updates are detailed herein.
UNASSIGNED: As prostate treatments are refined, a decreasing incidence of incontinence is anticipated. This Guideline will require further review as the diagnostic and treatment options for patients with IPT continue to evolve.

OBJECTIVE: There is no standardized regimen for follow-up after radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BC). To address this gap, we conducted a multicenter study involving urologist members from the European Association of Urology (EAU) bladder cancer guideline panels. Our objective was to identify consistent post-RC follow-up strategies and develop a practice-based framework based on expert opinion.
METHODS: We surveyed 27 urologist members of the EAU guideline panels for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer using a pre-tested questionnaire with dichotomous responses. The survey inquired about follow-up strategies after RC and the use of risk-adapted strategies. Consistency was defined as >75% affirmative responses for follow-up practices commencing 3 mo after RC. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.
UNASSIGNED: We received responses from 96% of the panel members, who provided data from 21 European hospitals. Risk-adapted follow-up is used in 53% of hospitals, with uniform criteria for high-risk (at least ≥pT3 or pN+) and low-risk ([y]pT0/a/1N0) cases. In the absence of agreement for risk-based follow up, a non-risk-adapted framework for follow-up was developed. Higher conformity was observed within the initial 3 yr, followed by a decline in subsequent follow-up. Follow-up was most frequent during the first year, including patient assessments, physical examinations, and laboratory tests. Computed tomography of the chest and abdomen/pelvis was the most common imaging modality, initially at least biannually, and then annually from years 2 to 5. There was a lack of consistency for continuing follow-up beyond 10 yr after RC.
CONCLUSIONS: This practice-based post-RC follow-up framework developed by EAU bladder cancer experts may serve as a valuable guide for urologists in the absence of prospective randomized studies.
RESULTS: We asked urologists from the EAU bladder cancer guideline panels about their patient follow-up after surgical removal of the bladder for bladder cancer. We found that although urologists have varying approaches, there are also common follow-up practices across the panel. We created a practical follow-up framework that could be useful for urologists in their day-to-day practice.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) treatments are associated with a detrimental impact on bone health (BH) and body composition. However, the evidence on these issues is limited and contradictory. This consensus, based on the Delphi method, provides further guidance on BH management in PCa.
METHODS: In May 2023, a survey made up of 37 questions and 74 statements was developed by a group of oncologists and endocrinologists with expertise in PCa and BH. In June 2023, 67 selected Italian experts, belonging to the Italian scientific societies Italian Association of Medical Oncology and Italian Network for Research in Urologic-Oncology (Meet-URO), were invited by e-mail to complete it, rating their strength of agreement with each statement on a 5-point scale. An agreement ≥75% defined the statement as accepted.
RESULTS: In non-metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa, the panel agreed that androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone implies sufficient fracture risk to warrant antifracture therapy with bone-targeting agents (BTAs) for cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) prevention (79%). Therefore, no consensus was reached (48%) for the treatment with BTAs of patients receiving short-term ADT (<6 months). All patients receiving active treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa (75%), non-metastatic castration-resistant PCa (89%) and metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) without bone metastases (84%) should be treated with BTAs at the doses and schedule for CTIBL prevention. All mCRPC patients with bone metastasis should be treated with BTAs to reduce skeletal-related events (94%). In all settings, the panel analyzed the type and timing of treatments and examinations to carry out for BH monitoring. The panel agreed on the higher risk of sarcopenic obesity of these patients and its correlation with bone fragility.
CONCLUSIONS: This consensus highlights areas lacking major agreement, like non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients undergoing short-term ADT. Evaluation of these issues in prospective clinical trials and identification of early biomarkers of bone loss are particularly urgent.

UNASSIGNED: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affects countless women worldwide. Given ChatGPT\'s rising ubiquity, patients may turn to the platform for SUI advice. Our objective was to evaluate the quality of clinical information about SUI from the ChatGPT platform.
UNASSIGNED: The most-asked patient questions regarding SUI were derived from patient materials from societal websites and forums, and queried using ChatGPT 3.5. The responses from ChatGPT were compiled into a survey and disseminated to 3 AUA guideline committee members who developed the Surgical Management of Female SUI guidelines. They were asked to grade responses on reliability, understandability, quality, and actionability using DISCERN and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool standardized questionnaires. Accuracy was assessed with a 4-point Likert scale and readability using Flesch Reading Ease score.
UNASSIGNED: The overall material was rated as moderate to moderately high quality (DISCERN = 3.73/5) with potentially important but no serious shortcomings. Reliability and quality were reported to be 63% and 75%. Understandability was 89%, actionability 18%, and accuracy 88%. All question domains were rated at moderate or better. Actionability was poor in all domains. Every response was \"hard to read\" translating to a college graduate reading level.
UNASSIGNED: The urologic community should critically evaluate this platform\'s output if patients are to use it for adjunctive medical guidance. AUA committee members, who are experts in the field, rate ChatGPT-produced responses on SUI as moderate to moderately high quality, moderate reliability, excellent understandability, and poor actionability utilizing standardized questionnaires. The reading level of the material was advanced, which is an area of potential improvement to make generated responses more comprehensible.

Transurethral procedures such as direct vision internal urethrotomy and urethral dilation have been the traditional treatments for urethral strictures. However, transurethral procedures are associated with high recurrence rates, resulting in many uncured cases and prompting major international urological societies to recommend urethroplasty as the standard treatment owing to its high success rate. In contrast, many Japanese general urologists have little doubts about treating urethral strictures with transurethral treatment. Therefore, urethral stricture treatments in Japan are not in line with those used in other countries. To address this, the Trauma, Emergency Medicine, and Reconstruction Subcommittee of the Japanese Urological Association has developed guidelines to offer standardized treatment protocols for urethral stricture, based on international evidence and tailored to Japan\'s medical landscape. These guidelines target patients with a clinically suspected urethral stricture and are intended for urologists and general practitioners involved in its diagnosis and treatment. Following the Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual 2020, the committee identified eight critical clinical issues and formulated eight clinical questions using the \"patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome\" format. A comprehensive literature search was conducted. For six clinical questions addressed by the existing guidelines or systematic reviews, the level of evidence was determined by qualitative systematic reviews. Quantitative systematic reviews and meta-analyses were performed for the two unique clinical questions. The recommendation grades were determined using the Delphi method and consensus by the committee. These guidelines will be useful to clinicians in daily practice, especially those involved in the care of urethral strictures.

BACKGROUND: Understanding antibiotic prescribing for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) could help to optimize management. However, data on uUTI treatment patterns in the European Union are scarce. We used real-world data to evaluate adherence to antibiotic prescribing guidelines for femalepatients with uUTI in Germany.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used anonymized German statutory health insurance claims data from the Wissenschaftliches Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Gesundheitssystemforschung from January 2013 to December 2019. Patients were female, aged ≥ 12 years, with an index uUTI diagnosis. Patient characteristics and treating physician specialties were examined overall and in sub-cohorts for recommended/non-recommended treatment (based on initial therapy adherence to German uUTI treatment guidelines) and optimal/sub-optimal outcome (based on a prescription of different antibiotics or a urinary tract infection-related episode).
RESULTS: Overall, 144,645 uUTI cases in 124,971 patients were analyzed; 51,230 (35.4%) and 93,415 (64.6%) cases were assigned to the recommended/non-recommended treatment sub-cohorts, respectively. Clinically meaningful differences in age and comorbidities were observed between these sub-cohorts. Most cases had an optimal outcome (n = 122,823; 84.9%); of these, a higher proportion received antibiotics that were recommended but not as first-choice versus first-choice therapies as their initial treatment (58.6% vs. 35.3%). In the sub-optimal outcome cohort, 49.1% received antibiotics that were recommended but not as first-choice and 41.1% received first-choice therapies as their initial treatment. Most uUTIs were treated by general practitioners (GPs; 82.3%), followed by gynecologists (13.3%), and urologists (6.8%). Notably, 64.5% of initial therapy prescriptions filled by gynecologists and 32.1% by GPs were first-choice antibiotics.
CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of prescribed treatments for the initial uUTI episode were not recommended by German uUTI guidelines as first-choice antibiotics. Prescribing adherence varied by physician specialty; specialists showed greater adherence to treatment guidelines versus GPs. This study provides a novel and multi-dimensional picture of uUTI treatment in Germany.
Uncomplicated urinary tract infections are one of the most common infections in women. Doctors around the world use different types of antibiotics to treat people with uncomplicated urinary tract infections. We performed this study to find out more about how doctors in Germany use antibiotics to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections. We looked at health records from female patients (aged 12+) in Germany. Overall, we examined 144,645 records. We found that around one in ten women use antibiotics to treat an uncomplicated urinary tract infection every year. We then checked to see if the doctors were giving people the right type of antibiotic, the right dose, and the right length of course. To do this, we checked against guidelines that were written by experts in Germany. We found that only one in three patients (35%) received treatment that met the guidelines. We also looked to see what differences there were between different types of doctors. For example, if general practitioners (family doctors) used different antibiotics to specialist doctors in hospitals. Four out of five patients (82%) were treated by general practitioners. We found that specialists were more likely to stick to the guidelines than general practitioners. Finally, we looked at how many patients recovered well after their first course of antibiotics. More than four out of five patients (80%) recovered well. Interestingly, more than half of the patients who had a good recovery (59%) received antibiotics that were not recommended by the guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: Recent clinical trials have shown improvement in progression-free survival in men with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) treated with combination poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) and novel hormonal therapy (NHT). Regulatory bodies in the USA, Canada, Europe, and Japan have recently approved this combination therapy for mPC. Common adverse events (AEs) include fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and anemia. Nuanced AE management guidance for these combinations is lacking. The panel objective was to develop expert consensus on AE management in patients with mPC treated with the combination PARPi + NHT.
METHODS: The RAND/University of California Los Angeles modified Delphi Panel method was used. AEs were defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Twelve experts (seven medical oncologists, one advanced practice registered nurse, three urologists, and one patient advocate) reviewed the relevant literature; independently rated initial AE management options for the agent suspected of causing the AE for 419 patient scenarios on a 1-9 scale; discussed areas of agreement (AoAs) and disagreement (AoDs) at a March 2023 meeting; and repeated these ratings following the meeting. Second-round ratings formed the basis of guidelines.
UNASSIGNED: AoDs decreased from 41% to 21% between the first and second round ratings, with agreement on at least one management strategy for every AE. AoAs included the following: (1) continue therapy with symptomatic treatment for patients with mild AEs; (2) for moderate fatigue, recommend nonpharmacologic treatment, hold treatment temporarily, and restart at a reduced dose when symptoms resolve; (3) for severe nausea or any degree of vomiting where symptomatic treatment fails, hold treatment temporarily and restart at a reduced dose when symptoms resolve; and (4) for hemoglobin 7.1-8.0 g/dl and symptoms of anemia, hold treatment temporarily and restart at a reduced dose after red blood cell transfusion.
CONCLUSIONS: This expert guidance can support management of AEs in patients with mPC receiving combination PARPi + NHT therapy.
RESULTS: A panel of experts developed guidelines for adverse event (AE) management in patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated with a combination of poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors and novel hormonal therapy. For mild AEs, continuation of cancer therapy along with symptomatic treatment is recommended. For moderate or severe AEs, cancer therapy should be stopped temporarily and restarted at the same or a reduced dose when AE resolves.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies noted varied adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), but studies are yet to quantify adherence to American Urological Association BPH guidelines. We studied guideline adherence in the context of a new quality improvement collaborative (QIC).
METHODS: Data were collected as part of a statewide QIC. Medical records for patients undergoing select CPT codes from January 2020 to May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed for adherence to selected BPH guidelines.
RESULTS: Most men were treated with transurethral resection of the prostate. Notably, 53.3% of men completed an IPSS and 52.3% had a urinalysis. 4.7% were counseled on behavioral modifications, 15.0% on medical therapy, and 100% on procedural options. For management, 79.4% were taking alpha-blockers and 59.8% were taking a 5-ARI. For evaluation, 57% had a PVR, 63.6% had prostate size measurement, 37.4% had uroflowmetry, and 12.3% were counseled about treatment failure. Postoperatively, 51.6% completed an IPSS, 57% had a PVR, 6.50% had uroflowmetry, 50.6% stopped their alpha-blocker, and 75.0% stopped their 5-ARI.
CONCLUSIONS: There was adherence to preoperative testing recommendations, but patient counseling was lacking in the initial work-up and preoperative evaluation. We will convey the data to key stakeholders, expand data collection to other institutions, and devise an improvement implementation plan.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the voting results of Japanese urologists with the global panel at the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2022.
METHODS: Among the 198 questions discussed at the APCCC 2022, the APCCC-JAPAN 2023 focused on 14 key questions related to the management of advanced prostate cancer with insufficient high-level evidence based on their relevance to the Japanese cohort. A panel of six prostate cancer experts addressed these 14 questions and presented the latest evidence to Japanese urologists who voted on-site using a web-based system. The results were compared with those of APCCC 2022.
RESULTS: This study found significant differences in the voting results between Japanese urologists and the global panel regarding several crucial issues related to advanced prostate cancer management. These differences were those observed in treatment preferences, monitoring strategies, and treatment choices in specific clinical scenarios. These findings highlight the need for a nuanced approach tailored to the unique challenges with considerations of the Japanese healthcare environment.
CONCLUSIONS: APCCC-JAPAN 2023 provides valuable insights into the current clinical issues surrounding the management of advanced prostate cancer in Japan. The partial divergence in the consensus between Japanese urologists and the global panel underscores the importance of a context-specific approach. The results of this study provide practical guidance for physicians facing complex challenges and should be used to inform decision-making in the management of advanced prostate cancer.

Over a decade ago, the United States Preventive Services Taskforce (USPSTF) recommended against prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer in all men, which considerably influenced prostate cancer screening policies worldwide after that. Consequently, the world has seen increasing numbers of advanced stages and prostate cancer deaths, which later led the USPSTF to withdraw its initial statement. Meanwhile, the European Union has elaborated a directive to address the problem of implementing prostate cancer screening in \"Europe\'s Beating Cancer Plan\". In Switzerland, concerned urologists formed an open Swiss Prostate Cancer Screening Group to improve the early detection of prostate cancer. On the 20th of September 2023, during the annual general assembly of the Swiss Society of Urology (SGU/SSU) in Lausanne, members positively voted for a stepwise approach to evaluate the feasibility of implementing organised prostate cancer screening programs in Switzerland. The following article will summarise the events and scientific advances in the last decade during which evidence and promising additional modalities to complement PSA-based prostate cancer screening have emerged. It also aims to provide an overview of contemporary strategies and their potential harms and benefits.