目的:越来越多的证据表明,癌症患者使用抗生素(ATB)可能与患者预后相关。有趣的是,这些药物的使用在结直肠癌(CRC)患者手术中并不少见;然而,它们在临床中的预后价值从未得到解决。
方法:手术过程中使用ATB的数据,包括累积每日剂量(cDDD)和类别数,被收集。低cDDD和高cDDD亚组之间以及≤4和>4类别的亚组之间的临床数据差异。此外,比较了这些亚组和特定类别之间的无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS).最后,Cox比例风险模型用于验证结局的危险因素.
结果:类别的数量,而不是cDDD,是DFS(P=0.043)和OS(P=0.039)的显著预测因子。患有梗阻的患者更有可能患有高cDDD,而老年患者更可能有多个类别。低cDDD和高cDDD亚组患者的DFS(logrank=1.36,P=0.244)和OS(logrank=0.40,P=0.528)差异无统计学意义。而与>4类患者相比,≤4类患者的DFS(logrank=9.92,P=0.002)和OS(logrank=8.30,P=0.004)均较好.具体来说,喹诺酮类药物的使用对生存有害(DFS:logrank=3.67,P=0.055;OS:logrank=5.10,P=0.024),而大环内酯类药物的使用有利于生存(DFS:logrank=12.26,P<0.001;OS:logrank=9.77,P=0.002)。最后,分类数是DFS(HR=2.05,95%CI:1.35~3.11,P=0.001)和OS(HR=1.82,95%CI:1.14~2.90,P=0.012)的独立危险因素.
结论:I-III期CRC患者手术期间ATB的cDDD与预后无关;然而,多个类别或特定类别的患者的生存率可能较差.这些结果表明,在临床中为这些患者选择ATB时应特别谨慎。
OBJECTIVE: Accumulating evidence indicates that the use of antibiotics (ATBs) in cancer patients is potentially correlated with patient prognosis. Interestingly, the use of these agents is not uncommon in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients during surgery; however, their prognostic value in the clinic has never been addressed.
METHODS: Data on ATB use during surgery, including the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) and the number of categories, were collected. Differences in the clinical data between the low and high cDDD subgroups and between subgroups with ≤ 4 and >4 categories. Additionally, the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among these subgroups and the specific categories were compared. Finally, a Cox proportional hazard model was used to validate the risk factors for the outcome.
RESULTS: The number of categories, rather than the cDDD, was a significant predictor of both DFS (P = 0.043) and OS (P = 0.039). Patients with obstruction are more likely to have a high cDDD, whereas older patients are more likely to have multiple categories. There were no significant differences in the DFS (log rank = 1.36, P = 0.244) or OS (log rank = 0.40, P = 0.528) between patients in the low- and high-cDDD subgroups, whereas patients with ≤ 4 categories had superior DFS (log rank = 9.92, P = 0.002) and OS (log rank = 8.30, P = 0.004) compared with those with >4 categories. Specifically, the use of quinolones was harmful to survival (DFS: log rank = 3.67, P = 0.055; OS: log rank = 5.10, P = 0.024), whereas the use of macrolides was beneficial to survival (DFS: log rank = 12.26, P < 0.001; OS: log rank = 9.77, P = 0.002). Finally, the number of categories was identified as an independent risk factor for both DFS (HR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.35-3.11, P = 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.14-2.90, P = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: The cDDD of ATBs during surgery in stage I-III CRC patients did not correlate with outcome; however, patients in multiple categories or a specific category are likely to have inferior survival. These results suggest that particular caution should be taken when selecting ATBs for these patients in the clinic.