• 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:管腔A乳腺癌患者腋窝转移淋巴结中免疫微环境的改变尚不清楚。
    方法:将纳入的腔ABCs的术后组织分为五类:N0期(PL1)的原发性BC病变,在N1期(PL2)的原发性BC病变,在N0BC(LN1)期腋窝淋巴结阴性,在N1BC期(LN2)腋窝淋巴结阴性,和淋巴结阳性在N1期BC(LN3)。阳性免疫标志物的频率(CD4,CD8,PD1,PD-L1,T细胞免疫球蛋白和粘蛋白结构域3(TIM3),和叉头盒蛋白3(Foxp3))在上述组织中通过AKOYA蛋白石Polaris7颜色手动IHC检测试剂盒定量。
    结果:本研究共纳入50例女性管腔ABC患者。在这些患者中,23人患有N1期疾病,27人患有N0期疾病。与PL2亚组相比,PD-1阳性细胞的频率在PL1亚组中显著增加,无论是在基质还是肿瘤内水平(P值<0.05)。LN1和LN2中CD8T细胞的频率均显着大于LN3(P值<0.05)。LN1中TIM3+T细胞频率显著年夜于PL1(P值<0.05)。LN2和LN3组的CD8+TIM3+T细胞频率均显著高于PL2组(P值<0.05)。LN1组CD4+Foxp3+T细胞频率明显高于PL1组(P值<0.05),LN3和PL2均相同(P值<0.05)。
    结论:CD8+PD1+的频率增加,CD8+TIM3+和CD4+Foxp3+T细胞可能抑制管腔A乳腺癌患者腋窝转移淋巴结的免疫微环境,进而促进淋巴结转移。
    BACKGROUND: The alteration of the immune microenvironment in the axillary metastatic lymph nodes of luminal A breast cancer patients is still unclear.
    METHODS: Postsurgical tissues from the enrolled luminal A BCs were divided into five categories: primary BC lesion at stage N0 (PL1), primary BC lesion at stage N1 (PL2), negative axillary lymph node at stage N0 BC (LN1), negative axillary lymph node at stage N1 BC (LN2), and positive axillary lymph node at stage N1 BC (LN3). The frequencies of positive immune markers (CD4, CD8, PD1, PD-L1, T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3 (TIM3), and forkhead box protein 3 (Foxp3)) in the above tissues were quantified by AKOYA Opal Polaris 7 Color Manual IHC Detection Kit.
    RESULTS: A total of 50 female patients with luminal A BC were enrolled in this study. Among these patients, 23 had stage N1 disease, and 27 had stage N0 disease. Compared with that in the PL2 subgroup, the frequency of PD-1-positive cells was significantly greater in the PL1 subgroup, whether at the stromal or intratumoral level (P value < 0.05). Both the frequency of CD8 + T cells in LN1 and that in LN2 were significantly greater than that in LN3 (P value < 0.05). The frequency of TIM3 + T cells in LN1 was significantly greater than that in PL1 (P value < 0.05). The frequency of CD8 + TIM3 + T cells was significantly greater in both the LN2 and LN3 groups than in the PL2 group (P value < 0.05). The frequency of CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells was significantly greater in LN1 than in PL1 (P value < 0.05), which was the same for both LN3 and PL2 (P value < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Increased frequencies of CD8 + PD1+, CD8 + TIM3 + and CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells might inhibit the immune microenvironment of axillary metastatic lymph nodes in luminal A breast cancer patients and subsequently promote lymph node metastasis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:计算机断层扫描(CT)引导的活检(CTB)程序通常用于辅助诊断肺结节(PNs)。当CTB表现为非恶性病变时,正确确定假阴性结果至关重要。因此,本研究旨在构建一个预测模型,用于预测接受非恶性结果的PNsCTB患者的假阴性病例.
    方法:2016年1月至2020年12月,对来自两个中心的连续患者进行回顾性检查,这些患者在接受PNs评估时接受了基于CTB的非恶性病理结果。一个训练队列被用来发现预测假阴性结果的特征,允许开发预测模型。其余患者用于建立测试队列,以验证预测模型的准确性。
    结果:训练队列包括102例根据CTB显示非恶性病理结果的PNs患者。每位患者都接受了单个结节的CTB。在这些患者中,85和17名患者,分别,显示真阴性和假阴性PN。通过单变量和多变量分析,更高的标准化最大吸收值(SUVmax,P=0.001)和基于CTB的可疑恶性细胞的发现(P=0.043)被鉴定为预测假阴性结果。在此之后,这两个预测因子被组合以产生预测模型。该模型实现了0.945的接收器工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。此外,其敏感性和特异性值分别为88.2%和87.1%。测试队列包括62名患者,每个人都有一个PN。当使用开发的模型来评估这个测试队列时,这产生了0.851的AUC值。
    结论:在PNs患者中,本文开发的预测模型证明了对识别基于CTB的假阴性非恶性病理数据的良好诊断有效性.
    BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy (CTB) procedures are commonly used to aid in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules (PNs). When CTB findings indicate a non-malignant lesion, it is critical to correctly determine false-negative results. Therefore, the current study was designed to construct a predictive model for predicting false-negative cases among patients receiving CTB for PNs who receive non-malignant results.
    METHODS: From January 2016 to December 2020, consecutive patients from two centers who received CTB-based non-malignant pathology results while undergoing evaluation for PNs were examined retrospectively. A training cohort was used to discover characteristics that predicted false negative results, allowing the development of a predictive model. The remaining patients were used to establish a testing cohort that served to validate predictive model accuracy.
    RESULTS: The training cohort included 102 patients with PNs who showed non-malignant pathology results based on CTB. Each patient underwent CTB for a single nodule. Among these patients, 85 and 17 patients, respectively, showed true negative and false negative PNs. Through univariate and multivariate analyses, higher standardized maximum uptake values (SUVmax, P = 0.001) and CTB-based findings of suspected malignant cells (P = 0.043) were identified as being predictive of false negative results. Following that, these two predictors were combined to produce a predictive model. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.945. Furthermore, it demonstrated sensitivity and specificity values of 88.2% and 87.1% respectively. The testing cohort included 62 patients, each of whom had a single PN. When the developed model was used to evaluate this testing cohort, this yielded an AUC value of 0.851.
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PNs, the predictive model developed herein demonstrated good diagnostic effectiveness for identifying false-negative CTB-based non-malignant pathology data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:建立并验证预测肾切除术后临床T1/2(cT1/2)透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)患者无复发生存期(RFS)的列线图。
    方法:纳入2017-2020年天津医科大学第二医院1289例cT1/2ccRCC患者的临床病理和生存资料。Cox回归分析用于确定训练和验证队列中902和387例ccRCC患者的独立危险因素。分别,并构造列线图。通过校准图评估列线图的性能,随时间变化的接收机工作特性(ROC)曲线,C指数(一致性指数),和决策曲线分析(DCA)。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线评价不同复发风险患者发生RFS的概率。
    结果:年龄,肿瘤大小,手术方法,Fuhrman年级,pT3a上升阶段被确定为RFS的独立预测因子。训练队列中3年和5年RFSROC曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.791和0.835,验证队列中的0.860和0.880。DCA和校准图证明了列线图在预测3年和5年RFS方面的最佳应用和出色的准确性。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示了训练和验证队列中三个风险组之间RFS的显着差异。临床上,开发的列线图为风险分层提供了更精确的工具,实现量身定制的术后管理和监测策略,最终旨在改善患者预后。
    结论:我们开发了一个列线图,用于预测cT1/2ccRCC患者肾切除术后的RFS,具有很高的准确性。此列线图的临床实施可以显着提高临床决策,改善患者预后,优化ccRCC管理资源利用。
    OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a nomogram for predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) for clinical T1/2 (cT1/2) clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients after nephrectomy.
    METHODS: Clinicopathological and survival data from 1289 cT1/2 ccRCC patients treated at the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University between 2017 and 2020 were included. Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors in 902 and 387 ccRCC patients in the training and validation cohorts, respectively, and construct the nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was assessed through calibration plots, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, C-index (concordance-index), and decision curve analysis (DCA). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate the probability of RFS in patients with different recurrence risks.
    RESULTS: Age, tumor size, surgical approach, Fuhrman grade, and pT3a upstage were identified as independent predictors of RFS. The area under the curve (AUC) for the 3-year and 5-year RFS ROC curves were 0.791 and 0.835 in the training cohort, and 0.860 and 0.880 in the validation cohort. The DCA and calibration plots demonstrated the optimal application and excellent accuracy of the nomogram for predicting 3-year and 5-year RFS. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed significant differences in RFS among the three risk groups in both the training and validation cohorts. Clinically, the developed nomogram provides a more precise tool for risk stratification, enabling tailored postoperative management and surveillance strategies, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: We developed a nomogram for predicting RFS in cT1/2 ccRCC patients after nephrectomy with high accuracy. The clinical implementation of this nomogram can significantly enhance clinical decision-making, leading to improved patient outcomes and optimized resource utilization in the management of ccRCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:越来越多的证据表明,癌症患者使用抗生素(ATB)可能与患者预后相关。有趣的是,这些药物的使用在结直肠癌(CRC)患者手术中并不少见;然而,它们在临床中的预后价值从未得到解决。
    方法:手术过程中使用ATB的数据,包括累积每日剂量(cDDD)和类别数,被收集。低cDDD和高cDDD亚组之间以及≤4和>4类别的亚组之间的临床数据差异。此外,比较了这些亚组和特定类别之间的无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS).最后,Cox比例风险模型用于验证结局的危险因素.
    结果:类别的数量,而不是cDDD,是DFS(P=0.043)和OS(P=0.039)的显著预测因子。患有梗阻的患者更有可能患有高cDDD,而老年患者更可能有多个类别。低cDDD和高cDDD亚组患者的DFS(logrank=1.36,P=0.244)和OS(logrank=0.40,P=0.528)差异无统计学意义。而与>4类患者相比,≤4类患者的DFS(logrank=9.92,P=0.002)和OS(logrank=8.30,P=0.004)均较好.具体来说,喹诺酮类药物的使用对生存有害(DFS:logrank=3.67,P=0.055;OS:logrank=5.10,P=0.024),而大环内酯类药物的使用有利于生存(DFS:logrank=12.26,P<0.001;OS:logrank=9.77,P=0.002)。最后,分类数是DFS(HR=2.05,95%CI:1.35~3.11,P=0.001)和OS(HR=1.82,95%CI:1.14~2.90,P=0.012)的独立危险因素.
    结论:I-III期CRC患者手术期间ATB的cDDD与预后无关;然而,多个类别或特定类别的患者的生存率可能较差.这些结果表明,在临床中为这些患者选择ATB时应特别谨慎。
    OBJECTIVE: Accumulating evidence indicates that the use of antibiotics (ATBs) in cancer patients is potentially correlated with patient prognosis. Interestingly, the use of these agents is not uncommon in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients during surgery; however, their prognostic value in the clinic has never been addressed.
    METHODS: Data on ATB use during surgery, including the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) and the number of categories, were collected. Differences in the clinical data between the low and high cDDD subgroups and between subgroups with ≤ 4 and >4 categories. Additionally, the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among these subgroups and the specific categories were compared. Finally, a Cox proportional hazard model was used to validate the risk factors for the outcome.
    RESULTS: The number of categories, rather than the cDDD, was a significant predictor of both DFS (P = 0.043) and OS (P = 0.039). Patients with obstruction are more likely to have a high cDDD, whereas older patients are more likely to have multiple categories. There were no significant differences in the DFS (log rank = 1.36, P = 0.244) or OS (log rank = 0.40, P = 0.528) between patients in the low- and high-cDDD subgroups, whereas patients with ≤ 4 categories had superior DFS (log rank = 9.92, P = 0.002) and OS (log rank = 8.30, P = 0.004) compared with those with >4 categories. Specifically, the use of quinolones was harmful to survival (DFS: log rank = 3.67, P = 0.055; OS: log rank = 5.10, P = 0.024), whereas the use of macrolides was beneficial to survival (DFS: log rank = 12.26, P < 0.001; OS: log rank = 9.77, P = 0.002). Finally, the number of categories was identified as an independent risk factor for both DFS (HR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.35-3.11, P = 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.14-2.90, P = 0.012).
    CONCLUSIONS: The cDDD of ATBs during surgery in stage I-III CRC patients did not correlate with outcome; however, patients in multiple categories or a specific category are likely to have inferior survival. These results suggest that particular caution should be taken when selecting ATBs for these patients in the clinic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究旨在评估非侵入性血清生物标志物的诊断能力,以预测肝纤维化分期和评估乙型肝炎的进展
    方法:我们招募了433例慢性HBV感染患者,有完整的医学数据可用于研究,谁接受了经皮肝活检。使用改良的METAVIR评分评估纤维化程度。通过具有95%置信区间的接受操作者特征曲线(AUROC)下的面积来评估非侵入性血清生物标志物的预测值。
    结果:肝纤维化进展期的男性比例相对较大,肝硬化分期患者的平均年龄比非肝硬化分期患者大。我们找到了PLT,GGT,ALP,TB,在我们的队列中,FIB4和GPR与肝纤维化显着相关。GGT显示在区分肝硬化(F4)与非肝硬化阶段(F1-3)的敏感性为71.4%和特异性为76.7%,AUROC为0.775(95CI0.711-0.840)。GPR区分肝硬化(F4)与非肝硬化阶段(F1-3)的AUROC为0.794(95CI0.734-0.853),但灵敏度较低,为59.2%。此外,GGT,FIB4和GPR可以区分慢性乙型肝炎患者的晚期纤维化(F3-4)与非晚期纤维化(F1-2),AUROC为0.723(95CI0.668-0.777),0.729(95CI0.675-0.782),和0.760(95CI:0.709-0.811)。
    结论:GGT是区分肝硬化(F4)和非肝硬化阶段(F1-3)的更好的生物标志物,而GPR是识别慢性乙型肝炎患者的晚期纤维化(F3-4)和非晚期纤维化(F1-2)的更好的生物标志物。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic abilities of the non-invasive serum biomarkers to predict liver fibrosis staging and evaluate the progress of hepatitis B.
    METHODS: We enrolled 433 patients with chronic HBV infection had complete medical data available for the study, who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy. The extent of fibrosis was assessed using the modified METAVIR score. The predictive values of the non-invasive serum biomarkers were evaluated by the areas under the receiving operator characteristics curves (AUROCs) with 95% confidence intervals.
    RESULTS: The proportion of males with progressive stages of liver fibrosis was relatively larger, and the average age of patients with cirrhosis stages is older than the non-cirrhotic stages. We found PLT, GGT, ALP, TB, FIB4 and GPR to be significantly associated with liver fibrosis in our cohort. GGT showed a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 76.7% in distinguishing cirrhosis (F4) from non-cirrhotic stages (F1-3), with an AUROC of 0.775 (95%CI 0.711-0.840).The AUROCs of the GPR in distinguishing cirrhosis (F4) from non-cirrhotic stages (F1-3) was 0.794 (95%CI 0.734-0.853), but it had a lower sensitivity of 59.2%. Additionally, GGT, FIB4, and GPR could differentiate advanced fibrosis (F3-4) from non-advanced fibrosis (F1-2) among individuals with chronic hepatitis B, with AUROCs of 0.723 (95%CI 0.668-0.777), 0.729 (95%CI 0.675-0.782), and 0.760 (95%CI: 0.709-0.811) respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: GGT was a better biomarker to distinguish cirrhosis (F4) from non-cirrhotic stages (F1-3), while GPR was a better biomarker to identify advanced fibrosis (F3-4) and non-advanced fibrosis (F1-2) in patients with chronic hepatitis B.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:非转移性淋巴结阳性结肠腺癌患者(NMLP-CA)的第8期AJCCTNM分期仅根据淋巴结状态进行,与肿瘤沉积物(TD)的阳性无关。本研究使用机器学习和Cox回归来预测NMLP-CA中肿瘤沉积物的预后价值。
    方法:来自SEER注册(2010-2019)的患者数据用于基于通过多变量Cox回归确定的预后因素开发CSS列线图。通过C指数评估模型性能,动态校准,和施密德得分。Shapley加性解释(SHAP)用于解释所选模型。
    结果:该研究包括16,548名NMLP-CA患者,随机7:3进入训练(n=11,584)和测试(n=4964)组。多变量Cox分析确定了TD,年龄,婚姻状况,主站点,grade,pT阶段,和pN分期作为癌症特异性生存率(CSS)的预后。在测试集中,梯度增强机(GBM)模型实现了CSS预测的最佳C指数(0.733),而Cox模型和GAMBoost模型优化了动态校准(6.473)和Schmid评分(0.285),分别。TD在模型中排名前三,随着时间的推移,预测意义越来越大。
    结论:在NMLP-CA患者中,阳性肿瘤沉积状态赋予更差的预后。肿瘤沉积可赋予更高的TNM分期。此外,TD可以在分期系统中发挥更重要的作用。
    BACKGROUND: The 8th AJCC TNM staging for non-metastatic lymph node-positive colon adenocarcinoma patients(NMLP-CA) stages solely by lymph node status, irrespective of the positivity of tumor deposits (TD). This study uses machine learning and Cox regression to predict the prognostic value of tumor deposits in NMLP-CA.
    METHODS: Patient data from the SEER registry (2010-2019) was used to develop CSS nomograms based on prognostic factors identified via multivariate Cox regression. Model performance was evaluated by c-index, dynamic calibration, and Schmid score. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were used to explain the selected models.
    RESULTS: The study included 16,548 NMLP-CA patients, randomized 7:3 into training (n = 11,584) and test (n = 4964) sets. Multivariate Cox analysis identified TD, age, marital status, primary site, grade, pT stage, and pN stage as prognostic for cancer-specific survival (CSS). In the test set, the gradient boosting machine (GBM) model achieved the best C-index (0.733) for CSS prediction, while the Cox model and GAMBoost model optimized dynamic calibration(6.473) and Schmid score (0.285), respectively. TD ranked among the top 3 most important features in the models, with increasing predictive significance over time.
    CONCLUSIONS: Positive tumor deposit status confers worse prognosis in NMLP-CA patients. Tumor deposits may confer higher TNM staging. Furthermore, TD could play a more significant role in the staging system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在开发和验证机器学习模型,以预测增殖性狼疮性肾炎(PLN)的发生,当肾活检不可行或不安全时,提供可靠的诊断选择。
    本研究回顾性分析了2011年至2021年在四川大学华西医院接受肾活检的SLE和肾脏受累患者的临床和实验室数据。我们将70%的患者随机分配到一个训练队列,其余30%随机分配到一个测试队列。在训练队列上构建了各种机器学习模型,包括广义线性模型(例如,逻辑回归,最小绝对收缩和选择运算符,岭回归,和弹性网),支持向量机(线性和径向基核函数),和决策树模型(例如,经典决策树,条件推理树,和随机森林)。使用ROC曲线评估诊断性能,校正曲线,和DCA为两个队列。此外,比较了不同的机器学习模型,以识别关键和共享特征,旨在筛选潜在的PLN诊断标志物。
    涉及1312名LN患者,对780例PLN/NPLN病例进行了分析。随机分为训练组(547例)和试验组(233例)。我们在训练组中开发了9种机器学习模型。七个模型在测试队列中表现出出色的辨别能力,随机森林模型的判别能力最高(AUC:0.880,95%置信区间(CI):0.835~0.926)。Logistic回归具有最佳的校准,而随机森林表现出最大的临床净效益。通过比较各种模型的特征,我们证实了传统指标如抗dsDNA抗体的功效,补码水平,血清肌酐,和尿红细胞和白细胞在预测和区分PLN中的作用。此外,我们发现了以前有争议或未充分利用的指标的潜在价值,如血清氯化物,中性粒细胞百分比,血清胱抑素C,血细胞比容,尿液pH值,血常规红细胞,和免疫球蛋白M在预测PLN中的作用。
    这项研究为纳入更广泛的生物标志物以诊断和预测PLN提供了全面的视角。此外,它为无法进行肾活检的SLE患者提供了理想的非侵入性诊断工具。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to develop and validate machine learning models to predict proliferative lupus nephritis (PLN) occurrence, offering a reliable diagnostic alternative when renal biopsy is not feasible or safe.
    UNASSIGNED: This study retrospectively analyzed clinical and laboratory data from patients diagnosed with SLE and renal involvement who underwent renal biopsy at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between 2011 and 2021. We randomly assigned 70% of the patients to a training cohort and the remaining 30% to a test cohort. Various machine learning models were constructed on the training cohort, including generalized linear models (e.g., logistic regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, ridge regression, and elastic net), support vector machines (linear and radial basis kernel functions), and decision tree models (e.g., classical decision tree, conditional inference tree, and random forest). Diagnostic performance was evaluated using ROC curves, calibration curves, and DCA for both cohorts. Furthermore, different machine learning models were compared to identify key and shared features, aiming to screen for potential PLN diagnostic markers.
    UNASSIGNED: Involving 1312 LN patients, with 780 PLN/NPLN cases analyzed. They were randomly divided into a training group (547 cases) and a testing group (233 cases). we developed nine machine learning models in the training group. Seven models demonstrated excellent discriminatory abilities in the testing cohort, random forest model showed the highest discriminatory ability (AUC: 0.880, 95% confidence interval(CI): 0.835-0.926). Logistic regression had the best calibration, while random forest exhibited the greatest clinical net benefit. By comparing features across various models, we confirmed the efficacy of traditional indicators like anti-dsDNA antibodies, complement levels, serum creatinine, and urinary red and white blood cells in predicting and distinguishing PLN. Additionally, we uncovered the potential value of previously controversial or underutilized indicators such as serum chloride, neutrophil percentage, serum cystatin C, hematocrit, urinary pH, blood routine red blood cells, and immunoglobulin M in predicting PLN.
    UNASSIGNED: This study provides a comprehensive perspective on incorporating a broader range of biomarkers for diagnosing and predicting PLN. Additionally, it offers an ideal non-invasive diagnostic tool for SLE patients unable to undergo renal biopsy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在I期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者中,保留生育力手术(FSS)与根治性手术(RS)相比的肿瘤学结果仍然是一个争论的话题。我们评估了接受FSS和RS的I期EOC患者预后的风险比(RR)。
    方法:我们对PubMed进行了系统搜索,WebofScience,和Embase为截至2023年11月29日发表的文章。不涉及外科手术或包括怀孕患者的研究被排除。我们计算了无病生存率的RR,总生存率,和复发率。使用非随机干预研究中的Cochrane偏差风险(ROBINS-I)工具评估纳入研究的质量。荟萃分析在PROSPERO(CRD42024546460)上注册。
    结果:从5,529篇潜在相关文章中,我们确定了83篇文章进行初步筛选,并在最终的荟萃分析中包括12篇文章,包括2,906例上皮性卵巢癌患者。两组无病生存率无显著差异(RR[95%置信区间{CI}],0.90[0.51,1.58];P=0.71),总生存率(RR[95%CI],0.74[0.53,1.03];P=0.07),和复发率(RR[95%CI],1.10[0.69,1.76];P=0.68)。在敏感性分析中,仅在总生存率方面观察到显著差异(排除前:RR[95%CI],0.74[0.53-1.03],P=0.07;排除后:RR[95%CI],0.70[0.50-0.99];P=0.04)。
    结论:这是第一个也是唯一一个比较无病生存率的个体患者数据的荟萃分析,总生存率,早期上皮性卵巢癌患者行FSS和RS的复发率。FSS与RS相似的无病生存率和复发风险。我们假设FSS组的总生存率下降不能归因于上皮性卵巢癌的远处转移。
    BACKGROUND: The oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) compared to radical surgery (RS) in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remain a subject of debate. We evaluated the risk ratios (RRs) for outcomes in patients with stage I EOC who underwent FSS versus RS.
    METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for articles published up to November 29, 2023. Studies that did not involve surgical procedures or included pregnant patients were excluded. We calculated the RRs for disease-free survival, overall survival, and recurrence rate. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. The meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024546460).
    RESULTS: From the 5,529 potentially relevant articles, we identified 83 articles for initial screening and included 12 articles in the final meta-analysis, encompassing 2,906 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. There were no significant differences between the two groups in disease-free survival (RR [95% confidence interval {CI}], 0.90 [0.51, 1.58]; P = 0.71), overall survival (RR [95% CI], 0.74 [0.53, 1.03]; P = 0.07), and recurrence rate (RR [95% CI], 1.10 [0.69, 1.76]; P = 0.68). In sensitivity analyses, the significant difference was observed only for overall survival (before exclusion: RR [95% CI], 0.74 [0.53-1.03], P = 0.07; after exclusion: RR [95% CI], 0.70 [0.50-0.99]; P = 0.04).
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first and only individual patient data meta-analysis comparing disease-free survival, overall survival, and recurrence rate of patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing FSS and RS. FSS was associated with similar disease-free survival and risk of recurrence as RS. We hypothesized that the decreased overall survival in the FSS group could not be attributed to distant metastases from epithelial ovarian cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管有证据支持新型血小板与白蛋白比值(PAR)与多种恶性肿瘤的生存率高度相关,其在鼻咽癌(NPC)中的预后相关性仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在研究NPC中PAR与总生存期(OS)之间的联系,并基于该生物标志物建立预测模型。
    方法:我们回顾性地收集了一个由858例接受同步放化疗(CCRT)的NPC患者组成的队列。利用最大选择的对数秩方法,我们确定了PAR的最佳截止点。随后,采用单变量和多变量Cox比例风险模型来辨别与OS显著相关的因素,并构建预测列线图.Further,我们对列线图的预测准确性进行了严格的独立验证。
    结果:最佳PAR阈值确定为4.47,有效地将NPC患者分为两个预后不同的亚组(风险比[HR]=0.53;95%置信区间[CI]:0.28-0.98,P=0.042)。使用多变量分析的结果制定了预测列线图,显示年龄超过45岁,T级,N级,和PAR评分作为操作系统的独立预测因子。列线图展示了操作系统值得称赞的预测能力,C指数为0.69(95%CI:0.64-0.75),超越传统暂存系统的性能,C指数为0.56(95%CI:0.65-0.74)。
    结论:在接受CCRT的NPC患者中,新的营养炎症生物标志物PAR成为一种有前途的,成本效益高,容易接近,非侵入性,和潜在有价值的预后预测指标。包含PAR评分的列线图的预测功效超过了常规分期方法的预测功效,从而表明其在这种临床环境中作为增强的预后工具的潜力。
    BACKGROUND: Despite evidence supporting the high correlation of the novel platelet-to-albumin ratio (PAR) with survival in diverse malignancies, its prognostic relevance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains underexplored. This study aimed to examine the link between PAR and overall survival (OS) in NPC and to establish a predictive model based on this biomarker.
    METHODS: We retrospectively assembled a cohort consisting of 858 NPC patients who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Utilizing the maximally selected log-rank method, we ascertained the optimal cut-off point for the PAR. Subsequently, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were employed to discern factors significantly associated with OS and to construct a predictive nomogram. Further, we subjected the nomogram\'s predictive accuracy to rigorous independent validation.
    RESULTS: The discriminative optimal PAR threshold was determined to be 4.47, effectively stratifying NPC patients into two prognostically distinct subgroups (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28-0.98, P = 0.042). A predictive nomogram was formulated using the results from multivariate analysis, which revealed age greater than 45 years, T stage, N stage, and PAR score as independent predictors of OS. The nomogram demonstrated a commendable predictive capability for OS, with a C-index of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.64-0.75), surpassing the performance of the conventional staging system, which had a C-index of 0.56 (95% CI: 0.65-0.74).
    CONCLUSIONS: In the context of NPC patients undergoing CCRT, the novel nutritional-inflammatory biomarker PAR emerges as a promising, cost-efficient, easily accessible, non-invasive, and potentially valuable predictor of prognosis. The predictive efficacy of the nomogram incorporating the PAR score exceeded that of the conventional staging approach, thereby indicating its potential as an enhanced prognostic tool in this clinical setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号