Richter transformation (RT) represents the development of intrusive lymphoma in individuals previously or concurrently diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and is characterized by lymph node enlargement. However, cases involving extra-nodal organ involvement as the first symptom are rare. There are no reports of RT with breast lesions as the first symptom. Nonspecific and atypical clinical manifestations represent key challenges in the accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment of RT. This case report describes an elderly female patient who presented with breast lesions as the first RT symptom. The patient was admitted with a painless mass in the left breast. Examination revealed multiple lymphadenopathies and abnormally high white blood cell levels. The patient was diagnosed with CLL after hematological tests, assessments of bone marrow morphology, and tissue biopsy. Mammography and B-ultrasonography showed solid space-occupying lesions (BI-RADS category 5) in the left breast. Initially, the patient declined a breast biopsy and was therefore prescribed ibrupotinib treatment, which showed limited efficacy. A needle biopsy of the affected breast indicated the presence of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Based on auxiliary and pathological examinations and medical history, the final diagnosis was RT with breast involvement. Zanubrutinib with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone treatment provided initial control; however, the treatment strategy required adjustment because of the patient\'s fluctuating condition. The current status of the patient is marked as stable, showing an overall achievement of partial alleviation. The patient is in the process of receiving follow-up treatment. We also performed a comprehensive literature review on RT, with particular emphasis on its biological paradigm, prognosis implications, existing therapeutic approaches, and emerging directions in treatment modalities.

As treatments with BTK inhibitors and BCL2 inhibitors have replaced the use of chemoimmunotherapy in CLL in both first-line and relapsed patients, it becomes critical to rationalize their use and exploit the full potential of each drug. Despite their proven, robust, and manifest efficacy, BTKis and BCL2is fail to provide long-term disease control in some categories of patients, and to date this is an unmet clinical need that is critical to recognize and address. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating new treatment algorithms and new molecules to progressively thin this population. In this review for each category of patients we explicate the different possible patterns of treatment sequencing based on currently available evidence, starting from the frontline to currently ongoing trials, in order to optimize therapies as much as possible.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) has different epidemiology in Chinese vs. Western patients, but there are few studies of CLL/SLL in large populations of Chinese patients. ALPINE is a global phase 3 trial investigating Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors zanubrutinib vs. ibrutinib to treat relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL/SLL. Here we report results from the subgroup of Chinese patients. Adults with R/R CLL/SLL were randomized 1:1 to receive zanubrutinib (160 mg twice-daily) or ibrutinib (420 mg once-daily) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Data were analyzed descriptively. Ninety patients were randomized in China (zanubrutinib, n = 47; ibrutinib, n = 43). Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups, with fewer male patients in the zanubrutinib vs. ibrutinib group (55.3% vs. 69.8%). Median age was 60.5 years, 11% had del(17p) mutation, and 32% had tumor protein 53 (TP53) mutation. With median 25.3 months follow-up, ORR was 80.9% with zanubrutinib vs. 72.1% with ibrutinib. PFS was improved with zanubrutinib vs. ibrutinib (HR = 0.34 [95% CI, 0.15, 0.77]), and the HR for OS was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.14, 1.50). Rates of Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 64.4% vs. 72.1%), AEs leading to discontinuation (6.4% vs. 14.0%), and serious TEAEs (35.6% vs. 51.2%) were lower with zanubrutinib vs. ibrutinib. Zanubrutinib demonstrated improved ORR, PFS, and OS vs. ibrutinib and a more favorable safety profile in patients with R/R CLL/SLL in China. These results are consistent with the full global population of ALPINE. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03734016, registered November 7, 2018.

Bruton\'s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of B-cell malignancies. They target BTK, a key effector in the B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathway, crucial for B-cell survival and proliferation. The first-in-class irreversible BTK inhibitor, ibrutinib, was approved for various B-cell malignancies but has limitations due to off-target effects. Second-generation inhibitors, such as acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib, offer improved selectivity and reduced side effects. However, resistance to BTK inhibitors, driven by BTK mutations, remains a challenge. Combinatorial therapies with PI3K inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, BH3 mimetics, and anti-CD20 antibodies show promise in overcoming resistance. Noncovalent BTK inhibitors and proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) are emerging strategies with potential to combat resistance. Overall, advancements in BTK-targeted therapies provide hope for improved outcomes in patients with B-cell malignancies and a promising avenue to address drug resistance. Further research is needed to optimize combination therapies and identify optimal treatment regimens.

In this editorial, we comment on the article by Wang et al. This manuscript explores the potential synergistic effects of combining zanubrutinib, a novel oral inhibitor of Bruton\'s tyrosine kinase, with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) as a therapeutic intervention for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). The study involves a retrospective analysis of 19 PCNSL patients, highlighting clinicopathological characteristics, treatment outcomes, and genomic biomarkers. The results indicate the combination\'s good tolerance and strong antitumor activity, with an 84.2% overall response rate. The authors emphasize the potential of zanubrutinib to modulate key genomic features of PCNSL, particularly mutations in myeloid differentiation primary response 88 and cluster of differentiation 79B. Furthermore, the study investigates the role of circulating tumor DNA in cerebrospinal fluid for disease surveillance and treatment response monitoring. In essence, the study provides valuable insights into the potential of combining zanubrutinib with HD-MTX as a frontline therapeutic regimen for PCNSL. The findings underscore the importance of exploring alternative treatment modalities and monitoring genomic and liquid biopsy markers to optimize patient outcomes. While the findings suggest promise, the study\'s limitations should be considered, and further research is needed to establish the clinical relevance of this therapeutic approach for PCNSL.

OBJECTIVE: Bruton\'s tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKIs), including first-generation ibrutinib, second-generation acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib, may be involved in the mechanisms of action related to adverse events (AEs) of the cardiovascular system. We aimed to characterize the cardiovascular AEs of BTKIs reported in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System, and to compare the cardiovascular risks of BTKIs.
METHODS: Across all indications of three FDA-approved BTKIs, primary suspect drugs were extracted over two periods: from January 2013 to December 2022 (after the approval of the first BTKI), and from January 2020 to December 2022 (all three BTKIs on the market). Disproportionality was measured by reporting odds ratios (RORs) and information components. Additional analyses were performed without incorporating patients with underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD).
RESULTS: A total of 10 353 cases included the uses of ibrutinib, acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib. Ibrutinib was significantly associated with 47 cardiovascular AEs. Acalabrutinib was associated with new signals, including cardiac failure (ROR = 1.82 [1.13-2.93]), pulmonary oedema (ROR = 2.15 [1.19-3.88]), ventricular extrasystoles (ROR = 5.18 [2.15-12.44]), heart rate irregular (ROR = 3.05 [1.53-6.11]), angina pectoris (ROR = 3.18 [1.71-5.91]) and cardiotoxicity (ROR = 25.22 [17.14-37.10]). In addition, cardiovascular events had an earlier onset in acalabrutinib users. Zanubrutinib was only associated with atrial fibrillation. Acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib had lower ROR values than ibrutinib. The AE signals were generally consistent between the population receiving and not receiving CVD medications.
CONCLUSIONS: Potential cardiovascular risks identified in this study were not clearly noted on the label of marketed acalabrutinib. Caution should be paid to the cardiovascular risks of BTKIs having been or being developed.

The treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the most frequent leukemia in adults, is constantly changing. CLL patients can be divided into three risk categories, based on their IGHV mutational status and the occurrence of TP53 disruption and/or complex karyotype. For the first-line treatment of low- and intermediate-risk CLL, both the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax plus obinutuzumab and the second generation BTK inhibitors (BTKi), namely acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib, are valuable and effective options. Conversely, venetoclax-based fixed duration therapies have not shown remarkable results in high-risk CLL patients, while continuous treatment with acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib displayed favorable outcomes, similar to those obtained in TP53 wild-type patients. The development of acquired resistance to pathway inhibitors is still a clinical challenge, and the optimal treatment sequencing of relapsed/refractory CLL is not completely established. Covalent BTKi-refractory patients should be treated with venetoclax plus rituximab, whereas venetoclax-refractory CLL may be treated with second generation BTKi in the case of early relapse, while venetoclax plus rituximab might be used if late relapse has occurred. On these grounds, here we provide an overview of the current state-of-the-art therapeutic algorithms for treatment-naïve patients, as well as for relapsed/refractory disease.

Bruton\'s Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitors have become one of the most vital drugs in the therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Inactivation of BTK disrupts the B-cell antigen receptor (BCR) signaling pathway, which leads to the inhibition of the proliferation and survival of CLL cells. BTK inhibitors (BTKi) are established as leading drugs in the treatment of both treatment-naïve (TN) and relapsed or refractory (R/R) CLL. Furthermore, BTKi demonstrate outstanding efficacy in high-risk CLL, including patients with chromosome 17p deletion, TP53 mutations, and unmutated status of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region (IGHV) gene. Ibrutinib is the first-in-class BTKi which has changed the treatment landscape of CLL. Over the last few years, novel, covalent (acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib), and non-covalent (pirtobrutinib) BTKi have been approved for the treatment of CLL. Unfortunately, continuous therapy with BTKi contributes to the acquisition of secondary resistance leading to clinical relapse. In recent years, it has been demonstrated that the predominant mechanisms of resistance to BTKi are mutations in BTK or phospholipase Cγ2 (PLCG2). Some differences in the mechanisms of resistance to covalent BTKi have been identified despite their similar mechanism of action. Moreover, novel mutations resulting in resistance to non-covalent BTKi have been recently suggested. This article summarizes the clinical efficacy and the latest data regarding resistance to all of the registered BTKi.

UNASSIGNED: This review evaluates zanubrutinib as a treatment option for adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Zanubrutinib, a covalent BTK (Bruton\'s tyrosine kinase) inhibitor, was recently approved by the US FDA based in part on head-to-head data demonstrating improved efficacy and safety compared to ibrutinib.
UNASSIGNED: The review discusses the efficacy, safety, and comparative advantages of zanubrutinib, highlighting its safety profile compared to other BTK inhibitors. It also addresses the unmet needs of current therapies in CLL/SLL and provides an overview of competitor compounds and ongoing research in BTK inhibition.
UNASSIGNED: Zanubrutinib, the first BTK inhibitor to demonstrate superior efficacy and safety compared to another BTK inhibitor in CLL, is likely to be widely adopted due to its high-quality data and ease of use. Looking ahead, pirtobrutinib, a novel non-covalent BTK inhibitor, has shown promise in heavily pretreated CLL patients, including those unresponsive to covalent inhibitors, with ongoing phase 3 trials comparing it against ibrutinib. The field is also exploring time-limited therapies like the combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax, with ongoing trials evaluating different combinations to optimize efficacy and minimize toxicity, indicating a promising future for combination therapies in CLL treatment.

To evaluate the effects of gene mutations on Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, zanubrutinib\'s effectiveness in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), we examined pooled data from four single-arm studies (BGB-3111-AU-003 [NCT02343120], BGB-3111-207 [NCT03145064], BGB-3111_GA101_Study_001 [NCT02569476], BGB-3111-213 [NCT03520920]; n = 121). Objective response rate (ORR) was higher, though not statistically significant, in patients with activated B-cell-like (ABC)- and unclassified DLBCL (42.9% [21/49]) versus those with germinal-center B-cell-like DLBCL (14.3% [1/7]; p = 0.15). Patients with CD79B mutations had better ORR (60%) versus patients with wild-type alleles (25.9%, p < 0.01). Higher TCL1A expression correlated with better zanubrutinib response (p = 0.03), longer progression-free survival (p = 0.01), and longer overall survival (p = 0.12). TCL1A expression was higher in ABC-DLBCL (p < 0.001) and MYD88/CD79B-mutated subtypes (p < 0.0001). Eighteen patients with high MYC/BCL-2 expression responded better to zanubrutinib (ORR = 61 vs. 29%, p = 0.02). Our results support assessing CD79B mutations, co-expressor DLBCL, and TCL1A expression status to identify patients with DLBCL who will benefit from zanubrutinib.