working alliance

工作联盟
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于心理干预的文化适应的研究表明,较高的适应水平与干预的较高效果大小有关。然而,不同适应水平的直接比较很少。
    这项研究使用了一种基于智能手机的自助计划,称为“一步一步”(阿尔巴尼亚语:Hap-pas-Hapi),用于治疗瑞士和德国说阿尔巴尼亚语的移民的心理困扰。文化适应的两个层面(即,表面与深层结构适应)进行了比较。我们假设深层结构适应将增强干预的接受度和有效性。
    我们进行了双臂,单盲随机对照试验。纳入标准是对阿尔巴尼亚语的良好掌握,年龄在18岁以上,心理困扰升高(凯斯勒心理困扰量表评分在15分以上)。主要结果指标是霍普金斯症状检查表的总分和至少完成三次(五次)的参与者人数。次要结果是全球功能,幸福,创伤后应激,和自我定义的问题。
    包括22名参与者,其中18人(8%)完成了后评估。在两种情况下,完成第三届会议的参与者人数相等,N=5(5%)和N=6(6%)。
    在这两种情况下,脱落率都很高,在接受干预措施方面没有发现组间差异.高退出率与其他逐步测试的试验相反。未来的研究应该检查影响招聘策略的文化因素,作为见解可能有助于降低临床试验参与者的辍学率。
    UNASSIGNED: Research on cultural adaptation of psychological interventions indicates that a higher level of adaptation is associated with a higher effect size of the intervention. However, direct comparisons of different levels of adaptations are scarce.
    UNASSIGNED: This study used a smartphone-based self-help programme called Step-by-Step (Albanian: Hap-pas-Hapi) for the treatment of psychological distress among Albanian-speaking immigrants in Switzerland and Germany. Two levels of cultural adaptation (i.e., surface vs. deep structure adaptation) were compared. We hypothesised that the deep structure adaptation would enhance the acceptance and efficacy of the intervention.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a two-arm, single-blind randomised controlled trial. Inclusion criteria were good command of the Albanian language, age above 18, and elevated psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale score above 15). Primary outcome measures were the total score of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist and the number of participants who completed at least three (out of five) sessions. Secondary outcomes were global functioning, well-being, post-traumatic stress, and self-defined problems.
    UNASSIGNED: Two-hundred-twenty-two participants were included, of which 18 (8%) completed the post-assessments. The number of participants who completed the third session was equal in both conditions, with N = 5 (5%) and N = 6 (6%) respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Drop-out rates were high in both conditions, and no group difference was found regarding the acceptance of the intervention. The high drop-out rate stands in contrast with other trials testing Step-by-Step. Future research should examine cultural factors impacting recruitment strategies, as insights could help to reduce participant drop-out rates in clinical trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由人-环境匹配理论获悉,这项初步研究检查了小组成员的治疗经验与其工作治疗背景(其他小组成员的汇总治疗经验)之间的契合度是否与他们在小组治疗中的动机水平相关,以治愈内在化的体重污名.
    我们研究了两种类型的成员内部和成员之间的群体凝聚力之间的关系,工作联盟,和动机。具体来说,我们利用参与者-合作伙伴相互依存模型来操作参与者的成员内部凝聚力和联盟(个人随时间的变化)和成员之间的凝聚力和联盟(个体差异)以及合作伙伴的成员内部凝聚力和联盟(上下文随时间的变化)和成员之间的凝聚力和联盟(上下文差异)对小组成员动机的影响。这项研究利用了参加三个在线体重污名心理治疗小组的26名成员的自我报告数据。
    对于内聚,结果表明,与小组中其他成员相比,在所有会议中报告低凝聚力的成员中,伴侣内部成员凝聚力和动机之间的关系更大。此外,认为小组会议比平均水平更有凝聚力的个人小组成员,报告说,在那次会议上增加了动力,对于平均认为自己的小组比其他小组成员凝聚力更低的成员来说,这种关系更强。最后,当其他组成员平均报告较低的组联盟时,会话级别的联盟与该会话中单个成员的动机更紧密地相关。
    这些发现强调了成员组适应在团体治疗中的重要性,以及个体成员和团体对彼此治疗结果的相互影响。
    UNASSIGNED: Informed by the person-environment fit theory, this preliminary study examined if a fit between a group member\'s treatment experience and their working therapy context (other group members\' aggregated treatment experiences) were related to their level of motivation within a group treatment for healing from internalized weight stigma.
    UNASSIGNED: We examined the relationship between two types of within-member and between-member\'s group cohesion, working alliance, and motivation. Specifically, we utilized the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model to operationalize the impact of actor\'s within-member cohesion and alliance (personal changes over time) and between-member cohesion and alliance (individual differences) as well as partner\'s within-member cohesion and alliance (contextual changes over time) and between-member cohesion and alliance (contextual differences) on group members\' motivation. This study utilized self-report data from 26 group members who participated in three online weight stigma psychotherapy groups.
    UNASSIGNED: For cohesion, results suggested that the relationship between partner within-member cohesion and motivation was larger for members who reported low cohesion across all the sessions compared to the other members of their group. Additionally, an individual group member who perceived a group session more cohesive than they did on average, reported increased motivation in that session, and this relationship was stronger for members who on average perceived their group less cohesive than other group members. Lastly, session-level alliance was more strongly associated with an individual member\'s motivation in that session when the other group members reported lower group alliance on average.
    UNASSIGNED: These findings underscore the significance of member-group fit in group therapy and the reciprocal impact of individual members and the group on each other\'s therapy outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:先前的荟萃分析表明,客户评估的工作联盟与依恋焦虑和依恋回避呈负相关。这项研究的目的是提供对联盟与依恋不安全感两个维度之间关系的最新荟萃分析。方法:采用随机效应模型检验工作联盟与依恋焦虑之间的关系以及工作联盟与依恋回避之间的关系。结果:联盟与依恋焦虑的总体关系为r=-.09(p=.01,k=33,I2=43.7%)。联盟与依恋回避的总体关系为r=-.13(p<.001,k=33,I2=44.7%)。没有证据表明这些关系因研究特征而异,例如客户种族或研究中的治疗师人数。结论:结果支持客户评估联盟与客户评估依恋不安全感的两个维度之间的负相关关系。需要进一步的研究来确定缓和这种关系的因素,使用更多样化的研究特征样本和更广泛的措施。
    Objective: Previous meta-analyses have shown that client-rated working alliance is negatively correlated with attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance. The purpose of this study is to provide an updated meta-analysis of the relation between alliance and the two dimensions of attachment insecurity. Method: Random effects models were used to examine the relation between the working alliance and attachment anxiety and the relation between the working alliance and attachment avoidance. Results: The overall relation between alliance and attachment anxiety was r = -.09 (p = .01, k = 33, I2 = 43.7%). The overall relation between alliance and attachment avoidance was r = -.13 (p < .001, k = 33, I2 = 44.7%). There was no evidence that these relations varied across study characteristics such as client race or the number of therapists in the study. Conclusion: The results support the negative relations between client-rated alliance and both dimensions of client-rated attachment insecurity. Further research is needed to identify the factors that moderate this relationship, using a more diverse sample of study characteristics and a wider range of measures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    广泛的研究探索了幽默在治疗中的结合,揭示了它对客户心理健康和个人成长的潜在积极影响。然而,关于教练如何从幽默作为干预中受益,以及幽默的利用如何影响教练和教练的互动过程和结果的研究有限。因此,我们的研究重点是专业对话中自发幽默的使用和效果。本文旨在从相邻领域的幽默学术文献中提取见解,并将这些见解应用于教练的背景。
    本文为教练理论和实践提供了启示,以及拟议的研究议程。初始阶段涉及分析专业背景下的幽默评论,和教练。其次,遵循PRISMA指南进行审查,我们确定了13项实证研究,解决了幽默在咨询中的作用,心理治疗,和指导。
    我们的研究结果表明,幽默是建立和深化工作联盟的宝贵工具,在客户中培养适应性应对机制,增强认知和行为过程。此外,幽默被证明是有利于专业人士在导航具有挑战性的客户关系。这些发现对教练实践领域也具有重要意义。根据这些见解,我们建议在教练专业人员的教育工具包中整合幽默的使用。
    UNASSIGNED: Extensive research has explored the incorporation of humor in therapy, revealing its potential positive effects on clients\' mental well-being and personal growth. However, limited research exists on how coaching could benefit from humor as an intervention and how its utilization impacts the interaction processes and outcomes for both the coachee and coach. Therefore, our research focuses on the use and effects of spontaneous humor within professional dialogues. This paper aims to extract insights from academic literature on humor in adjacent fields and apply these insights to the context of coaching.
    UNASSIGNED: This paper offers implications for coaching theory and practice, alongside a proposed research agenda. The initial phase involves analyzing reviews on humor in professional contexts, and coaching. Secondly, following the PRISMA guidelines for review, we identified 13 empirical studies, which address the role of humor in counseling, psychotherapy, and mentoring.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings suggest that humor serves as a valuable tool for establishing and deepening the working alliance, fostering adaptive coping mechanisms in clients, and enhancing the cognitive and behavioral process. Moreover, humor is shown to be advantageous for professionals in navigating challenging client relationships. These findings hold significance for the realm of coaching practice as well. In light of these insights, we propose the integration of humor use in education toolkits for coaching professionals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:治疗联盟与积极结果广泛相关。然而,这个领域的几乎所有研究都涉及面对面治疗,而自COVID-19大流行以来,远程治疗变得越来越普遍。现在迫切需要确定治疗联盟的性质和重要性是否受到远程治疗的影响。这项研究调查了患有神经性厌食症的青年家庭的治疗联盟,这些家庭参与了一项随机对照试验,该试验在COVID-19大流行期间从当面就诊过渡到远程医疗就诊。
    方法:我们分析了来自53名青少年及其父母的数据(20人开始面对面,33开始于远程医疗)。父母双方,青少年和治疗师在治疗4周后完成了工作联盟清单-短修订。
    结果:我们发现远程医疗和当面治疗对父亲或治疗师报告的数据没有显着差异。然而,与远程医疗相比,青少年和母亲报告的面对面会议的联系和目标相关联盟更高.
    结论:关于远程医疗和面对面会议联盟的调查结果好坏参半,在母亲和年轻人中,有些人更喜欢当面治疗。未来的研究应该确定可能的适应是否可以通过远程健康改善基于家庭的神经性厌食症治疗期间的工作联盟。
    OBJECTIVE: The therapeutic alliance is broadly linked with positive outcomes. However, nearly all research in this area involves in-person therapy, whereas teletherapy has grown increasing common since the COVID-19 pandemic. There is now a pressing need to establish whether the nature and importance of the therapeutic alliance is impacted by teletherapy. This study examined therapeutic alliance in families of youth with anorexia nervosa who were participating in a randomized controlled trial that transitioned from in-person to telehealth visits during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    METHODS: We analysed data from 53 adolescents and their parents (20 began in-person, 33 began with telehealth). Both parents, youth and therapist completed the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised after 4 weeks of treatment.
    RESULTS: We found no significant differences across telehealth and in-person treatment for paternal or therapist reported data. However, both adolescents and mothers reported higher bond and goal-related alliance for in-person sessions compared to telehealth.
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings regarding alliance across telehealth and in-person sessions were mixed, with some preference among mothers and youth for in-person treatment. Future studies should determine whether possible adaptations can improve working alliance during family-based treatment for anorexia nervosa via telehealth.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为当面心理治疗建立了症状变化和联盟之间的双向关联。联盟可能在促进无指导移动健康(mHealth)干预措施的参与和有效性方面发挥重要作用。使用将联盟和心理困扰分解为人内和人之间成分的模型(随机截距交叉滞后面板模型),我们报告了在为期4周的基于智能手机的冥想干预过程中,联盟与痛苦之间的双向关联(n=302,80.0%的抑郁/焦虑升高).关联在一段时间内是稳定的,其效应大小与心理治疗观察到的效应大小相似(βs=-.13至-.14和-.09至-.10,对于困境联盟和困境联盟,分别)。联盟可能值得衡量,以提高mHealth工具的可接受性和有效性。需要进一步的经验和理论工作来表征联盟在无指导的mHealth中的作用和意义。
    Bidirectional associations between changes in symptoms and alliance are established for in-person psychotherapy. Alliance may play an important role in promoting engagement and effectiveness within unguided mobile health (mHealth) interventions. Using models disaggregating alliance and psychological distress into within- and between-person components (random intercept cross-lagged panel model), we report bidirectional associations between alliance and distress over the course of a 4-week smartphone-based meditation intervention (n=302, 80.0% elevated depression/anxiety). Associations were stable across time with effect sizes similar to those observed for psychotherapy (βs=-.13 to -.14 and -.09 to -.10, for distress to alliance and alliance to distress, respectively). Alliance may be worth measuring to improve the acceptability and effectiveness of mHealth tools. Further empirical and theoretical work characterizing the role and meaning of alliance in unguided mHealth is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:近年来,越来越多的兴趣集中在心理治疗工作联盟上,以此作为理解数字心理健康干预措施临床变化的一种手段。然而,对于数字心理健康计划如何以及在多大程度上可以对抑郁症的混合(治疗师加数字计划)认知行为疗法(bCBT)干预中的工作联盟和临床结果产生影响,人们知之甚少。
    目的:本研究旨在测试bCBT和照常治疗(TAU)之间工作联盟得分的差异,检查双方工作联盟和抑郁严重程度评分之间的关联,并在3个月的评估中,就工作联盟与bCBT抑郁评分之间的关联,测试系统可用性与工作联盟之间的相互作用。
    方法:我们对E-COMPARED(欧洲混合抑郁症治疗与常规治疗的比较有效性研究)试验进行了二次数据分析,比较了9个欧洲国家的bCBT和TAU。数据收集了2015年4月至2017年12月之间的初级保健和专门服务。年龄在18岁或以上并被诊断为重度抑郁症的合格参与者被随机分配到bCBT(n=476)或TAU(n=467)。bCBT包括6-20次bCBT课程(包括与治疗师的面对面课程和基于互联网的计划)。TAU包括抑郁症的常规治疗。主要结果是随机分组后3个月的工作联盟(工作联盟清单-短修订客户[WAI-SR-C])和抑郁症状(患者健康问卷-9[PHQ-9])得分。其他变量包括3个月时的系统可用性得分(系统可用性量表-客户端[SUS-C])和基线人口统计信息。使用线性回归模型分析来自基线和3个月评估的数据,该模型针对一组基线变量进行了调整。
    结果:在945名参与者中,644(68.2%)为女性,平均年龄为38.96岁(IQR38)。与TAU相比,bCBT与较高的WAI-SR-C综合评分相关(B=5.67,95%CI4.48-6.86)。在bCBT(B=-0.12,95%CI-0.17至-0.06)和TAU(B=-0.06,95%CI-0.11至-0.02)中,WAI-SR-C和PHQ-9之间呈负相关,随着WAI-SR-C分数的增加,PHQ-9评分下降。最后,在bCBT中较高的WAI-SR-C评分和较低的PHQ-9评分之间的负相关方面,SUS-C和WAI-SR-C之间存在显著的交互作用(b=-0.030,95%CI-0.05至-0.01;P=.005).
    结论:据我们所知,这是第一项研究表明,与服务报告提供的循证常规抑郁症护理相比,bCBT可能会增强客户工作联盟。bCBT中的工作联盟也与临床改进相关,这些改进似乎通过良好的程序可用性得到了增强。我们的发现进一步增加了这样一种观点,即在面对面的CBT中添加互联网提供的CBT可能会积极增强工作联盟的经验。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT02542891,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02542891;德国临床试验注册DRKS00006866,https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00006866;荷兰试验注册NTR4962,https://www.onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/25452;临床试验。GovNCT02389660,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02389660;ClinicalTrials.govNCT02361684,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02361684;ClinicalTrials.NCT0go447;ClinicalNCT2449isrctn.com/ISRCTN12388725?q=ISRCTN12388725&filters=&sort=&offset=1&totalResults=1&page=1&pageSize=10;ClinicalTrials.govNCT02796573,https://classic。clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02796573.
    RR2-10.1186/s13063-016-1511-1。
    BACKGROUND: Increasing interest has centered on the psychotherapeutic working alliance as a means of understanding clinical change in digital mental health interventions in recent years. However, little is understood about how and to what extent a digital mental health program can have an impact on the working alliance and clinical outcomes in a blended (therapist plus digital program) cognitive behavioral therapy (bCBT) intervention for depression.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to test the difference in working alliance scores between bCBT and treatment as usual (TAU), examine the association between working alliance and depression severity scores in both arms, and test for an interaction between system usability and working alliance with regard to the association between working alliance and depression scores in bCBT at 3-month assessments.
    METHODS: We conducted a secondary data analysis of the E-COMPARED (European Comparative Effectiveness Research on Blended Depression Treatment versus Treatment-as-usual) trial, which compared bCBT with TAU across 9 European countries. Data were collected in primary care and specialized services between April 2015 and December 2017. Eligible participants aged 18 years or older and diagnosed with major depressive disorder were randomized to either bCBT (n=476) or TAU (n=467). bCBT consisted of 6-20 sessions of bCBT (involving face-to-face sessions with a therapist and an internet-based program). TAU consisted of usual care for depression. The main outcomes were scores of the working alliance (Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised-Client [WAI-SR-C]) and depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]) at 3 months after randomization. Other variables included system usability scores (System Usability Scale-Client [SUS-C]) at 3 months and baseline demographic information. Data from baseline and 3-month assessments were analyzed using linear regression models that adjusted for a set of baseline variables.
    RESULTS: Of the 945 included participants, 644 (68.2%) were female, and the mean age was 38.96 years (IQR 38). bCBT was associated with higher composite WAI-SR-C scores compared to TAU (B=5.67, 95% CI 4.48-6.86). There was an inverse association between WAI-SR-C and PHQ-9 in bCBT (B=-0.12, 95% CI -0.17 to -0.06) and TAU (B=-0.06, 95% CI -0.11 to -0.02), in which as WAI-SR-C scores increased, PHQ-9 scores decreased. Finally, there was a significant interaction between SUS-C and WAI-SR-C with regard to an inverse association between higher WAI-SR-C scores and lower PHQ-9 scores in bCBT (b=-0.030, 95% CI -0.05 to -0.01; P=.005).
    CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that bCBT may enhance the client working alliance when compared to evidence-based routine care for depression that services reported offering. The working alliance in bCBT was also associated with clinical improvements that appear to be enhanced by good program usability. Our findings add further weight to the view that the addition of internet-delivered CBT to face-to-face CBT may positively augment experiences of the working alliance.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02542891, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02542891; German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00006866, https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00006866; Netherlands Trials Register NTR4962, https://www.onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/25452; ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT02389660, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02389660; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02361684, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02361684; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02449447, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02449447; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02410616, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02410616; ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN12388725, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12388725?q=ISRCTN12388725&filters=&sort=&offset=1&totalResults=1&page=1&pageSize=10; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02796573, https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02796573.
    UNASSIGNED: RR2-10.1186/s13063-016-1511-1.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:工作联盟是面对面和基于互联网的干预措施中治疗结果的突出非特异性因素。工作联盟和治疗结果之间的关联似乎是特定于时间和疾病的,但是对干预期间工作联盟的变化以及工作联盟在针对悲伤的干预中的影响知之甚少。本研究调查了在基于互联网的干预措施中,针对经历过怀孕失败的父母,工作联盟的变化与治疗结果之间的关系。
    方法:228名参与者接受了基于认知行为疗法和异步基于文本的治疗师反馈的悲伤干预。长期的悲伤和相关的创伤压力症状,抑郁症,焦虑,和一般精神病理学在干预前后使用经过验证的仪器进行评估.在治疗中期(第4次会议)和治疗结束时(第10次会议),使用工作联盟清单的简短版本评估了工作联盟的变化。
    结果:分析了N=146人的数据。从第4届会议到第10届会议,工作联盟的总数和所有分量表都大大增加。工作联盟的这种变化与长期悲伤的减少显着相关。工作联盟分量表的变化也与抑郁症状和一般精神病理学有关。回归分析显示,工作联盟的变化预测了长时间悲伤的减少,但没有预测其他悲伤相关症状的改善。
    结论:结果检查了基于互联网的干预期间工作联盟的变化以及与治疗结果的关联。确认了工作联盟的变化对长期悲伤的治疗结果的影响很小,但没有相关症状。需要进一步的研究来评估联盟-结果协会的主持人,以改善基于互联网的干预措施。
    背景:不适用。
    BACKGROUND: Working alliance is a prominent non-specific factor for treatment outcomes in face-to-face and internet-based interventions. The association between working alliance and therapy outcome appears to be time- and disorder-specific, but less is known about the change of working alliance during the intervention and the impact of working alliance in grief-specific interventions. The present study examines the association between the change of working alliance and treatment outcomes in an internet-based intervention for parents who experienced pregnancy loss.
    METHODS: 228 participants received a grief intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy with asynchronous text-based therapist feedback. Prolonged grief and related symptoms of traumatic stress, depression, anxiety, and general psychopathology were assessed with validated instruments before and after the intervention. The change of working alliance was assessed using the short version of the Working Alliance Inventory at mid-treatment (session 4) and the end of the treatment (session 10).
    RESULTS: Data for N = 146 persons was analyzed. Working alliance in total and all subscales increased significantly from sessions 4 to 10. This change in working alliance correlated significantly with a reduction in prolonged grief. Changes in subscales of working alliance also correlated with symptoms of depression and general psychopathology. Regression analysis showed that a change in working alliance predicted a reduction in prolonged grief but did not predict improvements in other grief-related symptoms.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results examine the change of working alliance during an internet-based intervention and the association with treatment outcome. A small impact of change in working alliance on treatment outcome of prolonged grief was confirmed, but not on related symptoms. Further research is needed to assess moderators of the alliance-outcome association to improve internet-based interventions.
    BACKGROUND: Not applicable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    寻求电子健康应用的临床医生和患者在选择有效解决方案方面面临挑战,因为市场失败率很高。对话式代理应用程序(“聊天机器人”)通过在应用程序和用户之间建立纽带,有望提高医疗保健用户的参与度。目前尚不清楚聊天机器人是否提高了患者的依从性,或者过去将聊天机器人纳入电子健康应用的趋势是否是由于技术炒作动态和创新的竞争压力。我们使用首选报告项目对健康聊天机器人随机对照试验进行系统评价和荟萃分析方法进行了系统文献综述。这篇评论的目的是确定用户参与度指标是否在eHealth聊天机器人研究中发布。一项荟萃分析检查了患者对聊天机器人应用程序的临床试验保留率。结果显示没有chatbot手臂患者的保留效果。少量的研究表明,需要正在进行的eHealth聊天机器人研究,特别是考虑到有关其有效性的主张在科学文献之外。
    Clinicians and patients seeking electronic health applications face challenges in selecting effective solutions due to a high market failure rate. Conversational agent applications (\"chatbots\") show promise in increasing healthcare user engagement by creating bonds between the applications and users. It is unclear if chatbots improve patient adherence or if past trends to include chatbots in electronic health applications were due to technology hype dynamics and competitive pressure to innovate. We conducted a systematic literature review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology on health chatbot randomized control trials. The goal of this review was to identify if user engagement indicators are published in eHealth chatbot studies. A meta-analysis examined patient clinical trial retention of chatbot apps. The results showed no chatbot arm patient retention effect. The small number of studies suggests a need for ongoing eHealth chatbot research, especially given the claims regarding their effectiveness made outside the scientific literatures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管自我指导的数字干预对青少年脑震荡恢复有希望的好处,此类干预措施的流失率很高。证据表明,成年人可以通过自我指导的数字干预来发展治疗联盟,这反过来又与干预参与有关。然而,尚无研究调查青少年是否与自我指导的数字干预措施发展治疗联盟,以及哪些因素对其发展很重要.此外,社会存在——数字接触在多大程度上感觉它们是在人身上发生的——可能是理解青少年和自我引导数字干预之间联系性质的另一个相关因素,尽管这还有待于探索。
    目的:这项定性研究探讨了从脑震荡中恢复的青少年在使用基于自我指导的数字正念干预期间发展治疗联盟和社会存在的程度。此外,本研究旨在确定对青少年发展治疗联盟和社会存在的重要因素。
    方法:从2个地点招募年龄在12至17.99岁之间的持续脑震荡的青少年:脑震荡后48小时的儿科急诊科和脑震荡后1个月以上的三级护理诊所,以捕获脑震荡后有急性和持续症状的青少年。参与者(N=10)通过智能手机应用程序完成了为期4周的基于正念的干预。在app中,参与者听取了正念指南(配音演员)的录音,讲述了心理教育和正念实践。4周时,参与者完成了问卷调查和半结构化访谈,探讨了他们在干预中使用正念指南进行治疗联盟和社交活动的经验。
    结果:在定性结果中确定的主题表明,参与者通过“与正念指南建立真正的联系”和“感知真实的人”来发展治疗联盟和社会存在。“对治疗联盟和社会存在的发展特别重要的是正念指南”个人背景和声音,“通过了解有关他们的信息并通过指南,参与者感到与指南的联系更加紧密。定量结果支持定性结果;参与者治疗联盟的平均得分远高于量表中点,虽然社会存在测量的混合结果与定性发现一致,参与者认为正念指南似乎是真实的,但并不像面对面的联系那样真实。
    结论:我们的数据表明,青少年可以在没有直接接触的情况下使用数字干预措施时发展治疗联盟和社会存在。青少年通过自我指导的数字干预来发展治疗联盟和社会存在,可以通过提高类似人类的素质来支持(例如,真实的声音)在干预中。最大化治疗联盟和社会存在可能是一种有希望的方法,可以减少自我指导的数字干预中的减员,同时提供可访问的治疗。
    Despite the promising benefits of self-guided digital interventions for adolescents recovering from concussion, attrition rates for such interventions are high. Evidence suggests that adults can develop therapeutic alliance with self-guided digital interventions, which is in turn associated with intervention engagement. However, no research has examined whether adolescents develop therapeutic alliance with self-guided digital interventions and what factors are important to its development. Additionally, social presence-the extent to which digital encounters feel like they are occurring in person-may be another relevant factor to understanding the nature of the connection between adolescents and a self-guided digital intervention, though this has yet to be explored.
    This qualitative study explored the extent to which adolescents recovering from concussion developed therapeutic alliance and social presence during their use of a self-guided digital mindfulness-based intervention. Additionally, this study aimed to determine factors important to adolescents\' development of therapeutic alliance and social presence with the intervention.
    Adolescents aged between 12 and 17.99 years who sustained a concussion were recruited from 2 sites: a pediatric emergency department up to 48 hours after a concussion and a tertiary care clinic over 1 month following a concussion to capture adolescents who had both acute and persisting symptoms after concussion. Participants (N=10) completed a 4-week mindfulness-based intervention delivered through a smartphone app. Within the app, participants listened to audio recordings of mindfulness guides (voice actors) narrating psychoeducation and mindfulness practices. At 4 weeks, participants completed questionnaires and a semistructured interview exploring their experience of therapeutic alliance and social presence with the mindfulness guides in the intervention.
    Themes identified within the qualitative results revealed that participants developed therapeutic alliance and social presence by \"developing a genuine connection\" with their mindfulness guides and \"sensing real people.\" Particularly important to the development of therapeutic alliance and social presence were the mindfulness guides\' \"personal backgrounds and voices,\" such that participants felt more connected to the guides by knowing information about them and through the guides\' calm tone of voice in audio recordings. Quantitative findings supported qualitative results; participants\' average score for therapeutic alliance was far above the scale midpoint, while the mixed results for social presence measures aligned with qualitative findings that participants felt that the mindfulness guides seemed real but not quite as real as an in-person connection would.
    Our data suggest that adolescents can develop therapeutic alliance and social presence when using digital interventions with no direct human contact. Adolescents\' development of therapeutic alliance and social presence with self-guided digital interventions can be bolstered by increasing human-like qualities (eg, real voices) within interventions. Maximizing therapeutic alliance and social presence may be a promising way to reduce attrition in self-guided digital interventions while providing accessible treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号