UNASSIGNED: Since its discovery in the early 1900s, sickle cell disease (SCD) has contributed significantly to the scientific understanding of hemoglobin and hemoglobinopathies. Despite this, now almost a century later, optimal medical management and even curative options remain limited. Encouragingly, in the last decade, there has been a push toward advancing the care for individuals with SCD and a diversifying interest in options to manage this disorder.
UNASSIGNED: Here, we review the current state of disease modifying therapies for SCD including fetal hemoglobin inducers, monoclonal antibodies, anti-inflammatory modulators, and enzyme activators. We also discuss current curative strategies with specific interest in transformative gene therapies.
UNASSIGNED: SCD is a chronic, progressive disease that despite a century of clinical description, only now is seeing a growth and advance in therapeutic options to improve the lifespan and quality of life for individuals with SCD. We anticipate newly designed and even repurposed therapies that may work as a single agent or combination agents to tackle the progression of SCD. The vast majority of individuals living with SCD are unlikely to receive gene therapy, therefore improved disease management is critical even for those that may ultimately chose to pursue a potentially curative strategy.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common genetic blood disorder in the United States, with over 100,000 people suffering from this debilitating disease. SCD is caused by abnormal hemoglobin (Hb) variants that interfere with normal red blood cell (RBC) function. Research on SCD has led to the development and approval of several new SCD therapies in recent years. The recent FDA-approved novel gene therapies are potentially curative, giving patients an additional option besides a hematopoietic bone marrow transplant. Despite the promise of existing therapies, questions remain regarding their long-term pharmacological effects on adults and children. These questions, along with the exorbitant cost of the new gene therapies, justify additional research into more effective therapeutic options. Continual research in this field focuses on not only developing cheaper, more effective cures/treatments but also investigating the physiological effects of the current therapies on SCD patients, particularly on the brain and kidneys. In this article, we undertake a comprehensive review of ongoing clinical trials with completion dates in 2024 or later. Our exploration provides insights into the landscape of current therapeutics and emerging novel therapies designed to combat and potentially eradicate SCD, including the latest FDA-approved gene therapies.

UNASSIGNED: To date, there is limited evidence on patients utilizing both voxelotor and darbepoetin alfa and its impact on hemoglobin levels. The objective is to evaluate the effect of voxelotor and darbepoetin alfa on hemoglobin levels in patients with SCD.
UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective chart review study that assessed the primary independent variable as the utilization of either voxelotor alone, darbepoetin alfa alone, or the concurrent administration of voxelotor and darbepoetin alfa. Descriptive statistics were utilized to obtain the mean standard deviation for numerical variables and proportions for categorical variables.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 23 participants were included in this study. When comparing baseline to 2 months and 3 months, participants on voxelotor alone experienced a 3% decrease and a 6.6% increase in hemoglobin, darbepoetin alfa alone group a 4.3% decrease and a 0.6% increase in hemoglobin and voxelotor and darbepoetin group a 4.4% decrease and a 0.5% decrease in hemoglobin levels. Fifty percent of the participants in the voxelotor group and 6 (66.7%) participants in the voxelotor plus darbepoetin alfa group experienced adverse drug events.
UNASSIGNED: Voxelotor resulted in a clinically significant difference in the percent change of hemoglobin from baseline to 3 months.

OBJECTIVE: Voxelotor can increase hemoglobin levels in patients living with sickle cell disease (SCD). A clinician who is monitoring voxelotor response may want to know whole-blood voxelotor concentration, but this cannot be measured in most clinical settings. However, voxelotor has been demonstrated to cause \"peak splitting\" in common methods of hemoglobin measurement such as capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). We hypothesized that we could use the size of the peak split to estimate the whole-blood concentration.
METHODS: Blood from people with SCD was dosed with known concentrations of voxelotor, and multiparameter regression was used to derive the relationship of voxelotor concentration to the degree of peak splitting observed. To validate these equations, 21 patients started on voxelotor at 1500 mg/d had blood samples drawn at days 0, 14, 30, and 60. Samples were sent out for gold standard voxelotor concentration testing. The derived equations were then used to calculate voxelotor concentration.
RESULTS: Calculated concentrations correlated strongly with measured concentrations for both CZE (R2 = 0.83, P < .001) and HPLC (R2 = 0.76, P < .001). Voxelotor concentration also had a significant effect on increases in hemoglobin (R2 = 0.40, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Thus, peak splitting CZE and HPLC can be used to estimate voxelotor concentration.

BACKGROUND: Sickle haemoglobin (HbS) polymerisation perturbs red blood cell (RBC) rheology and drives sickle cell disease (SCD) pathophysiology. Voxelotor is an HbS polymerisation inhibitor that increases haemoglobin (Hb)-oxygen affinity.
RESULTS: In this 48-week, prospective, single-centre translational study, 10 children aged 4-11 years with SCD were treated with voxelotor. Improvements in RBC deformability were observed using osmotic/oxygen gradient ektacytometry, with increases in minimal and maximal elongation index and reductions in point of sickling. Increased Hb and reduced markers of haemolysis were also observed.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that voxelotor treatment is associated with reduced RBC sickling and haemolysis in children with SCD.

In preparation for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection, current ex vivo gene therapy protocols for sickle cell disease require patients to undergo several months of chronic red cell transfusion. For health care equity, alternatives to red cell transfusion should be available. We examined whether treatment with GBT1118, the murine analog of voxelotor, could be a safe and feasible alternative to red cell transfusion. We found that 3 weeks of treatment with GBT1118 increased the percentage of bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells and upon plerixafor mobilization, the percentage of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells. Our data suggest that voxelotor should be further explored for its potential safety and utility as preparation for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection.

We present a 22-year-old female with transfusion-dependent anemia due to sickle cell disease (SCD) with lipopolysaccharide-responsive and beige-like anchor protein (LRBA) deficiency whose treatment frequency was moderated with voxelotor (Oxbryta®). The patient was transfusion dependent, initially thought to be secondary only to SCD. After the diagnosis of LRBA deficiency, her regimen included abatacept, sirolimus, hydroxyurea, and folic acid, but she still required intermittent transfusion. She was started on voxelotor in January 2020. Since initiation, her baseline hemoglobin level has increased and she is no longer transfusion dependent.

In 2022, sickle cell disease (SCD) continues to affect the lives of millions of people, being one of the most frequently inherited blood disorders worldwide. Recently, several new therapies have been FDA approved for the treatment of SCD. The complexity of the pathophysiology of sickling has given opportunity to the evolution of several modalities of therapies. Nonetheless, the potential for complementary targeting of HbS polymerization, vasocclusion, and other inflammatory pathways remains controversial. None of these drugs can be considered a single curative line of treatment. With the advancement of CRISPR/Cas9 technology, autologous transplant of gene-edited hematopoietic stem cells could possibly provide a cure for most patients with SCD. The advantage of this approach over the conventional stem cell transplantation is that it decreases the need for immuno-suppressive drugs and the risk of graft-versus-host disease. In addition, recent technological advances can reduce the off-target effects, but long-term monitoring is needed to ensure the reliability of these methods in the clinical setting. This review explores the efficacy and safety of combination therapies and contrasting this alternative with the challenges that exist with sickle cell gene therapy using CRISPR.

Sickle cell anemia is a hemoglobinopathy that causes complications such as Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC), stroke, priapism, Acute Chest Syndromes (ACS), and bone infarcts due to blood vessel occlusion, resulting in hypoxia, ischemia, and inflammation. Preventing these incidents improves the quality of life and lowers mortality rates in Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) patients. This systematic review aims to describe the drugs, their mechanisms of action, dosages, changes in hemoglobin parameters, decrease in VOCs, delay the time for the next VOC, decrease in the length of hospital stay, and side effects associated with these drugs. This review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. For this review, we searched the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases and screened them for full free texts published in English and studied in humans in the last five years beginning in 2018. Randomized clinical trials (RCT), observational studies, meta-analyses, systemic reviews, and traditional reviews were all included in the search. According to the type of study, quality assessment tools are used, and eight papers are chosen. Full-text articles from these papers are studied, analyzed, and tabulated. We discussed seven interventions that are used to treat sickle cell disease. Voxelotor, crizanlizumab, L-glutamate, long-term blood transfusions, Zinc (Zn), Niprisan®, and Ciklavit* were found to reduce the number and severity of VOC. We discovered that VOCs containing L -glutamate reduced the length of hospitalization. Magnesium (Mg) did not affect the number and severity of VOCs. This review includes a few articles for the study. Future papers on this subject should include a large sample size and many papers. More clinical trials are required to evaluate the dosages and outcomes of using these drugs in combination to prevent VOCs.

OBJECTIVE: Voxelotor, a FDA-approved drug for the treatment of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), inhibits hemoglobin S (HbS) polymerization and increases total hemoglobin via hemolysis reduction. This drug has shown unique patterns in hemoglobin fractionation, affecting its interpretation. We aimed to evaluate whether these voxelotor-induced changes can be linked to improvement of hemolysis markers in pediatric patients on voxelotor.
METHODS: A total of 15 patients (age 12 to 20 years; 40% females) on voxelotor were evaluated to compare changes in the hemoglobin fractionation by capillary electrophoresis, total hemoglobin, reticulocyte percentage (retic%), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and bilirubin measurements before and after the recorded date of voxelotor prescription.
RESULTS: Hemoglobin fractionation showed changes in the profile of 60% (9/15) of the patients studied. Out of the 9 patients for which voxelotor showed changes in the hemoglobin fractionation, 44% (4/9) had an increase of >1 g/dL in their total hemoglobin after voxelotor treatment was started. Assessment of other hemolysis markers available showed decreased LDH (4/4), retic % (6/8), and bilirubin (3/4).
CONCLUSIONS: Unique pattern of hemoglobin fractionation analysis following therapy with voxelotor has potential as a tool for the assessment of response and/or compliance to voxelotor for the treatment of SCD.