BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are a serious threat to public health. Vancomycin (VAN) remains the primary treatment for these infections, and achieving the recommended area under the curve (AUC) target has been linked to improved clinical outcomes. The current VAN therapeutic monitoring guidelines recommend a loading dose (LD) of 20-35 mg/kg to rapidly attain targeted VAN exposures within 24 h of therapy. However, there is a paucity of data describing the impact of VAN LD on day 1 area under the curve (AUC0-24). This study aims to employ pharmacokinetic (PK) equations to calculate and describe the AUC0-24 following a VAN LD of 20 mg/kg.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adult patients who were loaded with VAN 20 mg/kg, received ≥ 48 h of treatment, and had two consecutive serum VAN levels collected within 24 h. Linear, non-trapezoidal PK equations and two post-infusion VAN levels were used to calculate AUC0-24. Therapeutic AUC0-24 was defined as 400-600 mg/l*h.
RESULTS: Among 123 included patients, the median age was 46 years (IQR 36, 62), 54% (67/123) of the patients had a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 and 27% (33/123) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Following a LD of 20 mg/kg, 50% (61/123) of the patients met the therapeutic AUC0-24, while 22% (27/123) of the patients were subtherapeutic, and 28% (35/123) were supratherapeutic. Compared with patients who achieved therapeutic AUC0-24, patients with subtherapeutic AUC0-24 were more likely to be younger (44 vs. 37 years old) and have a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (67 vs. 52%). In contrast, patients with supratherapeutic AUC0-24 were more likely to be older (64 vs. 44 years old) and to have chronic kidney disease diagnosis (23 vs. 7%) when compared to patients who achieved a therapeutic AUC0-24. CONCLUSIONS: Only 50% of patients achieve the target AUC0-24 following a VAN 20 mg/kg LD, with younger, heavier patients underexposed and older patients with renal impairment overexposed, suggesting that different dosing strategies are needed for these populations.

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to assess, for lipophilic drugs, the impact of logP on human volume of distribution at steady-state (VDss) predictions, including intermediate fut and Kp values, from six methods: Oie-Tozer, Rodgers-Rowland (tissue-specific Kp and only muscle Kp), GastroPlus, Korzekwa-Nagar, and TCM-New.
METHODS: A sensitivity analysis with focus on logP was conducted by keeping pKa and fup constant for each of four drugs, while varying logP. VDss was also calculated for the specific literature logP values. Error prediction analysis was conducted by analyzing prediction errors by source of logP values, drug, and overall values.
RESULTS: The Rodgers-Rowland methods were highly sensitive to logP values, followed by GastroPlus and Korzekwa-Nagar. The Oie-Tozer and TCM-New methods were only modestly sensitive to logP. Hence, the relative performance of these methods depended upon the source of logP value. As logP values increased, TCM-New and Oie-Tozer were the most accurate methods. TCM-New was the only method that was accurate regardless of logP value source. Oie-Tozer provided accurate predictions for griseofulvin, posaconazole, and isavuconazole; GastroPlus for itraconazole and isavuconazole; Korzekwa-Nagar for posaconazole; and TCM-New for griseofulvin, posaconazole, and isavuconazole. Both Rodgers-Rowland methods provided inaccurate predictions due to the overprediction of VDss.
CONCLUSIONS: TCM-New was the most accurate prediction of human VDss across four drugs and three logP sources, followed by Oie-Tozer. TCM-New showed to be the best method for VDss prediction of highly lipophilic drugs, suggesting BPR as a favorable surrogate for drug partitioning in the tissues, and which avoids the use of fup.

Several pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) were evaluated using the fish plasma model (FPM) for juvenile Chinook salmon exposed to effluent from a large urban wastewater treatment plant. The FPM compares fish plasma concentrations to therapeutic values determined in human plasma as an indication of potential adverse effects. We used human Cmax values, which are the maximum plasma concentration for a minimum therapeutic dose. Observed and predicted plasma concentrations from juvenile Chinook salmon exposed to a dilution series of whole wastewater effluent were compared to 1%Cmax values to determine Response Ratios (RR) ([plasma]/1%Cmax) for assessment of possible adverse effects. Several PPCPs were found to approach or exceed an RR of 1, indicating potential effects in fish. We also predicted plasma concentrations from measured water concentrations and determined that several of the values were close to or below the analytical reporting limit (RL) indicating potential plasma concentrations for a large number of PPCPs that were below detection. Additionally, the 1%Cmax was less than the RL for several analytes, which could impede predictions of possible effect concentrations. A comparison of observed and predicted plasma concentrations found that observed values were frequently much higher than values predicted with water concentrations, especially for low log10Dow compounds. The observed versus predicted values using the human volume of distribution (Vd), were generally much closer in agreement. These data appear to support the selection of whole-body concentrations to predict plasma values, which relies more on estimating simple partitioning within the fish instead of uptake via water. Overall, these observations highlight the frequently underestimated predicted plasma concentrations and potential to cause adverse effects in fish. Using measured plasma concentrations or predicted values from whole-body concentrations along with improved prediction models and reductions in analytical detection limits will foster more accurate risk assessments of pharmaceutical exposure for fish.

This commentary further reflects on the paper of De Sutter et al. on predicting volume of distribution in neonates, and the performance of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models We hereby stressed the add on value to collaborate on real world data to further close this knowledge gap. We illustrated this by weight distribution characteristics in breastfed (physiology) and in asphyxiated (pathophysiology), with additional reflection on their kidney and liver function.

UNASSIGNED: (-)-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the main psychoactive component of cannabis. Cannabis is the most widely used drug of abuse by pregnant individuals, but its maternal-fetal safety is still unclear. The changes in THC disposition during pregnancy may affect THC safety and pharmacology.
UNASSIGNED: This review summarizes the current literature on THC metabolism and pharmacokinetics in humans. It provides an analysis of how hormonal changes during pregnancy may alter the expression of cannabinoid metabolizing enzymes and THC and its metabolite pharmacokinetics. THC is predominately (>70%) cleared by hepatic metabolism to its psychoactive active metabolite, 11-OH-THC by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 and to other metabolites (<30%) by CYP3A4. Other physiological processes that change during pregnancy and may alter cannabinoid disposition are also reviewed.
UNASSIGNED: THC and its metabolites disposition likely change during pregnancy. Hepatic CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 are induced in pregnant individuals and in vitro by pregnancy hormones. This induction of CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 is predicted to lead to altered THC and 11-OH-THC disposition and pharmacodynamic effects. More in vitro studies of THC metabolism and induction of the enzymes metabolizing cannabinoids are necessary to improve the prediction of THC pharmacokinetics in pregnant individuals.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model for methotrexate (MTX) dosage for all ages, assess the association between concentration and clearance, and determine covariates affecting MTX disposition.
METHODS: We compared MTX PK profiles among neonates, children, and adults by performing a systematic literature search for published population MTX models and conducted a Monte Carlo-based meta-analysis. Subsequently, we evaluated study quality and covariates significantly affecting dosage regimens and compared LDMTX and HDMTX PK profiles.
RESULTS: Of the total 40 studies included, 34 were HDMTX, and six were LDMTX studies. For HDMTX, three studies involving neonates reported estimated apparent clearances (median, range) of 0.53 (0.27-0.77) L/kg/h; for 14 studies involving children, 0.23 (0.07-0.23) L/kg/h; and for 13 involving adults, 0.11 (0.03-0.22) L/kg/h. Neonates had a higher volume of distribution than children and adults. For LDMTX studies, apparent clearance was 0.085 (0.05-1.68) L/kg/h, and volume of distribution was 0.25 (0.018-0.47) L/kg, lower than those of HDMTX studies, with large between-subject variability. Bodyweight significantly influenced apparent clearance and volume of distribution, whereas renal function mainly influenced clearance. Mutations in certain genes reduced MTX clearance by 8-35.3%, whereas those in others increased it by 15-48%. Body surface area (BSA) significantly influenced apparent clearance with a median reduction of 51% when BSA increased in pediatric patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Methotrexate dosage regimens were primarily based on body surface area and renal function. Further studies are needed to evaluate MTX pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in both children (especially infants) and adults.

The volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) in neonates is still often estimated through isometric scaling from adult values, disregarding developmental changes beyond body weight. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of two physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Vss prediction methods in neonates (Poulin & Theil with Berezhkovskiy correction (P&T+) and Rodgers & Rowland (R&R)) with isometrical scaling. PBPK models were developed for 24 drugs using in-vitro and in-silico data. Simulations were done in Simcyp (V22) using predefined populations. Clinical data from 86 studies in neonates (including preterms) were used for comparison, and accuracy was assessed using (absolute) average fold errors ((A)AFEs). Isometric scaling resulted in underestimated Vss values in neonates (AFE: 0.61), and both PBPK methods reduced the magnitude of underprediction (AFE: 0.82-0.83). The P&T+ method demonstrated superior overall accuracy compared to isometric scaling (AAFE of 1.68 and 1.77, respectively), while the R&R method exhibited lower overall accuracy (AAFE: 2.03). Drug characteristics (LogP and ionization type) and inclusion of preterm neonates did not significantly impact the magnitude of error associated with isometric scaling or PBPK modeling. These results highlight both the limitations and the applicability of PBPK methods for the prediction of Vss in the absence of clinical data.

BACKGROUND: In acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), adequate antibiotic dosing is challenging due to changes of drug distribution and elimination. We studied the pharmacokinetics of linezolid in critically ill patients with ACLF during continuous renal replacement therapy compared to patients without concomitant liver failure (NLF).
METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, patients received linezolid 600 mg bid. Linezolid serum samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was performed followed by Monte-Carlo simulations of 150 mg bid, 300 mg bid, 450 mg bid, 600 mg bid, and 900 mg bid to assess trough concentration target attainment of 2-7 mg/L.
RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included in this study with nine suffering from ACLF. Linezolid body clearance was lower in the ACLF group with mean (standard deviation) 1.54 (0.52) L/h versus 6.26 (2.43) L/h for NLF, P < 0.001. A trough concentration of 2-7 mg/L was reached with the standard dose of 600 mg bid in the NLF group in 47%, with 42% being underexposed and 11% overexposed versus 20% in the ACLF group with 77% overexposed and 3% underexposed. The highest probability of target exposure was attained with 600 mg bid in the NLF group and 150 mg bid in the ACLF group with 53%.
CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid body clearance in ACLF was markedly lower than in NLF. Given the overall high variability, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with dose adjustments seems required to optimize target attainment. Until TDM results are available, a dose reduction may be considered in ACLF patients to prevent overexposure.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether therapeutic and toxic effects of intravesical lidocaine are determined by coincident serum levels.
METHODS: Published clinical trials and case studies on instilled lidocaine 1-2% that reported serum lidocaine levels were analyzed using model independent pharmacokinetic equations to compute the absorbed dose fraction (F) for linear regression with the respective dwell times.
RESULTS: Rapid absorption of intravesical lidocaine is evinced by the serum levels of 0.16±0.3 mg/L at 5 min in bladder cancer patients coinciding with the rapid onset of pain relief (<5 min) and blood pressure drop (≥10 mm Hg) in spinal cord injured patients. Serum levels at 5 min are raised five-fold by alkalinization for a tertiary amine with pKa of 7.8 and a linear rise in F with longer dwell time (r2 = 0.80; P<0.005) conforms to passive, paracellular diffusion of amphiphilic lidocaine (log P of 1.68) around umbrella cell borders with absorption rate at least five times faster than the terminal elimination rate, and therefore the delay in blood sampling after instillation is unwarranted. A rapid resolution of therapeutic and toxic effects is predicated on the extensive dilution of absorbed lidocaine with a rapid distribution half-life of 3.6 min in body weight dependent Vd - 15 times larger than blood volume, 0.13-4.5 L/kg which necessitates dose adjustment in children.
CONCLUSIONS: Whether rapid absorption of instilled lidocaine is complicated by an equally rapid and extensive dilution in body weight dependent Vd can be resolved by early blood sampling (<30 min) for: evidence-based medicine, avoidance of lidocaine toxicity in children and to educate the evolution of lidocaine solution to gel and devices.

The MedLine database contains 570 publications, including 71 randomized clinical trials and 6 meta-analyses on the rebamipide molecule in 2022. Indications for the use of rebamipide are gastric ulcer, chronic gastritis with hyperacidityin the acute stage, erosive gastritis, prevention of damage to the gastrointestinal mucosa while taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Currently trials are studying the efficacy and safety of the drug in gouty and rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, Sjögren\'s syndrome, bronchial asthma, vitiligo, atherosclerosis, diseases of the kidneys and liver; using in traumatology to accelerate bone regeneration; in ophthalmology to improve the regeneration of corneal epithelium; in oncology to reduce inflammatory changes in the oral mucosa after chemoradiotherapy. The review article is about the main pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of rebamipide. A detailed understanding of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics allows for individual selection of therapy based on the characteristics of the patient\'s body - gender, age, comorbidities; choose the optimal route of administration and dosing regimen; predict adverse effects and drug interactions; be determined with new clinical indications.
В 2022 г. в базе данных MedLine насчитывается 570 публикаций, включая 71 рандомизированное клиническое исследование и 6 метаанализов, о молекуле ребамипида. Показания к применению ребамипида – язвенная болезнь желудка, хронический гастрит с повышенной кислотообразующей функцией желудка в стадии обострения, эрозивный гастрит, профилактика повреждений слизистой оболочки желудочно-кишечного тракта на фоне приема нестероидных противовоспалительных лекарственных препаратов, эрадикация Helicobacter pylori. Изучаются эффективность и безопасность ребамипида при подагрическом и ревматоидном артритах, остеоартрите, синдроме Шегрена, бронхиальной астме, витилиго, атеросклерозе, заболеваниях почек и печени; в травматологии – для ускорения костной регенерации, в офтальмологии – для регенерации поврежденного эпителия роговицы, в онкологии – для уменьшения воспаления слизистой оболочки ротовой полости после химиолучевой терапии. В обзорной статье разбираются основные фармакокинетические и фармакодинамические характеристики ребамипида. Понимание фармакодинамики и фармакокинетики позволяет осуществлять индивидуальный подбор терапии, исходя из особенностей организма пациента (пол, возраст, сопутствующая патология); выбирать оптимальный путь введения и режим дозирования; прогнозировать нежелательные эффекты и лекарственные взаимодействия; определяться с новыми показаниями.