venous occlusion

静脉闭塞
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    低负荷血流限制阻力训练(LL-BFR-RT)越来越受欢迎,但其生理效应尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较LL-BFR-RT与低负荷抗阻运动(LL-RT)和高负荷抗阻运动(HL-RT)对代谢的影响。电解质,通过侵入性导管测量下肢的离子,这对风险评估至关重要。10名健康男性(27.6±6.4岁)用LL-RT(30%1RM)完成了三项膝关节伸肌锻炼试验,LL-BFR-RT(30%1RM,50%肢体闭塞压力),和HL-RT(75%1RM)。运动方案包括四组自愿性肌肉衰竭,两组之间休息1分钟。之前采集了血气分析,during,并在每次试验后通过运动腿的静脉导管。LL-BFR-RT的总工作量较低(1274±237kg,平均值±SD)与LL-RT(1745±604kg)相比,和HL-RT(1847±367千克,p<0.01),LL-RT与HL-RT无差异。疼痛感知没有显著差异。运动引起的氧分压下降,在所有条件下(p<0.001)都发生了乳酸积累和电解质变化(随着[K]的增加)。在所有三种情况下,运动后24小时和48小时肌酸激酶和乳酸脱氢酶均显着增加(p<0.001)。这项研究,使用侵入性导管测量,发现代谢没有显著差异,离子,和LL-BFR-RT之间的电解质反应,LL-RT,和HL-RT运动时自愿肌肉衰竭。LL-BFR-RT减少了失败时间而没有特定的生理反应。
    Low-load blood-flow-restriction resistance training (LL-BFR-RT) is gaining popularity, but its physiological effects remain unclear. This study aimed to compare LL-BFR-RT with low-load resistance exercise (LL-RT) and high-load resistance exercise (HL-RT) on metabolism, electrolytes, and ions in the lower extremities by invasive catheter measurements, which are crucial for risk assessment. Ten healthy men (27.6 ± 6.4 years) completed three trials of knee-extensor exercises with LL-RT (30% 1RM), LL-BFR-RT (30% 1RM, 50% limb occlusion pressure), and HL-RT (75% 1RM). The exercise protocol consisted of four sets to voluntary muscle failure with 1 min of rest between sets. Blood gas analysis was collected before, during, and after each trial through intravenous catheters at the exercising leg. LL-BFR-RT had lower total workload (1274 ± 237 kg, mean ± SD) compared to LL-RT (1745 ± 604 kg), and HL-RT (1847 ± 367 kg, p < 0.01), with no difference between LL-RT and HL-RT. Pain perception did not differ significantly. Exercise-induced drop in oxygen partial pressure, lactate accumulation and electrolyte shifts (with increased [K+]) occurred during under all conditions (p < 0.001). Creatine kinase and lactate dehydrogenase increased significantly 24- and 48-h postexercise under all three conditions (p < 0.001). This study, using invasive catheter measurements, found no significant differences in metabolic, ionic, and electrolyte responses among LL-BFR-RT, LL-RT, and HL-RT when exercised to voluntary muscular failure. LL-BFR-RT reduced time to failure without specific physiological responses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    小儿静脉阻塞是发病率和死亡率日益增长的原因,尤其是住院患者。在适当选择的患者中,导管定向再通是一种安全有效的治疗选择。导管定向治疗(CDT)的益处包括急性预防肺栓塞和终末器官衰竭以及慢性上腔静脉综合征和血栓后综合征。及时诊断,认识到血栓形成的潜在因素,熟悉CDT的工具和技术范围对于在急性环境中优化结果至关重要。慢性静脉闭塞的再通术可以类似地提供症状缓解并实现长期血管通畅。这篇评论将详细说明范围,技术,以及CDT治疗获得性系统性深静脉闭塞的结果。
    Pediatric venous occlusions are a growing cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in hospitalized patients. Catheter-directed recanalization is a safe and effective treatment option in appropriately selected patients. Benefits of catheter directed therapies (CDTs) include the prevention of pulmonary embolism and end organ failure acutely as well as superior vena cava syndrome and post-thrombotic syndrome chronically. Timely diagnosis, recognition of underlying factors for thrombosis, and familiarity with the spectrum of tools and techniques for CDT are essential to optimizing outcomes in the acute setting. Recanalization of chronic venous occlusions can similarly provide symptomatic relief and achieve long term vessel patency. This review will detail the scope, techniques, and outcomes for CDT in the treatment of acquired systemic deep vein occlusions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    通过植入新的左心室导线,可以使用多种方法来解决正在进行设备升级的患者的同侧静脉阻塞。解决此问题的一种可行解决方案是在有意识的镇静作用下,将升级导线植入对侧,并进行胸骨前隧道化。
    Multiple methods are used to tackle ipsilateral obstructed venous access in patients undergoing a device upgrade by implanting a new left ventricular lead. One feasible solution to tackle this is implantation of the upgrade lead contralaterally with pre-sternal tunnelization to the opposite side under conscious sedation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:血流限制阻力运动研究通常需要戒除咖啡因以避免可能改变血流限制刺激的心血管影响。然而,对于习惯的用户,影响可能会减弱。
    目的:比较习惯使用者摄入或戒除咖啡因时对血流限制阻力运动的心血管反应。
    方法:30名参与者完成了一项3次访问的受试者内研究,从熟悉和咖啡因摄入问卷开始。
    方法:访问2和3包括血流限制阻力运动(3组二头肌卷曲失败,30%1-重复的最大值,40%动脉闭塞压[AOP]),遵循参与者的正常咖啡因消费(CAFF)或弃权(ABS)。AOP,收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP),运动前和运动后测量心率。SBP的预值和运动前到运动后变化分数,DBP,AOP(所有毫米汞),心率(以每分钟为单位),和重复进行了条件之间的比较。结果表示为平均值(SD)。
    结果:运动前AOP与CAFF(137.8[14.4])和ABS(137.1[14.9],BF10=0.2),尽管前SBP的CAFF(115.4[9.8])高于ABS(112.3[9.4],BF10=1.9)。条件之间的Pre-DBP相似。运动引起的AOP变化对于CAFF(18.4[11.2])大于ABS(13.2[14.9]),尽管证据是轶事(BF10=0.7)。运动引起的SBP变化,DBP,和心率在不同情况下相似(所有BF10≤0.40)。CAFF(63[26])比ABS(57[17],BF10=2.1)。
    结论:这项研究的结果表明,对于习惯的用户,保持每日咖啡因习惯不会对与血流限制相关的常见心血管变量产生实质性影响.
    BACKGROUND: Blood flow restriction resistance exercise studies often require caffeine abstinence to avoid cardiovascular effects that could change the blood flow restriction stimulus. However, effects may be attenuated for habituated users.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare cardiovascular responses to blood flow restriction resistance exercise when habituated users consume or abstain from caffeine.
    METHODS: Thirty participants completed a 3-visit within-subject study beginning with familiarization and caffeine intake questionnaire.
    METHODS: Visits 2 and 3 consisted of blood flow restriction resistance exercise (3 sets bicep curls to failure, 30% 1-repetition max, 40% arterial occlusion pressure [AOP]), following participants\' normal caffeine consumption (CAFF) or abstaining (ABS). AOP, systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure, and heart rate were measured preexercise and postexercise. Prevalues and preexercise to postexercise change scores for SBP, DBP, AOP (all millimeters of mercury), heart rate (in beats per minute), and repetitions were compared between conditions. Results are represented as mean (SD).
    RESULTS: Preexercise AOP was similar for CAFF (137.8 [14.4]) and ABS (137.1 [14.9], BF10 = 0.2), although pre-SBP was higher for CAFF (115.4 [9.8]) than ABS (112.3 [9.4], BF10 = 1.9). Pre-DBP was similar between conditions. The exercise-induced change in AOP was greater for CAFF (18.4 [11.2]) than ABS (13.2 [14.9]), though evidence was anecdotal (BF10 = 0.7). Exercise-induced changes in SBP, DBP, and heart rate were similar between conditions (all BF10 ≤ 0.40). More repetitions were completed for CAFF (63 [26]) than ABS (57 [17], BF10 = 2.1).
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that for habituated users, maintaining daily caffeine habits will not have substantial effects on common cardiovascular variables relevant to blood flow restriction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:计算机断层扫描(CT)特征预测经静脉引线提取(TLE)的难度的能力是一个不断发展的课题。
    目的:确定与TLE难度增加相关的CT特征。
    方法:对2018年1月至2022年2月在加州大学圣地亚哥分校接受TLE的所有连续患者进行分析,利用加州大学圣地亚哥分校的铅提取注册表。患者接受了静脉造影的心脏门控胸部CT扫描;所有扫描均由一名放射科医师进行审查。根据标准机构方案进行铅提取,最初使用激光护套并根据需要交叉到机械护套。进行了多变量线性和逻辑回归分析,以确定个体引线去除透视时间和机械鞘使用的预测因素。作为提取难度的标记。
    结果:共对343例患者进行了分析。研究人群的平均年龄为63.8±15.4岁;71%为男性。平均铅停留时间为8.6±5.7年。在多元线性回归分析中,在CT上检测到的静脉闭塞与较高的个体引线去除透视时间独立相关(p=0.004),当调整临床特征,如导线停留时间。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,钙化和静脉闭塞与TLE期间对机械鞘使用的较高需求独立相关(比值比:5.08,p<0.001,95%CI:2.54-10.46)和(比值比:3.72,p<0.001,95%CI:1.89-7.35),分别。
    结论:在接受TLE的患者中,胸部CT发现的静脉阻塞与透视时间增加相关.胸部CT检测到导线相关钙化或静脉阻塞的患者需要从激光到机械鞘交叉的可能性分别增加五倍和三倍。
    BACKGROUND: The ability of computed tomography (CT) characteristics to predict the difficulty of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is an evolving subject.
    OBJECTIVE: To identify CT characteristics associated with increased TLE difficulty.
    METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing TLE at the University of California San Diego from January 2018 to February 2022 were analyzed, utilizing the UC San Diego Lead Extraction Registry. Patients underwent cardiac-gated chest CT scans with intravenous contrast; all scans were reviewed by a single radiologist. Lead extraction was performed per standard institutional protocol with the initial use of a laser sheath and crossover to a mechanical sheath as needed. Multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of individual lead-removal fluoroscopy time and mechanical sheath use, as markers of extraction difficulty.
    RESULTS: A total of 343 patients were analyzed. The mean age of the study population was 63.8 ± 15.4 years; 71% were male. The mean lead dwell-in duration was 8.6 ± 5.7 years. In multivariable linear regression analysis, venous occlusion detected on CT was independently associated with higher individual lead-removal fluoroscopy time (p = 0.004), when adjusting for clinical characteristics such as lead dwell time. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, calcification and venous occlusion were independently associated with a higher need for mechanical sheath use during TLE (odds ratio:5.08, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 2.54-10.46) and (odds ratio:3.72, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.89-7.35), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing TLE, venous occlusion identified by chest CT is associated with increased fluoroscopy time. Patients with lead-associated calcification or venous occlusion detected by chest CT are each five and three times more likely to require crossover from laser to a mechanical sheath.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    带覆膜支架的经导管静脉窦缺损(SVD)闭合术正在成为外科手术的替代方法。为了使覆膜支架稳定,必须在上腔静脉中有足够的锚固区,以防止尾栓塞。对于上腔静脉非常短的患者,覆膜支架的织物存在无名静脉闭塞的潜在风险。在我们机构接受SVD关闭的105例患者中有3例出现无名静脉阻塞。诱发解剖学因素,闭塞无名静脉的识别和管理,并讨论了后续结果。
    Transcatheter sinus venosus defect (SVD) closure with covered stents is emerging as an alternative to surgery. An adequate anchor zone in the superior vena cava is mandatory for the stability of the covered stent to prevent caudal embolization. There is a potential risk of innominate vein occlusion by the fabric of the covered stent in patients with a very short superior caval vein. Three among a total of 105 patients who underwent SVD closure at our institution developed innominate vein occlusion. Predisposing anatomical factors, identification and management of occluded innominate vein, and follow-up outcomes are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的是分析技术,临床,和我们的恶性上腔静脉综合征(SVCS)患者的生存结局,并分析不同类型支架的疗效。
    它是一种观测,回顾性,单中心研究。从2006年到2023年,42名患者(32名男性,10女,平均年龄62岁,年龄范围,41-87岁)接受了恶性SVCS的经皮支架置入术。1个不锈钢支架(Wallstent)和2个静脉镍钛诺支架类型(Sinus-XL,Venovo)被使用。平均随访时间为276天。
    共部署了53个支架。不到24小时的临床成功率为97.6%。技术成功率为97.6%。除1例患者因支架迁移和心房分离而死亡外,无并发症发生(2.3%)。术中支架总移行率为11.9%(18.8%不锈钢支架,9.6%镍钛诺支架,p>0.05)。总生存率为87.8%,41.99%,34.12%,总体原发性通畅率为100%,93.3%,在1个月、6个月和12个月时为91.6%,分别。
    血管内治疗是一种安全有效的SVCS治疗选择,技术和临床成功率高,并发症和复发率低。
    结论:恶性上腔静脉综合征是一种罕见的临床实体,通常用放疗和化疗治疗,反应较慢,或者手术旁路,这是一种积极的手术技术。血管内治疗提供了一种低侵入性技术,具有快速的临床分辨率和良好的渗透性结果。然而,缺乏对程序技术特征的进一步研究,使用的支架类型,技术并发症,以及中长期通畅性研究。本研究旨在评估所有这些项目,分析自膨式不锈钢和镍钛诺静脉裸金属支架,为血管内治疗增加价值,证实了这项技术的良好结果。
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose was to analyze the technical, clinical, and survival outcomes of our patients with malignant superior cava vein syndrome (SVCS) treated with endovascular approach and analyze the efficacy of different stent types used.
    UNASSIGNED: It is an observational, retrospective, single-center study. From 2006 to 2023, 42 patients (32 male, 10 female, mean age 62 years, age range, 41-87 years) underwent percutaneous stent placement for malignant SVCS. One stainless steel stent (Wallstent) and 2 venous nitinol stent type (Sinus-XL, Venovo) were used. Follow-up mean was 276 days.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 53 stents were deployed. Clinical success was 97.6% in less 24 hours. Technical success was achieved in 97.6%. No complications were found except 1 patient died during the procedure due to stent migration and atrial dissociation (2.3%). Overall intraprocedural stent migration rate was 11.9% (18.8% stainless steel stent, 9.6% nitinol stent, p>0.05). Overall survival rates were 87.8%, 41.99%, and 34.12%, and overall primary patency rates were 100%, 93.3%, 91.6% at 1, 6, and 12 months, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Endovascular treatment is a safe and effective therapeutic option for SVCS with high technical and clinical success rates and low complication and recurrence rates.
    CONCLUSIONS: The malignant superior cava vein syndrome is a rare clinical entity treated classically with radiation and chemotherapy with a slower response, or surgical bypass, which is an aggressive surgical technique. Endovascular treatment offers a low-invasive technique with quick clinical resolution and good permeability results. However, further studies are lacking to deal with procedure technical characteristics, stent type used, technical complications, and medium- and long-term patency studies. This study aims to evaluate all these items, analysing self-expanding stainless steel and nitinol venous bare metal stents, and add value to endovascular treatment, confirming the good results of this technique.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:先天性心脏病(CHD)患者的经静脉导线管理可能因静脉阻塞和残余分流而复杂化。我们介绍了我们的经验,同时进行引线提取和静脉途径的扩张/支架置入,包括完全静脉阻塞的患者。
    方法:对2017年至2021年波士顿儿童医院同时进行的所有病例进行回顾性分析,并对安全性和有效性进行审查。
    结果:8名患者,4女,纳入中位年龄38.5岁(范围16.7~49岁)和手术时体重81.6kg(范围41.3~97.8kg).所有患者均患有冠心病,大多数(n=7)通过心房开关减轻了大动脉移位。所有导线都被全部移除,大多数患者有两个引线提取(n=7)。铅的中位停留时间为13.8年(范围3.6-35.3年)。三个病人完全阻塞,其中3例需要对无名静脉进行支架置入,3例需要对股血管进行再通.中位手术时间为9.8h(范围5.4-12.8h)。并发症包括输血(n=2),心律失常(n=3),胸腔积液(n=1),压疮(n=1)。没有心脏穿孔,静脉撕裂,或死亡。
    结论:在静脉异常扩张和支架置入的同时,虽然持续时间很长,证明有效,并发症最少。这种组合的程序可以安全有效地解决经静脉引线继发的完全阻塞。
    BACKGROUND: Management of transvenous leads in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) can be complicated by venous obstructions and residual shunts. We present our experience performing concurrent lead extraction and dilation/stenting of venous pathways, including patients with complete venous obstruction.
    METHODS: All cases of concurrent lead extraction and recanalization of vena cavae/baffles between 2017 and 2021 at Boston Children\'s Hospital were retrospectively included and reviewed for safety and efficacy.
    RESULTS: Eight patients, 4 female, median 38.5 years of age (range 16.7-49 years) and 81.6 kg weight (range 41.3-97.8 kg) at time of procedure were included. All patients had CHD, a majority (n = 7) having transposition of the great arteries palliated via atrial switch. All leads were removed in their entirety, with most patients having two leads extracted (n = 7). Median lead dwell time was 13.8 years (range 3.6-35.3 years). Three patients had complete obstructions, three required stenting of their innominate veins and three required recanalization of their femoral vessels. Median procedure time was 9.8 h (range 5.4-12.8 h). Complications included blood transfusion (n = 2), arrhythmia (n = 3), pleural effusion (n = 1), and pressure ulcer (n = 1). There were no cardiac perforations, venous tears, or deaths.
    CONCLUSIONS: Lead extraction along with dilation and stenting of venous anomalies, though long in duration, proved effective with minimal complications. This combined procedure can safely and effectively resolve complete obstructions secondary to transvenous leads.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号