vasopressors

血管加压药
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:急性脊髓损伤(SCI)在世界范围内导致显著的发病率。指南建议增加平均动脉压(MAP)以防止灌注不足。虽然对于单一的血管活性药物用于MAP增强没有共识,静脉内血管加压药是常用的,需要重症监护病房(ICU)。除了患者的经济负担,ICU停留需要大量的医院系统资源利用。口服血管活性剂,如伪麻黄碱和米多君,还用于MAP增强,但是关于它们的功效的数据很少。这项研究调查了口服血管活性剂作为SCIMAP增强的替代方法的使用和剂量。
    方法:对成人SCI患者进行回顾性调查。每日总血管活性剂量,治疗功效,并对ICU住院时间进行评估。
    结果:对141例患者进行了评估,只有7.1%的人接受口服药物治疗,80.9%的人接受血管升压药过渡到伪麻黄碱,伪麻黄碱加米多君,或者没有口服药物。接受口服药物治疗的患者ICU住院时间趋于减少,但升压药持续时间没有差异.组间的MAP目标成功率相似。使用各种初始和最大日剂量的PO试剂。中位剂量为120mg伪麻黄碱和30mg米多君。伪麻黄碱的早期开始导致ICU住院时间缩短。
    结论:这项研究表明,与血管升压药相比,PO药物的ICU住院时间更短,MAP目标成功率相似。这可能表明这些药物可用于减轻长期ICU课程给患者和医疗保健系统带来的经济负担。这项研究受到小样本量和可变药剂剂量的限制。
    BACKGROUND: An acute spinal cord injury (SCI) results in significant morbidity worldwide. Guidelines recommend mean arterial pressure (MAP) augmentation to prevent hypoperfusion. Although there is no consensus on a single vasoactive agent for MAP augmentation, intravenous vasopressors are commonly utilized, requiring an intensive care unit (ICU). Beyond the financial burden for patients, ICU stays require significant hospital system resource utilization. Oral vasoactive agents, such as pseudoephedrine and midodrine, are also utilized for MAP augmentation, but little data on their efficacy are available. This study investigates the use and dosing of oral vasoactive agents as an alternative in MAP augmentation in SCI.
    METHODS: Adult SCI patients were retrospectively investigated. Total daily vasoactive dose, treatment efficacy, and ICU length of stay were evaluated.
    RESULTS: 141 patients were evaluated, with 7.1% receiving oral agents alone, and 80.9% receiving vasopressors who either transitioned to pseudoephedrine, pseudoephedrine plus midodrine, or no oral agent. Patients receiving oral agents trended toward decreased ICU stay, but there was no difference in vasopressor duration. Similar MAP goal success rates were found between groups. A variety of initial and maximum daily doses of PO agents were used. Median doses were 120 mg pseudoephedrine and 30 mg midodrine. Early initiation of pseudoephedrine resulted in shorter ICU stays.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated shorter ICU length of stay and similar MAP goal success with PO agents as compared to vasopressors. This may indicate these medications could be utilized to decrease the financial burden placed on patients and the health care system from lengthy ICU courses. This study is limited by a small sample size and variable agent dosing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脓毒性休克代表一组会导致严重的血液动力学和代谢功能障碍的表现。由于免疫系统对任何类型的感染的巨大反应,导致死亡风险显着增加,最终导致难治性低血压,从而导致住院患者死亡率上升,大多数时间分离的生物体是大肠杆菌,克雷伯菌属,铜绿假单胞菌,和金黄色葡萄球菌。WHO认为败血症是全球健康关注的问题;多年来,败血症和败血症性休克的发病率一直在增加,同时被认为报告不足。这篇综述是对使用乳酸(Lac)的诊断方法的最新研究的快速信息概述,降钙素原(PCT),序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分,急性生理学和慢性健康评估II(APACHEII)评分,以及使用血管加压药的管理建议,液体复苏,应对此类休克时应考虑的皮质类固醇和抗生素。
    Septic shock stands for a group of manifestations that will cause a severe hemodynamic and metabolic dysfunction, which leads to a significant increase in the risk of death by a massive response of the immune system to any sort of infection that ends up with refractory hypotension making it responsible for escalating the numbers of hospitalized patients mortality rate, Organisms that are isolated most of the time are Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staph aureus. The WHO considers sepsis to be a worldwide health concern; the incidence of sepsis and septic shock have been increasing over the years while being considered to be under-reported at the same time. This review is a quick informative recap of the recent studies regarding diagnostic approaches using lactic acid (Lac), procalcitonin (PCT), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score, as well as management recommendations for using vasopressors, fluid resuscitation, corticosteroids and antibiotics that should be considered when dealing with such type of shock.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:持续的血管加压药需求是重症监护病房(ICU)延迟释放的常见原因,有时使用辅助口服药物来加快血管加压药停药的时间。我们试图描述屈昔多巴在长期低血压的危重患者中用于血管加压药撤机的用途。
    方法:本回顾性研究,单臂,观察性研究包括2016年06月至2023年07月在两个学术中心入住ICU的成年患者,这些患者接受了屈昔多巴用于血管加压药断奶.入院前接受屈昔多巴或其他适应症的患者被排除在外。主要结果是升压药停药时间,定义为当血管加压药停止并保持关闭至少24小时。次要结局包括心动过速和开始后低血压的发生率,去甲肾上腺素等效物开始前和开始后,同时使用口服药物,和剂量。对通过饲管接受屈昔多巴的患者进行了亚组分析。
    结果:共有30例患者符合纳入标准。中位年龄为62岁,12人(40%)为女性,73%在心脏/心脏外科ICU。在屈昔多巴开始之前,患者服用血管加压药的中位数为16天。升压药停药的中位时间(IQR)为70小时(23-192),去甲肾上腺素当量在开始后立即降低(0.08vs0.02mcg/kg/min,p<0.001)。屈昔多巴开始后MAP增加(68.8vs66.5mmHg,p=0.008),而心率不变(86vs84BPM,开始后p=0.37)。在屈昔多巴启动后72小时内与超过72小时断奶的患者更有可能在启动前服用较低的去甲肾上腺素当量(0.05vs0.12mcg/kg/min,p=0.013)。饲管给药不影响血管加压药停药的时间(p=0.93)。
    结论:Droxidopa可被视为血管加压药断奶的辅助治疗。在分析通过饲管接受屈昔多巴的患者时,效果相似。
    BACKGROUND: Persistent vasopressor requirements are a common reason for delayed liberation from the intensive care unit (ICU) and adjunct oral agents are sometimes used to hasten time to vasopressor discontinuation. We sought to describe the use of droxidopa for vasopressor weaning in critically ill patients with prolonged hypotension.
    METHODS: This retrospective, single-arm, observational study included adult patients admitted to an ICU at two academic centers between 06/2016-07/2023 who received droxidopa for vasopressor weaning. Patients who received droxidopa prior to admission or for another indication were excluded. The primary outcome was time to vasopressor discontinuation, defined as when vasopressors were stopped and remained off for at least 24 h. Secondary outcomes included rates of tachycardia and hypotension post-initiation, norepinephrine equivalents pre- and post-initiation, concomitant oral agent use, and dosing. A subgroup analysis was conducted in patients receiving droxidopa via feeding tubes.
    RESULTS: A total of 30 patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 62 years old, 12 (40%) were female, and 73% were in a cardiac/cardiac surgical ICU. Patients were on vasopressors for a median of 16 days prior to droxidopa initiation. Median (IQR) time to vasopressor discontinuation was 70 h (23-192) and norepinephrine equivalents decreased immediately after initiation (0.08 vs 0.02 mcg/kg/min, p < 0.001). MAP increased after droxidopa initiation (68.8 vs 66.5 mm Hg, p = 0.008) while heart rates were unchanged (86 vs 84 BPM, p = 0.37) after initiation. Patients who weaned from vasopressors within 72 h versus longer than 72 h after droxidopa initiation were more likely to be on lower norepinephrine equivalents prior to initiation (0.05 vs 0.12 mcg/kg/min, p = 0.013). Feeding tube administration did not impact time to vasopressor discontinuation (p = 0.93).
    CONCLUSIONS: Droxidopa may be considered an adjunct therapy for vasopressor weaning. Effects were similar when analyzing patients receiving droxidopa via feeding tube.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较游离皮瓣重建时接受和未接受血管加压药(VP)的患者的游离皮瓣结局。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究包括2013年1月至2023年1月的患者。
    方法:这项多中心队列研究利用了TriNetX研究网络的数据,该网络包括80个医疗机构。
    方法:将18岁以上接受游离皮瓣重建的头颈部癌患者分为在手术当天接受或未接受VPs的患者。主要结果是皮瓣失败,定义为需要二次游离皮瓣手术,血管修复,和其他襟翼修正程序。
    结果:在倾向得分匹配后,对7446例患者进行分析。VP组包括3723例患者(平均年龄[SD],62.9[11.4]岁;2511名男性[67.4%])。非VP组包括3723例患者(平均年龄[SD],63.0[11.2]岁;2479名男性[66.6%])。游离皮瓣结果组间无统计学差异(次级游离皮瓣:166[4.5%]VPvs155[4.2%]非VP,P=.04;血管修复:314[8.4%]对319[8.6%],P=.06;其他皮瓣翻修程序:416[11.2%]vs449[12.1%],P=.02)。发现VP组的骨皮瓣的血管修复率降低(47[6.1%]vs69[9.0%],P=0.003]。对于次要结果,肺炎(173[4.6%]vs231[6.2%],P=.0002),尿路感染(34[1.0%]vs59[1.6%],P=.0007),深静脉血栓形成(93[2.5%]vs122[3.3%],P=.004)有显著差异。
    结论:VP使用与游离皮瓣并发症无显著相关性。这些结果表明,如果临床需要,在手术当天使用VP可能是安全的。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare free flap outcomes between those who received and did not receive vasopressors (VPs) at the time of free flap reconstruction.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study includes patients from January 2013 to January 2023.
    METHODS: This multicenter cohort study utilized data from the TriNetX Research Network which includes 80 health care organizations.
    METHODS: Head and neck cancer patients older than 18 years who underwent free flap reconstruction were separated into those who received or did not receive VPs on the day of surgery. The primary outcomes were flap failure defined by need for secondary free flap procedures, blood vessel repair, and other flap revision procedures.
    RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 7446 patients were analyzed. The VP group included 3723 patients (mean age [SD], 62.9 [11.4] years; 2511 males [67.4%]). The non-VP group included 3723 patients (mean age [SD], 63.0 [11.2] years; 2479 males [66.6%]). Free flap outcomes were not statistically different between groups (secondary free flap: 166 [4.5%] VP vs 155 [4.2%] non-VP, P = .04; vessel repair: 314 [8.4%] vs 319 [8.6%], P = .06; other flap revision procedures: 416 [11.2%] vs 449 [12.1%], P = .02). Bony flaps were found to have decreased rates of vessel repair in the VP group (47 [6.1%] vs 69 [9.0%], P = .003]. For secondary outcomes, pneumonia (173 [4.6%] vs 231 [6.2%], P = .0002), urinary tract infection (34 [1.0%] vs 59 [1.6%], P = .0007), and deep vein thrombosis (93 [2.5%] vs 122 [3.3%], P = .004) were significantly different.
    CONCLUSIONS: VP use is not significantly associated with free flap complications. These results imply that VP use on the same day as surgery may be safe if clinically necessary.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性循环性休克是一种危及生命的紧急情况,需要有效和及时的管理计划,根据休克的病因和病理生理学而有所不同。已经为每种类型的电击制定了具体的指导方针;然而,在休克识别和管理的早期阶段,需要有一个明确的时间表,以便及时实施初始的挽救生命的干预措施.一个简单的,容易记住的一系列干预措施可以促进具有明确目标和指定时间表的标准化管理。作者提出了“MINUTES”首字母缩写词,该缩写词总结了应在休克识别后的前30分钟内进行的基本干预措施。MINUTES束中的所有干预措施均适用于未分化休克的任何患者。除了缩写,我们建议每个步骤的时间表,平衡每次干预的可行性和紧迫性。MINUTES首字母缩写包括七个连续步骤,这些步骤应在电击识别后的前30分钟内执行:维护\“ABC\”,输注血管加压药和/或液体(以支持血液动力学/灌注)并通过简单的血液检查进行调查,超声波来检测休克的类型,治疗潜在的病因学,和稳定器官灌注。
    Acute circulatory shock is a life-threatening emergency requiring an efficient and timely management plan, which varies according to shock etiology and pathophysiology. Specific guidelines have been developed for each type of shock; however, there is a need for a clear timeline to promptly implement initial life-saving interventions during the early phase of shock recognition and management. A simple, easily memorable bundle of interventions could facilitate standardized management with clear targets and specified timeline. The authors propose the \"MINUTES\" acronym which summarizes essential interventions which should be performed within the first 30 min following shock recognition. All the interventions in the MINUTES bundle are suitable for any patient with undifferentiated shock. In addition to the acronym, we suggest a timeline for each step, balancing the feasibility and urgency of each intervention. The MINUTES acronym includes seven sequential steps which should be performed in the first 30 min following shock recognition: Maintain \"ABCs\", INfuse vasopressors and/or fluids (to support hemodynamic/perfusion) and INvestigate with simple blood tests, Ultrasound to detect the type of shock, Treat the underlying Etiology, and Stabilize organ perfusion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:创伤和急诊手术是发病率和死亡率的主要原因。这项研究的目的是确定血清肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素的水平是否与衰老和死亡率相关。
    方法:这是一项在外科重症监护病房进行的前瞻性观察性队列研究。我们纳入了90名接受术后护理的患者,因为严重的创伤,或者两者兼而有之。我们收集了人口统计学和临床变量,以及血清肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素的水平。
    结果:对于>60岁年龄组的患者,发现使用血管活性药物与无法检测的肾上腺素水平相关(OR[95%CI]=6.36[1.12,36.08]),p=0.05)。对于肾上腺素水平检测不到的患者,那些去甲肾上腺素水平≥2006.5pg/mL的患者的住院死亡率较高(OR[95%CI]=4.00[1.27,12.58]),p=0.03)。
    结论:年龄和死亡率之间存在关联。检测不到血清肾上腺素,这在老年患者中更常见,可能会导致糟糕的结果。使用肾上腺素可以改善老年休克手术患者的临床预后。
    BACKGROUND: Trauma and emergency surgery are major causes of morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to determine whether serum levels of epinephrine and norepinephrine are associated with aging and mortality.
    METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted in a surgical critical care unit. We included 90 patients who were admitted for postoperative care, because of major trauma, or both. We collected demographic and clinical variables, as well as serum levels of epinephrine and norepinephrine.
    RESULTS: For patients in the > 60-year age group, the use of vasoactive drugs was found to be associated with an undetectable epinephrine level (OR [95% CI] = 6.36 [1.12, 36.08]), p = 0.05). For the patients with undetectable epinephrine levels, the in-hospital mortality was higher among those with a norepinephrine level ≥ 2006.5 pg/mL (OR [95% CI] = 4.00 [1.27, 12.58]), p = 0.03).
    CONCLUSIONS: There is an association between age and mortality. Undetectable serum epinephrine, which is more common in older patients, could contribute to poor outcomes. The use of epinephrine might improve the clinical prognosis in older surgical patients with shock.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    以前的工作已经确定了两种AKI亚表型(SP1和SP2),其特征在于炎症和内皮功能障碍的差异。在这里,我们使用在急诊科收集的生物标本鉴定了这些亚表型,并在CLOVERS试验中测试了对脓毒症诱导的低血压的限制性和宽松性液体策略的差异反应。方法我们应用先前验证的3-生物标志物模型,使用血浆血管色素-1和2以及可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体-1对肾功能不全(AKI或终末期肾病[ESKD])患者的亚表型进行分类。我们还将从头潜在类别分析(LCA)与基于3-生物标志物的亚表型进行了比较。Kaplan-Meier估计用于通过治疗相互作用检验结果和亚表型的差异。结果1289例患者中,846在登记时具有肾功能障碍,并且3变量预测模型将605鉴定为SP1,并且将241鉴定为SP2。最佳LCA模型确定了与3-生物标志物模型(Cohen'sKappa0.8)高度相关的两个亚表型。与AKI分期和SOFA评分无关,SP2中28天和90天死亡率的风险高于SP1。SP2患者,以更严重的内皮损伤和炎症为特征,限制性液体策略与自由液体策略相比,28天死亡率降低(26%vs41%),而SP1患者的28天死亡率无差异(10%vs11%)(p-value-for-interaction=0.03).结论在急诊科可以识别出对脓毒症液体治疗策略有不同反应的亚表型。这些亚表型的鉴定可以为脓毒症诱导的低血压和肾损伤患者提供精确指导的治疗方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Previous work has identified two AKI sub-phenotypes (SP1 and SP2) characterized by differences in inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Here we identify these sub-phenotypes using biospecimens collected in the emergency department and test for differential response to restrictive versus liberal fluid strategy in sepsis-induced hypotension in the CLOVERS trial.
    UNASSIGNED: We applied a previously validated 3-biomarker model using plasma angiopietin-1 and 2, and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 to classify sub-phenotypes in patients with kidney dysfunction (AKI or end-stage kidney disease [ESKD]). We also compared a de novo latent class analysis (LCA) to the 3-biomarker based sub-phenotypes. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to test for differences in outcomes and sub-phenotype by treatment interaction.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 1289 patients, 846 had kidney dysfunction on enrollment and the 3-variable prediction model identified 605 as SP1 and 241 as SP2. The optimal LCA model identified two sub-phenotypes with high correlation with the 3-biomarker model (Cohen\'s Kappa 0.8). The risk of 28 and 90-day mortality was greater in SP2 relative to SP1 independent of AKI stage and SOFA scores. Patients with SP2, characterized by more severe endothelial injury and inflammation, had a reduction in 28-day mortality with a restrictive fluid strategy versus a liberal fluid strategy (26% vs 41%), while patients with SP1 had no difference in 28-day mortality (10% vs 11%) (p-value-for-interaction = 0.03).
    UNASSIGNED: Sub-phenotypes can be identified in the emergency department that respond differently to fluid strategy in sepsis. Identification of these sub-phenotypes could inform a precision-guided therapeutic approach for patients with sepsis-induced hypotension and kidney injury.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:围手术期低血压是常见的,并与患者不良预后相关。血管活性剂通常用于控制低血压,但理想的药物,治疗的剂量和持续时间尚未确定。通过这次范围审查,我们的目的是概述目前关于血管活性药物用于治疗非心脏手术围手术期低血压的证据.
    方法:我们纳入了描述使用血管活性药物治疗非心脏手术围手术期低血压的所有研究。我们排除了文献综述,案例研究,以及对动物和健康受试者的研究。我们提出了以下研究问题:(1)研究了哪些手术人群的血管活性药物?(2)研究了哪些药物?(3)评估了什么剂量?(4)治疗持续时间是多少?(5)评估了哪些理想和不良结果?
    结果:我们包括124项代表10个外科专业的研究。评估了18种不同的药物,主要是去氧肾上腺素,麻黄碱,和去甲肾上腺素.这些药物通过六种不同的途径给药,以及代理之间的大量比较,包括剂量和途径。然后,评估了88种不同的结果指标,其中54人被判定为非以患者为中心。
    结论:我们发现关于血管活性药物治疗围手术期低血压的研究在各个方面都有很大差异。种群是异质的,干预和暴露包括与自己相比的多种药物,彼此,液体或安慰剂,研究报告主要是非以患者为中心的结局.
    BACKGROUND: Perioperative hypotension is common and associated with adverse patient outcomes. Vasoactive agents are often used to manage hypotension, but the ideal drug, dose and duration of treatment has not been established. With this scoping review, we aim to provide an overview of the current body of evidence regarding the vasoactive agents used to treat perioperative hypotension in non-cardiac surgery.
    METHODS: We included all studies describing the use of vasoactive agents for the treatment of perioperative hypotension in non-cardiac surgery. We excluded literature reviews, case studies, and studies on animals and healthy subjects. We posed the following research questions: (1) in which surgical populations have vasoactive agents been studied? (2) which agents have been studied? (3) what doses have been assessed? (4) what is the duration of treatment? and (5) which desirable and undesirable outcomes have been assessed?
    RESULTS: We included 124 studies representing 10 surgical specialties. Eighteen different agents were evaluated, predominantly phenylephrine, ephedrine, and noradrenaline. The agents were administered through six different routes, and numerous comparisons between agents, dosages and routes were included. Then, 88 distinct outcome measures were assessed, of which 54 were judged to be non-patient-centred.
    CONCLUSIONS: We found that studies concerning vasoactive agents for the treatment of perioperative hypotension varied considerably in all aspects. Populations were heterogeneous, interventions and exposures included multiple agents compared against themselves, each other, fluids or placebo, and studies reported primarily non-patient-centred outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号