vascular surgery

血管外科
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:终末期肾病自体动静脉(AV)通路创建后,大多数患者将继续接受血液透析(HD),少数人将接受肾脏移植的明确治疗,一部分患者将转换为腹膜透析(PD)。我们的目标是确定与从HD到肾移植或PD的早期过渡相关的患者因素。
    方法:这是一项病例对照研究,对血管质量倡议(2011-2022)中首次建立房室通路的所有患者进行了长期随访。在AV通路创建后仍保持HD的患者为对照组,而接受早期肾脏移植或转换为PD的患者为两个病例组。人口统计学之间的关系,合并症,邻里社会劣势,评估了与肾脏替代治疗方式相关的功能状态。
    结果:包括19,782例患者;平均年龄为62±15岁,男性占57%。在中位306(71-403)天的随访期间,1.3%接受了肾移植,2.3%接受了PD的转换。关于单变量分析,肾移植或转化为PD的比率因种族而异(P<.001),保险状况(P<.001),面积剥夺指数(ADI)五分之一(P<.001),和一些医疗合并症。在多变量分析中,行走受损,目前吸烟,医疗补助或医疗保险,黑人种族,心力衰竭,身体质量指数,年龄和年龄与移植率下降相关。转化为PD与ADIQ5、Q4和Q3相关。转化为PD的减少与步行障碍有关,西班牙裔种族,黑人种族,以前吸烟,药物控制的糖尿病,和老年。
    结论:肾移植减少与黑人种族和非商业健康保险有关,但与ADI五分之一无关。表明在社区一级获得护理的机会之外存在差距。与HD和PD相比,早期肾脏移植带来了3年的生存益处。有相似的生存。需要进一步的工作来增加肾移植和PD的获得。
    OBJECTIVE: After autogenous arteriovenous (AV) access creation for end-stage renal disease, a majority of patients will continue on hemodialysis (HD), a minority will receive definitive treatment with kidney transplantation, and a subset of patients will convert to peritoneal dialysis (PD). Our goal was to identify patient factors associated with early transition from HD to either kidney transplantation or PD.
    METHODS: This is a case-control study of all patients with first-time AV access creation in the Vascular Quality Initiative (2011-2022) who had long-term follow-up. Patients who remained on HD after AV access creation were the control group while patients who received early kidney transplant or who converted to PD were the two case groups. Relationship among demographics, comorbidities, neighborhood social disadvantage, and functional status as they relate to renal replacement therapy modality was assessed.
    RESULTS: There were 19,782 patients included; the average age was 62±15 years and 57% were male. During the follow-up period of a median 306 (71-403) days, 1.3% underwent a kidney transplantation and 2.3% underwent conversion to PD. On univariable analysis, rates of kidney transplantation or conversion to PD varied with race (P<.001), insurance status (P<.001), Area Deprivation Index (ADI) quintile (P<.001), and several medical comorbidities. On multivariable analysis, impaired ambulation, current smoking, Medicaid or Medicare insurance, Black race, heart failure, body mass index, and older age were associated with decreased transplantation rates. Conversion to PD was associated with ADI Q5, Q4, and Q3. Decreased conversion to PD was associated with impaired ambulation, Hispanic ethnicity, Black race, former smoking, medication-controlled diabetes, and older age.
    CONCLUSIONS: Decreased kidney transplantation was associated with Black race and non-commercial health insurance but not ADI quintile, suggesting disparities exist beyond community-level access to care. Early kidney transplantation conveyed a 3-year survival benefit compared to HD and PD, which had similar survival. Further work is required to increase access to kidney transplantation and PD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们提出了一种在恶性肿瘤患者中使用改良的分叉大隐静脉移植物进行颈动脉重建的新技术。这项技术可以优化SVG和颈总动脉之间的大小匹配,以及颈内动脉和颈外动脉。手术后一年进行的术后计算机断层扫描显示出出色的移植物对齐和颈动脉通畅。
    We present a new technique for carotid artery reconstruction using a modified bifurcated saphenous vein graft in a patient with a malignant neck tumor. This technique can optimize the size match between the SVG and common carotid artery, as well as the internal and external carotid arteries. Post operative computed tomography performed a year after the operation demonstrated excellent graft alignment and patent carotid arteries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血压是一个重要的生理参数,特别是在心脏重症监护和围手术期的背景下。作为器官灌注的主要指标,维持足够的血压对于确保足够的组织氧气输送至关重要。在危重和大手术患者中,连续监测血压是患者的标准做法.尽管如此,关于血压目标的不确定性仍然存在,关于血压目标没有共识。这篇综述描述了血压的决定因素,检查血压对器官灌注的影响,综合各种重症监护和围手术期设置的当前临床证据,为日常临床实践提供简明指导。
    Blood pressure is a critical physiological parameter, particularly in the context of cardiac intensive care and perioperative settings. As a primary indicator of organ perfusion, the maintenance of adequate blood pressure is imperative for the assurance of sufficient tissue oxygen delivery. Among critically ill and major surgery patients, the continuous monitoring of blood pressure is performed as a standard practice for patients. Nonetheless, uncertainties remain regarding blood pressure goals, and there is no consensus regarding blood pressure targets. This review describes the determinants of blood pressure, examine the influence of blood pressure on organ perfusion, and synthesize the current clinical evidence from various intensive care and perioperative settings to provide a concise guidance for daily clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在接受血管外科手术后,女性患者的临床结果经常比男性患者差。然而,目前尚不清楚这些基于性别的差异是否也会影响心理健康结局.这项研究旨在调查接受血管手术的患者报告的抑郁症结局指标的性别差异。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了2016年1月至2023年4月期间接受血管外科手术的107例患者(男性73例,女性34例)。这些患者在手术前90d和手术后至少一次完成了患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)项目库v1.0-抑郁评估。在按性别对患者进行分层后,我们使用多重混合效应线性回归模型分析了PROMIS抑郁评分的变化.然后,采用logistic回归分析比较手术后15个月内PROMIS抑郁评分有临床意义差异的患者比例.
    结果:男女患者并发症发生率无显著差异,住院时间,或者非家庭出院率。然而,与男性相比,女性与术后PROMIS抑郁评分显著改善相关(P=0.034).此外,与男性患者相比,女性患者达到PROMIS抑郁评分改善的最低临床重要差异阈值的可能性高出3倍以上(比值比4.66,95%置信区间1.39~15.61).
    结论:这些结果表明,女性与接受血管手术后患者报告的抑郁程度改善有关。临床医生在评估女性患者的血管干预措施时应考虑这些心理健康益处。
    BACKGROUND: Female patients frequently experience worse clinical outcomes than male patients after undergoing vascular surgery procedures. However, it is unclear whether these sex-based disparities also impact mental health outcomes. This study was designed to investigate sex differences in patient-reported outcome measures of depression for patients undergoing vascular surgery.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 107 patients (73 males and 34 females) who underwent vascular surgery procedures between January 2016 and April 2023. These patients completed a Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v1.0-Depression assessment 90 d before surgery and at least once after surgery. After stratifying patients by sex, we analyzed changes in PROMIS depression scores using a multiple mixed-effects linear regression model. Then, logistic regression was used to compare the proportion of patients who achieved a clinically meaningful difference in PROMIS depression score within 15 mo after surgery.
    RESULTS: There was no significant difference between female and male patients among rates of complications, length of hospital stay, or rates of nonhome discharge. However, female sex was associated with significantly improved PROMIS depression scores after surgery compared to male sex (P = 0.034). Furthermore, female patients were over 3-fold more likely than male patients to reach the minimal clinically important difference threshold for improvement in PROMIS depression scores (odds ratio 4.66, 95% confidence interval 1.39-15.61).
    CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that female sex is associated with improved patient-reported measures of depression after undergoing vascular surgery. Clinicians should consider these mental health benefits when evaluating female patients for vascular interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:在过去的十年中,各种外科手术的MedicareB部分报销一直在下降,医疗费用继续增加。因此,医院可能会增加服务费以抵消收入损失,这可能会不成比例地影响保险不足的患者。我们的分析旨在描述常见血管外科手术中的医疗保险账单和利用趋势。
    方法:按提供者和服务数据集查询了2017-2021年Medicare医师和其他从业人员常见血管外科手术的CPT代码。平均费用,报销,收费与报销比率,计算血管外科医师进行的最常见干预的服务计数.数据按护理环境分层,设施(住院和门诊医院)与非设施地点。所有货币价值均调整为2021年美元,以计入通货膨胀。
    结果:对于设施设置,从2017年到2021年,向MedicareB部分收取的平均费用从3,708美元增加到3,952美元(6.6%),平均费用与报销比率从7.2增加到8.6。19个设施程序中有17个偿还额下降,从平均558美元降至499美元(-10.4%)。穿刺静脉切除术在设施报销方面有最大的个人下降(-53.5%),其次是膝盖以上截肢(-11.3%)和膝盖以下截肢(-11.0%)。在研究期间,非设施费用(-10.8%)和报销(-12.2%)都有所下降。2017年至2019年,程序利用率保持稳定。胫骨和股-pop动脉粥样斑块切除术分别增加了45.9%和33.7%,分别,从2017年到2019年在非设施环境中执行的总体程序利用率结论:我们对2017年到2021年向MedicareB部分收费的血管手术程序的分析显示费用增加,报销的减少,以及随之而来的设施护理设置的收费与报销比率的增加。相比之下,面对偿还额下降的情况,非设施费用有所下降。在设施位置提交的费用中的这些加价可能会成为获得保险不足的患者的额外障碍。
    OBJECTIVE: Within the past decade, Medicare Part B reimbursements for various surgical procedures have been declining, whereas health care expenses continue to increase. As a result, hospitals may increase service charges to offset losses in revenue, which may disproportionately affect underinsured patients. Our analysis aimed to characterize Medicare billing and utilization trends across common vascular surgical procedures.
    METHODS: The 2017 to 2021 Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners by Provider and Service dataset was queried for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for common vascular surgery procedures. The average charges, reimbursements, charge-to-reimbursement ratios, and service counts were calculated for the most common interventions performed by vascular surgeons. Data was stratified by care setting, facility (inpatient and outpatient hospital) vs non-facility locations. All monetary values were adjusted to the 2021 United States dollars to account for inflation.
    RESULTS: For facility settings, the mean charge billed to Medicare Part B increased from $3708 to $3952 (6.6%) from 2017 to 2021, with the average charge-to-reimbursement ratio increasing from 7.2 to 8.6. There were 17 of the 19 facility procedures that had a decline in reimbursements, decreasing from an average of $558 to $499 (-10.4%). Stab phlebectomy had the largest individual decrease in facility reimbursement (-53.5%), followed by above-knee amputation (-11.3%) and below-knee amputation (-11.0%). Both non-facility charges (-10.8%) and reimbursements (-12.2%) declined over the study period. Procedural utilization remained stable from 2017 to 2019. Tibial and femoral-popliteal atherectomy had increases of 45.9% and 33.7%, respectively, in overall procedural utilization when performed in non-facility settings from 2017 to 2019.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of vascular surgery procedures billed to Medicare Part B from 2017 to 2021 demonstrates an increase in charges, a decline in reimbursements, and a resultant increase in charge-to-reimbursement ratios for facility care settings. In contrast, non-facility charges have decreased in the face of declining reimbursements. These markups in submitted charges in facility locations may serve as an additional barrier to accessing care for patients who are underinsured.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:外周动脉疾病(PAD)可使伤口愈合率降低≤30%。目前的文献表明,当血管提供者推动管理时,伤口结局得到改善。然而,这种获益是否仅来自于早期血管提供者的参与仍不清楚.
    方法:对2022年7月至2023年7月在我们机构的伤口中心观察到的80条具有慢性伤口和潜在PAD的肢体进行了回顾性分析。动脉疾病由以下标准定义:(1)先前的PAD诊断,(2)踝臂指数<0.9或脚趾压力<70mmHg,或(3)缺乏外周脉冲。患者分为早期(<6周)血管提供者暴露(EVE;n=45)或晚期/无血管暴露(LNVE;n=35)。提供者包括血管外科医生和附属高级从业者。研究的主要结果是伤口愈合的总时间。统计分析包括χ2检验,t测试,皮尔逊相关性,Kaplan-Meier分析,和Cox回归模型(变量包括在多变量模型,如果单变量对愈合的影响在P<1相关)。
    结果:除基线白蛋白较低(P=0.037)外,组间基线人口统计学特征相似,更多的心力衰竭(P=.013),在EVE组中,先前的外周血管内干预更多(P=.013)。尽管最初的伤口位置和大小相似,EVE伤口的WIfI伤口评分明显更高(1.9±0.1vs1.6±0.1;P=.039)。尽管更多的LNVE患者发展为放射学骨髓炎(31.8%vs55.6%;P=0.033),接受手术清创或截肢的患者较少(100%vs63.2%;P=.008).在单变量分析中,EVE的愈合时间往往较短,但不显著(P=.089)。当控制合并症时,然而,EVE的治愈率几乎高出两倍(风险比,2.42;95%置信区间,1.21-4.84)。LNVE伤口也需要更长的时间才能达到检查点,包括超过75%肉芽的时间(P=0.05),每周大小减少15%(P=.044),和上皮化(P=0.026)。LNVE患者需要更多的伤口中心就诊(P=.024)和手术(P=.005),干预时间更长(P=.041)。所有EVE患者均获得踝臂指数,其中90.9%的患者在第一次伤口护理就诊时可用(P<.001)。尽管在EVE中接受大截肢的患者比例略高(15.6%vs11.4%;P=.595),这种差异没有达到显著性;此外,100%的EVE患者在截肢前有过关于不可挽救的四肢的讨论。
    结论:早期接触血管从业者可改善伤口愈合时间,及时干预,以及PAD患者伤口中心和医院资源的使用。进一步调查社区伤口中心模型中血管受累的益处可以显着提高较小/偏远社区对动脉伤口护理的认识和可及性。
    OBJECTIVE: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) can reduce wound healing rates by ≤30%. Current literature suggests wound outcomes are improved when management is driven by vascular providers. However, whether this benefit is derived solely from early vascular provider involvement remains unclear.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 80 limbs with chronic wounds and underlying PAD seen at our institution\'s wound center between July 2022 and July 2023. Arterial disease was defined by the following criteria: (1) prior PAD diagnosis, (2) ankle-brachial-index of <0.9 or toe pressure of <70 mm Hg, or (3) absent peripheral pulses. Patients were divided into early (<6 week) vascular provider exposure (EVE; n = 45) or late/no vascular exposure (LNVE; n = 35). Providers included vascular surgeons and affiliated advanced practitioners. The primary outcome studied was overall time to wound healing. Statistical analysis included χ2 tests, t test, Pearson correlation, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox regression modeling (variables included in a multivariate model if univariate effect on healing was associated at P < .1).
    RESULTS: Baseline demographic profiles were similar between groups with exception of lower baseline albumin (P = .037), more heart failure (P = .013), and more prior peripheral endovascular interventions (P = .013) in the EVE group. Although the initial wound locations and sizes were similar, EVE wounds had significantly higher WIfI wound scores (1.9 ± 0.1 vs 1.6 ± 0.1; P = .039). Although more LNVE patients developed radiographic osteomyelitis (31.8% vs 55.6%; P = .033), fewer underwent operative debridement or amputation (100% vs 63.2%; P = .008). On univariate analysis, healing time tended to be shorter in EVE, but not significantly (P = .089). When controlled for comorbidities, however, healing rates were nearly two-fold higher in EVE (hazard ratio, 2.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-4.84). LNVE wounds also took significantly longer to reach checkpoints including time to >75% granulation (P = .05), 15% weekly size decrease (P = .044), and epithelialization (P = .026). LNVE patients required more wound center visits (P = .024) and procedures (P = .005) with a longer time to intervention (P = .041). All EVE patients obtained ankle-brachial indices, with 90.9% of them available at their first wound care visit (P < .001). Although a slightly greater proportion of patients underwent a major amputation in EVE (15.6% vs 11.4%; P = .595), this difference did not attain significance; additionally, 100% of EVE patients had documented discussion of nonsalvageable limbs before amputation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Early exposure to vascular practitioners improves wound healing time, timeliness to intervention, and wound center and hospital resource use in patients with PAD. Further investigation into benefits of vascular involvement within community wound center models could significantly improve awareness and accessibility of arterial wound care in smaller/remote communities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹主动脉瘤(AAA)是世界范围内死亡率的重要来源,并且在破裂后具有大于80%的死亡率。尽管在开发药物治疗方面做出了广泛的努力,目前没有有效的药物来防止动脉瘤的生长和破裂。目前的治疗模式仅依赖于小动脉瘤的识别和监测,在最终开放手术或血管内修复之前。最近,再生疗法已成为解决AAA中观察到的退行性变化的有希望的途径。这篇综述简要概述了当前的临床管理原则,特点,和AAA的药物目标。随后,对再生方法进行了深入的讨论。这些方法包括细胞方法(血管平滑肌细胞,内皮细胞,和间充质干细胞)以及治疗分子的递送,基因疗法,和再生生物材料。最后,提供了临床翻译的其他障碍和注意事项。总之,再生方法对AAA组织损伤的原位逆转具有重要的前景,需要持续的研究和创新,以在AAA管理的新时代实现成功和可翻译的疗法。
    Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a significant source of mortality worldwide and carries a mortality of greater than 80% after rupture. Despite extensive efforts to develop pharmacological treatments, there is currently no effective agent to prevent aneurysm growth and rupture. Current treatment paradigms only rely on the identification and surveillance of small aneurysms, prior to ultimate open surgical or endovascular repair. Recently, regenerative therapies have emerged as promising avenues to address the degenerative changes observed in AAA. This review briefly outlines current clinical management principles, characteristics, and pharmaceutical targets of AAA. Subsequently, a thorough discussion of regenerative approaches is provided. These include cellular approaches (vascular smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, and mesenchymal stem cells) as well as the delivery of therapeutic molecules, gene therapies, and regenerative biomaterials. Lastly, additional barriers and considerations for clinical translation are provided. In conclusion, regenerative approaches hold significant promise for in situ reversal of tissue damages in AAA, necessitating sustained research and innovation to achieve successful and translatable therapies in a new era in AAA management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)背景:创建动静脉瘘(AVF)的外科手术可以在门诊或住院医院环境中进行,根据案件的复杂性,使用的麻醉类型,和病人的合并症。这项研究的主要范围是评估在门诊和住院环境中手术创建AVF的成本效益和临床意义。(2)方法:我们进行了一项回顾性观察研究,我们最初招募了血管外科收治的所有终末期肾病(ESKD)患者,TarguMures急诊县医院,罗马尼亚,通过手术制作一个用于透析的AVF,2020年1月至2022年12月。这项研究的主要终点是评估在非卧床手术中创建AVF的成本效益。通过比较两种入院所需的费用,在医院内设置。Further,本研究纳入的116例患者根据其住院偏好分为两组:门诊患者和住院患者.(3)结果:关于住院患者的合并症,外周动脉疾病(PAD)的患病率较高(p=0.006),恶性肿瘤(p=0.020),和以前的心肌梗死(p=0.012)。此外,在这些患者中,主动吸烟(p=0.006)和肥胖(p=0.018)更为常见.关于实验室数据,住院患者的白细胞(WBC)水平较低(p=0.004),中性粒细胞计数(p=0.025),淋巴细胞(p=0.034),和单核细胞(p=0.032),但两组在全身性炎症生物标志物或AVF类型方面无差异.此外,我们没有记录关于结果的任何差异:局部并发症(p=0.588),成熟失败(p=0.267),和原发性通畅(p=0.834)。在我们随后的分析中,我们发现患者选择的AVF原发通畅失败住院类型之间无显著差异(p=0.195).在多元线性回归和Cox比例风险分析中,我们发现住院类型和记录的结果之间没有显着关联(所有ps>0.05)。(4)结论:总之,在临床意义上没有显着差异,门诊和住院患者的AVF短期和长期并发症。此外,我们发现与制作AVF的实验室检查和手术用品相关的费用没有变化.因此,进行动态AVF是安全的,这可以降低医院感染的风险,并为患者提供更大的舒适度。
    (1) Background: The surgical procedure to create an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) can be performed in either an ambulatory or in-patient hospital setting, depending on the case\'s complexity, the anesthesia type used, and the patient\'s comorbidities. The main scope of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness and clinical implications of surgically creating an AVF in both ambulatory and in-hospital settings. (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study, in which we initially enrolled all patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) admitted to the Vascular Surgery Department, Emergency County Hospital of Targu Mures, Romania, to surgically create an AVF for dialysis, between January 2020 and December 2022. The primary endpoint of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of surgically creating an AVF in an ambulatory vs. in-hospital setting by comparing the costs required for the two types of admissions. Further, the 116 patients enrolled in this study were divided into two groups based on their preference for hospitalization: out-patients and in-patients. (3) Results: Regarding in-patient comorbidities, there was a higher prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) (p = 0.006), malignancy (p = 0.020), and previous myocardial infarction (p = 0.012). In addition, active smoking (p = 0.006) and obesity (p = 0.018) were more frequent among these patients. Regarding the laboratory data, the in-patients had lower levels of white blood cells (WBC) (p = 0.004), neutrophils count (p = 0.025), lymphocytes (p = 0.034), and monocytes (p = 0.032), but there were no differences between the two groups regarding the systemic inflammatory biomarkers or the AVF type. Additionally, we did not register any difference regarding the outcomes: local complications (p = 0.588), maturation failure (p = 0.267), and primary patency (p = 0.834). In our subsequent analysis, we discovered no significant difference between the hospitalization type chosen by patients regarding AVF primary patency failure (p = 0.195). We found no significant association between the hospitalization type and the recorded outcomes (all ps > 0.05) in both multivariate linear regression and Cox proportional hazard analysis. (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, there are no significant differences in the clinical implications, short-term and long-term complications of AVF for out-patient and in-patient admissions. Additionally, we found no variation in the costs associated with laboratory tests and surgical supplies for an AVF creation. Therefore, it is safe to perform ambulatory AVFs, which can reduce the risk of hospital-acquired infections and provide greater comfort to the patient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:小型研究表明,晚期冠状动脉疾病患者可能受益于更自由的输血策略。这项初步研究的目的是测试一组在休息时心肌肌钙蛋白升高的血管手术患者中输血干预的可行性。
    方法:我们进行了单中心,随机对照试点研究。术前高敏肌钙蛋白T升高的患者接受非心血管手术后的前3天随机分为自由输血方案(血红蛋白>10.4g/dL)和限制性输血方案(血红蛋白8.0-9.6g/dL)。主要结局定义为全因死亡率的复合终点,心肌梗死或计划外冠状动脉血运重建。
    结果:共筛选了499名患者;92名患者被纳入,50名患者被随机分组。干预组和对照组的术后血红蛋白不同;第一天10.6对9.8,10.4对9.4,10.9对9.4g/dL,两个和三个分别(p<0.05)。主要结局发生在自由输血组的4例患者(16%)和对照组的2例患者(8%)。
    结论:这项初步研究表明,所研究的输血方案能够在围手术期血红蛋白水平上产生临床上显著的差异。在10%的筛选患者中,随机化是可能的。一项大型的确定性试验应该可以提供证据,证明自由输血策略是否可以降低高危手术患者术后心肌梗死的发生率。
    BACKGROUND: Small studies have shown that patients with advanced coronary artery disease might benefit from a more liberal blood transfusion strategy. The goal of this pilot study was to test the feasibility of a blood transfusion intervention in a group of vascular surgery patients who have elevated cardiac troponins in rest.
    METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, randomised controlled pilot study. Patients with a preoperative elevated high-sensitive troponin T undergoing non-cardiac vascular surgery were randomised between a liberal transfusion regime (haemoglobin >10.4 g/dL) and a restrictive transfusion regime (haemoglobin 8.0-9.6 g/dL) during the first 3 days after surgery. The primary outcome was defined as a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction or unscheduled coronary revascularization.
    RESULTS: In total 499 patients were screened; 92 were included and 50 patients were randomised. Postoperative haemoglobin was different between the intervention and control group; 10.6 versus 9.8, 10.4 versus 9.4, 10.9 versus 9.4 g/dL on day one, two and three respectively (p < 0.05). The primary outcome occurred in four patients (16%) in the liberal transfusion group and in two patients (8%) in control group.
    CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study shows that the studied transfusion protocol was able to create a clinically significant difference in perioperative haemoglobin levels. Randomisation was possible in 10% of the screened patients. A large definitive trial should be possible to provide evidence whether a liberal transfusion strategy could decrease the incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction in high risk surgical patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号