vascular endothelial growth factor receptor

血管内皮生长因子受体
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较妊娠高血压综合征(PIH)妇女、非妊娠(NP)妇女和健康妊娠(HP)妇女循环中血管内皮生长因子受体3(VEGFR-3)的水平。
    方法:我们进行了一项病例对照研究,包括PIH(n=135),HP(n=68),和NP(n=49)来自巴西东南部的女性。根据国际指南诊断为PIH,并定义为妊娠期高血压(GH,n=61)或先兆子痫(n=74)。使用ELISA测量血浆中的VEGFR-3。
    结果:与NP(133pg/mL)女性相比,HP(1207pg/mL)的血浆VEGFR-3增加;然而,PIH(729pg/mL)患者的水平低于HP女性(均p<0.05)。此外,与GH相比,子痫前期患者血浆VEGFR-3降低(537对980pg/mL;p<0.05)。当根据不同的临床表现对先兆子痫进行分类时,在确定为具有严重特征的先兆子痫的病例中,血浆VEGFR-3进一步降低,先兆子痫,先兆子痫伴小于胎龄儿(均p<0.05)。
    结论:我们的数据表明PIH患者循环VEGFR-3水平降低,特别是那些被诊断为先兆子痫的患者。此外,VEGFR-3降低与子痫前期的不良临床结局相关.这些发现扩大了先前在先兆子痫中VEGFR-3表达降低的证据。未来的研究应该调查它是否可以用作先兆子痫的预测生物标志物和/或治疗靶标。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare circulating levels of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 (VEGFR-3) in women with pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) and in non-pregnant (NP) and healthy pregnant (HP) women.
    METHODS: We conducted a case-control study including PIH (n = 135), HP (n = 68), and NP (n = 49) women from southeastern Brazil. PIH were diagnosed according to international guidelines, and defined as gestational hypertension (GH, n = 61) or pre-eclampsia (n = 74). VEGFR-3 was measured in plasma using ELISA.
    RESULTS: Plasma VEGFR-3 was increased in HP (1207 pg/mL) compared with NP (133 pg/mL) women; however, PIH (729 pg/mL) patients exhibited lower levels than HP women (both p < 0.05). In addition, plasma VEGFR-3 was decreased in pre-eclampsia compared with GH (537 versus 980 pg/mL; p < 0.05). When pre-eclampsia was classified according to different clinical presentations, plasma VEGFR-3 was further decreased in the cases identified as pre-eclampsia with severe features, preterm pre-eclampsia, and pre-eclampsia accompanied by small for gestational age (all p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate reduced circulating VEGFR-3 levels in patients with PIH, specifically in those diagnosed with pre-eclampsia. Moreover, decreased VEGFR-3 was associated with adverse clinical outcomes in pre-eclampsia. These findings expand previous evidence of reduced VEGFR-3 expression in pre-eclampsia. Future studies should investigate whether it can be used as a predictive biomarker and/or therapeutic target for pre-eclampsia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于血管生成在肿瘤进展和转移中起关键作用,导致更多与癌症相关的死亡,血管生成过程可以被认为是诊断和治疗应用的目标。血管内皮生长因子受体-1(VEGFR-1)和VEGFR-2在乳腺癌细胞中高表达,有助于血管生成和肿瘤发展。因此,通过VEGFR-1/2检测进行早期诊断是一种极好的策略,可以显著增加患者的生存机会.在这项研究中,VEGFR1/2靶向肽VGB3与1,4,7,10-四氮杂环十二烷-1,4,7,10-四乙酸(DOTA)缀合,使用6-氨基己酸(Ahx)作为间隔基以防止结合中的空间位阻。DOTA-Ahx-VGB3有效地用镓-68(68Ga)放射性标记。在4T1细胞系中评估体外细胞结合测定。对4T1荷瘤小鼠进行[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-Ahx-VGB3的肿瘤靶向潜力。因此,制备高放射化学纯度[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-Ahx-VGB3(RCP=98%)并在不同的缓冲体系中稳定。在2小时孵育和受体结合后,约17%的放射性肽被内化,其特征在于IC50值为约867nM。生物分布和PET/CT研究表明,[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-Ahx-VGB3到达了肿瘤部位,并被肾脏系统迅速排泄。这些特征传达[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-Ahx-VGB3作为用于VEGFR-1/2表达的非侵入性可视化的合适试剂。
    As angiogenesis plays a pivotal role in tumor progression and metastasis, leading to more cancer-related deaths, the angiogenic process can be considered as a target for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. The vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (VEGR-1) and VEGFR-2 have high expression on breast cancer cells and contribute to angiogenesis and tumor development. Thus, early diagnosis through VEGFR-1/2 detection is an excellent strategy that can significantly increase a patient\'s chance of survival. In this study, the VEGFR1/2-targeting peptide VGB3 was conjugated with 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA), using 6-aminohexanoic acid (Ahx) as a spacer to prevent steric hindrance in binding. DOTA-Ahx-VGB3 was radiolabeled with Gallium-68 (68Ga) efficiently. An in vitro cell binding assay was assessed in the 4T1 cell line. The tumor-targeting potential of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-Ahx-VGB3 was conducted for 4T1 tumor-bearing mice. Consequently, high radiochemical purity [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-Ahx-VGB3 (RCP = 98%) was prepared and stabilized in different buffer systems. Approximately 17% of the radiopeptide was internalized after 2 h incubation and receptor binding as characterized by the IC50 value being about 867 nM. The biodistribution and PET/CT studies revealed that [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-Ahx-VGB3 reached the tumor site and was excreted rapidly by the renal system. These features convey [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-Ahx-VGB3 as a suitable agent for the noninvasive visualization of VEGFR-1/2 expression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在探讨结膜下注射阿柏西普的效果,在缝合诱导的角膜新生血管形成的小鼠模型中,VEGFR-1和VEGFR-2对角膜血管生成和表达VEGFR的CD11b细胞的可溶性蛋白诱饵。
    方法:通过在角膜上放置三条缝线,在BALB/c小鼠中诱导角膜新生血管形成。手术后立即,将200µg阿柏西普(5µL)或等体积的磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)注入结膜下间隙.七天后,通过临床检查和测量角膜平板支架中CD31染色面积,对角膜新血管进行了量化.使用RT-qPCR评估角膜中促血管生成和炎症标志物的水平。分析角膜中VEGFR-2+CD11b+细胞和VEGFR-3+CD11b+细胞的百分比,血,和使用流式细胞术引流颈部淋巴结(DLN)。
    结果:与结膜下PBS注射相比,结膜下注射阿柏西普显着降低了角膜新血管的生长。Cd31、血管生长因子(Vegfc和Angpt1)的mRNA水平,结膜下阿柏西普下调角膜中的促血管生成/炎症标志物(Tek/Tie2,Mrc1,Mrc2和Il6)。此外,角膜中VEGFR-3+CD11b+细胞的百分比,血,DLN被ablibercept减少了,而VEGFR-2+CD11b+细胞不受影响。
    结论:结膜下给予阿柏西普抑制角膜炎性血管生成,减少角膜浸润和循环VEGFR-3+CD11b+细胞的数量。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of subconjunctival injection of aflibercept, a soluble protein decoy for VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, on corneal angiogenesis and VEGFR-expressing CD11b+ cells in a mouse model of suture-induced corneal neovascularization.
    METHODS: Corneal neovascularization was induced in BALB/c mice by placing three sutures on the cornea. Immediately after surgery, either 200 µg aflibercept (5 µL) or an equal volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was administered into the subconjunctival space. Seven days after later, corneal new vessels were quantified through clinical examination and measurement of the CD31-stained area in corneal flat mounts. The levels of pro-angiogenic and inflammatory markers in the cornea were evaluated using RT-qPCR. The percentages of VEGFR-2+CD11b+ cells and VEGFR-3+CD11b+ cells were analyzed in the cornea, blood, and draining cervical lymph nodes (DLNs) using flow cytometry.
    RESULTS: Subconjunctival injection of aflibercept significantly reduced the growth of corneal new vessels compared to subconjunctival PBS injection. The mRNA levels of Cd31, vascular growth factors (Vegfc and Angpt1), and pro-angiogenic/inflammatory markers (Tek/Tie2, Mrc1, Mrc2, and Il6) in the cornea were downregulated by subconjunctival aflibercept. Also, the percentage of VEGFR-3+CD11b+ cells in the cornea, blood, and DLNs was decreased by aflibercept, whereas that of VEGFR-2+CD11b+ cells was unaffected.
    CONCLUSIONS: Subconjunctival aflibercept administration inhibits inflammatory angiogenesis in the cornea and reduces the numbers of cornea-infiltrating and circulating VEGFR-3+CD11b+ cells.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    口服多激酶抑制剂索拉非尼和乐伐替尼目前可作为不可切除或转移性甲状腺癌患者的一线治疗。然而,这些多激酶抑制剂难治性患者的治疗选择有限.这项研究旨在评估在真实世界临床实践中,在转移性甲状腺癌患者中,在lenvatinib和索拉非尼均失败后,重新攻击lenvatinib的安全性和有效性。我们回顾性分析了2016年至2023年在静冈癌症中心首次lenvatinib和索拉非尼治疗失败后接受lenvatinib治疗的连续16例转移性甲状腺癌患者的数据。其中,最初的lenvatinib在12例患者中由于进行性疾病而停用,在3例患者中,由于不良事件,由于两者兼而有之,1名患者。总有效率为6.7%,在所有具有靶病变的患者中,通过使用lenvatinib重新攻击实现疾病控制.使用lenvatinib重新攻击后的中位无进展生存期为15.0个月。在用lenvatinib重新攻击后,没有观察到新的毒性迹象。我们的研究结果表明,在临床实践中,在转移性甲状腺癌患者中,在lenvatinib和索拉非尼均失败后,lenvatinib再次攻击显示出可控的安全性和适度的疗效。lenvatinib再激发的策略可能为没有可靶向驱动基因或未指示选择性激酶抑制剂的患者提供替代选择。
    The oral multikinase inhibitors sorafenib and lenvatinib are currently available as first-line treatment for patients with unresectable or metastatic thyroid cancer. However, treatment options for patients who are refractory to these multikinase inhibitors are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rechallenged lenvatinib after failure of both lenvatinib and sorafenib in patients with metastatic thyroid cancer in the real-world clinical practice. We retrospectively reviewed the data of consecutive 16 patients with metastatic thyroid cancer who received lenvatinib as a rechallenge after failure of initial lenvatinib and sorafenib treatment at Shizuoka Cancer Center between 2016 and 2023. Of these, the initial lenvatinib was discontinued in 12 patients owing to progressive disease, in 3 patients owing to adverse events, and in 1 patient owing to both. The overall response rate was 6.7%, and disease control was achieved by rechallenge with lenvatinib in all patients with the target lesions. The median progression free survival after rechallenging with lenvatinib was 15.0 months. No new signs of toxicity were observed after rechallenging with lenvatinib. Our findings suggest that rechallenge with lenvatinib after failure of both lenvatinib and sorafenib showed manageable safety and modest efficacy in patients with metastatic thyroid cancer in clinical practice. The strategy of lenvatinib rechallenge may provide an alternative option for patients with no targetable driver genes or when selective kinase inhibitors are not indicated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)和VEGF报告基因(VEGFR)是VEGF信号通路中的重要分子。尽管VEGF和VEGFR的功能在脊椎动物中已得到很好的报道,它们的功能在无脊椎动物中仍然知之甚少。在这项研究中,从中华绒螯蟹中克隆了EsVEGF1和EsVEGFR4的开放阅读框序列,它们相应的蛋白质与其他物种的蛋白质具有典型的结构特征。EsVEGF1主要在肝胰腺和肌肉中表达,而EsVEGFR4主要在血细胞和肠道中表达。金黄色葡萄球菌和副溶血性弧菌快速诱导血细胞中EsVEGF1的表达,在接受副溶血性弧菌攻击后,它在肝胰腺中也迅速增加。EsVEGFR4的表达水平仅在注射金黄色葡萄球菌的螃蟹的肝胰腺中增加。EsVEGFR4的细胞外免疫球蛋白结构域可以与革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性细菌以及脂多糖和肽聚糖结合。EsVEGF1可以作为EsVEGFR4和Toll样受体的配体,以组织特异性的方式调节地壳素和溶菌酶的表达,而对抗脂多糖因子没有调节功能。这项研究将为甲壳类动物VEGF和VEGFR介导的免疫防御机制提供新的见解。
    Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF reporter (VEGFR) are essential molecules in VEGF signalling pathway. Although the functions of VEGF and VEGFR have been well reported in vertebrates, their functions are still poorly understood in invertebrates. In this study, the open reading frame sequences of EsVEGF1 and EsVEGFR4 were cloned from Eriocheir sinensis, and their corresponding proteins shared typical structure characteristics with their counterparts in other species. EsVEGF1 were predominantly expressed in hepatopancreas and muscle while EsVEGFR4 mainly expressed in hemocytes and intestine. The expression levels of EsVEGF1 in hemocytes were rapidly induced by Staphylococcus aureus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and it also increased rapidly in hepatopancreas after being challenged with V. parahaemolyticus. The expression levels of EsVEGFR4 only increased in hepatopancreas of crabs injected with S. aureus. The extracellular immunoglobulin domain of EsVEGFR4 could bind with Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria as well as lipopolysaccharide and peptidoglycan. EsVEGF1 could act as the ligand for EsVEGFR4 and Toll-like receptor and regulate the expression of crustins and lysozyme with a tissue-specific manner, while have no regulatory function on that of anti-lipopolysaccharide factors. This study will provide new insights into the immune defense mechanisms mediated by VEGF and VEGFR in crustaceans.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这项研究中,我们评估了66例被诊断为腺样囊性癌(ACC)的患者,这些患者参与了韩国癌症研究组的两项试验,目的是研究接受血管内皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(VEGFR-TKIs)治疗的复发和/或转移性ACC的缓解和进展模式.
    我们评估了66名被诊断为ACC的患者,这些患者被纳入了韩国癌症研究组试验。肿瘤测量,临床资料,治疗结果,并分析了治疗的进展模式。
    在66名患者中(53名接受阿西替尼,13名接受尼达尼布),疾病控制率为61%,3例患者获得部分缓解。中位随访,中位无进展生存期(PFS),总生存率,6个月的PFS率分别为27.6、12.4和18.1个月和62.1%,分别。在42例进展的患者中,27例(64.3%)显示靶病变进展。骨转移是一个独立的不良预后因素。
    总的来说,大多数患者表现出疾病稳定,PFS延长;然而,一些患者出现明显的靶病变进展.因此,PFS可以或许捕捉VEGFR-TKI的疗效优于客观反响率。
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, we evaluated 66 patients diagnosed with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) enrolled in two Korean Cancer Study Group trials to investigate the response and progression patterns in recurrent and/or metastatic ACC treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs).
    UNASSIGNED: We evaluated 66 patients diagnosed with ACC who were enrolled in the Korean Cancer Study Group trials. The tumor measurements, clinical data, treatment outcomes, and progression patterns of therapy were analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: In the 66 patients (53 receiving axitinib and 13 receiving nintedanib), the disease control rate was 61%, and 3 patients achieved partial response. The median follow-up, median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and 6-month PFS rate were 27.6, 12.4, and 18.1 months and 62.1%, respectively. Among 42 patients who experienced progression, 27 (64.3%) showed target lesion progression. Bone metastasis was an independent poor prognostic factor.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, most patients demonstrated stable disease with prolonged PFS; however, prominent target lesion progression occurred in some patients. Thus, PFS may capture VEGFR-TKI efficacy better than the objective response rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)已被认为是治疗各种肿瘤的关键药物。它们的关键靶标之一是血管内皮生长因子受体(VEGFR)的细胞内位点。虽然TKIs已证明其在实体瘤患者中的有效性并延长了预期寿命,它们还可能导致不良的心血管影响,包括高血压,血栓栓塞,心肌缺血,和左心室功能障碍。在TKIs中,索拉非尼是第一个被批准的药物,它通过靶向VEGFR和RAF抑制血管生成和肿瘤细胞增殖,对肝细胞癌(HCC)和肾细胞癌(RCC)发挥抗肿瘤作用。不幸的是,索拉非尼引起的心血管不良作用不仅影响实体瘤患者,而且限制了其在治疗其他疾病中的应用。这篇综述探讨了索拉非尼引起心血管不良反应的潜在机制。包括内皮功能障碍,线粒体功能障碍,内质网应激,自噬失调,和铁中毒。它还讨论了潜在的治疗策略,如抗氧化剂和肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂,并强调了索拉非尼诱导的高血压与癌症患者治疗效果之间的关系。此外,新兴研究表明索拉非尼诱导的糖酵解之间存在联系,耐药性,和心血管毒性,需要进一步调查。总的来说,了解这些机制对于优化索拉非尼治疗和降低癌症患者的心血管风险至关重要.
    Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been recognized as crucial agents for treating various tumors, and one of their key targets is the intracellular site of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR). While TKIs have demonstrated their effectiveness in solid tumor patients and increased life expectancy, they can also lead to adverse cardiovascular effects including hypertension, thromboembolism, cardiac ischemia, and left ventricular dysfunction. Among the TKIs, sorafenib was the first approved agent and it exerts anti-tumor effects on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by inhibiting angiogenesis and tumor cell proliferation through targeting VEGFR and RAF. Unfortunately, the adverse cardiovascular effects caused by sorafenib not only affect solid tumor patients but also limit its application in curing other diseases. This review explores the mechanisms underlying sorafenib-induced cardiovascular adverse effects, including endothelial dysfunction, mitochondrial dysfunction, endoplasmic reticulum stress, dysregulated autophagy, and ferroptosis. It also discusses potential treatment strategies, such as antioxidants and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, and highlights the association between sorafenib-induced hypertension and treatment efficacy in cancer patients. Furthermore, emerging research suggests a link between sorafenib-induced glycolysis, drug resistance, and cardiovascular toxicity, necessitating further investigation. Overall, understanding these mechanisms is crucial for optimizing sorafenib therapy and minimizing cardiovascular risks in cancer patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评价血管生成素-2(Ang-2)和血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)-A抑制剂法利玛与阿柏西普治疗静脉阻塞患者的24周疗效和安全性。
    方法:第三阶段,全球,随机化,双面蒙面,主动对照试验:BALATON/COMINO(ClincalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04740905/NCT04740931;站点:149/192)。
    方法:治疗初期中央凹中心累及的黄斑水肿由分支(BALATON)或中央或半视网膜(COMINO)RVO引起的患者。
    方法:患者以1:1的比例随机分配至法利单抗6.0mg或阿柏西普2.0mg,每4周一次,共24周。
    方法:主要终点:最佳矫正视力(BCVA)从基线到第24周的变化。疗效分析包括意向治疗人群中的患者。安全性分析包括接受≥1剂量研究药物的患者。
    结果:注册:BALATON,n=553;COMINO,n=729。从基线到第24周,法利单抗的BCVA增益与BALATON中的阿柏西普相比不差(调整后的平均变化,+16.9个字母[95.03%置信区间(CI),15.7-18.1字母]vs.+17.5字母[95.03%CI,16.3-18.6字母])和COMINO(+16.9字母[95.03%CI,15.4-18.3字母]与+17.3个字母[95.03%CI,15.9-18.8个字母])。在BALATON的第24周时,faricimab和aflibercept相对于基线的调整平均中心子场厚度减少具有可比性(-311.4μm[95.03%CI,-316.4至-306.4μm]和-304.4μm[95.03%CI,-309.4μm])和COMINO(-461.6μm[95.3%CI,-471.3%至-在BALATON的第24周,法利单抗与阿柏西普组的患者比例更高(33.6%vs.21.0%;标称P=0.0023)和COMINO(44.4%与30.0%;标称P=0.0002)。Faricimab耐受性良好,具有与阿柏西普相当的可接受的安全性。在BALATON和COMINO中,接受法利单抗治疗的患者的眼部不良事件发生率相似(16.3%[n=45]和23.0%[n=84],分别)和阿柏西普(20.4%[n=56]和27.7%[n=100],分别)。
    结论:这些发现证明了法利单抗的有效性和安全性,Ang-2/VEGF-A双重抑制剂,视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿患者。
    背景:专有或商业披露可以在本文末尾的脚注和披露中找到。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 24-week efficacy and safety of the dual angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A inhibitor faricimab versus aflibercept in patients with vein occlusion.
    METHODS: Phase 3, global, randomized, double-masked, active comparator-controlled trials: BALATON/COMINO (ClincalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT04740905/NCT04740931; sites: 149/192).
    METHODS: Patients with treatment-naïve foveal center-involved macular edema resulting from branch (BALATON) or central or hemiretinal (COMINO) RVO.
    METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to faricimab 6.0 mg or aflibercept 2.0 mg every 4 weeks for 24 weeks.
    METHODS: Primary end point: change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to week 24. Efficacy analyses included patients in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses included patients who received ≥ 1 doses of study drug.
    RESULTS: Enrollment: BALATON, n = 553; COMINO, n = 729. The BCVA gains from the baseline to week 24 with faricimab were noninferior versus aflibercept in BALATON (adjusted mean change, +16.9 letters [95.03% confidence interval (CI), 15.7-18.1 letters] vs. +17.5 letters [95.03% CI, 16.3-18.6 letters]) and COMINO (+16.9 letters [95.03% CI, 15.4-18.3 letters] vs. +17.3 letters [95.03% CI, 15.9-18.8 letters]). Adjusted mean central subfield thickness reductions from the baseline were comparable for faricimab and aflibercept at week 24 in BALATON (-311.4 μm [95.03% CI, -316.4 to -306.4 μm] and -304.4 μm [95.03% CI, -309.3 to -299.4 μm]) and COMINO (-461.6 μm [95.03% CI, -471.4 to -451.9 μm] and -448.8 μm [95.03% CI, -458.6 to -439.0 μm]). A greater proportion of patients in the faricimab versus aflibercept arm achieved absence of fluorescein angiography-based macular leakage at week 24 in BALATON (33.6% vs. 21.0%; nominal P = 0.0023) and COMINO (44.4% vs. 30.0%; nominal P = 0.0002). Faricimab was well tolerated, with an acceptable safety profile comparable with aflibercept. The incidence of ocular adverse events was similar between patients receiving faricimab (16.3% [n = 45] and 23.0% [n = 84] in BALATON and COMINO, respectively) and aflibercept (20.4% [n = 56] and 27.7% [n = 100], respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the efficacy and safety of faricimab, a dual Ang-2/VEGF-A inhibitor, in patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.
    BACKGROUND: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血管生成是恶性神经胶质瘤的主要特征之一。磷酸化旌旗灯号转导因子和转录激活因子3(pSTAT3)不只介入胶质瘤细胞的增殖,抗凋亡,和免疫抑制,但在细胞迁移和侵袭中起关键作用。宪法规定,活化的pSTAT3诱导血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)及其受体VEGFR的表达,导致内皮细胞增殖和异常微血管形成,引起瘤周水肿(PTE)。PTE是恶性神经胶质瘤死亡率的重要因素之一。因此,了解胶质瘤演化的分子机制是必要的。本研究旨在评估pSTAT3,VEGF的表达水平,和VEGFR在恶性胶质瘤中的表达,并分析PTE的程度和这些标志物中的一种或多种的表达程度。
    这项研究包括84名根据世界卫生组织将中枢神经系统肿瘤分类为IV级的患者,III,及Ⅱ型胶质瘤中pSTAT3、VEGF、和VEGFR通过免疫组织化学。此外,在这些患者中,使用磁共振成像/计算机断层扫描确定是否存在PTE.
    标记之间的关联(pSTAT3,VEGFR,和VEGF),这些患者的PTE程度具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
    pSTAT3,VEGF-R,VEGF信号通路可能导致瘤周水肿,并可能是肿瘤发生和发展过程中PTE形成的调节机制。
    UNASSIGNED: Angiogenesis is one of the main characteristic features of malignant gliomas. Phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription factor 3 (pSTAT3) is not only involved in glioma cell proliferation, anti-apoptosis, and immunosuppression but also plays a key role in cell migration and invasion. Constitutively, activated pSTAT3 induces expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor VEGFR, leading to endothelial cell proliferation and abnormal microvascular formation causing peritumoral edema (PTE). PTE is one of the significant contributors to mortality in malignant gliomas. Therefore, understanding the molecular mechanism involved in the evolution of gliomas is necessary. This study was to assess the level of expression of pSTAT3, VEGF, and VEGFR in malignant gliomas and analyze the extent of PTE and the extent of expression of one or more of these markers.
    UNASSIGNED: This study included 84 patients categorized as per the World Health Organization classification of central nervous system tumors into grade IV, III, and II gliomas to investigate the expression of pSTAT3, VEGF, and VEGFR by immunohistochemistry. Furthermore, the presence or absence of PTE was determined using magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography scans in these patients.
    UNASSIGNED: The association between the markers (pSTAT3, VEGFR, and VEGF) and the extent of PTE in these patients was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: The pSTAT3, VEGF-R, and VEGF signaling pathways could contribute to peritumoral edema and might be a regulatory mechanism during PTE formation during tumorigenesis and progression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号