vaping product

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:电子健康记录(EHRs)可以识别尼古丁电子烟的长期健康影响。我们描述了在英国初级保健EHR中记录电子烟的程度,在人口水平上。
    方法:我们对临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)进行了描述性分析,英国25%人口的初级保健电子健康记录(约1600万患者)。确定了年龄≥18岁的患者,其使用2006年至2022年之间的医疗代码记录了电子烟状态。我们报告了电子烟代码的频率;它们按患者年龄分布,性别,和种族;vaping记录随时间变化的趋势(包括中断的时间序列分析);以及患者吸烟状况的转变。
    结果:七个医疗代码表示当前或以前的电子烟,150,114名患者。当他们的电子烟状态第一次被记录时,患者平均年龄为50.2岁(标准差:15.0),52.4%是女性,白人占82.1%。在那些被记录为当前电子烟的人中,几乎所有人(98.9%)都有以前吸烟状况的记录:55.0%曾吸烟,38.3%的人戒烟,5.6%的人从未吸烟。在被记录为电子烟之前吸烟的人中,vaping记录一年多后,超过三分之一(34.2%)的人仍在吸烟,不到四分之一(23.7%)戒烟,1.7%的人获得了“从未吸烟”的状态,40.4%没有吸烟。“电子烟或电子烟产品使用相关肺损伤”(EVALI)爆发与2019年9月至2020年3月之间当前电子烟的新记录下降趋势显着相关;以及前电子烟的新记录立即显着增加,其次是下降的趋势。
    结论:很少有患者被问及vaping。大多数vape吸烟的人,许多人在开始吸烟后戒烟。为了使电子健康记录能够提供更强有力的健康影响证据,我们建议改进的完整性,准确性和一致性。
    Electronic health records (EHRs) could identify long-term health effects of nicotine vaping. We characterised the extent to which vaping is recorded in primary care EHRs in the UK, on a population level.
    We performed descriptive analysis of Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), primary care electronic health records of 25% of the UK population (~ 16 million patients). Patients aged ≥ 18 years whose vaping status was recorded using medical codes between 2006 and 2022 were identified. We reported the frequency of vaping codes; their distribution by patient age, gender, and ethnicity; trends in vaping recording over time (including interrupted time series analyses); and transitions in patient smoking status.
    Seven medical codes indicated current or former vaping, from 150,114 patients. When their vaping status was first recorded, mean patient age was 50.2 years (standard deviation: 15.0), 52.4% were female, and 82.1% were White. Of those recorded as currently vaping, almost all (98.9%) had records of their prior smoking status: 55.0% had been smoking, 38.3% had stopped smoking, 5.6% had never smoked. Of those who were smoking prior to being recorded as vaping, more than a year after the vaping record, over a third (34.2%) were still smoking, under a quarter (23.7%) quit smoking, 1.7% received a \'never smoked\' status, and there was no smoking status for 40.4%. The \'e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury\' (EVALI) outbreak was significantly associated with a declining trend in new records of current vaping between September 2019 and March 2020; and an immediate significant increase in new records of former vaping, followed by a declining trend.
    Few patients are being asked about vaping. Most who vape had smoked, and many quit smoking after starting vaping. To enable electronic health records to provide stronger evidence on health effects, we recommend improved completeness, accuracy and consistency.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    电子烟或电子烟产品使用相关肺损伤(EVALI)是与使用电子烟或电子烟产品相关的严重肺部疾病,于2019年正式确定并命名。这个美国胸科学会研讨会于2021年召开,旨在确定和优先考虑研究和监管需求,以充分应对EVALI爆发,并防止与电子烟或电子烟产品使用相关的类似疾病。一个由26名成人和儿科临床护理专家组成的跨学科小组,公共卫生,监管监督,和毒理学召开了研讨会。研究了四个主要主题:1)对EVALI的公共卫生和监管反应;2)EVALI临床护理;3)促进EVALI的机制;4)需要采取行动来解决EVALI的健康影响。口头陈述和小组讨论是用于确定解决EVALI的首要任务的主要模式。包括国家EVALI病例登记和生物存储库在内的举措,集成电子病历编码系统,美国食品和药物管理局规定和执行尼古丁电子烟标准,非烟草衍生电子烟的监管机构,评估外源性暴露的培训,前瞻性临床研究,标准化临床随访评估,能够更容易地研究大麻素电子烟的影响,和研究,以确定生物标志物的暴露和疾病被确定为关键需求。这些举措将需要大量的联邦投资以及监管政策的变化。总的来说,研讨会确定有必要解决EVALI的根本原因,以防止未来爆发。需要从多个角度采取综合方法,包括公共卫生;临床,基本的,和转化研究;监管机构;以及电子烟的使用者。改善公共卫生应对措施以降低另一次重大疾病诱发事件的风险取决于采取协调行动,以更好地了解这些产品的吸入毒性。告知公众风险,并制定和执行所有电子烟的监管标准。
    E-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) is a severe pulmonary illness associated with the use of e-cigarettes or vaping products that was officially identified and named in 2019. This American Thoracic Society workshop was convened in 2021 to identify and prioritize research and regulatory needs to adequately respond to the EVALI outbreak and to prevent similar instances of disease associated with e-cigarette or vaping product use. An interdisciplinary group of 26 experts in adult and pediatric clinical care, public health, regulatory oversight, and toxicology were convened for the workshop. Four major topics were examined: 1) the public health and regulatory response to EVALI; 2) EVALI clinical care; 3) mechanisms contributing to EVALI; and 4) needed actions to address the health effects of EVALI. Oral presentations and group discussion were the primary modes used to identify top priorities for addressing EVALI. Initiatives including a national EVALI case registry and biorepository, integrated electronic medical record coding system, U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulation and enforcement of nicotine e-cigarette standards, regulatory authority over nontobacco-derived e-cigarettes, training in evaluating exogenous exposures, prospective clinical studies, standardized clinical follow-up assessments, ability to more readily study effects of cannabinoid e-cigarettes, and research to identify biomarkers of exposure and disease were identified as critical needs. These initiatives will require substantial federal investment as well as changes to regulatory policy. Overall, the workshop identified the need to address the root causes of EVALI to prevent future outbreaks. An integrated approach from multiple perspectives is required, including public health; clinical, basic, and translational research; regulators; and users of e-cigarettes. Improving the public health response to reduce the risk of another substantial disease-inducing event depends on coordinated actions to better understand the inhalational toxicity of these products, informing the public of the risks, and developing and enforcing regulatory standards for all e-cigarettes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号