Uterine fibroid embolisation (UFE) is an established treatment method for symptomatic uterine myomas. This study evaluates the efficacy of UFE using objective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data for size and perfusion analysis as well as patient questionnaires assessing fibroid-related symptoms.
Patients underwent MR-Angiography before UFE and 4 days, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. The images were evaluated using dedicated software. Patient questionnaires were completed before UFE and at 12 months follow-up, focussing on the embolization procedure and symptoms associated with uterine fibroids. Statistical analysis of the questionnaires was performed using paired sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test, while Kruskal-Wallis test and Friedman test were applied for MRI-analysis.
Eleven women were included. There was a significant reduction in fibroid-related symptoms. The volume reduction after 12 months was significant in both, uterus and myomas, after an initial increase in uterine volume at the first post-interventional MRI. The perfusion analysis showed that blood flow to the fibroids could be significantly reduced up to 12 months after UFE while uterine tissue was not affected.
This study shows that uterine fibroid embolisation induces a significant long-term decrease in myoma size and perfusion while healthy uterine tissue remains unaffected. Fibroid-related symptoms are reduced for the sake of improved quality of life.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: This was a retrospective case-control study at a single tertiary centre investigating all UFE procedures between January 2013 and December 2018 for symptomatic fibroids. The aim was to determine the clinical, imaging and procedural risk factors which impact upon the risk of post-uterine fibroid embolisation (UFE) intrauterine infection. Cases were patients which developed intrauterine infection post-procedure, and controls were the background UFE population without infection.
METHODS: Clinical demographics, presenting symptoms, uterine and fibroid characteristics on imaging and procedural variants were analysed. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The main outcome measures were presence of infection and requirement of emergency hysterectomy.
RESULTS: 333 technically successful UFE procedures were performed in 330 patients. Infection occurred after 25 procedures (7.5%). 3 of these patients progressed to overwhelming sepsis and required emergency hysterectomy. Clinical obesity (BMI > 30) (OR 1.53 [1.18-1.99]) and uterine volume > 1000cm3 (2.94 [1.15-7.54]) were found to increase the risk of infection CONCLUSIONS: UFE is generally safe in patients with symptomatic fibroids. Obese patients (BMI > 30) and those with large volume uteri (> 1000cm3) are at slight increased risk of developing infection and require appropriate pre-procedural counselling, as well as careful post-UFE follow-up. BMI and uterine volume may be useful to assess before the procedure to help to determine post-UFE infection risk.

BACKGROUND: To investigate if intra-arterial lidocaine administrated immediately after the embolisation endpoint reduces the pain.
METHODS: Forty patients were randomised and 36 completed the study for purposes of analysis. In one group, the patients got 1% 10 ml lidocaine (100 mg) administered into each uterine artery immediately after embolisation with microspheres. The other group was embolised without supplementary lidocaine. The patients scored their pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS) 2 h, 4 h, 7 h, 10 h and 24 h after embolisation, and the total amount of used morphine was noted. Three-month follow-up MRI control was scheduled for all the patients to investigate the infarction rate.
RESULTS: Embolisation was performed without any complications and with embolisation of both uterine arteries in all cases. Intra-arterial lidocaine was administered in all 20 patients without complications, and 20 patients in a control group did not receive lidocaine intra-arterial. VAS schemes showed a significant reduction in pain experience 2 h after UFE where mean pain score in the lidocaine group was 42.7 ± 21.4 compared with the control group in which the mean pain score was 61.1 ± 20.4 (p < 0.02). There was no significant difference in pain score 4 h, 7 h, 10 h and 24 h after UFE. In the lidocaine group, the mean amount of used morphine was significantly less with 11.2 mg compared with 20.2 mg in the control group (p < 0.03). Three months of MR follow-up control showed no significant difference in the grade of fibroid infarction.
CONCLUSIONS: Intra-arterial Lidocaine administration after embolisation is safe and effective in reducing post-procedural pain in the early hours and opioid usage in the first 24 h following UAE.

Uterine leiomyomata (fibroids) are symptomatic in up to 35% of women and treatment can be a costly burden to the individual and society. Options for treatment range from non-hormonal, hormonal, minimally invasive, to surgery. While symptoms from smaller fibroids may respond to simple treatment, those with larger fibroids or with a large volume of disease require a more definitive option. Surgery (hysterectomy or myomectomy) are both well-established treatment modalities with good clinical outcomes. Since the 1990s, uterine fibroid embolisation has emerged as a less invasive option for women than for surgical techniques, while level 1 evidence shows that in the short to mid-term, there is a similar improvement in symptom-related quality of life outcomes to surgery, but with reduced hospital stay and reduced cost. However, in the longer term there may be a need for further treatment or retreatment in some patients compared with surgery. Since its introduction, uptake of this procedure in Australia has been low relative to surgical options. This manuscript reviews the current literature surrounding treatment, along with the trends in uptake of embolisation by Australian women, places this in context of current guidelines from major societies, and encourages gynaecologists and interventional radiologists to be aware of the advantages and limitations of embolisation.

BACKGROUND: Uterine fibroids have the potential to cause morbidity, and there is a substantial cost to both the healthcare system and society. There is support for minimally invasive intervention, and uterine fibroid embolisation (UFE) is an established cost-effective option for women wishing for an alternative to surgery. There is a lack of local Australian costing data to compliment use in the public hospital system, and we offer a costing analysis of running a public hospital service.
METHODS: We reviewed the costs for 10 sequential uterine fibroid embolisation cases, by assessing the direct and indirect hospital costs.
RESULTS: The total cost of providing a uterine fibroid embolisation service using our model in a public hospital including initial outpatient assessment, procedure costs, overnight hospital ward stay and outpatient follow-up is $3995 per admission.
CONCLUSIONS: Using our model, the overall cost to perform this procedure is low, and lower than prior estimates for surgical alternatives. We encourage government and regulatory bodies to support UFE through guidelines and remuneration models, and encourage more public Australian interventional radiology departments to offer this service.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate potential factors on MR imaging that could be used to predict migration of uterine fibroids post-UAE.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients referred for UAE having pre-procedural and 6 months post-procedural MRI, at a tertiary centre, over a 1-year period. Pre- and post-UAE images were reviewed in 64 women by two radiologists to identify the sub-type, dimensions, and infarction rate of each dominant fibroid. The shortest distance between the fibroid and the endometrial wall was measured to determine intramural fibroid movement. Paired sample T tests and two-sample T tests were used to compare between pre- and post-embolization variations and between migrated and non-migrated intramural fibroids, respectively. After preliminary results suggested potential predictors of intramural fibroids migration, we tested our findings against the non-dominant intramural fibroids in the same patients.
RESULTS: Review of images revealed 35 dominant intramural fibroids, of which eight migrated to become submucosal fibroids, while five were either partially or completely expelled. These 13 migrated fibroids had a shorter pre-procedural minimum endometrial distance (range 1-2.4 mm) and greater maximum fibroid diameter (range 5.1-18.1 cm), when compared to non-migrating fibroids. On image reassessment, the migrated non-dominant intramural fibroids had a minimum endometrial distance and maximum fibroid diameter within the same range.
CONCLUSIONS: Intramural fibroids with a minimum endometrial distance less than 2.4 mm and a maximum fibroid diameter greater than 5.1 cm have a high likelihood of migrating towards the endometrial cavity after UAE.