Although rare, ureteric injuries can occur during gynecological surgical interventions, and their diagnosis can be challenging, especially when delayed. If left untreated, missed ureteric injuries can lead to severe complications, including prolonged hospitalization, sepsis, renal damage, and potentially even loss of the affected kidney. We present a unique case of a urinoma caused by bilateral ureteric injuries following abdominal hysterectomy, which was initially misdiagnosed as an intraperitoneal hematoma. However, further radiological investigations enabled accurate diagnosis without the need for exploratory laparotomy, demonstrating the importance of thorough evaluation for all possible complications in patients presenting with post-operative issues. In cases of pelvic collections of unclear origin or ureteric injury, a computed tomography (CT) scan is the gold standard diagnostic modality, providing precise diagnosis and expedited management.

Genitourinary fistulas are a well-recognized complication of various gynecological, obstetrical, and endourological interventions. The incidence of uretero-uterine fistula is very rare compared to other genitourinary fistulas. Few cases are reported in literature regarding the uretero- uterine fistula following manual vacuum aspiration of retained product of placenta. We report a case of 28 year multi-parous women who had presented with complain of involuntary passage of urine following manual vacuum aspiration for retained product of conception. Common tests for suspicion of uretero-uterine fistula include cystoscopy, triple swab test, and CT urography. Our patient was diagnosed in CT urography and was managed by exploratory laparotomy with end-to-end anastomosis of the right ureter, DJ stenting, and repair of a uterine perforation. Due to relatively rare incidence of this condition, there has not been a specific guideline for management. A multimodality and multidisciplinary approach have been proposed for the management of uretero-uterine fistulas.

UNASSIGNED: To present an alternative technique called pseudo-flap for reconstructing long ureteral defects as an alternative to Boari flap. Despite being used for more than 70 years by urologists for tension-free reconstruction of distal and mid-ureteral defects, the Boari flap exhibits high complication rates, with an average of 27% (range 5.5%-30.4%). These complications arise from compromised blood supply, attributed to incisions made on all three sides of the flap and dependence on the flap base as the sole source of blood supply.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent our modified technique by a single surgeon between 2008 and 2021. We used a semi-oblique cystotomy on the lowest part of the anterior and contralateral aspects of the bladder after complete release from adhesions and sacrificing the superior vesical pedicle, if necessary. The innovative part of the technique involved making short relaxing incisions at different levels on both sides of a pseudo-flap while pushing the bladder dome upward to reach the healthy ureter in a tension-free manner, followed by anastomosis with a non-refluxing or refluxing technique.
UNASSIGNED: Fifteen patients underwent the pseudo-flap technique with a mean follow-up of 16.9 months. Four had prior radiation, three had hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis, and one had a ureteral stricture in a transplanted kidney. Eight procedures were performed during intraoperative consultations.Only one patient (7%) developed a major complication (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2). This patient developed postoperative leak, and none developed obstructive hydronephrosis, suggesting stricture or flap ischemia. The mean length of the flap was 9.3 cm.
UNASSIGNED: Our pseudo-flap technique has lower complication rates than the traditional Boari flap. It is not technically challenging, minimally compromises blood supply and is thus especially suitable for complex, highly morbid patients with decreased tissue vascularity, such as those with prior radiation and peritoneal carcinomatosis.

暂无摘要。

Here we present two cases of post-operative obstructive renal failure following major abdomino-pelvic sarcoma surgery. In both cases, prophylactic ureteric stents were inserted to aid the identification and protection of the ureters during resection of these complex retroperitoneal masses. In case one, obstructive renal failure occurred following ureteric stent removal on day 0 post-operatively. In case two, obstructive renal failure developed on day 1 post-operatively despite having a ureteric stent in situ. Here we propose that a combination of reflex anuria/ureteric edema and papillary sloughing led to the obstructive renal failure in both cases. Re-insertion of bilateral ureteric stents in case one, and replacement of a right ureteric stent in case two saw prompt excretion of urine and sloughy debris with rapid improvement of renal function. This article presents these cases in detail and further reviews the use of prophylactic ureteric stents in major abdomino-pelvic surgery along with the current guidelines for their usage.

We discuss the case of a 67-year-old man who presented with a right-sided abdominal pain and on subsequent radiological imaging(s) in the form of an enhanced computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis followed by a delayed excretory phase (computed tomography urogram), found to have a distal 4 mm vesicoureteric junction stone which had caused a pelvicoureteric junction rupture which was evident on extravasation of contrast. This warranted an urgent surgical intervention in the form of ureteric stent insertion. This case clearly depicts that with even a small stone associated with severe flank pain, rupture or pelvicoureteric junction/calyces should be suspected and we should never overlook symptoms and push for medical expulsive therapy in patients who do not appear to be septic or obstructed. This work has been reported in line with the Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) criteria.

Compartment syndrome of the extremities is a rare but potentially devastating condition. We herein report a case of a 53-year old female with an unusual case of hand compartment syndrome and fasciitis secondary to methylene blue (MB) extravasation to detect urinary tract injury intraoperatively. This was recognized immediately and fasciotomy was performed. Features of this case are discussed together with its implications. Despite MB\'s long history of use, few adverse events of an accidental extravasation have been reported.

UNASSIGNED: The proximity of the uterus and the cervix to the urinary tract predisposes the latter to injury during obstetrical and gynaecological surgical procedures. Following a difficult surgical procedure on the lower uterine segment and or adnexa, urinary tract injury should be excluded.
UNASSIGNED: A booked 39-year-old G3P2 lady who suffered an ischaemic stroke in the index pregnancy had a caesarean delivery at 39 weeks of gestation and sustained an extensive tear that extended inferiorly on the left lateral aspect of the uterus and this resulted in postpartum haemorrhage. Following the repair of the tear, uterine artery ligation was performed to achieve haemostasis.
UNASSIGNED: Postoperatively, conventional ultrasonography which was performed to exclude ureteric injury suggested left hydronephrosis and a preliminary report of computerized tomography (CT) showed the same finding. The patient subsequently had left ureteric stenting. The final report of the CT scan was delayed but showed a simple left renal cyst and no hydronephrosis.
UNASSIGNED: Renal cyst is a differential diagnosis of hydronephrosis. Delayed availability of the final result of medical investigations jeopardises patients\' safety. A preliminary imaging report is prone to error and its use to determine the indication for an invasive procedure should be limited to emergencies.

BACKGROUND: Foleys catheter insertion is among the most common urological procedures performed by urologists.
METHODS: Here we present a case diagnosed with neurogenic bladder before 3 years and she was on long-term indwelling Foleys catheter since that due to urge incontinence and changes her catheter regularly every 10 to12 weeks, where the tip of the catheter was found in the right vesico-ureteric junction with hydronephrosis of the right kidney.
CONCLUSIONS: The two most commonly encountered complications of Foley catheter placement are urethral injury and retention of the Foley balloon in the urethra. Misdirection of Foleys catheter into the ureter is a rare complication. Up to our knowledge, only twenty cases have been reported in literature.
CONCLUSIONS: One should keep in mind that inadvertent insertion into the ureter can occur, especially in female patients with neurogenic bladder.

To assess the incidence of ureteric injuries, clinical value of prophylactic ureteric stenting and impact of intra- or postoperative detection of ureteric injuries in patients treated with gynaecological or colorectal surgery.
Multiple databases were searched for articles published before September 2021 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they evaluated the differences in the rate of ureteric injuries between laparoscopic and open surgery, prophylactic ureteric stenting or not, and those of final treatment success between intra- and postoperative detection in patients who underwent gynaecological or colorectal surgery.
Overall, 46 studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. Compared to open surgery, laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a higher incidence of ureteric injuries (pooled odds ratio [OR] 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71-2.62), but there was no statistically significant difference in colectomy (pooled OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.03). Prophylactic ureteric stenting was associated with a lower incidence of ureteric injuries during gynaecological surgery (pooled OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.96). The number needed to perform ureteric stenting to prevent one ureteric injury was 224 in gynaecological surgery. On the other hand, prophylactic ureteric stenting did not reduce the risk of ureteric injuries during colorectal surgery. Intraoperative detection of a ureteric injury was associated with a lower rate of complication management failure compared to postoperative detection (pooled OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.12-0.41).
Laparoscopic hysterectomy seems to be associated with a higher rate of ureteric injuries compared to an open approach. Prophylactic ureteric stenting seems to reduce this risk during gynaecological surgery. Intraoperative detection of a ureteric injury during abdominal/pelvic surgery improves outcomes, suggesting the need for awareness and proactive problem identification. Further well-designed studies assessing the candidates who are more likely to benefit from prophylactic ureteric stenting including cost analysis are needed.