BACKGROUND: Physiological motion of the lumbar spine is a topic of interest for musculoskeletal health care professionals since abnormal motion is believed to be related to lumbar complaints. Many researchers have described ranges of motion for the lumbar spine, but only few have mentioned specific motion patterns of each individual segment during flexion and extension, mostly comprising the sequence of segmental initiation in sagittal rotation. However, an adequate definition of physiological motion is still lacking. For the lower cervical spine, a consistent pattern of segmental contributions in a flexion-extension movement in young healthy individuals was described, resulting in a definition of physiological motion of the cervical spine.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to define the lumbar spines\' physiological motion pattern by determining the sequence of segmental contribution in sagittal rotation of each vertebra during maximum flexion and extension in healthy male participants.
METHODS: Cinematographic recordings were performed twice in 11 healthy male participants, aged 18-25 years, without a history of spine problems, with a 2-week interval (time point T1 and T2). Image recognition software was used to identify specific patterns in the sequence of segmental contributions per individual by plotting segmental rotation of each individual segment against the cumulative rotation of segments L1 to S1. Intraindividual variability was determined by testing T1 against T2. Intraclass correlation coefficients were tested by reevaluation of 30 intervertebral sequences by a second researcher.
RESULTS: No consistent pattern was found when studying the graphs of the cinematographic recordings during flexion. A much more consistent pattern was found during extension, especially in the last phase. It consisted of a peak in rotation in L3L4, followed by a peak in L2L3, and finally, in L1L2. This pattern was present in 71% (15/21) of all recordings; 64% (7/11) of the participants had a consistent pattern at both time points. Sequence of segmental contribution was less consistent in the lumbar spine than the cervical spine, possibly caused by differences in facet orientation, intervertebral discs, overprojection of the pelvis, and muscle recruitment.
CONCLUSIONS: In 64% (7/11) of the recordings, a consistent motion pattern was found in the upper lumbar spine during the last phase of extension in asymptomatic young male participants. Physiological motion of the lumbar spine is a broad concept, influenced by multiple factors, which cannot be captured in a firm definition yet.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03737227; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03737227.
UNASSIGNED: RR2-10.2196/14741.

BACKGROUND: Various methods and techniques have been developed for extraforaminal decompression, particularly for far lateral lumbar disc herniation. Distinct anatomical differences are noticeable in the upper levels of the lumbar spine, which may complicate the related surgical approach. This study aimed to determine the safety and efficiency of the far lateral extraforaminal approach for the upper lumbar disc.
METHODS: L1-2 and L2-3 migrated lumbar disc herniations were defined as upper lumbar disc herniations. 31 consecutive patients with upper lumbar disk herniation who underwent extraforaminal lumbar microdiscectomy between January 2018 and March 2022 were retrospectively investigated. The patients were assessed using the interval history, follow-up lower back and leg pain visual analog scale scores (0-100 mm), the Oswestry Disability Index (%), and modified MacNab criteria.
RESULTS: 31 consecutive patients with upper lumbar disk herniation (20 men and 11 women) with a mean age of 52.8 ± 10.8 years (range 31-70 years) underwent extraforaminal lumbar microdiscectomy. The preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale scores and Oswestry Disability Index were significantly different (P < 0.001). According to the modified MacNab criteria, 23 patients showed excellent improvement, 5 showed good improvement, and 3 showed fair improvement; thus, the rate of satisfactory improvement was 90.3% at the 2-year follow-up. No patients required reoperation at the operative level during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Extraforaminal lumbar microdiscectomy is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgical technique for treating upper lumbar disc herniation.

Several reports have highlighted comparable surgical outcomes between microendoscopic laminectomy (MEL) and open laminectomy (open) for lumbar spinal stenosis. However, the unilateral approach in MEL may present challenges for the upper lumbar levels, where facet joints are located deeper inside. Our objective was to compare surgical outcomes and radiographic evaluations for single-level decompression cases at L1-L2 or L2-L3 between MEL and open laminectomy.
We analyzed patients who underwent single-level decompression for upper lumbar spinal stenosis at 12 distinguished spine centers from April 2017 to September 2021. Baseline demographics, preoperative, and 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcomes, along with imaging parameters, were compared between the MEL and open groups. To account for potential confounding, patients\' backgrounds were adjusted using the inverse probability weighting method based on propensity scores.
Among the 2487 patients undergoing decompression surgery, 118 patients (4.7%) underwent single-level decompression at L1-L2 or L2-L3. Finally, 80 patients (51 in the MEL group, 29 in the open group) with postoperative data were deemed eligible for analysis. The MEL group exhibited significantly improved postoperative EuroQol 5-Dimension values compared to the open group. Additionally, the MEL group showed a lower facet preservation rate according to computed tomography examination, whereas the open group had a higher incidence of retrolisthesis.
Although overall surgical outcomes were similar, the MEL group demonstrated potential advantages in enhancing EuroQol 5-Dimension scores. The MEL group\'s lower facet preservation rate did not translate into a higher postoperative instability rate.

Aim The aim of this study is to apply surgical treatments to upper lumbar disc hernias in order to provide lumbar stability and lumbar lordosis using a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cage and to preserve the success rate of surgical results by protecting neural structures without excessive subject tension. Material and methods Between 2012 and 2017, 32 patients who had undergone an operation for upper lumbar disc herniation and who had received a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage using a posterior technique were evaluated retrospectively. Results The radiological and clinical findings, surgical methods, and results of the patients were evaluated. In our study, 25 (78.1%) of the patients with upper lumbar disc hernias who were evaluated retrospectively were female and seven (21.9%) were male. Their average age was 55.43 years. The average follow-up was 21.75 months. The most common complaints were lower back pain, leg pain, and claudication. In the findings from neurological examinations, a positive result on the femoral stretching test occurred in 30 (93.7%) patients. In the degenerative spinal structure of patients at the L1-2 and L2-3 levels, a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion was performed via a wide laminectomy with posterior stabilization due to a wide-bottomed disc hernia and stenosis. Only one of the patients with a neurological deficit still had a motor deficit after surgery. Conclusion While planning a surgery for upper lumbar disc hernias, the anatomical features of this region and the patients\' radiological and neurological findings should be carefully evaluated. If TLIF is performed during upper lumbar region surgery, it may be preferable to perform it using a posterior technique.

UNASSIGNED: Intradural disc herniation (IDH) is a rare type of disc degeneration that infrequently affects the upper lumbar spine. Pre- and intraoperative diagnosis and surgical management of IDH are challenging. The present case study provides insight into these aspects of upper lumbar IDH and discusses possible mechanisms.
UNASSIGNED: A 63-year-old female with a history of chronic lower back and leg pain presented with an acute lumbar sprain that had occurred 1 month prior. The pain progressed and spread to the front of the left thigh, which affected her ability to lift her leg when ascending/descending stairs. Sagittal gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a disc protruding into the ventral dural sac showing a hawk-beak sign, and the posterior edge of the disc annulus and local posterior longitudinal ligament was broken. Total L2 laminectomy was performed, and the dorsal side of the dural sac was exposed and incised to enable exploration of the ventral side of the dura. We found two free fragments protruding into the inner wall of the dura through the left ventral dura mater defect. After carefully and completely removing the mass, we repaired the defect and performed internal fixation. Postoperative pathologic analysis confirmed that the mass was nucleus pulposus tissue from the degenerated disc. The patient\'s pain significantly improved after surgery, and she was able to walk normally at the 1-month follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: Upper lumbar IDH is an extremely rare type of disc degeneration. An enhanced MRI scan can provide diagnostic evidence, but the final diagnosis requires surgical exploration of the path of herniation and pathologic examination of the mass lesion.

OBJECTIVE: There are differences in the clinical characteristics and surgical results between upper (L1-2 and L2-3) and lower (L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1) lumbar disc herniations. We conducted this study to compare the clinical features and surgical outcomes between the two types of lumbar disc herniations.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical features of patients who underwent microdiscectomies from 2008 to 2012. We evaluated the clinical characteristics such as age, preoperative autonomic dysfunction, the presence or absence of previous lumbar surgery and fusion required during surgery. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores about back pain and leg pain were evaluated preoperatively and at the final follow-up.
RESULTS: Upper lumbar group (n=15) was significantly older than lower lumbar group (n=148). The incidence of autonomic dysfunction was significantly higher in upper lumbar group. The number of patients with a previous lumbar surgery was significantly greater in upper lumbar group. There was no statistical significance for fusion required during surgery between two groups. Both groups showed a significant decrease in the VAS scores of leg pain. VAS scores of back pain were significantly decreased in lower lumbar group. But this was not seen in upper lumbar group. Both groups showed significant improvement of Oswestry Disability Index score.
CONCLUSIONS: Upper lumbar group had different clinical characteristics from those of lower lumbar group and these include older age, a higher incidence of autonomic dysfunctions and a higher incidence of patients with previous lumbar surgery. There were no significant differences in surgical outcomes, except for back pain, between two groups.

OBJECTIVE: Disc herniations at the L1-L2 and L2-L3 levels are different from those at lower levels of the lumbar spine with regard to clinical characteristics and surgical outcome. Spinal canals are narrower than those of lower levels, which may compromise multiple spinal nerve roots or conus medullaris. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical features and surgical outcomes of upper lumbar disc herniations.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical features of 41 patients who had undergone surgery for single disc herniations at the L1-L2 and L2-3 levels from 1998 to 2007. The affected levels were L1-L2 in 14 patients and L2-L3 in 27 patients. Presenting symptoms and signs, patient characteristics, radiologic findings, operative methods, and surgical outcomes were investigated.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients with upper lumbar disc was 55.5 years (ranged 31 to 78). The mean follow-up period was 16.6 months. Most patients complained of back and buttock pain (38 patients, 92%), and radiating pain in areas such as the anterior or anterolateral aspect of the thigh (32 patients, 78%). Weakness of lower extremities was observed in 16 patients (39%) and sensory disturbance was presented in 19 patients (46%). Only 6 patients (14%) had undergone previous lumbar disc surgery. Discectomy was performed using three methods : unilateral laminectomy in 27 cases, bilateral laminectomy in 3 cases, and the transdural approach in 11 cases, which were performed through total laminectomy in 10 cases and unilateral laminectomy in 1 case. With regard to surgical outcomes, preoperative symptoms improved significantly in 33 patients (80.5%), partially in 7 patients (17%), and were aggravated in 1 patient (2.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical features of disc herniations at the L1-L2 and L2-L3 levels were variable, and localized sensory change or pain was rarely demonstrated. In most cases, the discectomy was performed successfully by conventional posterior laminectomy. On the other hand, in large central broad based disc herniation, when the neural elements are severely compromised, the posterior transdural approach could be an alternative.