Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common form of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, and its diagnostic and therapeutic approaches have been well-established. Traditionally, AVNRT is understood to be an intranodal reentry having two bystander pathways; the upper common pathway (UCP) which connects to the atrium and the lower common pathway which connects to the ventricle. However, the existence of the UCP remains a subject of ongoing debate. The assertion of the UCP\'s presence is supported by electrophysiological evidence suggesting that the atrium is not essential for the perpetuation of AVNRT. Nonetheless, numerous anatomical studies have failed to identify any structure that could be conclusively designated as the UCP. The histological and electrophysiological characteristics of the slow and fast pathways, which are the core components of AVNRT, suggest the inclusion of atrial myocardium in the reentry circuit. While clear interpretation of these discrepancies remains elusive, potential explanations may be derived from existing evidence and recent research findings concerning the actual AVNRT circuit.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Anatomic and electrophysiologic findings suggest that the actual circuit of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) involves the perinodal atrium. However, occasional instances in which the atrium is dissociated from the AVNRT have led to the concept of an upper common pathway (UCP).
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the prevalence of UCP in AVNRT using a late atrial premature depolarization (LAPD) maneuver.
METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with typical AVNRT by electrophysiologic studies were enrolled. For evaluation of the presence of UCP, an LAPD was given at the coronary sinus ostium (osCS) during AVNRT, and then pacing was repeated incrementally every 10 ms. Electrograms in the earliest retrograde atrial activation site (ERAS) near the proximal His were mapped and recorded during the pacing. Results were interpreted as follows: absence of UCP-an LAPD from the osCS can reset the tachycardia without depolarizing the ERAS; presence of UCP-an LAPD from the osCS can depolarize the ERAS without resetting the tachycardia; and indeterminate-an LAPD from the osCS either resets the ERAS and tachycardia simultaneously or does not reset both.
RESULTS: The LAPD maneuver was performed in 126 patients with AVNRT. It demonstrated an absence of UCP in 121 (96.0%) patients and the presence of UCP in 3 (2.4%) patients; the result was indeterminate in 2 (1.6%) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The LAPD maneuver revealed that the presence of UCP is indicated in only rare cases of AVNRT. In most AVNRT cases, the atrium is involved in the reentry circuit.

We present an atypical response to single atrial premature depolarization (APD) in a long RP\' tachycardia. APD advanced the His-bundle potential immediately after it and resulted in a VA block; however, tachycardia persisted and consequently exhibited an A-V-V-A response. We propose the mechanism for an A-V-V-A response to APD in a long RP\' tachycardia.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

This study sought to assess the performance of current diagnostic criteria and identify additional electrophysiological features differentiating orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) with a concealed nodoventricular/nodofascicular (NV/NF) pathway from atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT).
Diagnosing sustained supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) despite the occurrence of ventriculoatrial block (VAB) is challenging.
We analyzed electrograms of 25 sustained SVTs (9 NV/NF-ORTs [n = 7/2] and 16 AVNRTs) with VAB and 91 AVNRTs without VAB (for reference).
More than 1 SVT, each with a different ventriculoatrial interval, was commonly induced in AVNRT cases (75%) but not in NV/NF-ORT cases (0%; p = 0.0005). Wenckebach VAB was common in NV/NF-ORTs (78%), but VAB patterns varied in AVNRTs. The His-His interval transiently prolonged in the following beat after the VAB in most AVNRTs but rarely did in NV/NF-ORTs (79% vs. 22%; p = 0.01). NV/NF-ORT was diagnosed by His-refractory premature ventricular contractions (n = 5) and the findings during right ventricular overdrive pacing showing an uncorrected/corrected post-pacing interval (PPI)-tachycardia cycle length (TCL) ≤115/110 ms (n = 5/5), orthodromic His capture (n = 6), and V-V-A (ventricle-ventricle-atrial response) response (n = 3). A single form of induced SVT (positive predictive value [PPV]: 69%; negative predictive value [NPV]: 100%), Wenckebach VAB (PPV: 70%; NPV: 87%), stable His-His interval despite VAB (PPV: 70%; NPV: 85%), orthodromic His capture (PPV: 100%; NPV: 97%), and V-V-A response (PPV: 100%; NPV: 95%) characterized NV/NF-ORT, and a PPI-TCL of ≤125 ms (PPV: 100%; NPV: 100%) characterized NV-ORT.
Induction of a single SVT form, Wenckebach VAB, stable His-His interval despite VAB, orthodromic His capture, and V-V-A response appeared to discriminate NV/NF-ORT from AVNRT, with a PPI-TCL of ≤125 ms discriminating NV-ORT from NF-ORT and AVNRT.

We described a 15-year-old boy who underwent the catheter ablation for the nodoventricular (NV) tachycardia that had difficulty in differentiation from atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with upper common pathway. The modification of the fast pathway revealed an anterograde conduction of the NV fiber. We successfully performed the catheter ablation targeting for the right ventricular insertion site of the NV fiber.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。