Accurate prediction of the recovery of Disorders of Consciousness (DoC) is of paramount significance for clinicians and families. Serum total bilirubin (TBIL) formed by activation of heme oxygenase 2, is associated with incidence and prognosis of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. However, studies that based TBIL and DoC are limited. The study attempted to examine the association between serum TBIL levels and prognosis in patients with DoC. One hundred and sixty-eight patients with DoC in the Second hospital of Shandong University from June 2021 to June 2023 were recruited. The clinical characteristics and venous blood samples were collected within 24 h after admission. The diagnosis of DoC was determined by two skilled investigators employing various behavioral evaluations along the coma recovery scale-revised (CRS-R) and the investigators conducted follow-up assessments of diagnosis at 1, 3, and 6 months after admission. For statistical analysis, we categorized patients with an improvement in clinical diagnosis from study entry as having a \"good outcome\". In total, 139 individuals enrolled in the study. The median TBIL level was 8.2 μmol/L. Good recovery of DoC at 1, 3, and 6 months occurred in 25 (18.0%), 41 (29.5%), and 56 (40.3%) patients, respectively. After full adjustment, a significant association was found between TBIL levels and the prognosis of DoC at 1, 3, and 6 months. When TBIL levels were analyzed as categorical variables, an increasing trend in the tertiles of TBIL levels demonstrated a significant positive association with the recovery of DoC at 1, 3, and 6 months. Stratified analysis revealed that the association between serum TBIL levels and the recovery of DoC remained consistent across different sub-populations. A high serum TBIL level is associated with an improved likelihood of recovery of DoC. Additional research is required to elucidate the underlying pathophysiological causal association between TBIL levels and DoC.

UNASSIGNED: We performed the current research to describe healthcare providers\' perspectives toward withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST) and advanced directive (AD) of patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) and to identify influencing factors of their perspectives.
UNASSIGNED: Healthcare providers were recruited during a professional conference on disorders of consciousness (DoC). Participants completed self-administered questionnaires which included demographics, personal perspectives regarding WLST and the perception of ADs.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 230 Chinese healthcare providers (female: 69.7%) were included. Only a small proportion reported positive attitudes toward withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration (35.2%), antibiotics (30.9%), and do-not-resuscitation orders (23.5%) in UWS patients. As for predictors\' identification, religion was significantly associated with the positive attitude toward DNR order (p = 0.004). Moreover, although 47.4% of the participants had never heard of ADs before of conference, almost all of them would consider ADs (95.7%) thereafter, especially for non-neurologists (p = 0.033).
UNASSIGNED: The propensity to WLST for UWS in China is low and perspective on WLST is significantly associated with individual characteristics. The attitudes of healthcare providers toward integrating ADs in the decisional process are positive. Future research regarding ADs and their predictors should be carried out to improve the quality of end-of-life care of UWS in China.

BACKGROUND: Accurate evaluation of level of disorder of consciousness (DOC) is clinically challenging.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to establish a distinctive DOC-related pattern (DOCRP) for assessing disease severity and distinguishing unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) from minimally conscious state (MCS).
METHODS: Fifteen patients with DOC and eighteen health subjects with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) were enrolled in this study. All patients were assessed by Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) and all individuals were randomly divided into two cohorts (Cohort A and B). DOCRP was identified in Cohort A and subsequently validated in Cohort B and A+B. We also assessed the discriminatory power of DOCRP between MCS and UWS.
RESULTS: The DOCRP was characterized bilaterally by relatively decreased metabolism in the medial and lateral frontal lobes, parieto-temporal lobes, cingulate gyrus and caudate, associated with relatively increased metabolism in the cerebellum and brainstem. DOCRP expression exhibited high accuracy in differentiating DOC patients from controls (P<0.0001, AUC=1.000), and furthermore could effectively distinguish MCS from UWS (P=0.037, AUC=0.821, sensitivity: 85.7 %, specificity: 75.0 %). Particularly in the subgroup of DOC patients survived global hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, DOCRP expression exhibited even better discriminatory power between MCS and UWS (P=0.046, AUC=1.000).
CONCLUSIONS: DOCRP might serve as an objective biomarker in distinguishing between UWS and MCS, especially in patients survived global hypoxic-ischemic brain injury.
BACKGROUND: ChiCTR2300073717 (Chinese clinical trial registry site, http://www.chictr.org).

BACKGROUND: Research on disorders of consciousness in children is scarce and includes disparate and barely comparable participants and assessment instruments and therefore provides inconclusive information on the clinical progress and recovery in this population. This study retrospectively investigated the neurobehavioral progress and the signs of transition between states of consciousness in a group of children admitted to a rehabilitation program either with an unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) or in a minimally conscious state (MCS).
METHODS: Systematic weekly assessments were conducted with the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) until emergence from MCS, discharge, or death.
RESULTS: Twenty-one children, nine admitted with a UWS and 12 admitted in an MCS, were included in the study. Four children with a UWS transitioned to an MCS with a CRS-R of 10 (9.2 to 12.2) by showing visual pursuit, visual fixation, or localization to noxious stimulation. Twelve children emerged from the MCS with a CRS-R of 20.5 (19 to 21.7). Children who emerged from the MCS had had a shorter time postinjury and higher CRS-R at admission, compared with those who did not emerge.
CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of the children who were admitted with a UWS transitioned to an MCS, and almost all who were admitted in an MCS emerged from this state. Children who emerged had shorter times since injury and higher scores on the CRS-R at admission, compared with those who did not emerge.

This study aimed to verify the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).
Subjects included 59 patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) due to acquired brain injury. To validate test-retest reliability, Evaluator A assessed the CRS-R twice on the same day (A1, A2). To examine inter-rater reliability, Evaluators A (A2) and B (B) assessed the CRS-R without a time interval. To test concurrent validity, Evaluator A (A1) assessed the CRS-R, Japan Coma Scale (JCS), and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) consecutively. To validate diagnostic accuracy, we evaluated the degree of agreement between A1 and A2 and between A2 and B in their diagnosis of DOC by CRS-R.
The test-retest (ρ = 0.92) and inter- (ρ = 0.98) reliability of CRS-R were excellent\" and Concurrent validity of CRS-R with JCS (ρ =  -0.82) and GCS (ρ = 0.92) were high. Results of DOC diagnosis were consistent for 48/59 cases (κ = 0.82) for A1 and A2 and for 54/59 cases (κ = 0.92) for A2 and B.
The Japanese version of the CRS-R may be as reliable and valid as the original English and other language versions.

Detecting willful cognition in these patients is known to be challenging due to the patients\' motor disabilities and high vigilance fluctuations but also due to the lack of expertise and use of adequate tools to assess these patients in specific settings. This review will discuss the main disorders of consciousness after severe brain injury, how to assess consciousness and cognition in these patients, as well as the challenges and tools available to overcome these challenges and reach an accurate diagnosis.

The advent of neurotechnologies including advanced functional magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography to detect states of awareness not detectable by traditional bedside neurobehavioral techniques (i.e., covert consciousness) promises to transform neuroscience research and clinical practice for patients with brain injury. As these interventions progress from research tools into actionable, guideline-endorsed clinical tests, ethical guidance for clinicians on how to responsibly communicate the sensitive results they yield is crucial yet remains underdeveloped. Drawing on insights from empirical and theoretical neuroethics research and our clinical experience with advanced neurotechnologies to detect consciousness in behaviorally unresponsive patients, we critically evaluate ethical promises and perils associated with disclosing the results of clinical covert consciousness assessments and describe a semistructured approach to responsible data sharing to mitigate potential risks.

Covert consciousness is a state of residual awareness following severe brain injury or neurological disorder that evades routine bedside behavioral detection. Patients with covert consciousness have preserved awareness but are incapable of self-expression through ordinary means of behavior or communication. Growing recognition of the limitations of bedside neurobehavioral examination in reliably detecting consciousness, along with advances in neurotechnologies capable of detecting brain states or subtle signs indicative of consciousness not discernible by routine examination, carry promise to transform approaches to classifying, diagnosing, prognosticating and treating disorders of consciousness. Here we describe and critically evaluate the evolving clinical category of covert consciousness, including approaches to its diagnosis through neuroimaging, electrophysiology, and novel behavioral tools, its prognostic relevance, and open questions pertaining to optimal clinical management of patients with covert consciousness recovering from severe brain injury.

Patients with disorders of consciousness who survive to discharge following severe acute brain injury may face profoundly complex medical, ethical, and psychosocial challenges during their courses of recovery and rehabilitation. Although issues encountered in caring for such patients during acute hospitalization have received substantial attention, ethical challenges that may arise in subacute and chronic phases have been underexplored. Shedding light on these issues, this article explores the landscape of normative issues in the course of treating and facilitating access to care for persons with disorders of consciousness during rehabilitation and examines potential implications for patients, clinicians, family members, and society.

In this article, we discuss the taxonomy associated with the four major disorders of consciousness (DoC): coma, vegetative state or unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, minimally conscious state, and post-traumatic confusional state. We briefly review the history of each disorder and then provide operational definitions and diagnostic criteria for each one. We rely heavily on recently released practice guidelines and, where appropriate, identify knowledge gaps and discuss future directions to advance DoC research and practice.