Heart failure (HF) is a syndrome characterized by the heart failing to pump blood to the body at a rate proportional to its needs. HF is a public health burden globally and one of the leading causes of hospitalizations in adults. While many classes of drugs have been introduced for the treatment of HF, not every drug may be well-tolerated by patients. In this narrative review, we describe a few of the newer classes of medications proposed to be efficacious in treating acute and chronic HF. We focus on vericiguat, omecamtiv mecarbil, ularitide, and serelaxin, and thoroughly examine their efficacy and safety profiles while summarizing the clinical trials of the drugs. There is a need for more long-term studies comparing the efficacy of these medications to the conventional ones.

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) has a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. No direct comparisons between ularitide-a synthetic natriuretic peptide being evaluated in ADHF-and other vasoactive substances are available. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine haemodynamic effect sizes from randomized double-blind trials in ADHF.
Eligible studies enrolled patients with ADHF requiring hospitalization and haemodynamic monitoring. Patients received 24-48 h of infusion with a vasoactive substance or comparator. Primary outcome measure was pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP). Treatment effects were quantified as changes from baseline using mean differences between study drug and comparator. Results were analysed using random-effects (primary analysis) and fixed-effects meta-analyses. Twelve randomized, double-blind studies were identified with data after 3, 6, and 24 h of treatment (n = 622, 644, and 644, respectively). At 6 h, significant PAWP benefits for ularitide over placebo were seen (Hedges\' g effect size, -0.979; P < 0.0001). On meta-analysis, treatment difference between ularitide and pooled other agents was statistically significant (-0.501; P = 0.0303). Effect sizes were numerically higher with ularitide than other treatments at 3 and 24 h. After 6 h, a significant difference in effect size between ularitide and all other treatments was observed for right atrial pressure (Hedges\' g, -0.797 for ularitide and -0.304 for other treatments; P = 0.0274).
After 6 h, ularitide demonstrated high effect sizes for PAWP and right atrial pressure. Improvements in these parameters were greater with ularitide vs. pooled data for other vasoactive drugs.

Heart failure (HF) is characterized by maladaptive neurohormonal activation of the cardiovascular and renal systems resulting in circulatory inadequacy and frequent acute exacerbations. The increasing burden of HF prompted investigation of underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and the design of pharmacotherapeutics that would target these pathways.
A MEDLINE search for relevant original investigations and review articles of newer hormonal drugs for HF since the year 2005 till October 2017 provided us with necessary literature. Major trials and relevant clinical investigations were discussed.
A multitude of hormonal pathways central to HF were identified, including the natriuretic peptide system and neurohormones such as relaxin, arginine vasopressin, and endothelin. However, drugs targeting these novel pathways (aliskiren, tolvaptan, ularitide, serelaxin, bosentan, macitentan) failed to show mortality benefit. This emphasizes a tremendous unmet need in the pharmacotherapy for HF, especially for the subtypes of acute HF and HF with preserved ejection fraction. Sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated substantial mortality benefit in chronic systolic HF population and is endorsed by international HF guidelines. If proven to be efficacious in larger outcome trials, finerenone can be a valuable addition baseline HF therapy. More basic, translational, and phenotype specific clinical research is warranted to improve HF pharmacotherapy.

The TRUE-AHF is a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial which is evaluating the effects of a 48-h infusion of ularitide (15 ng/kg/min) on the short- and long-term clinical course of patients with acute heart failure. Noteworthy features of the study include the early enrolment of patients following their initial clinical presentation (within 12 h), and entry blood pressure criteria and thresholds for the adjustment of drug infusion rates, which aim to minimize the risk of hypotension. The trial has two primary endpoints: (i) cardiovascular mortality during long-term follow-up; and (ii) the clinical course of patients during their index hospitalization. Cardiovascular mortality is evaluated in this event-driven trial by following all randomized patients for the occurrence of death until the end of the entire study without truncation at an arbitrarily determined early time point. The clinical course during the index hospitalization is evaluated using the hierarchical clinical composite endpoint, which combines information regarding changes in symptoms and the occurrence of in-hospital worsening heart failure events and death into a single ranked metric that captures interval clinical events and minimizes the likelihood of missing data and confounding due to intensification of background therapy. The design of the TRUE-AHF trial capitalizes on lessons learned from earlier trials and aims to evaluate definitively the potential benefit of ularitide in patients with acute heart failure.
NCT01661634.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of heart failure (HF) has increased globally in recent decades. Advances in our understanding of underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms have given rise to new therapies for treating the growing HF population. Nonetheless, morbidity and mortality associated with HF and its financial implications are daunting. Thus, novel therapies that can improve the natural history of HF patients are urgently needed.
METHODS: This article reviews new investigational drugs being developed for the treatment of both acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). It presents the background of these drugs with a focus on their mechanism of action, their pharmacology, evidence from clinical studies and their potential role in HF management.
CONCLUSIONS: The mortality benefit associated with serelaxin treatment in the RELAX-HF trial is being tested in RELAX-AHF II, while two other drugs, ularitide and TRV027, are also being evaluated in ADHF patients. Two new agents for the treatment of chronic HFrEF, LCZ696 and ivabradine, have been recently been approved for use by the FDA and four novel agents which have shown considerable promise in early studies, omecamtiv mecarbil, vericiguat, finerenone, and neuregulin, are currently being evaluated in late-phase clinical trials.

Although the period from 1953 to 2001 resulted in the approval of more than 30 medications currently used to treat heart failure (HF), few novel drugs have been approved in the last decade. However, the investigational pipeline for HF medications once again appears promising. In patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), ivabradine and valsartan/sucubitril (LCZ696) were recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Both agents have been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization. In the treatment of acute HF, serelaxin and ularitide are the farthest along in development. Both agents have demonstrated favorable effects on surrogate end points and preliminary data suggest a possible mortality benefit with serelaxin. Consequently, phase 3 trials are ongoing to evaluate the effect of serelaxin and ularitide on clinical outcomes. Given the poor history of recent investigational acute HF drugs that have advanced to phase 3/4 studies, enthusiasm for both serelaxin and ularitide must be tempered until these trials are completed.

Treatment for acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF) has not changed much in the last two decades. Currently available therapies have variable efficacy and can be associated with adverse outcomes. Natriuretic peptides properties include diuresis, natriuresis, vasorelaxation, inhibition of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, and are thus chosen in the treatment of ADHF. Two forms of natriuretic peptides are currently available for the treatment of ADHF. Urodilatin (INN: ularitide) represents another member of the natriuretic peptide family with a unique molecular structure that may provide distinct benefits in the treatment of ADHF. Early clinical exploratory and Phase II studies have demonstrated that ularitide has potential cardiovascular and renal benefits. Ularitide is currently being tested in the Phase III TRUE-AHF clinical study. TRUE-AHF has features that may be different when compared with other recent outcome studies in ADHF. These distinct differences aim to maximize clinical effects and minimize potential adverse events of ularitide. However, whether this rationale translates into a better outcome needs to be awaited.

The short- and long-term morbidity and mortality in acute heart failure is still unacceptably high. There is an unmet need for new therapy options with new drugs with a new mode of action. One of the drugs currently in clinical testing in Phase III is ularitide, which is the chemically synthesized form of the human natriuretic peptide urodilatin. Urodilatin is produced in humans by differential processing of pro-atrial natriuretic peptide in distal renal tubule cells. Physiologically, urodilatin appears to be the natriuretic peptide involved in sodium homeostasis. Ularitide exerts its pharmacological actions such as vasodilation, diuresis, and natriuresis through the natriuretic peptide receptor/particulate guanylate cyclase/cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway. In animal models of heart failure as well as Phase I and II clinical studies in heart failure patients, ularitide demonstrated beneficial effects such as symptom relief and vasodilation, while still preserving renal function. Subsequently, the pivotal acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) Phase III study, called TRUE-AHF, was started with the objectives to evaluate the effects of ularitide infusion on the clinical status and cardiovascular mortality of patients with ADHF compared with placebo. This review summarizes preclinical and clinical data supporting the potential use of ularitide in the treatment of ADHF.

Vasodilators play an important role in the management of acute heart failure, particularly when increased afterload is the precipitating cause of decompensation. The time-honored approach to afterload reduction has been largely focused on use of intravenous nitrovasodilators and, when properly dosed, this class of agents does provide substantial symptom relief for patients with acute hypertensive heart failure. Despite this, nitrovasodilators have never been shown to diminish mortality or provide any post-discharge outcome benefit leading to an on-going search for viable and more effective alternatives. While no new vasodilators have been approved for use in acute heart failure since nesiritide more than a decade ago, a number of novel agents have been developed, with some showing significant promise in recent clinical trials. In this review, we summarize the latest study data as it relates to vasodilator therapy and provide a glimpse into the not too distant future state of acute heart failure care.