typical doses

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    确定现有阿片类药物使用障碍药物的典型剂量,例如可注射阿片类激动剂治疗(iOAT),可以支持客户和程序的需求,并可能增加iOAT的扩展。一项队列研究参与者的纵向数据(n=131),我们使用2014年8月至2020年4月的临床配药记录来检查医生处方以及使用剂量的注射用二乙酰吗啡和氢吗啡酮.剂量组,按每次疗程的药物和处方剂量计算,为氢吗啡酮和二乙酰吗啡产生。在研究期间,129名参与者共登记了534、522次注射。平均接受二乙酰吗啡的剂量范围为每天106至989毫克,大多数客户每次使用125-262毫克(平均192.99毫克),每天参加2.40次会议。平均接受氢吗啡酮剂量范围为每天51.09至696.06毫克,大多数人每节使用88-154毫克(平均121.32毫克;2.43个疗程)。平均每日剂量保持稳定,虽然中等剂量是最典型的,参与者使用了整个允许剂量处方。支持iOAT典型剂量的证据可以整合到计划计划中,以更好地允许提供者和处方者预测计划需求并参与个性化护理。
    Identifying typical doses of existing opioid use disorder medications, such as injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT), can support client and program needs, and potentially increase iOAT expansion. Longitudinal data from participants in a cohort study (n = 131), along with clinic dispensation records from August 2014 to April 2020, were used to examine physician prescribed as well as used doses of injectable diacetylmorphine and hydromorphone. Dosage groups, by medication and prescribed dose per session, were created for both hydromorphone and diacetylmorphine. A total of 534, 522 injections were registered during the study period among 129 participants. Mean received diacetylmorphine doses ranged from 106 to 989 mg per day, with most clients using 125-262 mg per session (mean 192.99 mg) and attending 2.40 sessions per day. Mean received hydromorphone doses ranged from 51.09 to 696.06 mg per day, with the majority using 88-154 mg per session (mean 121.32 mg; 2.43 sessions). Average daily doses remained stable overtime and, while mid-range doses were most typical, participants used the whole spectrum of allowable dose prescriptions. Evidence supporting typical doses of iOAT can be integrated into program planning to better allow providers and prescribers to anticipate program needs and engage in individualized care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的主要目标是确定与患者体重相关的儿科心脏电生理程序的剂量面积乘积(DAP)的典型值和有效剂量(ED)的差异。本文还显示了与指示相关的DAP和ED,手术过程中确定的心律失常底物,以及使用辐射的原因。还描述了器官剂量。受试者是在两个医疗机构中使用3D绘图系统和X射线进行电生理研究的儿童。先天性心脏病患儿被排除在外。包括347名儿童。发现质量组之间存在显着差异,而体重较重的儿童的DAP和ED值较高。不同质量组的平均DAP在4.00(IQR1.00-14.00)至26.33(IQR8.77-140.84)cGycm2之间。ED中位数在23.18(IQR5.21-67.70)至60.96(IQR20.64-394.04)µSv之间。与适应症相关的DAP和ED最高的是室性早搏和室性心动过速-27.65(IQR12.91-75.0)cGycm2和100.73(IQR53.31-258.10)µSv,分别。在心律失常底物组中,结果相似,最高剂量是在DAP29.62(IQR13.81-76.0)cGycm2和ED103.15(IQR60.78-266.99)µSv的心室基质中。与基于X射线的电生理学相比,使用3D映射系统时,可以使用非常低的X射线剂量来完成小儿电生理学,或与儿科介入心脏病学或成人电生理学相比。
    The main goal of this study is to determine typical values of dose area product (DAP) and difference in the effective dose (ED) for pediatric electrophysiological procedures on the heart in relation to patient body mass. This paper also shows DAP and ED in relation to the indication, the arrhythmia substrate determined during the procedure, and in relation to the reason for using radiation. Organ doses are described as well. The subjects were children who have had an electrophysiological study done with a 3D mapping system and X-rays in two healthcare institutions. Children with congenital heart defects were excluded. There were 347 children included. Significant difference was noted between mass groups, while heavier children had higher values of DAP and ED. Median DAP in different mass groups was between 4.00 (IQR 1.00-14.00) to 26.33 (IQR 8.77-140.84) cGycm2. ED median was between 23.18 (IQR 5.21-67.70) to 60.96 (IQR 20.64-394.04) µSv. The highest DAP and ED in relation to indication were noted for premature ventricular contractions and ventricular tachycardia-27.65 (IQR 12.91-75.0) cGycm2 and 100.73 (IQR 53.31-258.10) µSv, respectively. In arrhythmia substrate groups, results were similar, and the highest doses were in ventricular substrates with DAP 29.62 (IQR 13.81-76.0) cGycm2 and ED 103.15 (IQR 60.78-266.99) µSv. Pediatric electrophysiology can be done with very low doses of X-rays when using 3D mapping systems compared to X-rays-based electrophysiology, or when compared to pediatric interventional cardiology or adult electrophysiology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    实施荧光透视诊断和介入程序的典型剂量(TD)和典型值(TV)。这项回顾性研究包括在34个月内对三个设备进行的总共3811次荧光透视检查。剂量-,使用机构剂量管理系统(DMS)提取患者和手术相关信息.TD/TV被定义为中值剂量,并计算了每个设备的剂量面积乘积(DAP)的五个最常见程序。累积空气角膜(CAK)和透视时间(FT)。将国家诊断参考水平和其他单一设施研究与我们的结果进行了比较。此外,分析了每种设备剂量最高的五个程序。与图片存档和通信系统(PACS)相比,要评估DMS的数据覆盖范围,从PACS中提取程序列表并将其与从DMS中提取的程序信息进行比较。TD/TV共实施了15个程序。在所有设备中,DAP的TD范围在端口导管控制(n=64)的0.6Gycm2和经动脉化疗栓塞(n=84)的145.9Gycm2之间。CAK的TD范围在端口导管控制的5mGy和动脉瘤治疗的1397mGy之间(n=129),FT的TV范围在上腔造影的0.3分钟(n=67)和动脉瘤治疗的51.4分钟之间。DAP和CAK的TD较低或在其他单一设施研究的范围内。确定了每个设备的DAP中位数最高的五个程序,15个程序中的6个也被发现是最常见的程序之一。与PACS相比,DMS的数据覆盖率在每个设备的最常见程序的71%(设备2,中风治疗)和78%(设备1,下肢血管造影)之间。因此,在22%-29%的病例中,所进行手术的剂量数据未转移至DMS.我们为透视诊断和介入程序实施了TD/TV,可以进行全面的剂量分析并与以前发表的值进行比较。
    To implement typical doses (TD) and typical values (TV) for fluoroscopic diagnostic and interventional procedures. A total of 3811 fluoroscopic procedures performed within 34 months on three devices were included in this retrospective study. Dose-, patient- and procedure-related information were extracted using the institutional dose management system (DMS). TD/TV were defined as median dose and calculated for the five most frequent procedures per device for dose area product (DAP), cumulative air kerma (CAK) and fluoroscopy time (FT). National diagnostic reference levels and other single facility studies were compared to our results. Additionally, the five procedures with the highest doses of each device were analysed. To evaluate the data coverage of the DMS compared to the picture archiving and communication system (PACS), procedure lists were extracted from the PACS and compared to the procedure information extracted from the DMS. TD/TV for 15 procedures were implemented. Among all devices, TD for DAP ranged between 0.6 Gycm2for port catheter control (n= 64) and 145.9 Gycm2for transarterial chemoembolisation (n= 84). TD for CAK ranged between 5 mGy for port catheter control and 1397 mGy for aneurysm treatment (n= 129) and TV for FT ranged between 0.3 min for upper cavography (n= 67) and 51.4 min for aneurysm treatment. TD for DAP and CAK were lower or within the range of other single facility studies. The five procedures with the highest median DAP per device were identified, 6 of 15 procedures were also found to be among the most frequent procedures. Data coverage of the DMS compared to the PACS ranged between 71% (device 2, stroke treatment) and 78% (device 1, lower limb angiography) for the most common procedure per device. Thus, in 22%-29% of cases dose data of the performed procedure was not transferred into the DMS. We implemented TD/TV for fluoroscopic diagnostic and interventional procedures which enable a comprehensive dose analysis and comparison with previously published values.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号