tumor treating fields

肿瘤治疗领域
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)是最常见和侵袭性的原发性脑肿瘤,有效的治疗方法有限。肿瘤治疗领域(TTF;OptuneGio®)是FDA批准的设备,其数据支持显着的生存益处和最小的毒性,当添加到维持化疗时。临床实践中的摄取并不普遍,如果较短的治疗时间可行,则可能会有所改善。这项1期试验旨在确定TTF伴随放化疗的安全性和初步疗效。
    新诊断的患者,组织学证实的GBM是合格的。手术后,患者在标准放化疗的同时接受TTF治疗.该装置持续2个月周期的替莫唑胺维持治疗,定期进行影像学和临床评估,以评估毒性和反应。主要终点是基于不良事件的发生率和严重程度的联合方式治疗的安全性和耐受性。次要终点是总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。
    13例患者入组。皮肤病学不良事件频繁发生,但仅限于1/2级。只有1例可能与TTF相关的严重不良事件,没有患者由于TTF相关毒性而无法完成规定的多模式治疗过程。12例患者的中位和6个月无进展生存期为8.5个月(mo)和66.7%,分别。中位和12个月总生存期为16.0个月和83.3%,分别。
    TTF可以与化学放射一起安全地递送。有限的TTF课程的潜力值得进一步评估。
    UNASSIGNED: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor and has limited effective therapies. Tumor treating fields (TTF; Optune Gio®) is an FDA-approved device with data supporting a significant survival benefit and minimal toxicity when added to maintenance chemotherapy. Uptake in clinical practice is not universal and might improve if a shorter duration of treatment is feasible. This phase 1 trial was designed to determine the safety and preliminary efficacy of TTF concomitant to chemoradiation.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed GBM were eligible. Following surgery, patients were treated with TTF concomitant to standard chemoradiation. The device continued through 2 monthly cycles of maintenance temozolomide with imaging and clinical assessments at regular intervals to assess toxicity and response. The primary endpoint was the safety and tolerability of combined modality treatment based upon the incidence and severity of adverse events. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
    UNASSIGNED: Thirteen patients were enrolled. Dermatologic adverse events were frequent but limited to grade 1/2. There was only 1 serious adverse event possibly related to TTF and no patients were unable to complete the prescribed course of multimodality treatment due to TTF-associated toxicity. Twelve patients were evaluable for median and 6-month progression-free survival which were 8.5 months (mo) and 66.7%, respectively. Median and 12 mo overall survival were 16.0 mo and 83.3%, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: TTF can be safely delivered in conjunction with chemoradiation. The potential for a finite TTF course merits further evaluation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肿瘤治疗场(TTFields)是中断癌细胞过程的交变电场。TTFields疗法被批准用于复发性胶质母细胞瘤(rGBM),和新诊断(nd)GBM(同时使用替莫唑胺治疗ndGBM;美国),和IV级神经胶质瘤(欧盟)。我们提出了一个最新的全球,使用TTFields治疗的CNS恶性肿瘤患者的上市后监测安全性分析。
    方法:从北美患者的常规上市后活动中收集安全性数据,欧洲,以色列,和日本(2011年10月-2022年10月)。不良事件(AE)按年龄分层,性别,和诊断。
    结果:总体而言,包括25,898例患者(诊断:ndGBM[68%],rGBM[26%],间变性星形细胞瘤/少突胶质细胞瘤[4%],其他中枢神经系统恶性肿瘤[2%])。中位(范围)年龄为59(3-103)岁;66%的患者为男性。大多数(69%)患者年龄为18-65岁;0.4%<18岁;30%>65岁。18,798(73%)和14,599(56%)患者发生了全因和TTField相关的AE,分别。最常见的治疗相关的AE是皮下反应(43%),电感觉(刺痛;14%),和热感觉(温暖;12%)。与治疗相关的皮肤反应在儿科患者中具有可比性(39%),成人(42%)和老年人(45%)组,在男性(41%)和女性(46%)中;在诊断亚组中相似(ndGBM,46%;rGBM,34%;间变性星形细胞瘤/少突胶质细胞瘤,42%;其他,40%)。未报告TTFelds相关的系统性AE。
    结论:从长远来看,对>25,000例患者的真实世界分析显示,中枢神经系统恶性肿瘤患者对TTField的耐受性良好.大多数治疗相关的AE是局部可控的,非严重皮肤事件。TTFields治疗的安全性在各个亚组之间保持一致(年龄,性别,和诊断),表明其广泛的适用性。
    BACKGROUND: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are alternating electric fields that disrupt cancer cell processes. TTFields therapy is approved for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM), and newly-diagnosed (nd) GBM (with concomitant temozolomide for ndGBM; US), and for grade IV glioma (EU). We present an updated global, post-marketing surveillance safety analysis of patients with CNS malignancies treated with TTFields therapy.
    METHODS: Safety data were collected from routine post-marketing activities for patients in North America, Europe, Israel, and Japan (October 2011-October 2022). Adverse events (AEs) were stratified by age, sex, and diagnosis.
    RESULTS: Overall, 25,898 patients were included (diagnoses: ndGBM [68%], rGBM [26%], anaplastic astrocytoma/oligodendroglioma [4%], other CNS malignancies [2%]). Median (range) age was 59 (3-103) years; 66% patients were male. Most (69%) patients were 18-65 years; 0.4% were < 18 years; 30% were > 65 years. All-cause and TTFields-related AEs occurred in 18,798 (73%) and 14,599 (56%) patients, respectively. Most common treatment-related AEs were beneath-array skin reactions (43%), electric sensation (tingling; 14%), and heat sensation (warmth; 12%). Treatment-related skin reactions were comparable in pediatric (39%), adult (42%), and elderly (45%) groups, and in males (41%) and females (46%); and similar across diagnostic subgroups (ndGBM, 46%; rGBM, 34%; anaplastic astrocytoma/oligodendroglioma, 42%; other, 40%). No TTFields-related systemic AEs were reported.
    CONCLUSIONS: This long-term, real-world analysis of > 25,000 patients demonstrated good tolerability of TTFields in patients with CNS malignancies. Most therapy-related AEs were manageable localized, non-serious skin events. The TTFields therapy safety profile remained consistent across subgroups (age, sex, and diagnosis), indicative of its broad applicability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:已知高级别神经胶质瘤(HGG)的特征是恶性程度高,预后较差。经典的治疗方法是安全切除,辅以放疗和化疗。肿瘤治疗领域(TTFields),一种新兴的物理治疗方式,使用中频针对恶性实体瘤,低强度,交变电场干扰细胞分裂,已被用于治疗新诊断的胶质母细胞瘤,然而,它们在HGG中的给药需要进一步的临床证据.我们在单中心回顾性评估了TTField在中国HGG患者中的疗效和安全性。
    方法:我们从2019年12月至2022年6月招募并分析了52例接受手术和标准放化疗方案的新诊断HGG患者,并随访至2023年6月。基于他们是否使用了TTFields,他们被分为TTFields组和非TTFields组。比较两组患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。
    结果:TTFields组26例,非TTFields组26例。在“TTField”组中,中位PFS为14.2个月(95%CI:9.50-18.90),中位OS为19.7个月(95%CI:14.95-24.25),从手术到开始使用TTField治疗的中位间隔为2.47个月(95%CI:1.47-4.13),TTFields治疗的中位持续时间为10.6个月(95%CI:9.57-11.63).15例(57.69%)患者发生不良事件,未报告严重不良事件。在非TTFields组中,中位PFS为9.57个月(95%CI:6.23~12.91),中位OS为16.07个月(95%CI:12.90~19.24).两组间PFS(p=0.005)和OS(p=0.007)差异有统计学意义。
    结论:在本回顾性分析中,观察到TTField改善了新诊断的HGG患者的中位PFS和OS。依从性远高于临床试验报告,安全性保持良好。
    OBJECTIVE: High-grade glioma (HGG) is known to be characterized by a high degree of malignancy and a worse prognosis. The classical treatment is safe resection supplemented by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Tumor treating fields (TTFields), an emerging physiotherapeutic modality that targets malignant solid tumors using medium-frequency, low-intensity, alternating electric fields to interfere with cell division, have been used for the treatment of new diagnosis of glioblastoma, however, their administration in HGG requires further clinical evidence. The efficacy and safety of TTFields in Chinese patients with HGG were retrospectively evaluated by us in a single center.
    METHODS: We enrolled and analyzed 52 patients with newly diagnosed HGG undergoing surgery and standard chemoradiotherapy regimens from December 2019 to June 2022, and followed them until June 2023. Based on whether they used TTFields, they were divided into a TTFields group and a non-TTFields group. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups.
    RESULTS: There were 26 cases in the TTFields group and 26 cases in the non-TTFields group. In the TTFields group, the median PFS was 14.2 months (95% CI: 9.50-18.90), the median OS was 19.7 months (95% CI: 14.95-24.25) , the median interval from surgery to the start of treatment with TTFields was 2.47 months (95% CI: 1.47-4.13), and the median duration of treatment with TTFields was 10.6 months (95% CI: 9.57-11.63). 15 (57.69%) patients experienced an adverse event and no serious adverse event was reported. In the non-TTFields group, the median PFS was 9.57 months (95% CI: 6.23-12.91) and the median OS was 16.07 months (95% CI: 12.90-19.24). There was a statistically significant difference in PFS (p = 0.005) and OS (p = 0.007) between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, TTFields were observed to improve newly diagnosed HGG patients\' median PFS and OS. Compliance was much higher than reported in clinical trials and safety remained good.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胶质瘤恶性程度高,预后差,严重影响患者的预后。传统的治疗方法主要包括开颅肿瘤切除术,术后放疗和化疗。虽然上述方法取得了显著的疗效,仍有一定的局限性和不良反应。随着微创外科概念的提出及其临床应用以及影像技术的发展与进步,脑胶质瘤的微创治疗已成为神经医学领域的研究热点,包括光热处理,光动力疗法,激光诱导热治疗和肿瘤的TT场。这些治疗方法具有精确的优点,微创,恢复快,疗效显著,并在临床实践中得到了广泛的应用。本综述旨在介绍近年来脑胶质瘤微创治疗的进展及取得的成就和对未来的展望。
    Glioma has a high malignant degree and poor prognosis, which seriously affects the prognosis of patients. Traditional treatment methods mainly include craniotomy tumor resection, postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Although above methods have achieved remarkable curative effect, they still have certain limitations and adverse reactions. With the introduction of the concept of minimally invasive surgery and its clinical application as well as the development and progress of imaging technology, minimally invasive treatment of glioma has become a research hotspot in the field of neuromedicine, including photothermal treatment, photodynamic therapy, laser-induced thermal theraphy and TT-Fields of tumor. These therapeutic methods possess the advantages of precision, minimally invasive, quick recovery and significant curative effect, and have been widely used in clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to introduce the progress of minimally invasive treatment of glioma in recent years and the achievements and prospects for the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于阻抗测量的单细胞生物物理表征是一种有利的方法,因为它没有标记,高效率,具有成本效益和实时能力。生物物理表型分析能及时、丰富的细胞生理病理状态信息,用于疾病诊断,药物筛选,精准医学,等。然而,单细胞阻抗的精确测量具有挑战性,特别是由于耦合和阻抗模型的复杂性,很难计算出单细胞的详细生物物理参数。这里,我们提出了一种分析确定方法来解码单细胞电生理参数(包括细胞-基底界面电容,细胞膜电容,细胞膜电导率,和细胞质电导率)通过使用解析解而不是频谱拟合在优化频率下测得的阻抗。通过这种简单快速的解析求解方法,可以实时准确地确定处于自然粘附状态的单个细胞的生理参数。我们验证了这种细胞参数确定方法在水力效应下监测细胞粘附的变化,并探索MCF-7,HeLa,Huh7和MDA-MB-231细胞系。特别是,我们应用该方法优化肿瘤治疗场(TTFields)治疗,实现个体化精准医疗。我们的工作为实时表征单细胞生物物理特性提供了一种准确有效的方法,就地,无标签,和侵入性较小的优势。
    Single-cell biophysical characterization based on impedance measurement is an advantageous approach due to its label-free, high-efficiency, cost-effective and real-time capability. Biophysical phenotyping can yield timely and rich information on physiological and pathological state of cells for disease diagnosis, drug screening, precision medicine, etc. However, precise measurement on single-cell impedance is challenging, particularly hard to figure out the detailed biophysical parameters of single cell due to coupling and complexity of impedance model. Here, we propose an analytic determination method to decode single-cell electrophysiological parameters (including cell-substrate interface capacitance, cell membrane capacitance, cell membrane conductivity, and cytoplasm conductivity) from the impedances measured at optimized frequencies by using analytic solution rather than spectrum fitting. With this simple and fast analytic solution method, the physiological parameters of single cell in natural adhesion state can be accurately determined in real time. We validate this cell parameter determination method in monitoring the change of cell adhesion under hydraulic effects and exploring electrophysiological differences among MCF-7, HeLa, Huh7, and MDA-MB-231 cell lines. Particularly, we apply the approach to optimize tumor treating fields (TTFields) therapy, realizing individualized precision medicine. Our work provides an accurate and efficient approach for characterizing single-cell biophysical properties with real-time, in-situ, label-free, and less invasive advantages.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肿瘤治疗场(TTFields)疗法是FDA批准的用于胶质母细胞瘤的一线和复发性治疗。尽管有3期证据显示TTFields改善了生存率,它没有统一使用。我们旨在通过与医学神经肿瘤学和医学社会科学的独特研究合作伙伴关系,检查患者和临床医生对TTField的看法以及影响TTField利用的因素。
    方法:在三级护理学术医院接受TTField治疗的成人胶质母细胞瘤患者被邀请参加关于他们决定使用或不使用TTField的半结构化访谈。处方TTFields的临床医生被邀请参加关于TTFields的半结构化访谈。
    结果:对40名平均年龄为53岁的患者进行了访谈;92.5%为白人,60%为男性。决定反对TTFields的参与者表示,剃头,看起来生病了,以及佩戴/携带设备的不便对他们的决定影响最大。使用TTField的影响最大的因素是器械的疗效及其临床医师的意见。临床医生(N=9)指出,TTField是胶质母细胞瘤患者的良好选择,但是有些人指出,他们的患者应该考虑TTField的负担和益处,因为它可能不是所有患者的理想选择。
    结论:这是第一项检查TTField患者决策的研究。研究结果表明,临床医生的支持和疗效数据是关键的决策因素。正确理解患者决策的路径对于优化胶质母细胞瘤患者使用TTField和其他治疗决策至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Therapy is an FDA-approved therapy in the first line and recurrent setting for glioblastoma. Despite Phase 3 evidence showing improved survival with TTFields, it is not uniformly utilized. We aimed to examine patient and clinician views of TTFields and factors shaping utilization of TTFields through a unique research partnership with medical neuro oncology and medical social sciences.
    METHODS: Adult glioblastoma patients who were offered TTFields at a tertiary care academic hospital were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview about their decision to use or not use TTFields. Clinicians who prescribe TTFields were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview about TTFields.
    RESULTS: Interviews were completed with 40 patients with a mean age of 53 years; 92.5% were white and 60% were male. Participants who decided against TTFields stated that head shaving, appearing sick, and inconvenience of wearing/carrying the device most influenced their decision. The most influential factors for use of TTFields were the efficacy of the device and their clinician\'s opinion. Clinicians (N = 9) stated that TTFields was a good option for glioblastoma patients, but some noted that their patients should consider the burdens and benefits of TTFields as it may not be the desired choice for all patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to examine patient decision making for TTFields. Findings suggest that clinician support and efficacy data are among the key decision-making factors. Properly understanding the path to patients\' decision making is crucial in optimizing the use of TTFields and other therapeutic decisions for glioblastoma patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肿瘤治疗场(TTFields)通过干扰广泛的肿瘤细胞过程来延长成胶质细胞瘤(GBM)患者的存活。其中,TTField破坏GBM细胞上的初级纤毛稳定性。在这里,我们询问TTFelds与其他干扰GBM纤毛发生的药物的伴随治疗是否进一步抑制体外GBM细胞增殖。Aurora激酶A(AURKA)促进纤毛分解和GBM生长。AURKA的抑制剂,比如Alisertib,抑制纤毛分解并增加各种细胞类型的纤毛频率。然而,我们发现,Alisertib治疗显著降低了跨多个患者来源细胞系的胶质细胞球的GBM纤毛频率,和离体治疗的患者活检。这种作用似乎是神经胶质瘤细胞特异性的,因为它不会降低正常的神经元或神经胶质纤毛频率。Alisertib介导的神经胶质瘤纤毛耗竭似乎是AURKA特有的,而不是AURKB抑制,部分归因于自噬途径的激活。用TTField和Alisertib处理两种不同的GBM患者来源的细胞系导致与任一单独处理相比细胞增殖的显著降低。然而,这种作用不是纤毛依赖性的,因为联合治疗减少了纤毛缺失细胞系的增殖,ARL13B,或天然缺乏ARL13B+纤毛的U87MG细胞。因此,Alisertib介导的对神经胶质瘤纤毛的作用可能是肿瘤组织内药物功效的有用生物标志物。考虑到Alisertib可以穿过血脑屏障并抑制颅内生长,我们的数据保证了未来的研究,以探讨是否同时暴露Alisertib和TTFields延长脑肿瘤携带动物的体内生存期。
    Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) extend the survival of glioblastoma (GBM) patients by interfering with a broad range of tumor cellular processes. Among these, TTFields disrupt primary cilia stability on GBM cells. Here we asked if concomitant treatment of TTFields with other agents that interfere with GBM ciliogenesis further suppress GBM cell proliferation in vitro. Aurora kinase A (AURKA) promotes both cilia disassembly and GBM growth. Inhibitors of AURKA, such as Alisertib, inhibit cilia disassembly and increase ciliary frequency in various cell types. However, we found that Alisertib treatment significantly reduced GBM cilia frequency in gliomaspheres across multiple patient derived cell lines, and in patient biopsies treated ex vivo. This effect appeared glioma cell-specific as it did not reduce normal neuronal or glial cilia frequencies. Alisertib-mediated depletion of glioma cilia appears specific to AURKA and not AURKB inhibition, and attributable in part to autophagy pathway activation. Treatment of two different GBM patient-derived cell lines with TTFields and Alisertib resulted in a significant reduction in cell proliferation compared to either treatment alone. However, this effect was not cilia-dependent as the combined treatment reduced proliferation in cilia-depleted cell lines lacking, ARL13B, or U87MG cells which are naturally devoid of ARL13B+ cilia. Thus, Alisertib-mediated effects on glioma cilia may be a useful biomarker of drug efficacy within tumor tissue. Considering Alisertib can cross the blood brain barrier and inhibit intracranial growth, our data warrant future studies to explore whether concomitant Alisertib and TTFields exposure prolongs survival of brain tumor-bearing animals in vivo.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肿瘤治疗领域(TTFields)作为一种具有改善胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者预后的潜力的新型治疗方法,近年来已经获得了大量关注。然而,TTFields的影响仍然是一个正在进行辩论的主题。这项研究旨在为GBM的TTFields治疗提供真实世界的证据,并研究影响其疗效的临床决定因素。
    我们报告了在浙江大学附属第二医院接受TTField/Stupp治疗的81例新诊断的中国GBM患者的回顾性分析。使用Kaplan-Meier方法分析总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。使用具有时间依赖性协变量的Cox回归模型来解决非比例风险并评估临床变量对PFS和OS的影响。
    TTFields/STUPP治疗后的中位PFS和OS分别为12.6个月(95%CI11.0-14.1)和21.3个月(95%CI10.0-32.6)。与短期治疗组(≤2个月)相比,长期TTFields治疗(>2个月)表现出PFS和OS的显著改善。时间依赖性协变量COX分析显示,更长的TTFields治疗与长达12和13个月的PFS和OS增强相关。分别。对TTFields的更高依从性(≥0.8)显着降低了死亡风险(HR=0.297,95CI0.108-0.819)。完全手术切除和MGMT启动子甲基化与进展风险显著降低(HR=0.337,95%CI0.176-0.643;HR=0.156,95%CI0.065-0.378)和死亡风险显著降低(HR=0.276,95%CI0.105-0.727;HR=0.249,95%CI0.087-0.710)。
    TTFields/Stupp治疗可能会延长GBM患者的中位OS和PFS,通过长期的TTFields治疗,更高的TTFields合规性,完整的手术切除,MGMT启动子甲基化显著改善预后。
    UNASSIGNED: Tumor treating fields (TTFields) have earned substantial attention in recent years as a novel therapeutic approach with the potential to improve the prognosis of glioblastoma (GBM) patients. However, the impact of TTFields remains a subject of ongoing debate. This study aimed to offer real-world evidence on TTFields therapy for GBM, and to investigate the clinical determinants affecting its efficacy.
    UNASSIGNED: We have reported a retrospective analysis of 81 newly diagnosed Chinese GBM patients who received TTFields/Stupp treatment in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression models with time-dependent covariates were utilized to address non-proportional hazards and to assess the influence of clinical variables on PFS and OS.
    UNASSIGNED: The median PFS and OS following TTFields/STUPP treatment was 12.6 months (95% CI 11.0-14.1) and 21.3 months (95% CI 10.0-32.6) respectively. Long-term TTFields treatment (>2 months) exhibits significant improvements in PFS and OS compared to the short-term treatment group (≤2 months). Time-dependent covariate COX analysis revealed that longer TTFields treatment was correlated with enhanced PFS and OS for up to 12 and 13 months, respectively. Higher compliance to TTFields (≥ 0.8) significantly reduced the death risk (HR=0.297, 95%CI 0.108-0.819). Complete surgical resection and MGMT promoter methylation were associated with significantly lower risk of progression (HR=0.337, 95% CI 0.176-0.643; HR=0.156, 95% CI 0.065-0.378) and death (HR=0.276, 95% CI 0.105-0.727; HR=0.249, 95% CI 0.087-0.710).
    UNASSIGNED: The TTFields/Stupp treatment may prolong median OS and PFS in GBM patients, with long-term TTFields treatment, higher TTFields compliance, complete surgical resection, and MGMT promoter methylation significantly improving prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)是最具侵袭性和普遍性的原发性脑恶性肿瘤。肿瘤治疗场(TTFields),一种补充GBM治疗化疗的创新疗法,可以显著提高总体生存率,无疾病进展生存期,和病人的生活质量。然而,国内外对TTFields疗法的卫生经济学评价缺乏。
    目的:本研究旨在评估TTFields+替莫唑胺(TMZ)与单纯TMZ治疗新诊断GBM患者的成本效益。目的是提供有力的经济证据,作为GBM治疗政策制定和决策过程的基础。
    方法:我们使用具有三个状态的分区生存模型来估计新诊断的GBM患者在一生中的结果:无进展生存,疾病进展,和死亡。生存模型来自中国的一项现实研究,长期生存数据来自GBM流行病学文献。不良事件发生率来自EF-14试验数据。成本数据,经专家咨询验证,是从公共文献和数据库中获得的。从已发表的文献中提取效用值。使用MicrosoftExcel,我们从卫生系统的角度计算了15年的预期成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs).支付意愿门槛设定为2022年中国人均国内生产总值(GDP)的三倍,为242,928元人民币(37,655美元)/QALY。成本和公用事业采用5%的贴现率。通过单因素和概率敏感性分析对结果进行分析。
    结果:TTField+TMZ表明,与仅TMZ相比,成本平均增加了389,326元(57,859美元),增加了2.46QALY。每QALY增量成本效益比(ICER)为157,979日元(23,474美元)。该模型对贴现率的变化表现出更高的敏感性。概率敏感性分析表明,在现有的门槛下,TTFields+TMZ经济的概率为95.60%。
    结论:这项成本效益分析确认,将TTFields纳入TMZ治疗被证明具有成本效益,给出了中国人均GDP三倍的门槛。
    BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) stands as the most aggressive and prevalent primary brain malignancy. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields), an innovative therapy complementing chemotherapy for GBM treatment, which can significantly enhance overall survival, disease progression-free survival, and patient\'s quality of life. However, there is a dearth of health economics evaluation on TTFields therapy both domestically and internationally.
    OBJECTIVE: The study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of TTFields + temozolomide (TMZ) in comparison to TMZ alone for newly diagnosed GBM patients. The intent is to provide robust economic evidence to serve as a foundation for policymaking and decision-making processes in GBM treatment.
    METHODS: We estimated outcomes for newly diagnosed GBM patients over a lifetime horizon using a partitioned survival model with three states: Progression-Free Survival, Progression Disease, and Death. The survival model was derived from a real-world study in China, with long-term survival data drawn from GBM epidemiology literature. Adverse event rates were sourced from the EF-14 trial data. Cost data, validated by expert consultation, was obtained from public literature and databases. Utility values were extracted from published literature. Using Microsoft Excel, we calculated expected costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over 15 years from a health system perspective. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at three times the Chinese per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2022, amounting to CN¥242,928 (US$37,655) /QALY. A 5% discount rate was applied to costs and utilities. Results underwent analysis through single factor and probability sensitivity analyses.
    RESULTS: TTFields + TMZ demonstrated a mean increase in cost by CN¥389,326 (US$57,859) and an increase of 2.46 QALYs compared to TMZ alone. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was CN¥157,979 (US$23,474) per QALY gained. The model exhibited heightened sensitivity to changes in the discount rate. Probability sensitivity analysis indicates that, under the existing threshold, the probability of TTFields + TMZ being economical is 95.60%.
    CONCLUSIONS: This cost-effectiveness analysis affirms that incorporating TTFields into TMZ treatment proves to be cost-effective, given a threshold three times the Chinese per capita GDP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Published Erratum
    [这更正了文章DOI:10.3389/fonc.2021.738801。].
    [This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.738801.].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号