UNASSIGNED: Prior literature has demonstrated that ipsilateral hindfoot arthrodesis may increase the risk for reoperation after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and that simultaneous hindfoot arthrodesis with TAA could result in short-term clinical and radiologic improvements. The purpose of this study is to compare the reoperation rates after TAA with prior hindfoot arthrodesis vs simultaneous arthrodesis and TAA.
UNASSIGNED: Patients who underwent primary TAA were identified in the PearlDiver database. Patients were sorted into 2 study cohorts: hindfoot arthrodesis prior to TAA and simultaneous arthrodesis and TAA. Propensity matched control cohorts were identified for each study group. Multivariate analysis was conducted to account for any confounding variables and covariates when identifying differences in complications between cohorts.
UNASSIGNED: 297 patients underwent TAA with prior hindfoot arthrodesis and 174 underwent TAA and hindfoot arthrodesis concurrently. The incidence of reoperation (13.8% vs 5.2%, P < .001) and infection (12.6% vs 5.9%, P = .011) for the simultaneous cohort was higher when compared to the matched control cohort. In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference when comparing the prior arthrodesis cohort to the matched control cohort in reoperation rates (5.1% vs 4.7%, P = .787) or infection rates (4.4% vs 4.8%, P = .734). Those undergoing simultaneous procedures had increased incidences of reoperation, wound complications, infection, and emergency department visits (P < .0167) when compared to the TAA with prior arthrodesis cohort.
UNASSIGNED: Patients undergoing TAA and hindfoot arthrodesis concurrently were found to have higher rates of reoperation and infection when compared to the matched control cohort . In contrast, there was no difference in these rates in patients undergoing TAA with prior hindfoot arthrodesis compared with their matched control cohort. Patients undergoing simultaneous procedures had increased rates of reoperations, wound complications, infection, and emergency department visits compared to the TAA with prior arthrodesis cohort.

Time spent in the operating room is valuable to both surgeons and patients. One of the biggest rate-limiting factors when it comes to arthrodesis procedures of the foot and ankle is cartilage removal and joint preparation. Power instrumentation in joint preparation provides an avenue to decrease joint preparation time, thus decreasing operating room time and costs. Arthrodesis of 47 joints (n) from 27 patients were included. Power rasp joint preparation in 26 joints was compared to traditional osteotome and curette joint preparation in 21 joints in both time (seconds), cost (total operating room time cost per minute), and union rate. The overall mean joint preparation time using power rasp for the subtalar joint was 268.3 seconds, talonavicular joint 212.3 seconds, calcaneocuboid joint 142.6 seconds, 1st TMT 107.2 seconds. Mean joint preparation time using traditional method for subtalar joint 509.8 seconds, talonavicular joint 393.0 seconds, calcaneocuboid joint 400.0 seconds, 1st TMT 319.6 seconds. Mean cost of joint preparation using power rasp for subtalar joint $165.47, talonavicular joint $130.89, calcaneocuboid joint $87.94, 1st TMT $66.11. Mean cost of joint preparation using traditional techniques for subtalar joint $314.34, talonavicular joint $242.35, calcaneocuboid joint $246.67, 1st TMT $197.33. Overall union rate was 98% (1 asymptomatic non-union). Increasing efficiency in the operating room is vital to every surgeon\'s practice. Power rasp joint preparation is a viable option to increase efficiency and decrease operative time, this study shows no statistically significant differences in union rate, with comparable rates to existing literature.

UNASSIGNED: Hindfoot fusion procedures are common for the treatment of end-stage arthritis or deformity. Surgical treatments for these conditions include talonavicular joint (single) arthrodesis, talonavicular and subtalar (double) arthrodesis, or talonavicular, subtalar, and calcaneocuboid (triple) arthrodesis. This study evaluated the complication rate, revision surgery rate, and hardware removal rate for those treated with either single, double, or triple arthrodesis.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective review was conducted for patients who underwent single (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] code 28740), double (CPT 28725 and 28740), or triple (CPT 28715) arthrodesis to treat hindfoot arthritis/deformity (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] code: 734, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ICD-10] codes: M76821, M76822, and M76829) from 2005 to 2022 using the South Carolina Revenue and Fiscal Affairs databank. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, procedure data, and postoperative outcomes within 1 year of principal surgery. Student t test, chi-squared test, and multivariable logistic regression analysis were utilized during data analysis.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 433 patients were identified, with 248 undergoing single arthrodesis, 67 undergoing double arthrodesis, and 118 undergoing triple arthrodesis. There was no significant difference between single, double, and triple arthrodesis in the rate of complications, hardware removals, revision surgeries, or 30-day readmission when controlling for confounding variables. However, a decrease in Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was found to be predictive of an increase in the revision surgery rate (OR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.85, P = .02).
UNASSIGNED: We found no difference in the rate of complications, hardware removals, or revision surgeries in those undergoing single, double, or triple arthrodesis. Surprisingly we found that a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index, indicating a healthier patient had a significant relationship with a higher rate of revision surgery. Further study including radiographic indications for surgery or the impact of overall health status on revision surgery rates may further elucidate the other components of this relationship.
UNASSIGNED: Level III, cohort study.

Triple arthrodesis is an effective method for treating stiff horseshoe feet and severe osteoarthritis. However, it is still a challenge to improve postoperative bone fusion by changing early weight-bearing. This study improved the classical bone remodeling algorithm, established a mathematical relationship between density change rate and mechanical stimulation, and combined it with finite element theory. The proposed algorithm can not only predict the effect of early weight-bearing on triple arthrodesis but also visually demonstrate the change of bone mineral density with time. The analysis results indicated that 2.5% of the initial load was a potential factor leading to bone nonunion, and 50% of the initial load would result in bone resorption. Meanwhile, it was found that 25% of the external load was more conducive to postoperative rehabilitation. The study results have theoretical significance for enhancing the effect of postoperative bone fusion and formulating a more scientific rehabilitation program, thereby supporting patients\' postoperative rehabilitation exercise.

The aim of this study is to analyze patient-reported outcomes following this procedure as well as any demographics that may confer prognostic capability. A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients who underwent Triple Arthrodesis at our facility from 2014-2021. Patients were selected if they underwent an isolated triple arthrodesis. All cases included either a gastrocnemius recession versus a percutaneous tendo-achilles lengthening depending on the patient\'s Silverskiold examination. The electronic medical record was utilized to collect basic patient demographics, previous foot and ankle surgeries, hardware failures, additional procedures, and surgical complications. To evaluate outcomes, we compared patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) survey scores with the general population and preoperative versus postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Foot function index (FFI) scores and scores were utilized as a validation tool for our results. A total of 132 patients met the criteria for our study with a total of 50 participants completing the PROMIS and FFI surveys. The average time point at which the outcomes were collected was 5.50 y postoperatively, ranging from 1.65 to 7.57 y. The average PROMIS physical function was 38.35, pain interference was 61.52, and depression was 49.82 for this population. The mean FFI scores were 58.56 for pain, 60.07 for disability, and 48.07 for activity limitation. There was a significant decrease in preoperative and postoperative VAS scores from 5.4 to 2.55 (p < .001). Three patients experienced wound complications related to decreased sensation. Our results indicated that only PROMIS depression scores were within one standard deviation of the population mean following a triple arthrodesis procedure. PROMIS physical function and pain interference were both outside of one standard deviation for the population.

No consensus exists regarding operative treatment of Müller-Weiss disease (MWD). Its only classification is based solely on Méary\'s angle and serves neither as guide to management nor prognosis. We report on 33 feet that underwent surgery following failed conservative management. Treatment was directed towards joint(s) involved, as determined by clinical examination, plain radiography and SPECT-CT. Thus, surgery consisted of isolated talonavicular in 6 feet, triple in 8, subtalar and talonavicular in 7, talonaviculocuneiform in 4, talonaviculocuneiform with interpositional tricortical iliac crest graft in 6 and pantalar arthrodesis in 2. PROMIS scores for pain interference and depression decreased significantly (p < .001) with significant accompanying increase in physical function (p = .003). Union occurred in 31 of 33 feet (94%) with complete resolution of pain at an average follow-up of 84 months. Of the 2 nonunions, 1 had fracture through the lateral navicular, and the other marked sclerosis and avascularity of the lateral navicular. We describe our pathways for selecting arthrodesis based on the joints affected. Isolated talonavicular arthrodesis was performed in early stages of MWD, which begins at the talonavicular articulation. When disease extended to both sides of the navicular, we performed talonaviculocuneiform arthrodesis. When considering isolated talonavicular, double medial or triple arthrodesis, there should be adequate cancellous bone stock remaining in the lateral part of the navicular, as determined on medial oblique radiographs and CT scan. In case of inadequate bone stock or fracture through the lateral navicular, talonaviculocuneiform arthrodesis with interpositional iliac crest bone graft is recommended.

In patients requiring surgical correction of ipsilateral valgus knee and rigid pes planovalgus deformities, the optimal operative sequence is controversial. Growing evidence suggests these 2 deformities are related in etiology and interrelated in disease course. We present the case of a 72-year-old female with concomitant valgus knee and rigid pes planovalgus deformities successfully treated with total knee arthroplasty followed by triple arthrodesis and Achilles lengthening. Surgical correction of these deformities must be carefully planned between the operating surgeons to avoid over- or under-correction of alignment that could further impact gait. In contrast with the limited available literature, the authors recommend correction at the knee first and the foot and ankle second. Further prospective studies are needed to elucidate the best operative sequence in these patients.

Nonunions are managed by general principles that govern other bone healing sites; however, when confounding with malunion, additional attention must be given. Malunited triple arthrodesis requires a thorough understanding of biomechanical and surgical principles for adequate revision surgery. Due to the rigid nature of arthrodesis surgery on a weight-bearing surface, malunited fusions have very low patient tolerance. The lack of joints leads to a block of bone that can be corrected via derotational osteotomies with wedge supplementation. However, even if a rectus foot is achieved, compensatory motion via the ankle joint commonly causes arthritic long-term sequelae.

OBJECTIVE: Triple arthrodesis (TA) is a common procedure for stabilization of painful and unstable hind foot deformities. The aim of the study was to analyze postoperative changes in function and pain following isolated TA based on clinical outcomes, radiological findings, and pain scores. The study also considered economic aspects, such as the inability to work, before and after surgery.
METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study, with a mean follow-up of 7.8 (range=2.9-12.6) years, of isolated triple fusions was performed. Short-Form 36 (SF-36), Foot Function Index (FFI), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS) were analyzed. Clinical examination and standardized radiographs pre- and post-surgery were evaluated.
RESULTS: All 16 patients were very satisfied with the outcome after TA. In patients with secondary arthrosis of the ankle joint, AOFAS scores were significantly lower (p=0.012), whereas arthrosis in tarsal and tarsometatarsal joints did not affect the score. Body mass index (BMI) was associated with lower AOFAS, FFI-pain, FFI-function and increased hindfoot valgus. The non-union rate was approximately 11%.
CONCLUSIONS: TA leads to good clinical and radiological outcomes. None of the study participants reported a deterioration in their quality of life after TA. Two thirds of the patients reported significant limitations when walking on uneven ground. More than half of the feet developed secondary arthrosis of the tarsal joints and 44% of the ankle joint.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to investigate changes in hallux alignment after corrective surgery for adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD).
METHODS: The present study retrospectively investigated the changes of hallux alignment in 37 feet (33 patients) which were treated with double or triple arthrodesis of the hindfoot for AAFD between 2015 and 2021 and could be followed up to one year postoperatively.
RESULTS: Hallux valgus (HV) angle significantly decreased by a mean 4.1° among the whole 37 subjects and by a mean 6.6° among the 24 subjects who had a preoperative HV angle of 15° or more. Those who had HV correction (HV angle correction ≥ 5°) demonstrated more near-normal postoperative alignment of the medial longitudinal arch and hindfoot than those without HV correction.
CONCLUSIONS: Hindfoot fusion for AAFD could improve preoperative HV deformity to some degree. HV correction was associated with proper realignment of the midfoot and hindfoot.
METHODS: Level IV; retrospective case series.