trial sequential analysis

试验序贯分析
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在探讨CC-细胞因子配体-2(CCL2)2518A/G(rs1024611)单核苷酸多态性(SNP)与年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)易感性的关系。
    方法:PubMed,Embase,WebofScience,和其他数据库搜索2023年8月24日之前发表的文章。搜索后,数据提取,和质量评估,使用RevMan5.4、Stata17.0和TSA0.9.5.10Beta软件进行荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。合并或,P值,计算95%置信区间(CI)。敏感性分析,我们还进行了亚组分析和发表偏倚评估.
    结果:六篇文章,包括1186例病例和1124例对照,包括在内。在六个主要结果中没有发现显著的统计学差异。然而,由于观察到的异质性和高灵敏度,进行亚组分析,揭示了不同地区之间的统计上的显著差异。没有观察到显著的发表偏倚。试验序贯分析表明,需要进行额外的后续病例对照研究以进一步验证研究结果。
    结论:CCL2基因2518A/G(rs1024611)多态性与AMD易感性相关。在西亚和欧洲的高加索人群中,G等位基因对AMD有保护作用,而在东亚和南亚,它构成了一个风险因素。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the association between the CC-cytokine ligand-2 (CCL2) 2518A/G (rs1024611) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
    METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and other databases were searched for articles published before August 24, 2023. After searching, data extraction, and quality assessment, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis were conducted using RevMan 5.4, Stata 17.0, and TSA 0.9.5.10 Beta software. Combined OR, P values, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis and publication bias assessment were also performed.
    RESULTS: Six articles, comprising 1186 cases and 1124 controls, were included. No significant statistical difference was found in six main outcomes. However, due to observed heterogeneity and high sensitivity, subgroup analysis was performed, revealing statistically significant differences across different regions. No significant publication bias was observed. Trial sequential analysis suggested the need for additional follow-up case-control studies to further validate the findings.
    CONCLUSIONS: The CCL2 gene 2518A/G (rs1024611) polymorphism is associated with AMD susceptibility. Among Caucasian populations in West Asia and Europe, the G allele is protective against AMD, whereas in East and South Asia, it poses a risk factor.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们的研究旨在评估UCP2基因3'非翻译区插入/缺失(3'UTRI/D)和A55V(丙氨酸/缬氨酸)多态性与神经管缺陷(NTDs)易感性之间的关联。
    根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准,文章搜索是为了搜索2023年10月之前发表的文章。两位作者独立筛选了所包含的文章,并提取了它们的基本特征。经过质量评估,使用RevMan5.4,Stata/MP17和TSA0.9.5.10Beta进行meta分析和试验序贯分析(TSA).根据国家和病例组组成进行亚组分析。使用逐一排除方法进行敏感性分析。Begg\和Egger\的测试用于评估发表偏倚。
    共包括七篇文章。总体荟萃分析显示,在纳入的UCP2基因3'UTRI/D多态性研究中,存在显着的异质性。显著的统计数据表明,与具有II基因型和I等位基因的那些相比,具有DD基因型和D等位基因的那些具有更高的NTD机会。分别。II与II的综合结果ID无统计学意义。A55V变异对NTD的风险无统计学意义,尽管纳入的研究中没有显著的异质性。大多数异质性在分组后得到解决,发现中国人ID基因型的风险高于II基因型。NTD患者或其母亲的基因分型不是影响异质性的因素。敏感性分析和发表偏倚分析表明,阳性结果支持我们的结果。
    UCP2基因3'UTRI/D多态性增加了中国人群发展NTDs的可能性,D等位基因是危险因素,这有助于理解NTDs的遗传基础。TSA表明,未来需要更多高质量的原始研究进行进一步验证。
    UNASSIGNED: Our study aimed to assess the association between UCP2 gene 3\' untranslated region insertion/deletion (3\'UTR I/D) and A55V (alanine/valine) polymorphisms and neural tube defects (NTDs) susceptibility.
    UNASSIGNED: According to pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria, the article search was conducted to search articles published before October 2023. Two authors independently screened the included articles and extracted their basic characteristics. After quality evaluation, the meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were conducted using RevMan 5.4, Stata/MP 17, and TSA 0.9.5.10 Beta. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on country and case group composition. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using a one-by-one exclusion method. Begg\'s and Egger\'s tests were used to evaluate publication bias.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of seven articles were included. Overall meta-analysis revealed significant heterogeneity among the included studies for 3\'UTR I/D polymorphism of the UCP2 gene. Significant statistical data indicated that those with the DD genotype and D allele had higher chances of NTD compared to those with the II genotype and the I allele, respectively. The combined result of II vs. ID was not statistically significant. A55V variation showed no statistical significance in the risk of NTD, despite the absence of significant heterogeneity across the included studies. Most of the heterogeneity was resolved after subgrouping, and a higher risk of the ID genotype was found than the II genotype for Chinese people. Genotyping NTD patients or their mothers was not a factor affecting the heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias analysis suggested that positive findings supported our results.
    UNASSIGNED: The UCP2 gene 3\'UTR I/D polymorphism increased the likelihood of developing NTDs in the Chinese population, with the D allele being the risk factor, which contributed to the understanding of the genetic basis of NTDs. TSA indicated that more high-quality original studies were needed in the future for further validation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Xileisan(XLS)治疗溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的益处和风险尚不清楚。
    目的:本研究旨在评估XLS联合美沙拉嗪治疗UC的疗效和安全性。
    方法:我们检索了8个数据库,用于评估XLS和美沙拉嗪联合治疗UC的临床试验,到2024年1月。使用Revman5.3和TSA0.9.5.10β进行Meta分析和试验序贯分析(TSA),分别。
    结果:本研究包括13项临床研究,涉及990例患者,其中501例患者接受XLS联合美沙拉嗪,而489例患者仅接受美沙拉嗪。荟萃分析表明,就功效而言,XLS和美沙拉嗪的组合显着提高了22%的临床疗效[风险比(RR)=1.22;95CI:1.15-1.28;P<0.00001]和25%的粘膜改善率(RR=1.25;95CI:1.12-1.39;P=0.0001),同时将腹痛的持续时间显着减少2.25天[平均差(MD)=-2.25;95CI:-3.35至-1.14;P<0.0001],腹泻2.06天(MD=-2.06;95CI:-3.92至-0.20;P=0.03),便血2.32天(MD=-2.32;95CI:-4.02至-0.62;P=0.008),肿瘤坏死因子α16.25ng/mL(MD=-16.25;95CI:-20.48至-12.01;P<0.00001),白细胞介素-6下降14.14ng/mL(MD=-14.14;95CI:-24.89至-3.39;P=0.01)。TSA在疗效终点的荟萃分析中表明了结论性。在安全方面,荟萃分析显示,XLS和美沙拉嗪的组合并没有增加总不良事件和胃肠道不良事件的发生,腹胀,红斑(P>0.05)。TSA在安全性终点的荟萃分析中显示非结论性发现。Harbord检验显示无发表偏倚(P=0.734)。
    结论:XLS治疗可缓解临床症状,肠粘膜损伤,UC患者的炎症反应,同时表现出良好的安全性。
    BACKGROUND: The benefits and risks of Xileisan (XLS) in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) remain unclear.
    OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of XLS and mesalazine when treating UC.
    METHODS: We searched eight databases for clinical trials evaluating the combination of XLS and mesalazine in the treatment of UC, up to January 2024. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were performed using Revman 5.3 and TSA 0.9.5.10 beta, respectively.
    RESULTS: The present study included 13 clinical studies involving 990 patients, of which 501 patients received XLS combined with mesalazine while 489 patients received mesalazine alone. The meta-analysis showed that, in terms of efficacy, the combination of XLS and mesalazine significantly improved the clinical efficacy rate by 22% [risk ratio (RR) = 1.22; 95%CI: 1.15-1.28; P < 0.00001] and mucosal improvement rate by 25% (RR = 1.25; 95%CI: 1.12-1.39; P = 0.0001), while significantly reducing the duration of abdominal pain by 2.25 days [mean difference (MD) = -2.25; 95%CI: -3.35 to -1.14; P < 0.0001], diarrhea by 2.06 days (MD = -2.06; 95%CI: -3.92 to -0.20; P = 0.03), hematochezia by 2.32 days (MD = -2.32; 95%CI: -4.02 to -0.62; P = 0.008), tumor necrosis factor alpha by 16.25 ng/mL (MD = -16.25; 95%CI: -20.48 to -12.01; P < 0.00001), and interleukin-6 by 14.14 ng/mL (MD = -14.14; 95%CI: -24.89 to -3.39; P = 0.01). The TSA indicated conclusiveness in the meta-analysis of the efficacy endpoints. In terms of safety, the meta-analysis revealed that the combination of XLS and mesalazine did not increase the occurrence of total and gastrointestinal adverse events, abdominal distension, and erythema (P > 0.05). The TSA showed non conclusive findings in the meta-analysis of the safety endpoints. Harbord\'s test showed no publication bias (P = 0.734).
    CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with XLS alleviated the clinical symptoms, intestinal mucosal injury, and inflammatory response in patients with UC, while demonstrating good safety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:疗效,有效性,批准的尼马特雷韦/利托那韦方案治疗实验室确诊的轻度/中度COVID-19的安全性尚不清楚.
    方法:我们系统地确定了已批准的尼马特雷韦/利托那韦方案治疗COVID-19的疗效/有效性和/或安全性的随机对照试验(RCT)和真实世界研究(RWS;观察性研究)。我们使用逆方差汇集了适当的数据(RWS的调整估计),随机效应模型。我们使用I2统计量计算了统计异质性。结果以95%CI相关的相对风险(RR)表示。我们进一步评估偏倚风险/研究质量,并对来自随机对照试验的证据进行试验序贯分析。
    结果:我们纳入了4个RCT(4,070人)和16个RWS(1,925,047人)的成年人(年龄≥18岁)。1个和3个随机对照试验的偏倚风险较低且不清楚,分别。RWS质量良好。与安慰剂/无治疗相比,尼马特雷韦/利托那韦显着降低了COVID-19的住院率(RR=0.17;95%CI,0.10-0.31;I2=77.2%;2个随机对照试验,3,542人),但恶化严重程度的降低没有显着差异(RR=0.82;95%CI,0.66-1.01;I2=47.5%;3项RCT,1,824人),病毒清除率(RR=1.19;95%CI,0.93-1.51;I2=82%;2个随机对照试验,528人),不良事件(RR=1.41;95%CI,0.92-2.14;I2=70.6%;4项随机对照试验,4,070人),严重不良事件(RR=0.82;95%CI,0.41-1.62;I2=0%;3项随机对照试验,3,806人),和全因死亡率(RR=0.27;95%CI,0.04-1.70;I2=49.9%;3项随机对照试验,3,806人),尽管试验序贯分析表明,目前这些结局的总样本量不足以得出结论.真实世界研究还显示,COVID-19住院率显着降低(RR=0.48;95%CI,0.37-0.60;I2=95.0%;11RWS,1,421,398人)和全因死亡率(RR=0.24;95%CI,0.14-0.34;I2=65%;7RWS,286,131人)与不治疗相比,尼马特雷韦/利托那韦。
    结论:Nirmatrelvir/利托那韦对于预防轻度/中度COVID-19患者的住院和可能降低全因死亡率似乎很有希望,但证据不足。需要更多的研究。
    BACKGROUND: The efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of the approved nirmatrelvir/ritonavir regimen for treatment of laboratory-confirmed mild/moderately severe COVID-19 remains unclear.
    METHODS: We systematically identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies (RWS; observational studies) of the efficacy/effectiveness and/or safety of the approved nirmatrelvir/ritonavir regimen for COVID-19. We pooled appropriate data (adjusted estimates for RWS) using an inverse variance, random-effects model. We calculated statistical heterogeneity using the I 2 statistic. Results are presented as relative risk (RR) with associated 95% CI. We further assessed risk of bias/study quality and conducted trial sequential analysis of the evidence from RCTs.
    RESULTS: We included 4 RCTs (4,070 persons) and 16 RWS (1,925,047 persons) of adults (aged ≥18 years). One and 3 RCTs were of low and unclear risk of bias, respectively. The RWS were of good quality. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir significantly decreased COVID-19 hospitalization compared with placebo/no treatment (RR = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.10-0.31; I 2 = 77.2%; 2 RCTs, 3,542 persons), but there was no significant difference for decrease of worsening severity (RR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.66-1.01; I 2 = 47.5%; 3 RCTs, 1,824 persons), viral clearance (RR = 1.19; 95% CI, 0.93-1.51; I 2 = 82%; 2 RCTs, 528 persons), adverse events (RR = 1.41; 95% CI, 0.92-2.14; I 2 = 70.6%; 4 RCTs, 4,070 persons), serious adverse events (RR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.41-1.62; I 2 = 0%; 3 RCTs, 3,806 persons), and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.04-1.70; I 2 = 49.9%; 3 RCTs, 3,806 persons), although trial sequential analysis suggested that the current total sample sizes for these outcomes were not large enough for conclusions to be drawn. Real-world studies also showed significantly decreased COVID-19 hospitalization (RR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.37-0.60; I 2 = 95.0%; 11 RWS, 1,421,398 persons) and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.14-0.34; I 2 = 65%; 7 RWS, 286,131 persons) for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir compared with no treatment.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir appears to be promising for preventing hospitalization and potentially decreasing all-cause mortality for persons with mild/moderately severe COVID-19, but the evidence is weak. More studies are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在先前的研究中,针灸已被证明可用于治疗过敏性鼻炎。然而,儿童过敏性鼻炎患者缺乏相关证据.我们旨在通过荟萃分析和试验序列分析来验证针灸治疗儿童过敏性鼻炎的疗效。
    方法:对8个数据库进行了全面搜索,直到2023年8月27日。包括比较单独或与药物联合使用针灸与AR儿童药物治疗的随机对照试验。主要结果是总鼻部症状评分(TNSS)。次要结果是血清免疫球蛋白E水平,和复发率。
    结果:纳入了13项研究,涉及1186名参与者。在结果中,针刺组(AC组)与药物组(Med组)在儿童AR的治疗中没有显着差异(风险比[RR]=1.10,95%CI=0.97至1.24,p=0.13),而TSA建议纳入的样本量不超过所需的信息大小(RIS).AC+Med组与Med组之间存在显著差异(RR=1.29,95%CI=1.17~1.42,p<0.00001),有足够的样本量。结果治疗后血清IgE对Med组有利(MD=51.94,95%CI[22.24,81.65],p=0.0006)。就复发率而言,AC组的复发率低于Med组(RR=0.40,95%CI=0.26-0.63,p<0.0001)。
    结论:针刺是治疗儿童过敏性鼻炎的有效方法,但这一结论可能受到证据质量普遍较低的限制。TSA建议需要更大样本量和更长治疗持续时间的其他高质量试验。
    BACKGROUND: Acupuncture has been shown for the treatment of allergic rhinitis in previous studies. Nevertheless, relevant evidence was lacked for paediatric patients with allergic rhinitis. We aim to validate the efficacy of acupuncture for allergic rhinitis in children by meta-analysis and trial sequence analysis.
    METHODS: Comprehensive search of eight databases were conducted until August 27, 2023. Randomized controlled trials comparing acupuncture alone or in combination with drugs versus medication in children with AR were included. The primary outcome was total nasal symptom score (TNSS). The secondary outcomes were serum immunoglobulin E levels, and relapse rates.
    RESULTS: Thirteen studies involving 1186 participants were included. In results, acupuncture group (AC group) versus medication group (Med group) shows no significant difference in the treatment of AR in children (risk ratio [RR] = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.97 to 1.24, p = 0.13), while TSA suggested the included sample size did not exceed required information size (RIS). Significant differences were found between the AC + Med group versus the Med group (RR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.17 to 1.42, p < 0.00001), with sufficient sample size. Results in serum IgE after treatment which favored the Med group (MD = 51.94, 95% CI [22.24, 81.65], p = 0.0006). In terms of relapse rate, The AC group had a lower relapse rate than the Med group (RR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.26-0.63, p < 0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture is an efficacious treatment for allergic rhinitis in children, but this conclusion might be limited by the generally low quality of evidence. TSA suggested additional high-quality trials with larger sample sizes and longer treatment durations were needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们的研究表明,B族维生素对骨折发生率没有显著影响,骨矿物质密度,和骨转换标记。然而,B族维生素对骨密度和骨转换标志物的研究数据有限,需要更多的临床试验来得出足够的结论。
    目的:本研究的目的是确定B族维生素(VB)(叶酸,B6和B12)对骨折发生率的补充,骨矿物质密度(BMD),和骨转换标志物(BTMs)。
    方法:在PubMed中进行了全面搜索,MEDLINE,EMBASE,Cochrane数据库,和ClinicalTrials.gov至2023年9月4日。根据Cochrane手册评估偏倚风险,并根据GRADE系统评估证据质量。我们使用试验序贯分析(TSA)评估随机误差的风险,使用Stata14进行敏感性和发表偏倚分析。
    结果:提取并分析了来自14个RCT的34,700名患者的数据。结果表明,VB并没有显着降低骨折发生率(RR,1.06;95%CI,0.95-1.18;p=0.33;I2=40%)并且不影响腰椎和股骨颈的BMD。VBs对骨特异性碱性相(骨形成的生物标志物)没有显著影响,但可以增加血清羧基末端肽(骨吸收的生物标志物)(p=0.009;I2=0%)。TSA显示,由于所包含的样本数据数量很少,需要在更多的临床试验中证明,因此VBs对BMD和BTM的结果可能不足以得出足够的结论。VBs无法减少骨折发生率已被TSA充分证实。敏感性分析和发表偏倚评估证明我们的meta分析结果稳定可靠,没有显著的发表偏倚。
    结论:来自RCT的现有证据不支持VBs可以有效影响骨质疏松性骨折风险,BMD,和BTM。
    背景:PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023427508。
    Our study showed that B vitamins did not have significant effect on fracture incidence, bone mineral density, and bone turnover markers. However, the research data of B vitamins on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers are limited, and more clinical trials are needed to draw sufficient conclusions.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify the efficacy of B vitamin (VB) (folate, B6, and B12) supplements on fracture incidence, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone turnover markers (BTMs).
    METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to September 4, 2023. The risk of bias was assessed according to Cochrane Handbook and the quality of evidence was assessed according to the GRADE system. We used trial sequential analysis (TSA) to assess risk of random errors and Stata 14 to conduct sensitivity and publication bias analyses.
    RESULTS: Data from 14 RCTs with 34,700 patients were extracted and analyzed. The results showed that VBs did not significantly reduce the fracture incidence (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.95 - 1.18; p = 0.33; I2 = 40%) and did not affect BMD in lumbar spine and femur neck. VBs had no significant effect on bone specific alkaline phase (a biomarker for bone formation), but could increase the serum carboxy-terminal peptide (a biomarker for bone resorption) (p = 0.009; I2 = 0%). The TSA showed the results of VBs on BMD and BTMs may not be enough to draw sufficient conclusions due to the small number of sample data included and needed to be demonstrated in more clinical trials. The inability of VBs to reduce fracture incidence has been verified by TSA as sufficient. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias assessment proved that our meta-analysis results were stable and reliable, with no significant publication bias.
    CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence from RCTs does not support VBs can effectively influence osteoporotic fracture risk, BMD, and BTMs.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023427508.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    术后神经认知功能障碍(PNCD)通常发生在手术后并延长住院时间。涉及对中枢神经系统的直接有害刺激和全身性炎症。由于它们有效的抗炎作用,皮质类固醇已被用于减轻PNCD的发病率和严重程度.本系统综述和荟萃分析试图评估围手术期皮质类固醇对PNCD的预防作用。
    在预定义的数据库中搜索评估皮质类固醇在预防PNCD中的作用的随机对照试验(RCT)。1个月内PNCD的发生率是主要结果。次要结果包括使用抗精神病药物进行治疗,术后感染,和住院时间。结果显示为比值比(OR)和平均差(MD),置信区间为95%(CI)。
    纳入15个RCT,包括15,398名患者。糖皮质激素组PNCD发生率明显低于对照组,合并OR为0.75(95%CI0.58,0.96;P=0.02;I2=66%)。试验序贯分析显示皮质类固醇在预防PNCD方面的临床益处;然而,必要的信息规模仍然不足。亚组分析支持皮质类固醇对谵妄预防的预防作用,但不支持延迟神经认知恢复。
    我们的荟萃分析显示,皮质类固醇对PNCD的发生率具有统计学意义的保护作用。然而,仍需要进一步的研究来证实这种常用且相对安全的预防PNCD的策略的保护作用.
    UNASSIGNED: Postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction (PNCD) commonly occurs after surgery and prolongs hospital stays. Both direct noxious stimuli to the central nervous system and systemic inflammation have been implicated. Due to their potent anti-inflammatory effects, corticosteroids have been utilised to attenuate the incidence and severity of PNCD. This systematic review and meta-analysis strived to evaluate the prophylactic role of perioperative corticosteroids for PNCD.
    UNASSIGNED: A search was run in pre-defined databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the role of corticosteroids in preventing PNCD. The incidence of PNCD within 1 month was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the use of antipsychotic medications for the treatment, postoperative infection, and hospital length of stay. The results are exhibited as odds ratio (OR) and the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI).
    UNASSIGNED: Fifteen RCTs comprising 15,398 patients were included. The incidence of PNCD was significantly lower in the corticosteroid group than in the control group, with a pooled OR of 0.75 (95% CI 0.58, 0.96; P = 0.02; I2 = 66%). Trial sequential analysis showed the clinical benefit of corticosteroids in preventing PNCD; however, the requisite information size is still inadequate. The sub-group analysis supported the prophylactic effect of corticosteroids on delirium prevention but not on delayed neurocognitive recovery.
    UNASSIGNED: Our meta-analysis revealed statistically significant protective effects of corticosteroids on the incidence of PNCD. However, further studies are still needed to confirm the protective role of this commonly used and relatively safe strategy for preventing PNCD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:近年来,在清醒插管中,视频喉镜检查已越来越多地用作纤维支气管镜检查的替代方法。尽管如此,目前尚不确定视频喉镜是否可以替代纤维支气管镜检查。我们通过荟萃分析进行了系统评价,以比较视频喉镜检查和纤维支气管镜在清醒插管中的作用。方法:我们系统地搜索了所有比较视频喉镜和纤维支气管镜用于清醒插管的随机对照试验(RCT)。Cochrane中央对照试验登记册(CENTRAL),Embase,和MEDLINE的系统查询到2023年8月。我们的主要结果指标是插管的持续时间。次要结局包括初次尝试插管成功率,插管失败,患者报告的满意度,以及可能源于插管程序的任何并发症或不良事件。采用Cochrane偏差风险RCT工具评估所有研究的偏差证据。采用等级方法来衡量证据的确定性。结果:涉及873例患者的11项试验最终纳入我们的数据提取综述。荟萃分析表明,与纤维支气管镜检查相比,视频喉镜检查可缩短插管时间(SMD-1.9671[95%CI:-2.7794至-1.1548]p<0.0001),这一发现在电视喉镜类型的亚组分析中得到证实(SMD-2.5027[95%CI:-4.8733至-0.1322]p=0.0385)。此外,视频喉镜检查略微降低了手术过程中饱和度低于90%的风险(RR-0.7040[95%CI:-1.4038,-0.0043]p=0.0486).在失败的插管方面,两种技术之间没有观察到统计学上的显着差异,最初成功的插管尝试,或喉咙痛/声音嘶哑。关于患者报告的满意度,由于各试验用于评估该结局的评估方法存在差异,因此无法进行汇总分析.最后,针对插管时间(主要结局)进行的试验序贯分析(TSA)确认了该证据的结论性;针对次要结局进行的TSA未能得出结论性证据,表明进一步试验的必要性。结论:与纤维支气管镜检查相比,用于清醒气管插管的视频喉镜检查可缩短插管时间,并减少低于90%的饱和风险。
    Background: In recent years, videolaryngoscopy has increasingly been utilized as an alternative to fiberoptic bronchoscopy in awake intubation. Nonetheless, it remains uncertain whether videolaryngoscopy represents a viable substitute for fiberoptic bronchoscopy. We conducted this systematic review with a meta-analysis to compare videolaryngoscopy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy for awake intubation. Methods: We systematically searched for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing videolaryngoscopy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy for awake intubation. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, and MEDLINE were systematically queried through August 2023. Our primary outcome measure was the duration of intubation. Secondary outcomes encompassed the rate of successful intubation on the initial attempt, failed intubation, patient-reported satisfaction, and any complications or adverse events potentially stemming from the intubation procedure. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs was employed to evaluate all studies for evidence of bias. The GRADE approach was utilized to gauge the certainty of the evidence. Results: Eleven trials involving 873 patients were ultimately included in our review for data extraction. Meta-analysis demonstrated that videolaryngoscopy decreased the duration of intubation compared to fiberoptic bronchoscopy (SMD -1.9671 [95% CI: -2.7794 to -1.1548] p < 0.0001), a finding corroborated in subgroup analysis by the type of videolaryngoscope (SMD -2.5027 [95% CI: -4.8733 to -0.1322] p = 0.0385). Additionally, videolaryngoscopy marginally lowered the risk of experiencing a saturation below 90% during the procedure (RR -0.7040 [95% CI: -1.4038 to -0.0043] p = 0.0486). No statistically significant disparities were observed between the two techniques in terms of failed intubation, initial successful intubation attempt, or sore throat/hoarseness. With regard to patient-reported satisfaction, a pooled analysis was precluded due to the variability in evaluation methods employed across the trials to assess this outcome. Lastly, trial sequential analysis (TSA) conducted for intubation time (primary outcome) affirmed the conclusiveness of this evidence; TSA performed for secondary outcomes failed to yield conclusive evidence, indicating the necessity for further trials. Conclusions: Videolaryngoscopy for awake tracheal intubation diminishes intubation time and the risk of experiencing a saturation below 90% compared to fiberoptic bronchoscopy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号