BACKGROUND: Treatment pressures encompass communicative strategies that influence mental healthcare service users\' decision-making to increase their compliance with recommended treatment. Persuasion, interpersonal leverage, inducements, and threats have been described as examples of treatment pressures. Research indicates that treatment pressures are exerted not only by mental healthcare professionals but also by relatives. While relatives play a crucial role in their family member\'s pathway to care, research on the use of treatment pressures by relatives is still scarce. Likewise, little is known about other strategies relatives may use to promote the treatment compliance of their family member with a serious mental health condition. In particular, no study to date has investigated this from the perspective of relatives of people with a serious mental health condition.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to answer the following research questions: Which types of treatment pressures do relatives use? Which other strategies do relatives use to promote the treatment compliance of their family member with a serious mental health condition? How do treatment pressures relate to these other strategies?
METHODS: Eleven semi-structured interviews were conducted with relatives of people with a serious mental health condition in Germany. Participants were approached via relatives\' self-help groups and flyers in a local psychiatric hospital. Inclusion criteria were having a family member with a psychiatric diagnosis and the family member having experienced formal coercion. The data were analyzed using grounded theory methodology.
RESULTS: Relatives use a variety of strategies to promote the treatment compliance of their family member with a serious mental health condition. These strategies can be categorized into three general approaches: influencing the decision-making of the family member; not leaving the family member with a choice; and changing the social or legal context of the decision-making process. Our results show that the strategies that relatives use to promote their family member\'s treatment compliance go beyond the treatment pressures thus far described in the literature.
CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative study supports and conceptually expands prior findings that treatment pressures are not only frequently used within mental healthcare services but also by relatives in the home setting. Mental healthcare professionals should acknowledge the difficulties faced and efforts undertaken by relatives in seeking treatment for their family member. At the same time, they should recognize that a service user\'s consent to treatment may be affected and limited by strategies to promote treatment compliance employed by relatives.

Psychological pressure refers to communicative strategies used by professionals and informal caregivers to influence the decision-making of service users and improve their adherence to recommended treatment or social rules. This phenomenon is also commonly referred to as informal coercion or treatment pressure. Empirical studies indicated that psychological pressure is common in mental healthcare services. No generally accepted definition of psychological pressure is available to date. A first conceptual analysis of psychological pressure focused on staff communication to promote treatment adherence and distinguished between persuasion, interpersonal leverage, inducements and threats.
The aim of this study was to develop a conceptual model of psychological pressure based on the perspectives of service users.
Data were collected by means of semi-structured interviews. The sample consisted of 14 mental health service users with a self-reported psychiatric diagnosis and prior experience with coercion in mental healthcare. We used theoretical sampling and contacted participants via mental healthcare services and self-help groups to ensure a variety of attitudes toward the mental healthcare system in the sample. The study was conducted in Germany from October 2019 to January 2020. Data were analyzed according to grounded theory methodology.
The study indicated that psychological pressure is used not only to improve service users\' adherence to recommended treatment but also to improve their adherence to social rules; that it is exerted not only by mental health professionals but also by relatives and friends; and that the extent to which service users perceive communication as involving psychological pressure depends strongly on contextual factors. Relevant contextual factors were the way of communicating, the quality of the personal relationship, the institutional setting, the material surroundings and the level of convergence between the parties\' understanding of mental disorder.
The results of the study highlight the importance of staff communication training and organizational changes for reducing the use of psychological pressure in mental healthcare services.

UNASSIGNED: Despite the extensive research and intense debate on coercion in psychiatry we have seen in recent years, little is still known about formally voluntarily admitted patients, who experience high levels of perceived coercion during their admission to a psychiatric hospital.
UNASSIGNED: The purpose of the present research was to explore forms of treatment pressure put on patients, not only by clinicians, but also by patients\' relatives, during admission to psychiatric hospitals in Italy, Poland and the United Kingdom.
UNASSIGNED: Data were obtained via in-depth, semi-structured interviews with patients (N = 108) diagnosed with various mental disorders (ICD-10: F20-F49) hospitalised in psychiatric inpatient wards. Maximum variation sampling was applied to ensure the inclusion of patients with different socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. The study applied a common methodology to secure comparability and consistency across participating countries. The qualitative data from each country were transcribed verbatim, coded and subjected to theoretical thematic analysis.
UNASSIGNED: The results of the analysis confirm that the legal classifications of involuntary and voluntary hospitalisation do not capture the fundamental distinctions between patients who are and are not coerced into treatment. Our findings show that the level of perceived coercion in voluntary patients ranges from \'persuasion\' and \'interpersonal leverage\' (categorised as treatment pressures) to \'threat\', \'someone else\'s decisions\' and \'violence\' (categorised as informal coercion).
UNASSIGNED: We suggest that the term \'treatment pressures\' be applied to techniques for convincing patients to follow a suggested course of treatment by offering advice and support in getting professional help, as well as using emotional arguments based on the personal relationship with the patient. In turn, we propose to reserve the term \'informal coercion\' to describe practices for pressuring patients into treatment by threatening them, by making them believe that they have no choice, and by taking away their power to make autonomous decisions.

In-laboratory titration polysomnography (PSG) is standard to determine optimal therapeutic continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The use of auto-titrating CPAP devices (autoCPAP) as an alternative to CPAP titration has not been well studied in children. We hypothesized that autoCPAP-derived pressures (PMEAN, PPEAKMEAN, P90) would be similar to titration PSG pressure (PPSG).
This is a retrospective study of children with OSAS initiated on autoCPAP between 2007 and 2017, who used autoCPAP for at least 2 h/night and who had adequate titration PSG were included in the analysis. AutoCPAP-derived pressures were obtained from use downloads and compared with PPSG. PPSG predictive factors were analyzed by median regression. Nonparametric methods were used for analysis.
Of 110 children initiated on autoCPAP, 44 satisfied the inclusion criteria. Age (median (interquartile range)) was 13.01 (9.98-16.72) years, and 63.6% were obese. PPSG median (interquartile range) was 8 (7-11) cmH₂O, mean autoCPAP-derived pressure (PMEAN) was 6.2 (5.6-7.6) cmH₂O, peak mean pressure (PPEAKMEAN) was 9.4 (7.7-11.1) cmH₂O, and average device pressure ≤ 90% of the time (P90) was 8.1 (7.2-9.7) cmH₂O. AutoCPAP-derived pressures correlated with PPSG (P < .05). PMEAN was lower than the other 3 pressures (P < .0002). Median regression analysis demonstrated that after adjusting for patient characteristics such as age, sex, and obesity status, autoCPAP-derived pressures remained significant predictors of PPSG (P < .05). There were no significant interactions between these patient characteristics and autoCPAP-derived pressures.
This study demonstrates that autoCPAP-derived pressures correlate with the titration PSG-derived pressures. These results indicate that autoCPAP can be used in the pediatric population and can determine pressures that are close to the titration pressures.

Treatment pressure restricts patients\' voluntary and autonomous decisions. Yet interventions involving treatment pressure are widely used in mental health and psychosocial services. This cross-sectional study explored whether mental health professionals\' knowledge on five types of treatment pressure (no coercion, persuasion or conviction, leverage, threat, and formal coercion) was associated with sociodemographic, professional and contextual factors. A more positive attitude towards interventions involving treatment pressure was associated with underrating the level of those interventions compared with a predefined default value. The treatment setting and professional group played a minor role in \'leverage\' and \'formal coercion\' types of treatment pressure, respectively.