treatment preferences

治疗偏好
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    提交人检查了刑期结束时的年龄,种族,73名男性囚犯(28名非生命者,45名救生员)来自阿拉巴马州的老年和成年惩教所。所有措施(例如,简要症状清单,死亡焦虑量表)以访谈形式进行。心肺复苏的治疗偏好差异很大,饲管,姑息治疗是由种族预测的,救生员身份,死亡焦虑属于少数群体的囚犯,非生命主义者,那些高度死亡焦虑的人表达了对喂食管的更大渴望,而高加索人或终身监禁的囚犯表达了对姑息治疗的更大愿望。鉴于囚犯人口的老龄化和医疗保健费用的增加,有必要进一步探索老年囚犯的临终治疗偏好。
    The authors examined age at the end of prison sentence, race, and psychosocial factors on end-of-life treatment preferences among 73 male inmates (28 nonlifers, 45 lifers) from the Alabama Aged and Infirmed Correctional Facility. All measures (e.g., Brief Symptom Inventory, Death Anxiety Scale) were administered in an interview format. A significant amount of variance in treatment preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, feeding tube, and palliative care was predicted by race, lifer status, and death anxiety. Inmates who were members of minority groups, nonlifers, and those with high death anxiety expressed greater desire for a feeding tube, whereas inmates who were Caucasian or lifers expressed a greater desire for palliative care. Given the aging of the inmate population and increasing health care costs, further exploration of end-of-life treatment preferences among older inmates is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    长效注射(LAI)治疗HIV是日常口服药物的替代方法。早期向符合条件的患者推广LAI的成功需要更好地了解患者对这种新疗法的认识和兴趣。我们对在美国南部城市HIV诊所就诊的患者进行了电子调查。符合条件的参与者年龄为18岁以上,最近的HIV-1病毒载量<200拷贝/ml。没有任何对LAI成分或慢性乙型肝炎的基因型耐药性的证据调查接受者被问及目前的治疗,参与护理,和LAI的知识。2023年1月至4月,480名患者接受了筛查;319名患者符合条件,155人(49%)完成了调查。大多数人(119,77%)知道,87人(56%)对LAI感兴趣。在回归分析中,仅年龄与LAI相关(OR0.95,95%CI0.92,0.99).在注射剂的拟议好处中,没有药丸的旅行方便,缺乏每日服药,和较少的药物相互作用是最有吸引力的。在对注射剂的拟议关注中,新药的更高成本和保险范围最令人担忧。绝大多数艾滋病毒感染者(PWH)都知道最新的治疗方法,我们一半以上的样本表示对LAI感兴趣。年龄较大与对LAI的兴趣较低有关。LAI以其便利性而呼吁,隐私,避免药物相互作用,而与LAI相关的成本增加需要解决。
    Long Acting Injectable (LAI) therapy to treat HIV is an alternative to daily oral medications. The success of early roll-out of LAI to eligible patients requires a better understanding of patients\' awareness and interest in this novel therapy. We administered an electronic survey to patients attending an urban HIV clinic in the US South. Eligible participants were 18 + years old with a most recent HIV-1 viral load < 200 copies/ml, without any evidence of genotypic resistance to LAI components or chronic hepatitis B. Survey recipients were asked about current treatment, engagement in care, and knowledge of LAI. Between January-April 2023, 480 patients were screened; 319 were eligible, and 155 (49%) completed the survey. The majority (119, 77%) were aware of, and 87 (56%) were interested in LAI. In regression analysis, only age was associated with interest in LAI (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92,0.99). Among proposed benefits of injectables, ease of travel without pills, lack of daily pill-taking, and fewer medication interactions were most appealing. Among proposed concerns with injectables, higher cost and insurance coverage of the new medicine were most worrisome. A large majority of people with HIV (PWH) are aware of the newest treatment available, and just over half of our sample expressed interest in LAI. Older age was associated with lower interest in LAI. LAI is appealing for its convenience, privacy, and avoidance of drug interactions, while the increased costs associated with LAI need to be addressed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着憩室炎患病率的增加,专业指南鼓励个性化治疗。然而,两位外科医生的治疗偏好频率,和病人,这种偏好对憩室炎管理的影响被低估了。我们回顾了我们机构的3名结直肠外科医生的27例连续患者就诊,以评估推动他们治疗的因素,以及它们对患者随机分为医疗或手术治疗的平衡。使用标准化的访问前和访问后问卷,我们调查了就诊对治疗建议的影响.我们的结果表明,我们的外科医生对复杂疾病有实践偏见,并且偏爱憩室炎的手术治疗,既复杂又不复杂的疾病。这种偏好在门诊就诊后经常没有变化,这对指导真正的共同决策有意义,因为它仍然是建议。
    With the increasing prevalence of diverticulitis, professional guidelines encourage the individualization of treatment. However, the frequency of treatment preferences of both surgeons, and patients, and the resultant impact of that preference on diverticulitis management is underexplored. We reviewed 27 consecutive patient visits of 3 colorectal surgeons at our institution to evaluate factors that drove their treatment, as well as their equipoise for patient randomization into medical or surgical treatments. Using standardized pre- and post-visit questionnaires, we investigated the impact of the clinic visit on treatment recommendations. Our results demonstrate that our surgeons have a practice bias towards complicated disease, and have a preference towards operative management of diverticulitis, in both complicated and uncomplicated disease. This preference was frequently unchanged after clinic visit, which has implications for guiding truly shared decision making, as it continues to be the recommendation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    认识到当前疼痛疗法的局限性,本研究旨在探讨乳腺癌患者(BC)与慢性疼痛(CP)的疼痛管理相关的独特需求和障碍.
    进行了4个焦点组,涉及17个具有不同疼痛强度的CP(Mage=51,SD=7.99)的BC。专题分析被应用于转录讨论。
    出现了三个关键主题:(1)疼痛管理的挑战,包括“医患沟通障碍”和“情境和社会障碍”;(2)自我管理需求,包括“心理社会支持,\"\"护理相关需求,“和”共同决策“;(3)治疗偏好和疼痛管理的看法,具有诸如“治疗偏好”之类的子主题,\"\"机构偏好,“和”决策角色感知。\"
    这项研究强调针对患者犹豫的量身定制的支持系统,对抗疼痛正常化,并解决医疗保健提供者的态度。它强调了整合护理人员和同伴支持的重要性。调查结果提倡完善医疗保健提供者的教育,采用全面的多学科方法,并战略性地将电子健康工具纳入此类护理中。
    UNASSIGNED: Recognizing the limitations of the current pain therapies, the study aimed to explore the unique needs and obstacles related to pain management in Breast Cancer Survivors (BCs) with Chronic Pain (CP).
    UNASSIGNED: 4 focus groups were conducted involving 17 BCs with CP (Mage = 51, SD = 7.99) with varying pain intensities. Thematic analysis was applied to transcribed discussions.
    UNASSIGNED: Three key themes emerged: (1) Challenges to pain management, including \"Doctor-patients communications barriers\" and \"Contextual and societal barriers\"; (2) Self-management needs, encompassing \"Psycho-social support,\" \"Care-related needs,\" and \"Shared decision-making\"; (3) Treatment preferences and perceptions of pain management, with subthemes like \"Treatment preferences,\" \"Institution preference,\" and \"Decision role perception.\"
    UNASSIGNED: This study emphasizes tailored support systems targeting patient hesitancy, countering pain normalization, and addressing healthcare providers\' attitudes. It underscores the importance of integrating caregiver and peer support. Findings advocate refining healthcare provider education, adopting a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach, and strategically incorporating eHealth tools into such care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:经口激光显微手术(TLMS)和放射治疗(XRT)是早期声门型喉癌(EGC)的主要治疗手段。这里,我们调查了病例依赖提供者的治疗偏好,并确定了影响EGC决策的因素.
    方法:这项对喉科医师的横断面调查,头颈外科医生,放射肿瘤学家介绍了5例逐渐进展的EGC(T1/2,N0)。受访者表示对TLMS或XRT的偏好以及影响他们对每种情况的推荐的排名因素。分析利用描述性统计数据,Fischer的精确测试,和Kruskal-Wallis检验非参数数据。
    结果:共收到141个完全应答(69.5%喉科医师)。大多数受访者在学术环境(93.5%)和多学科团队(94.0%)中实践。前连合受累是独立于病例的治疗建议的最重要的先验肿瘤因素(Likert量表:4.22/5),其次是侧向(李克特量表:4.02/5)。在所有专业中,单侧T1a病变推荐TLMS。喉科医师继续在T2病变中推荐TLMS(41.0%),高于头颈部外科医生(5.0%)和放射肿瘤学家(0.0%)。在所有案件中,生存率和嗓音结局是影响治疗决策的最重要临床因素.在更复杂的EGC演示中,放射肿瘤学家比喉科医生更重视声音(排名:1.6vs.2.7,Kruskall-Wallis:p<0.05)。
    结论:在更复杂的EGC临床表现中,与XRT相比,TLMS的偏好在专家之间有所不同,尽管驱动这些治疗建议的因素排名相似。这可能是由TLMS与XRT之后对病例相关语音结果的不同经验和观点驱动的,提示需要增加对肿瘤位置和深度如何影响语音结果的理解。
    方法:V喉镜,2024.
    OBJECTIVE: Transoral laser microsurgery (TLMS) and radiotherapy (XRT) are mainstays of treatment for early glottic carcinoma (EGC). Here, we investigated case-dependent provider treatment preferences and identify factors which impact decision-making in EGC.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional survey of laryngologists, head-and-neck surgeons, and radiation oncologists presented five diagrammatic cases of progressively advanced EGC (T1/2, N0). Respondents indicated preference for TLMS or XRT and ranked factors which influenced their recommendation for each case. Analysis utilized descriptive statistics, Fischer\'s exact tests, and Kruskal-Wallis tests for nonparametric data.
    RESULTS: A total of 141 complete responses (69.5% laryngologists) were received. Most respondents practiced in academic settings (93.5%) and within multidisciplinary teams (94.0%). Anterior commissure involvement was the most important a priori tumor factor for case-independent treatment recommendation (Likert Scale: 4.22/5), followed by Laterality (Likert Scale: 4.02/5). Across all specialties, TLMS was recommended for unilateral T1a lesions. Laryngologists continued recommending TLMS in T2 lesions (41.0%) more than head-and-neck surgeons (5.0%) and radiation oncologists (0.0%). Across all cases, survival and voice outcomes were the most important clinical factors impacting treatment decisions. Radiation oncologists weighed voice more heavily than laryngologists in more complex presentations of EGC (rank: 1.6 vs. 2.7, Kruskall-Wallis: p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: In more complex clinical presentations of EGC, preference for TLMS compared to XRT differed across specialists, despite similar rankings of factors driving these treatment recommendations. This may be driven by differing experiences and viewpoints on case-dependent voice outcomes following TLMS versus XRT, suggesting a need for increased understanding of how tumor location and depth impact voice outcomes.
    METHODS: 5 Laryngoscope, 134:3686-3694, 2024.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    生物炎症性肠病(IBD)药物,一旦限于静脉内(IV)给药,现在可以通过IV和皮下(SC)给药。这项研究调查了患者的偏好,愿意从IV转到SC,和相关因素。一份涵盖人口统计的问卷,疾病相关的查询,生活质量,IBD药物偏好通过电子邮件分发,以色列克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎基金会,输液中心,和诊所。来自454名IBD患者(平均年龄:42岁;55.7%为女性),反应显示每8周对SC的偏好,与每日口服剂量相当。这两种选择都比每8周静脉和每2周SC明显更受欢迎。后两者无统计学差异。然而,在同时接受SC和IV给药的患者中,明显倾向于每2周一次的SC给药,而不是每8周一次的静脉给药。在IV治疗的患者中,54.5%拒绝切换到SC。造成这种情况的主要原因包括医务人员的存在(57.7%),对针头的恐惧(46.4%),相信输液疗效(37.1%),输液间隔时间较长(36.1%)。研究结果表明,由于患者的抵抗力,从IV到SC治疗的过渡具有挑战性。受特定因素的影响。识别和解决这些障碍对于优化IBD管理至关重要。
    Biological inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) medications, once limited to intravenous (IV) administration, can now be administered both via IV and subcutaneously (SC). This study investigates patient preferences, willingness to switch from IV to SC, and associated factors. A questionnaire covering demographics, disease-related inquiries, quality of life, and IBD medication preferences was distributed via email, the Israeli Crohn\'s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Foundation, infusion centers, and clinics. From 454 IBD patients (median age: 42 years; 55.7% female), responses revealed a preference for SC every 8 weeks, which is comparable to daily oral dosing. Both options were significantly favored over IV every 8 weeks and SC every 2 weeks, with no statistically significant differences between the latter two. However, among patients who were experienced with both SC and IV administration, a clear preference for SC administration every 2 weeks over IV every 8 weeks surfaced. Among IV-treated patients, 54.5% resisted switching to SC. Key reasons for this included medical staff presence (57.7%), a fear of needles (46.4%), belief in infusion efficacy (37.1%), and longer intervals between infusions (36.1%). Findings suggest that transitioning from IV to SC treatment is challenging due to patient resistance, which is influenced by specific factors. Identifying and addressing these obstacles is crucial for optimizing IBD management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全球有近3亿人患有慢性乙型肝炎感染,大多数人仍未被诊断并有患肝癌的风险。2015年,世界卫生组织(WHO)制定了预防指南,care,和慢性乙型肝炎患者的治疗,并在2023年初开始致力于更新这些指南。2023年3月,一个自我管理的,匿名在线调查启动,旨在确定与乙型肝炎的临床管理相关的患者偏好,包括当前管理,治疗,和护理经验,关于与提供商互动的偏好,和偏好相关的简化乙肝护理访问。来自76个国家的560名乙型肝炎患者(自我鉴定为HBsAg阳性)完成了调查。关键调查结果表明,不到一半(49%,N=268)的参与者定期去看医生检查肝脏的健康状况(每6-12个月),37%的参与者由专科医生开抗病毒药物(82%,N=167)或全科医生(13%,N=26)。参与者报告说,他们没有积极参与与其提供者的护理决策(42%,N=217),绝大多数人希望参与乙型肝炎管理和治疗选择(85%,N=435)。参与者在调查中使用开放式答复提供了定性和定量详细信息,内容涉及药物可负担性挑战,并从知识渊博的提供者那里获得护理。总体调查结果表明了护理方面的关键差距,管理,和与乙型肝炎相关的治疗:确定这些差距可用于确定在病毒性肝炎的护理连续体中需要改进的领域。调查发现,需要全面简化与乙型肝炎相关的临床管理和医疗保健服务。对开放式调查答复的专题分析强调了主要的总体主题,包括与乙型肝炎管理和治疗相关的成本和获取负担,以及寻找知识渊博的提供商的挑战。这项混合方法调查的结果用于通知WHO乙型肝炎指南更新。应继续努力探索公共卫生方法,以解决检测障碍和促进者,care,以及对乙型肝炎患者的治疗,以提高对乙型肝炎的认识和获取,care,以及患者和提供者之间的治疗。
    Almost 300 million people are living with chronic hepatitis B infection worldwide and most remain undiagnosed and at risk for liver cancer. In 2015 the World Health Organization (WHO) developed guidelines for the prevention, care, and treatment of persons with chronic hepatitis B and in early 2023 began to work on updating these guidelines. In March 2023, a self-administered, anonymous online survey was launched, aiming to identify patient preferences related to the clinical management of hepatitis B including current management, treatment, and care experiences, preferences regarding engagement with providers, and preferences related to simplifying hepatitis B care access. A sample of 560 individuals living with hepatitis B (self-identified as HBsAg positive) from 76 countries completed the survey. Key findings demonstrated that less than half (49%, N = 268) of participants regularly visited a doctor to check the health of their liver (every 6-12 months), with 37% of participants prescribed antiviral medication by a specialist (82%, N = 167) or general practitioner (13%, N = 26). Participants reported not being actively involved in care decision making with their providers (42%, N = 217), with an overwhelming majority wanting to participate in hepatitis B management and treatment choices (85%, N = 435). Participants provided qualitative and quantitative details using open-ended responses within the survey about challenges with medication affordability and receiving care from a knowledgeable provider. Overall findings demonstrated key gaps in care, management, and treatment access related to hepatitis B: identifying these gaps can be used to identify areas for improvement along the care continuum for viral hepatitis. The survey found a need for the comprehensive simplification of clinical management and health care services related to hepatitis B. A thematic analysis of the open-ended survey responses highlighted major overarching themes including the cost and access burdens associated with hepatitis B management and treatment, and challenges in finding knowledgeable providers. Results from this mixed methods survey were used to inform the WHO hepatitis B guidelines update. Efforts should continue to explore public health approaches to address barriers and facilitators to testing, care, and treatment for people with hepatitis B to improve awareness of hepatitis B and access, care, and treatment among patients and providers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究将患者的偏好纳入治疗结果的影响,突出了其对关键方面的影响,如降低辍学率和提高有效性。认识到个人有权参与有关其治疗方法的决定强调了研究治疗偏好和影响这些选择的因素的重要性。
    本研究旨在确定治疗偏好(心理,药理学,或组合)在患者样本中,并辨别影响这些偏好的社会心理和临床因素。
    共有2,133名在社区精神卫生部门接受护理的人完成了对焦虑抑郁症状的评估,社会和职业适应,以及他们的治疗偏好。数据分析采用SPSS,通过描述性统计,卡方检验,应用了单向方差分析。
    治疗的偏好分布如下:联合(49.8%),心理(33%),和药理学(10.6%)。诊断等因素,抑郁和焦虑症状的严重程度,和功能影响与中等效应大小的治疗偏好相关。同时,与所选治疗相关的各种社会人口统计学因素,虽然效果大小较弱。
    对联合治疗有明显的偏好。心理治疗的意义是显而易见的,因为五分之四的参与者在他们的选择中更喜欢他们。解决这些偏好要求在更广泛的心理健康处方自由背景下进行探索。
    UNASSIGNED: Studies examining the effects of incorporating patients\' preferences into treatment outcomes highlight their impact on crucial aspects such as reduced dropout rates and enhanced effectiveness. Recognizing individuals\' rights to participate in decisions about their treatments underscores the importance of studying treatment preferences and the factors influencing these choices.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to identify treatment preferences (psychological, pharmacological, or combined) among a sample of patients and to discern the psychosocial and clinical factors influencing these preferences.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 2,133 individuals receiving care at a community mental health unit completed assessments on anxious-depressive symptoms, social and occupational adjustment, and their treatment preference. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS, with descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and one-way ANOVA applied.
    UNASSIGNED: Preferences for treatments were distributed as follows: Combined (49.8%), psychological (33%), and pharmacological (10.6%). Factors such as diagnosis, severity of depressive and anxious symptoms, and functional impact were related to treatment preference with a moderate effect size. Meanwhile, various sociodemographic factors correlated with the selected treatment, though with a weak effect size.
    UNASSIGNED: There is a pronounced preference for combined treatments. The significance of psychological treatments is evident, as four out of five participants favored them in their choices. Addressing these preferences calls for an exploration within the broader context of prescription freedom in mental health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    超重和肥胖在澳大利亚很常见,也是导致健康不良的主要危险因素之一。保持>5-10%的体重减轻可以预防和降低与肥胖相关的合并症的风险。与单独的生活方式干预相比,处方减肥药物加上生活方式干预可以导致额外的体重减轻,但是这些药物在澳大利亚处方不足。我们的目标是更好地了解超重或肥胖患者的治疗偏好以及治疗他们的医疗保健从业人员(HCP)。
    于2020年对澳大利亚超重或肥胖并治疗HCP的成年人进行了在线调查。使用离散选择实验(DCE)方法来确定在评估口服和可注射处方减肥药物时对人们最重要的是什么。要求参与者在三种假设的治疗替代方案之间进行选择:“口服药丸”;“皮下注射笔(可更换针头)”;“一次性皮下注射笔(隐藏针头)”;和选择退出选项(“这些都没有”)。
    在线调查和DCE由193名患者和104名HCP完成。对于患者和HCP来说,所有治疗替代方案(口服,可替换注射和一次性注射)优先于选择退出。胃肠道副作用,其次是成功率,体重减轻的百分比,和费用是患者最重要的属性。对于HCP,体重减轻百分比是最重要的治疗属性,其次是成功率,胃肠道副作用和费用。虽然大多数患者报告的针头恐惧相对较低,医生报告了相对较高的感知患者针的恐惧。
    临床医师与患者之间关于减肥治疗的讨论应涵盖处方减肥药物的选择,包括注射药物,患者可能比医生认为的更不担心。具有高成功率和低或可控制的胃肠道副作用风险的治疗可能优于替代方案。
    UNASSIGNED: Overweight and obesity are common in Australia and among the leading risk factors for ill health. Maintained weight loss of >5-10% can prevent and reduce the risk of obesity-related comorbidities. Prescription weight loss medications plus lifestyle interventions can result in additional weight loss compared with lifestyle interventions alone, but these medications are under-prescribed in Australia. Our aim was to develop a greater understanding of the treatment preferences of people with overweight or obesity and the healthcare practitioners (HCPs) who treat them.
    UNASSIGNED: An online survey of Australian adults with overweight or obesity and treating HCPs was conducted in 2020. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach was used to determine what is most important to people when evaluating oral and injectable prescription weight loss medications. Participants were asked to choose between three hypothetical treatment alternatives: \"Oral pill\"; \"Subcutaneous injection pen (replaceable needle)\"; \"Disposable subcutaneous injection pen (hidden needle)\"; and an opt-out option (\"None of these\").
    UNASSIGNED: The online survey and DCE were completed by 193 patients and 104 HCPs. For both patients and HCPs, all treatment alternatives (oral, replaceable injection and disposable injection) were preferred over the opt-out. Gastrointestinal side effects, followed by success rate, percentage body weight lost, and cost were the most important attributes to patients. For HCPs, percentage body weight loss was the most important treatment attribute, followed by success rate, gastrointestinal side effects and cost. While most patients reported relatively low needle fear, physicians reported relatively high perceived patient needle fear.
    UNASSIGNED: Clinician-patient discussions about treatments for weight loss should cover the option of prescription weight loss medications, including injectable medications, which patients may be less apprehensive about than physicians believe. Treatments with a high success rate and low or manageable risk of gastrointestinal side effects may be preferred over alternatives.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    广泛性焦虑症(GAD)是一种普遍存在的慢性心理健康状况,伴随着相当大的个人和经济负担。尽管有有效的治疗方法,许多人无法获得支持。当前的研究探讨了治疗历史,寻求帮助的障碍,和认知行为疗法(CBT)治疗偏好为具有临床显著GAD症状的个体。还研究了健康信念模型(HBM)在预测求助中的实用性。使用了127名参与者的横截面设计(Mage=29.17;SD=11.86;80.3%为女性)。62%的参与者曾寻求心理治疗,大约28%的人首先接受了CBT。最有影响力的治疗障碍是希望自己解决问题(M=1.96,SD=0.96),其次是负担能力(M=1.75,SD=1.15)和感到尴尬或羞愧(M=1.75,SD=1.06)。最优选的治疗模式是亲自单独治疗(M=7.59,SD=2.86),然后通过视频会议进行远程治疗(M=4.31,SD=3.55)。约38%的意向寻求治疗的差异与HBM变量相关,感知到的治疗益处是最强的预测因子。结果有可能通过减少治疗障碍并使公共卫生运动与心理治疗的好处保持一致来告知精神卫生服务的提供。
    Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a prevalent and chronic mental health condition, associated with considerable individual and economic burden. Despite the availability of effective treatments, many individuals do not access support. The current study explores treatment histories, barriers to help-seeking, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) treatment preferences for individuals with clinically significant GAD symptoms. The utility of Health Belief Model (HBM) in predicting help-seeking is also examined. A cross-sectional design with 127 participants (Mage = 29.17; SD = 11.86; 80.3% female) was used. Sixty-two percent of participants reported previously seeking psychological treatment, and approximately 28% received CBT in the first instance. The most influential treatment barriers were a desire to solve the problem on one\'s own (M = 1.96, SD = 0.96), followed by affordability (M = 1.75, SD = 1.15) and feeling embarrassed or ashamed (M = 1.75, SD = 1.06). The most preferred treatment modes were in-person individual treatment (M = 7.59, SD = 2.86) followed by remote treatment via videoconferencing (M = 4.31, SD = 3.55). Approximately 38% of the variance in intention to seek treatment was associated with the HBM variables, with perceived benefit of treatment being the strongest predictor. Results have the potential to inform mental health service delivery by reducing treatment barriers and aligning public health campaigns with benefits of psychological treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号