trastorno de estrés postraumático

Trastorno de ester é s post straum á tico
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:难民和寻求庇护者(ASR)除了受到各种其他压力外,还经常遭受损失,并且经常表现出高水平的各种心理症状。目的:本研究旨在初步确定长期悲伤障碍(PGD)的集群,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),和失去亲人的ASR中的抑郁症状,其次确定聚类成员关系的预测因子。在探索性分析中调查了与社会人口统计学和飞行相关的变量。方法:德国的ASR(N=92)与人际流失接触,即至少一个失踪或去世的亲戚或朋友,通过基于访谈的PGD问卷进行评估,创伤后应激障碍,和抑郁症状。我们使用k均值聚类分析来区分症状概况,并使用逻辑回归分析来确定聚类成员的预测因子。结果:我们发现了一个三簇解决方案。PGD簇(30%)的特征主要是PGD症状,而PGD/PTSD集群(32%)具有较高的PGD和PTSD以及中度抑郁症状。弹性集群(38%)总体症状较低。相对于弹性集群,不安全居住状态预测PGD和PGD/PTSD集群中的成员资格,而相对于其他集群,较高的依恋焦虑预测了PGD/PTSD集群中的成员资格。探索性分析显示,住院时间是一个重要的预测因素。结论:研究结果可以扩展有关欧洲丧亲ASR中不同症状特征的最新知识。对依恋和迁移相关变量进行区分的见解为干预提供了起点。
    在德国失去亲人的寻求庇护者和难民可以分为三个症状群:(1)主要是长时间的悲伤,(2)长时间的悲伤,高创伤后压力,和中度抑郁症状,(3)症状负荷低。与附件和迁移相关的变量(即居住状态,逗留时间,和依恋焦虑)区分聚类成员。结果强调了在失去亲人的寻求庇护者和难民中关注概况的重要性,而不仅仅是单一类别的症状和依恋特征。
    Background: Refugees and asylum seekers (ASRs) are frequently exposed to loss in addition to a variety of other stressors and often display high levels of various psychological symptoms.Objective: The study aimed to primarily determine clusters of prolonged grief disorder (PGD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and depression symptoms in bereaved ASRs and secondly identify predictors of cluster membership. Sociodemographic  - and flight-related variables were investigated in exploratory analyses.Method: ASRs in Germany (N = 92) with interpersonal loss exposure, i.e. at least one missing or deceased relative or friend, were assessed with interview-based questionnaires for PGD, PTSD, and depressive symptoms. We used k-means cluster analysis to distinguish symptom profiles and logistic regression analyses to identify predictors of cluster membership.Results: We found a three-cluster-solution. The PGD-cluster (30%) was characterised predominantly by PGD symptoms, while the PGD/PTSD-cluster (32%) had high PGD and PTSD and moderate depressive symptoms. The resilient cluster (38%) showed low symptoms overall. insecure residence status predicted membership in the PGD and PGD/PTSD clusters relative to the resilient cluster, whilst higher attachment anxiety predicted membership in the PGD/PTSD cluster relative to the other clusters. Explorative analysis revealed duration of stay as a significant predictor.Conclusion: Findings can extend the current knowledge about different symptom profiles among bereaved ASRs in Europe. Insights to attachment  - and migration-related variables distinguishing between these profiles offer starting points for interventions.
    Bereaved asylum seekers and refugees in Germany can be grouped into three symptom clusters: (1) predominantly prolonged grief, (2) high prolonged grief, high posttraumatic stress, and moderate depressive symptoms, and (3) low symptom load.Attachment  – and migration-related variables (i.e. residence status, duration of stay, and attachment anxiety) distinguish between cluster membership.Results highlight the importance of attending to profiles and not only single categories of symptoms and attachment features in bereaved asylum seekers and refugees.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:当创伤事件和损失以创伤损失的形式相交时,这些事件可以引发创伤后应激障碍和病理性悲伤。目的:本系统评价研究了哪些特征区分了各自疾病的发展或与合并症相关。方法:使用Medline进行系统的文献检索,PubMed,APAPsycInfo和WebofScience共进行了46项符合纳入标准的研究。在这些研究中,使用17种方法评估PTSD,并使用16种不同的经过验证的仪器评估病理性悲伤。在质量评估中,12项研究被归类为平均值,30高于平均水平,4一样优秀。将调查的风险因素分为19个上级聚类,并使用叙事综合进行处理。结果:与死者的关系,心理健康问题,与PTSD症状相比,宗教信仰似乎与病理性悲伤症状特别相关。社会支持和社会情绪是PTSD和病理性悲伤的重要相关因素和潜在危险因素。纳入的研究主要是横截面设计。结论:病理性悲伤与创伤后应激障碍之间似乎存在区分因素。应在纳入研究和研究领域异质性的限制范围内考虑结果。缺乏使用纵向研究设计的研究(1),(2)在创伤损失后尽早开始数据收集,(3)使用规范,最新的测量仪器和(4)包括其分析中的合并症。迫切需要进一步的研究以进行更准确的(急性)筛查,预后,以及创伤性损失后的干预措施。
    当创伤事件和损失以创伤损失的形式相交时,这些事件可以引发创伤后应激障碍和病理性悲伤。本系统综述调查了哪些特征可以区分各自疾病的发展或与合并症相关。和死者的关系,心理健康问题,宗教信仰似乎是预测病态悲伤的特定特征。社会支持和社会情绪经常被报道为PTSD和病理性悲伤的重要相关因素。迄今为止的研究是非常异质的,主要是横截面的。在纵向研究设计中考虑创伤损失后两种疾病的进一步研究迫切需要更好的(急性)筛查,预后,和干预。
    Background: When traumatic events and losses intersect in the form of traumatic loss, these events can trigger both posttraumatic stress disorder and pathological grief.Objective: This systematic review investigates which characteristics differentiate between the development of the respective disorders or are associated with comorbidity.Method: A systematic literature search using Medline, PubMed, APA PsycInfo and Web of Science yielded 46 studies which met the inclusion criteria. In these studies, PTSD was assessed using 17 and pathological grief using 16 different validated instruments. In the quality assessment, 12 studies were classified as average, 30 as above average, and 4 as excellent. The investigated risk factors were categorized into 19 superordinate clusters and processed using narrative synthesis.Results: The relationship to the deceased, mental health issues, and religious beliefs seem to be associated specifically with pathological grief symptoms compared to PTSD symptoms. Social support and social emotions emerged as significant correlates and potential risk factors for both PTSD and pathological grief. Included studies had mainly cross-sectional designs.Conclusions: Differentiating factors between pathological grief and PTSD appear to exist. The results should be considered within the limitations of the heterogeneity of the included studies and the research field. There is a lack of studies (1) using a longitudinal study design, (2) starting data collection early following the traumatic loss, (3) using standardized, up-to-date measurement instruments and (4) including comorbidity in their analyses. Further research is urgently needed for more accurate (acute) screenings, prognoses, and interventions following traumatic loss.
    When traumatic events and losses intersect in the form of traumatic loss, these events can trigger both posttraumatic stress disorder and pathological grief. This systematic review investigates which characteristics can differentiate between the development of the respective disorders or are associated with comorbidity.The relationship to the deceased, mental health issues, and religious beliefs seem to be specific characteristics for predicting pathological grief. Social support and social emotions were frequently reported as significant correlates of both PTSD and pathological grief.The studies to date have been very heterogeneous and mainly cross-sectional. Further research considering both disorders after traumatic loss in longitudinal study designs is urgently indicated for better (acute) screenings, prognoses, and interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    背景:以色列目前处于持续动荡和战争状态。以色列国内和国外都有大量财政援助来治疗精神健康问题。尽管对复原力的研究有所增加,治疗和大规模干预,有人担心这对精神卫生援助分配没有显著影响.目标:这封信给编辑的目的是描述当前的情况,并解决当前的困难在有关文献从最近的冲突和国家创伤事件。方法:一个由国家和国际创伤专家组成的联盟,根据临床和研究结果的证据,汇集了他们的知识,以产生工作声明。结果:相对于更广泛的,短期心理干预措施的长期疗效有限,以前战区的教训,大规模遭受创伤和当前饱受战争蹂躏的国家突出了目标和评估的重要性,解决护理障碍,加强现有系统,促进社区复原力和护理。结论:除了急性护理,资金应该分配给长期护理,加强治疗可及性和社区后续行动,并支持长期研究以评估有效性并促进国际知识。
    在大规模攻击之后,国家灾难和战争爆发有援助大量涌入的趋势,近年来,心理健康援助。尽管该领域的研究有所增加,但文献中仍然存在巨大差距,证据与经济和慈善政策之间存在脱节,而短期举措往往比长期战略规划更受欢迎。建议更加注重针对性和评估,解决护理障碍,加强现有系统和促进社区护理。
    Background: Israel is currently under a state of continued unrest and state of war. There has been an influx of financial aid to treat the mental health fallout both from within Israel and abroad. Despite increased research into resilience, treatment and wide-scale interventions, there is a concern that this is not significantly influencing mental health aid allocation.Objective: This letter to the editor aims to describe the current situation and address current difficulties in regard to the relevant literature from recent conflicts and national traumatic events.Method: A consortium of national and international trauma experts pooled together their knowledge to produce a working statement based on evidence from clinical and research findings.Results: As opposed to wider, short-term psychological interventions which have limited long-term proven efficacy, lessons from previous war zones, wide-scale exposure to trauma and current war-torn countries highlight the importance of targeting and assessment, addressing barriers to care, strengthening existing systems and promoting community resilience and care.Conclusions: In addition to acute care, funding should be allocated to long-term care, enhancing treatment accessibility and community follow-up and additionally support long-term research to assess effectiveness and contribute to international knowledge.
    Immediately following widescale attacks, national disasters and outbreaks of war there is a tendency for an outpouring of aid, and in recent years, mental health aid.Despite an increase in research in the field there are still significant gaps in the literature and a disconnect between the evidence and economic and philanthropic policy with short-term initiatives often favoured over long-term strategic planning.It is recommended that greater attention be paid to targeting and assessment, addressing barriers to care, strengthening existing systems and promoting community care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:许多有创伤后应激症状(PTSS)的年轻人没有接受循证护理。基于互联网和移动的干预(IMI)包括基于证据的创伤集中组件可以解决这一差距,但是研究很少。因此,我们调查了创伤集中的IMI对患有PTSS的青年的可行性。方法:在一项单臂非随机前瞻性概念验证研究中,32名年龄在15-21岁的临床相关PTSS(CATS≥21)的年轻人在治疗师的指导下接受了以创伤为重点的IMI,包括通过网络浏览器访问的eHealth平台上的九个会话。我们使用了一个评估招聘能力的可行性框架,样本特征,数据收集,满意,可接受性,学习管理能力,安全方面,IMI在PTSS严重程度和相关结局中的疗效。自我评估发生在之前,mid-,干预后和3个月随访以及基线和干预后的临床医生评估.结果:样本主要包括具有人际关系创伤和高PTSS水平的年轻成年女性(CATS,M=31.63,SD=7.64)。IMI会议被发现是有用的和可理解的,而创伤处理的可行性被认为是困难的。大约三分之一的参与者(31%)完成了IMI的八个核心会议。研究完成者分析显示,在治疗后[t(21)=4.27;p<.001;d=0.88]和随访[t(18)=3.83;p=.001;d=0.84]时,自我评估的PTSS显着降低,影响很大,和临床医生评定的创伤后应激障碍严重程度在治疗后[t(21)=4.52;p<.001;d=0.93]。意向治疗分析表明,在治疗后和随访中,PTSS显着降低,效果较大(d=-0.97--1.02)。所有参与者都经历了至少一个负面影响,最常见的是令人不快的记忆(n=17/22,77%)。结论:这项研究覆盖了负担沉重的年轻人。IMI在有用性和可理解性方面被接受,但许多年轻人并未完成所有课程。有必要探索改善青少年创伤重点IMI依从性的策略,在随后的随机对照试验中评估IMI的疗效。
    青少年在创伤后往往无法获得循证护理。这项研究评估了在治疗师指导下进行以创伤为重点的基于互联网和移动的干预的可行性。年轻人接受了干预,对参与者反应的初步评估表明其有效性。未来的研究应该研究在RCT中提高依从性和IMI疗效的策略。
    Background: Many youth with posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) do not receive evidence-based care. Internet- and Mobile-Based Interventions (IMIs) comprising evidence-based trauma-focused components can address this gap, but research is scarce. Thus, we investigated the feasibility of a trauma-focused IMI for youth with PTSS.Methods: In a one-arm non-randomized prospective proof-of-concept study, 32 youths aged 15-21 years with clinically relevant PTSS (CATS ≥ 21) received access to a trauma-focused IMI with therapist guidance, comprising nine sessions on an eHealth platform accessible via web-browser. We used a feasibility framework assessing recruitment capability, sample characteristics, data collection, satisfaction, acceptability, study management abilities, safety aspects, and efficacy of the IMI in PTSS severity and related outcomes. Self-rated assessments took place pre-, mid-, post-intervention and at 3-month follow-up and clinician-rated assessments at baseline and post-intervention.Results: The sample mainly consisted of young adult females with interpersonal trauma and high PTSS levels (CATS, M = 31.63, SD = 7.64). The IMI sessions were found useful and comprehensible, whereas feasibility of trauma processing was perceived as difficult. Around one-third of participants (31%) completed the IMI\'s eight core sessions. The study completer analysis showed a significant reduction with large effects in self-rated PTSS at post-treatment [t(21) = 4.27; p < .001; d = 0.88] and follow-up [t(18) = 3.83; p = .001; d = 0.84], and clinician-rated PTSD severity at post-treatment [t(21) = 4.52; p < .001; d = 0.93]. The intention-to-treat analysis indicated significant reductions for PTSS at post-treatment and follow-up with large effect sizes (d = -0.97- -1.02). All participants experienced at least one negative effect, with the most common being the resurfacing of unpleasant memories (n = 17/22, 77%).Conclusion: The study reached highly burdened young adults. The IMI was accepted in terms of usefulness and comprehensibility but many youths did not complete all sessions. Exploration of strategies to improve adherence in trauma-focused IMIs for youth is warranted, alongside the evaluation of the IMI\'s efficacy in a subsequent randomized controlled trial.
    Youth often lack access to evidence-based care after trauma. This study assessed the feasibility of a trauma-focused internet- and mobile-based intervention with therapist guidance.The intervention was accepted by youths, and the preliminary evaluation of participant responses suggests its efficacy.Future studies should examine strategies to improve adherence and the IMI’s efficacy in a RCT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:可乐定是一种中枢作用的抗肾上腺素能药物,可用于创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),尤其是睡眠。目的:在这篇系统综述中,我们旨在总结可乐定对睡眠质量和持续时间的影响,噩梦,以及患有PTSD的成年人的PTSD症状严重程度。方法:PubMed(Medline),Embase,PsycINFO,CINAHL,直到2023年4月,对clinicaltrials.gov进行了搜索。关于成人PTSD患者使用可乐定的研究报告了对睡眠的影响,噩梦,并包括PTSD症状。对研究结果进行了叙述性总结和荟萃分析。结果:十份报告,占N=569名PTSD患者(可乐定145名,对照组436名),包括在最终选择中。有四例病例报告,四项观察性研究,一项非盲临床试验,和一项交叉随机对照试验(RCT)。可乐定的中位剂量为0.15mg/天(范围:0.1-0.5mg/天)。中位随访时间为31天(范围:3天至19个月)。证据的质量从很低到很低。个别研究存在明显的研究间异质性和低功率,但是许多人报告说睡眠质量有所改善,噩梦减少,并改善接受可乐定治疗的患者的PTSD症状。荟萃分析仅适用于两项报告可乐定对噩梦的影响的研究,并且显示与比较器(即哌唑嗪或特拉唑嗪)没有差异(比值比:1.16;95%置信区间:0.66至2.05),可能指向这些药物之间的非劣效性。结论:未来的研究,比如动力良好的RCT,需要确定在较低剂量范围内的疗效和最合适的治疗组,并获得关于可乐定治疗与PTSD相关的睡眠障碍的有效证据。
    创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)与过度觉醒和睡眠障碍有关,反映肾上腺素能神经系统的参与。在PTSD中使用抗肾上腺素能药物靶向交感神经激活是合理的。然而,以前关于哌唑嗪的报道,外周作用剂,提供了微弱的证据。可乐定,中枢肾上腺素能拮抗剂,显示出改善睡眠的希望,噩梦,和创伤后应激障碍症状,但由于目前证据的质量较低,还需要进一步的研究.
    Background: Clonidine is a centrally acting anti-adrenergic agent that may have applications in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), particularly for sleep.Objective: In this systematic review, we aimed to summarize the effect of clonidine on sleep quality and duration, nightmares, and PTSD symptom severity in adults with PTSD.Method: PubMed (Medline), Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched up to April 2023. Studies on clonidine use in adult PTSD patients reporting data on the effect on sleep, nightmares, and PTSD symptoms were included. A narrative summary and a meta-analysis of the study findings are presented.Results: Ten reports, accounting for N = 569 patients with PTSD (145 on clonidine and 436 controls), were included in the final selection. There were four case reports, four observational studies, one non-blind clinical trial, and one crossover randomized controlled trial (RCT). Median clonidine dose was 0.15 mg/day (range: 0.1-0.5 mg/day). Median follow-up time was 31 days (range: 3 days to 19 months). The quality of the evidence was rated from very low to low. There was marked between-study heterogeneity and low power in the individual studies, but many reported improved sleep quality, nightmare reduction, and improvement of PTSD symptoms for patients treated with clonidine. Meta-analysis was only possible for two studies reporting the effect of clonidine on nightmares, and showed no difference from the comparator (i.e. prazosin or terazosin) (odds ratio: 1.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 2.05), potentially pointing towards non-inferiority between these medications.Conclusions: Future research, such as well-powered RCTs, is needed to identify the efficacy in the lower dose range and the most suitable treatment group, and to obtain good evidence on the effects of clonidine in the treatment of sleep disorders related to PTSD.
    Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with hyperarousal and sleep disorders, reflecting adrenergic nervous system involvement.The use of anti-adrenergic drugs to target the sympathetic activation in PTSD is rational. However, previous reports on prazosin, a peripherally acting agent, yielded weak evidence.Clonidine, a central adrenergic antagonist, shows promise in improving sleep, nightmares, and PTSD symptoms, but further research is needed because the quality of the current evidence is low.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:警察遇到各种潜在的创伤事件(PTE),并可能被迫从事与他们的道德准则相抵触的行为。因此,他们有可能出现创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的症状,还有道德压力或道德伤害(MI)。迄今为止,警察中的MI受到的关注有限。目的:本研究旨在确定暴露于PTE的警察中的MI评估和PTSD症状的类别,同时还调查了这些类别之间的潜在临床差异。方法:对于这项研究,对421名遭受创伤的警察进行了人口统计和多项临床测量,包括MI评估(自我指导和其他指导),创伤后应激障碍严重程度,和一般精神病理学。进行了潜在类别和回归分析,以检查遭受创伤的警官中不同类别的存在以及人口统计方面的类别差异,一般精神病理学,创伤后应激障碍严重程度,不信任,内疚,内疚自我惩罚,和毫无价值的感觉。结果:确定了以下五类:(1)低MI,创伤后应激障碍等级高(28%),(2)高MI,创伤后应激障碍等级低(11%),(3)高MI,创伤后应激障碍等级高(17%),(4)低MI,创伤后应激障碍等级低(16%),和(5)一个高MI-其他,创伤后应激障碍等级高(27%)。在年龄方面,班级之间存在显着差异,一般精神病理学,创伤后应激障碍严重程度,不信任,内疚,内疚和自我惩罚,但没有性别和无价值的感觉的差异。结论:总之,我们确定了五个班级,每种都表现出独特的认知MI评估和PTSD症状模式。这强调了在这一特定群体中测量和识别MI的重要性,因为它允许定制的治疗干预措施。
    这项研究确定了暴露于潜在创伤事件的警官在认可MI评估和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状方面存在差异的类别。确定了五个班级,每个都表现出独特的MI评估和PTSD症状模式。重要的是,除了受创伤的警官的PTSD症状外,还要测量MI评估的存在,因为它可以为治疗干预提供信息。
    Background: Police officers encounter various potentially traumatic events (PTEs) and may be compelled to engage in actions that contradict their moral codes. Consequently, they are at risk to develop symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), but also moral stress or moral injury (MI). To date, MI in police officers has received limited attention.Objective: The present study sought to identify classes of MI appraisals and PTSD symptoms among police officers exposed to PTEs, while also investigating potential clinical differences between these classes.Method: For this study, 421 trauma-exposed police officers were assessed on demographics and several clinical measurements including MI appraisals (self-directed and other-directed), PTSD severity, and general psychopathology. Latent class and regression analyses were conducted to examine the presence of different classes among trauma-exposed police officers and class differentiation in terms of demographics, general psychopathology, PTSD severity, mistrust, guilt, self-punishment, and feelings of worthlessness.Results: The following five classes were identified: (1) a \'Low MI, high PTSD class\' (28%), (2) a \'High MI, low PTSD class\' (11%), (3) a \'High MI, high PTSD class\' (17%), (4) a \'Low MI, low PTSD class\' (16%), and (5) a \'High MI-other, high PTSD class\' (27%). There were significant differences between the classes in terms of age, general psychopathology, PTSD severity, mistrust, guilt, and self-punishment but no differences for gender and feelings of worthlessness.Conclusion: In conclusion, we identified five classes, each exhibiting unique patterns of cognitive MI appraisals and PTSD symptoms. This underscores the criticality of measuring and identifying MI in this particular group, as it allows for tailored treatment interventions.
    This study identified classes differing in terms of endorsement of MI appraisals and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms among police officers exposed to potentially traumatic events.Five classes were identified, each exhibiting unique patterns of MI appraisals and PTSD symptoms.It is important to measure the presence of MI appraisals in addition to PTSD symptoms in traumatized police officers as it can inform treatment interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:重症监护病房(ICU)入院和有创机械通气(IMV)与心理困扰和创伤有关。COVID-19大流行带来了一系列额外的持久压力和创伤经历。然而,对共病抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)知之甚少。目的:检查发生,共现,抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍的临床症状持续存在,以及它们的预测因素,在COVID-19危重病幸存者中。方法:对入住ICU≥24小时的COVID-19成年幸存者进行单中心前瞻性观察性研究。在ICU出院后1个月和12个月,使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表和戴维森创伤量表的抑郁量表对患者进行评估。分析了有和没有IMV的患者之间抑郁和PTSD的孤立和共病症状的差异,以及这些精神障碍症状的发生和持续存在的预测因素。结果:89例患者(42例患有IMV)完成了1个月的随访,71例(34例患有IMV)完成了12个月的随访。出院后一个月,29.2%的患者有抑郁症状,36%的患者有PTSD症状;一年后,分别为32.4%和31%。抑郁症和PTSD症状并存约占所有症状病例的一半。孤立的PTSD症状在IMV患者中更为常见(p≤0.014)。对IMV的需求与这两种精神障碍中任何一种的症状在一个月时的发生(OR=6.098,p=0.005)和在12个月时的持续(OR=3.271,p=0.030)相关。结论:在我们的COVID-19危重病幸存者队列中,共患抑郁症和PTSD症状非常常见。对IMV的需求预测了这些精神障碍症状的短期发生和长期持续,特别是PTSD症状。呼吸困难在IMV与ICU后精神障碍之间的关联中的具体作用值得进一步研究。试用注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04422444。
    COVID-19危重病幸存者的临床显着抑郁和创伤后应激障碍症状,特别是在接受有创机械通气的患者中,非常频繁,发生在出院后不久,并长期坚持。
    Background: Intensive care unit (ICU) admission and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) are associated with psychological distress and trauma. The COVID-19 pandemic brought with it a series of additional long-lasting stressful and traumatic experiences. However, little is known about comorbid depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).Objective: To examine the occurrence, co-occurrence, and persistence of clinically significant symptoms of depression and PTSD, and their predictive factors, in COVID-19 critical illness survivors.Method: Single-centre prospective observational study in adult survivors of COVID-19 with ≥24 h of ICU admission. Patients were assessed one and 12 months after ICU discharge using the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Davidson Trauma Scale. Differences in isolated and comorbid symptoms of depression and PTSD between patients with and without IMV and predictors of the occurrence and persistence of symptoms of these mental disorders were analysed.Results: Eighty-nine patients (42 with IMV) completed the 1-month follow-up and 71 (34 with IMV) completed the 12-month follow-up. One month after discharge, 29.2% of patients had symptoms of depression and 36% had symptoms of PTSD; after one year, the respective figures were 32.4% and 31%. Coexistence of depressive and PTSD symptoms accounted for approximately half of all symptomatic cases. Isolated PTSD symptoms were more frequent in patients with IMV (p≤.014). The need for IMV was associated with the occurrence at one month (OR = 6.098, p = .005) and persistence at 12 months (OR = 3.271, p = .030) of symptoms of either of these two mental disorders.Conclusions: Comorbid depressive and PTSD symptoms were highly frequent in our cohort of COVID-19 critical illness survivors. The need for IMV predicted short-term occurrence and long-term persistence of symptoms of these mental disorders, especially PTSD symptoms. The specific role of dyspnea in the association between IMV and post-ICU mental disorders deserves further investigation.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04422444.
    Clinically significant depressive and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in survivors of COVID-19 critical illness, especially in patients who had undergone invasive mechanical ventilation, were highly frequent, occurred soon after discharge, and persisted over the long term.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自杀是导致死亡的主要原因,在COVID-19大流行期间,自杀未遂率有所增加。诊断不足的分离精神病表型与自杀自我伤害升高有关;然而,它在很大程度上被排除在预测和预防自杀的尝试之外。目标:我们设计了一种人工智能方法来识别分离患者并预测先前的自杀企图,数据驱动方式。方法:研究对象为30名对照组和93名寻求治疗的女性患者,这些患者患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和各种程度的分离,包括一些患有PTSD解离亚型的患者和一些患有解离同一性障碍(DID)的患者。结果:无监督学习模型沿分离谱识别了患者。此外,监督学习模型准确地预测了先前的自杀企图,F1得分高达0.83。DID以前有自杀企图的风险最高,和分离的不同亚型预测了PTSD和DID中的自杀企图。结论:这些发现扩大了我们对解离表型的理解,并强调了迫切需要评估解离以识别自杀自我伤害高风险的个体。
    分离,在一个人的自我意识和周围环境中的超然和中断的感觉,与自杀自我伤害的风险升高有关;然而,它在很大程度上被排除在预测和预防自杀的尝试之外。使用机器学习技术,我们发现分离性身份障碍在先前自杀未遂的风险最高,分离的不同亚型预测了创伤后应激障碍和分离身份障碍的自杀企图。这些发现强调了迫切需要评估分离以识别自杀自我伤害高风险的个体。
    Background: Suicide is a leading cause of death, and rates of attempted suicide have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. The under-diagnosed psychiatric phenotype of dissociation is associated with elevated suicidal self-injury; however, it has largely been left out of attempts to predict and prevent suicide.Objective: We designed an artificial intelligence approach to identify dissociative patients and predict prior suicide attempts in an unbiased, data-driven manner.Method: Participants were 30 controls and 93 treatment-seeking female patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and various levels of dissociation, including some with the PTSD dissociative subtype and some with dissociative identity disorder (DID).Results: Unsupervised learning models identified patients along a spectrum of dissociation. Moreover, supervised learning models accurately predicted prior suicide attempts with an F1 score up to 0.83. DID had the highest risk of prior suicide attempts, and distinct subtypes of dissociation predicted suicide attempts in PTSD and DID.Conclusions: These findings expand our understanding of the dissociative phenotype and underscore the urgent need to assess for dissociation to identify individuals at high-risk of suicidal self-injury.
    Dissociation, feelings of detachment and disruption in one\'s sense of self and surroundings, is associated with an elevated risk of suicidal self-injury; however, it has largely been left out of attempts to predict and prevent suicide.Using machine learning techniques, we found dissociative identity disorder had the highest risk of prior suicide attempts, and distinct subtypes of dissociation predicted suicide attempts in posttraumatic stress disorder and dissociative identity disorder.These findings underscore the urgent need to assess for dissociation to identify individuals at high-risk of suicidal self-injury.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    N=4,607名创伤暴露的成年参与者是在COVID-19大流行的第一年从普通人群中招募的。可能的创伤后应激障碍的患病率为17.7%。我们确定了与创伤后应激障碍相关的危险因素(例如健康状况差)和保护因素(例如社交接触)。
    UNASSIGNED: N =  4,607 trauma-exposed adult participants were recruited from the general population during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.The prevalence for probable posttraumatic stress disorder was 17.7%.We identified risk factors (e.g. poor health condition) and protective factors (e.g. social contact) associated with posttraumatic stress disorder.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:研究表明,集中于创伤的强化治疗可以有效缓解创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和边缘性人格障碍(BPD)的症状。然而,这些研究依赖于BPD症状的自我报告,随访数据很少.目标:这项可行性研究的目的是确定以创伤为重点的强化治疗计划对PTSD和BPD症状的严重程度以及长达12个月随访的诊断状态的影响。方法:共有45名(60%的女性)符合PTSD和BPD的诊断标准的人参加了为期8天的以创伤为重点的强化治疗计划,该计划结合了长期暴露和EMDR治疗。在治疗前评估PTSD和BPD症状的严重程度,治疗后,6个月,和治疗后12个月(CAPS-5,BPDSI-IV)。在治疗前和12个月随访时使用临床访谈(CAPS-5和SCID-5-P)确定诊断状态。结果:在所有参与者中,93.3%的人遭受过身体虐待,12岁之前的性虐待占71.1%。从治疗前到治疗后,PTSD和BPD症状严重程度显着降低(Cohen'sds:分别为1.58和0.98),这些结果维持在6-(ds:1.20和1.01)和12个月随访(ds:1.53和1.36)。根据CAPS-5,在12个月的随访中,69.2%的人不再符合PTSD的诊断标准,而根据SCID-5-P,当时73.1%不再符合BPD的诊断标准。没有出现明显的症状恶化。结论:本研究的发现,这是第一个检查PTSD的心理治疗对治疗后一年出现边缘性人格障碍的影响,对于患有PTSD和BPD的个体,短暂的以创伤为中心的强化治疗可能是一个有价值的选择。
    研究创伤聚焦治疗对BPD的影响。首次评估治疗后一年BPD诊断状况的研究。针对创伤的治疗被证明是诊断为PTSD和BPD的患者的可行且安全的治疗方法。
    Background: Research indicates that intensive trauma-focused therapy can be effective in alleviating symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD). However, these studies have relied on self-report of BPD symptoms and follow-up data are scarce.Objective: The purpose of this feasibility study was to determine the effects of an intensive trauma-focused treatment programme on the severity of PTSD and BPD symptoms and the diagnostic status up to a 12-month follow-up.Methods: A total of 45 (60% female) individuals meeting the diagnostic criteria of both PTSD and BPD participated in an intensive eight-day trauma-focused treatment programme which combined prolonged exposure and EMDR therapy in an inpatient treatment setting. Severity of PTSD and BPD symptoms were assessed at pre-treatment, post-treatment, 6 months, and 12 months after treatment (CAPS-5, BPDSI-IV). Diagnostic status was determined using clinical interviews (CAPS-5 and SCID-5-P) at pre-treatment and 12-month follow-up.Results: Of all participants, 93.3% had been exposed to physical abuse, and 71.1% to sexual abuse prior to the age of 12 years. PTSD and BPD symptom severity significantly decreased from pre- to post-treatment (Cohen\'s ds: 1.58 and 0.98, respectively), and these results were maintained at 6- (ds: 1.20 and 1.01) and 12-month follow-up (ds: 1.53 and 1.36). Based upon CAPS-5, 69.2% no longer met the diagnostic criteria of PTSD at 12-month follow-up, while according to the SCID-5-P 73.1% no longer fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of BPD at that time. No significant worsening of symptoms occurred.Conclusion: The findings of this study, which is the first to examine the effects of psychotherapeutic treatment of PTSD on the presence of a borderline personality disorder one year after treatment, add support to the notion that a brief intensive trauma-focused treatment can be a valuable option for individuals suffering from both PTSD and BPD.
    Investigated the effects of trauma-focused treatment on BPD.First study that evaluated the status of BPD diagnosis one year after treatment.Trauma-focused treatment proved to be a feasible and safe treatment for patients diagnosed with both PTSD and BPD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号