transradial access

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的经桡动脉(TRA)入路与经股动脉入路相比,大出血和血管并发症的风险较低。通过TRA入路使用大口径(≥7-Fr)引导导管增加了桡动脉闭塞(RAO)的可能性。这项研究旨在调查是否使用薄壁7-FrGlidesheathSlender,允许使用大口径引导导管进行PCI,在复杂病变的经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗(TRI)后24小时内,围手术期RAO优于标准7-FrCordis鞘管。
    前瞻性随机,控制,进行了单盲(患者盲)试验,将504例复杂病变的TRI患者随机分为7-FrGlidesheathSlender或常规7-FrCordis鞘。主要结局定义为TRI后最初24小时内多普勒超声检查围手术期RAO的发生率。
    7-FrGlidesheathSlender早期RAO的发生率为10.3%,常规7-Fr鞘管的发生率为13.5%(p=0.271)。GlidesheathSlender的手术成功率为92.9%,Cordis鞘的手术成功率为93.7%(p=0.722)。在局部血肿和桡骨痉挛方面,治疗组之间没有显著差异。而GlidesheathSlender的使用与手术过程中疼痛明显减轻相关(数字评定量表[NRS],2.27±0.75vs.2.45±0.95,p=0.017)。GlidesheathSlender改善了复杂TRI后桡动脉超声参数的评估。
    在接受TRI的复杂冠状动脉病变患者中,在复杂PCI术后24小时内预防围手术期RAO方面,7-FrGlidesheathSlender并不优于常规7-Fr,而不会减少RAO的发生。
    NCT04748068。
    UNASSIGNED: Transradial artery (TRA) access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was associated with lower risks of major bleeding and vascular complications compared to transfemoral artery access. Use of large-bore ( ≥ 7-Fr) guiding catheters through TRA approach increased the likelihood of radial artery occlusion (RAO). This study aimed to investigate whether use of the thin-walled 7-Fr Glidesheath Slender, allowing PCI with large-caliber guiding catheters, is superior to standard 7-Fr Cordis sheath with respect to periprocedural RAO within 24 hours after transradial coronary intervention (TRI) in complex lesions.
    UNASSIGNED: A prospective randomized, controlled, single-blinded (patient-blinded) trial was conducted, randomizing 504 patients with TRI for complex lesions to either 7-Fr Glidesheath Slender or conventional 7-Fr Cordis sheath. The primary outcome was defined as the incidence of periprocedural RAO with Doppler ultrasound during the first 24 hours after TRI.
    UNASSIGNED: The incidence of early RAO was 10.3% for 7-Fr Glidesheath Slender and 13.5% for conventional 7-Fr sheath (p = 0.271). The procedural success rate for Glidesheath Slender was 92.9% and for Cordis sheath was 93.7% (p = 0.722). There was no signficiant difference between treatment arms in terms of local hematoma and radial spasm, whereas use of the Glidesheath Slender was associated with significantly less pain during the procedure (numeric rating scale [NRS], 2.27 ± 0.75 vs. 2.45 ± 0.95, p = 0.017). The assessment of radial artery in ultrasound parameters after complex TRI was improved with Glidesheath Slender.
    UNASSIGNED: Among patients with complex coronary lesions undergoing TRI, 7-Fr Glidesheath Slender was not superior to conventional 7-Fr in the prevention of periprocedural RAO within 24 hours following complex PCI, without reducing RAO occurrence.
    UNASSIGNED: NCT04748068.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经桡骨途径后压缩出血部位的方法一直是人们感兴趣的话题,然而,明确的指导方针仍然难以捉摸。本研究旨在通过优化经桡动脉入路后的机械压迫止血方案来解决这一差距。
    方法:这项回顾性分析包括300例来自脑血管病科的患者,同济大学附属上海市第四人民医院,接受了经桡动脉途径脑血管造影的患者。按照程序,患者使用球囊压迫器接受桡动脉压迫止血.根据止血方法不同分为A组(n=100,持续放气)和B组(n=200,间歇放气)。比较两组穿刺部位出血发生率及并发症发生情况。
    结果:与A组(100例患者中有20例)相比,B组(200例患者中有20例)的穿刺部位出血率明显较低(P=0.032)。同样,穿刺部位并发症的发生率,如水肿,拥塞,B组(200例患者中有5例)的伤口感染低于A组(100例患者中有10例)(P=0.006)。
    结论:经过radial入路后,间歇性放气四个小时的压迫(B组)成为最佳的压迫方法,显示患者穿刺部位的并发症较少。
    BACKGROUND: The method for compressing hemorrhagic sites after transradial access has been a topic of interest, yet definitive guidelines remain elusive. This study aims to address this gap by optimizing the mechanical compression hemostasis protocol after transradial access.
    METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 300 patients from the Department of Cerebrovascular Diseases, Shanghai Fourth People\'s Hospital affiliated to Tongji University, who underwent transradial access for cerebrovascular angiography. Following the procedure, patients received radial artery compression hemostasis using a balloon compressor. They were divided into group A (n=100, continuous deflation) and group B (n=200, intermittent deflation) according to different hemostasis methods. The incidence of bleeding at the puncture site and complications were compared between the two groups.
    RESULTS: The rate of bleeding at the puncture site was significantly lower in group B (20 out of 200 patients) compared to group A (20 out of 100 patients) (P=0.032). Similarly, the incidence of puncture site complications, such as edema, congestion, and wound infection was lower in group B (5 out of 200 patients) compared to group A (10 out of 100 patients) (P=0.006).
    CONCLUSIONS: Four hours of compression with intermittent deflation (group B) emerged as the optimal compression method after transradial access, demonstrating fewer complications at the patient\'s puncture site.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    SCCAG患者中不同穿刺点与围手术期并发症和住院时间(LOS)之间的关系鲜有报道。
    比较经桡动脉入路和经股动脉入路在联合心脑血管造影中的疗效和安全性。选择
    120例在我院行联合心脑血管造影的患者,按照随机数字表法分为经桡动脉入路组(TRA)和经股动脉入路组(TFA)。比较2组术后疗效和安全性。
    2组穿刺时间和手术时间差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。术后卧床时间,住院时间,TRA组X线照射时间短于TFA组,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。手术前和手术后3天,两组间左心室射血分数无显著差异(p>0。05).TFA组并发症总发生率高于TRA组。TFA组血肿和假性动脉瘤的发生率较高,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。
    对于同时进行的心脑血管造影,经桡动脉和股动脉介入治疗具有较好的疗效,可改善心功能。然而,经桡动脉介入治疗可缩短术后卧床时间和住院时间,减少并发症的发生。
    UNASSIGNED: The relationship between different puncture points and perioperative complications and length of stay in hospital (LOS) in SCCAG patients has rarely been reported.
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the curative effect and safety of the transradial artery approach and the transfemoral artery approach in combined heart-brain angiography.
    UNASSIGNED: 120 patients who received combined cardio-cerebral angiography in our hospital were selected and divided into a transradial artery approach group (TRA) and a transfemoral artery approach group (TFA) according to a random number table. The postoperative efficacy and safety of the 2 groups were compared.
    UNASSIGNED: There was no statistically significant difference in puncture time and operation time between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). Postoperative bed rest time, hospitalization time, and X-ray exposure time in the TRA group were shorter than those in the TFA group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Before operation and 3 days after operation, there was no significant difference in left ventricle ejection fraction between the 2 groups (p > 0. 05). The overall incidence of complications in the TFA group was higher than that in the TRA group. The incidence between haematoma and pseudoaneurysm in the TFA group was higher, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: For simultaneous heart-brain angiography, interventional therapy via radial artery and femoral artery has good curative effect and can improve cardiac function. However, interventional therapy through the radial artery can shorten the postoperative bed rest time and hospitalization time, and reduce the incidence of complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于较低的进入部位并发症发生率和提高的患者满意度,桡动脉(RA)进入已越来越多地用于冠状动脉手术。然而,可用于周围血管介入(PVI)的RA入路的数据有限.我们对2020年2月至2022年9月在单一机构通过RA接受PVI的143例患者进行了回顾性审查。从前瞻性维护的机构数据库中确定了基线特征和后续数据。在491个PVI中,156例(31.8%)通过RA进行。介入的解剖位置为股骨(44.8%),髂关节(31.1%),pop(9.6%)腓骨(2.7%),胫骨(9.9%),锁骨下动脉(1.9%)。通过正确的RA获得了程序访问(92.9%),左RA(4.5%),或右尺动脉(2.6%)使用6法国R2P目的地细长鞘在85厘米,105厘米,和119厘米的长度。动脉粥样硬化切除术的使用率为34.7%。平均造影剂体积为105.5mL,平均透视时间为18.5分钟。由于动脉痉挛和不可交叉病变,3例(1.9%)发生了股动脉通路的转换。2例(1.3%)同时使用踏板。围手术期并发症发生率为3.84%,其中入路血肿最常见(3.2%);没有人需要输血,手术干预,或额外住院。住院脑卒中1例(0.64%)。30天的死亡率,6个月,1年期为1.4%,2.8%,和4.2%,分别。总之,RA接入对于不同的PVI是可行的,未来的研究需要评估与股动脉入路相比的安全性和益处.
    Radial artery (RA) access has been increasingly utilized for coronary procedures because of lower rates of access-site complications and improved patient satisfaction. However, limited data are available for RA access for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI). We performed a retrospective review of 143 patients who underwent PVI through RA access from February 2020 to September 2022 at a single institution. Baseline characteristics and follow-up data were ascertained from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Of 491 PVI, 156 (31.8%) were performed through the RA. Anatomical locations for intervention were the femoral (44.8%), iliac (31.1%), popliteal (9.6%) peroneal (2.7%), tibial (9.9%), and subclavian (1.9%) arteries. Procedural access was obtained through the right RA (92.9%), left RA (4.5%), or right ulnar artery (2.6%) using the 6 French R2P Destination Slender sheath in 85, 105, and 119 cm lengths. Atherectomy was used in 34.7%. Mean contrast volume was 105.5 ml and the average fluoroscopy time was 18.5 minutes. Conversion to femoral access occurred in 3 cases (1.9%) because of arterial spasm and noncrossable lesions. Concomitant pedal access occurred in 2 cases (1.3%). Periprocedural complication rate was 3.84%, of which access-site hematoma was most common (3.2%); none required blood transfusion, surgical intervention, or additional hospital stay. There was 1 case (0.64%) of in-hospital stroke. The mortality rate at 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year was 1.4%, 2.8%, and 4.2%, respectively. In conclusion, RA access is feasible for diverse PVI, and future studies are needed to assess safety and benefit compared with femoral artery access.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    良性前列腺增生是导致老年男性泌尿症状的常见病。有时会导致前列腺源性血尿,由于增大的腺体的血管分布增加。如果这种类型的血尿严重且保守措施难以治疗,可能会危及生命.前列腺动脉栓塞术(PAE)是传统外科手术的微创替代疗法,特别是有合并症和手术禁忌症的患者。我们介绍了一例79岁男性,患有难治性前列腺源性血尿(RHPO),多种合并症,左上肢和双下肢明显畸形。患者经右桡动脉接受PAE治疗,介入放射学中较不常见的方法。手术成功,血尿完全消退,没有并发症。该报告强调了适应复杂患者治疗的重要性,并表明PAE在这种情况下可以安全有效。
    Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a common condition causing urinary symptoms in older men. It can sometimes lead to hematuria of prostatic origin, due to increased vascularity of the enlarged gland. If this type of hematuria is severe and refractory to conservative measures, it can be life-threatening. Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) serves as a minimally invasive alternative to traditional surgical interventions, particularly in patients with comorbidities and contraindications to surgery. We present a case of a 79-year-old male with refractory hematuria of prostatic origin (RHPO), multiple comorbidities, and significant deformities of the left upper and both lower limbs. The patient was treated with PAE via the right radial artery, a less common approach in interventional radiology. The procedure was successful and led to a complete resolution of hematuria, with no complications. This report highlights the importance of adapting treatment for complex patients and shows that PAE can be safe and effective in such cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    引言腹部血管造影术如经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)对于肝细胞癌治疗是必不可少的。一种常用的方法是经股动脉接入(TFA)。然而,与此方法相关的问题,其中包括穿刺部位的术后压迫和长时间的卧床休息,会影响患者满意度。因此,经桡动脉通路(TRA),一种提高治疗质量的微创治疗方法,是为TACE开发的。这次回顾,多中心研究旨在研究使用桡动脉途径进行腹部血管造影的有效性和安全性。方法总计,1,601名患者使用TRA进行了腹部血管造影,并在日本的14个机构接受了治疗(内脏介入(RAVI))。治疗时间,程序完成率,患者满意度,并对并发症进行了调查。结果RAVI成功率为99.4%,并发症发生率为1.2%。约98.2%的患者要求再次行桡动脉入路。根据操作者的经验年限或患者的年龄,RAVI的成功率和并发症的发生率没有显著差异。一些患者出现轻微并发症,如穿刺部位出血,血肿,血管疼痛,还有血管痉挛.Further,严重并发症(脑梗死(n=1),小脑梗死(n=1),观察到主动脉夹层(n=1)。结论与常规TFA相似,RAVI有助于安全地促进腹膜造影。在腹部血管造影中,这种方法可以减轻患者负担,从临床获益的角度来看,可以在未来广泛使用。
    Introduction Abdominal angiography procedures such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are essential for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment. One method commonly used is transfemoral access (TFA). However, issues associated with this method, which include postoperative compression of the puncture site and long periods of bed rest, can affect patient satisfaction. Thus, transradial access (TRA), a minimally invasive treatment method that improves treatment quality, was developed for TACE. This retrospective, multicenter study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of abdominal angiography using the radial artery approach. Methods In total, 1,601 patients underwent abdominal angiography using TRA and received treatment (radial access for visceral intervention (RAVI)) at 14 institutions in Japan. The treatment time, procedure completion rate, patient satisfaction, and complications were investigated. Results The success rate of RAVI was 99.4%, and the complication rate was 1.2%. Approximately 98.2% of the patients requested the radial artery approach again. There were no significant differences in the success rate of RAVI and the incidence of complications based on the operator\'s years of experience or the patient\'s age. Some patients developed minor complications such as puncture site bleeding, hematoma, vascular pain, and vasospasm. Further, serious complications (cerebral infarction (n = 1), cerebellar infarction (n = 1), and aortic dissection (n = 1)) were observed. Conclusion Similar to the conventional TFA, RAVI helped in facilitating peritoneal angiography safely. In abdominal angiography, this method can reduce patient burden and can be widely used in the future from the perspective of clinical benefit.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最近已经描述了一种通过解剖鼻烟盒在桡动脉远端的新型动脉通路,用于冠状动脉介入手术。然而,没有足够的数据来比较远端经桡动脉入路(dTRA)的优势和局限性,传统的经桡动脉通路(TRA),和经股动脉入路(TFA)。这项研究的目的是比较冠状动脉介入手术期间或之后的三个进入部位的局部疼痛和并发症。
    方法:这项前瞻性单中心观察性研究包括211例接受心导管插入术或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者,分为三组:dTRA(n=69),TRA(n=71),和TFA(n=71)。访问站点是由三个操作员自行决定的。我们对所有患者进行了问卷调查,解决手术期间或之后的局部疼痛或不适,以及可能出现的并发症,如远端苍白,局部出血,访问网站上的紫色。
    结果:在TRA组中,手术期间进入部位疼痛的发生率更高(dTRA15.9%vs.TRA32.4%与TFA15.5%)。三组术后局部疼痛的发生率均无差异(dTRA组为29.6%,TRA组28.2%,TFA组为26.8%)。疼痛强度,当它发生时,在dTRA组中较高(dTRA5.8vs.TRA4.8vs.TFA4.6在1-10量表上),持续时间也是如此(dTRA13.7vs.TRA7.6vs.TFA8.2天)。仅报告了两次局部出血事件,都在TFA组中。无重大并发症记录。
    结论:三组冠状动脉介入术后穿刺部位局部疼痛的发生率无差异。与TRA相比,dTRA组在手术过程中的疼痛发生率较低,而与TFA相比,紫色的发生率较低。然而,报告疼痛时,dTRA组的疼痛强度和持续时间较高.在某些情况下,使用dTRA进行冠状动脉手术是可行且安全的策略。
    BACKGROUND: A novel arterial access distally on the radial artery through the anatomical snuffbox has been recently described for coronary interventional procedures. However, there is insufficient data comparing the advantages and limitations of distal transradial access (dTRA), conventional transradial access (TRA), and transfemoral access (TFA). The aim of this study was to compare the three access sites regarding local pain and complications during or after coronary interventional procedures.
    METHODS: This prospective observational single-center study included 211 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization or percutaneous coronary intervention, divided into three groups: dTRA (n=69), TRA (n=71), and TFA (n=71). The access site was chosen at the discretion of three operators. We administered a questionnaire to all patients, addressing local pain or discomfort during or after the procedure and the occurrence of possible complications such as distal pallor, local bleeding, and purple color on the access site.
    RESULTS: Pain on the access site during the procedure was reported more frequently in the TRA group (dTRA 15.9% vs. TRA 32.4% vs. TFA 15.5%). There were no differences in the occurrence of local pain after the procedure in all three groups (29.6% in the dTRA group, 28.2% in the TRA group, and 26.8% in the TFA group). Pain intensity, when it occurred, was higher in the dTRA group (dTRA 5.8 vs. TRA 4.8 vs. TFA 4.6 on a 1-10 scale), as was its duration (dTRA 13.7 vs. TRA 7.6 vs. TFA 8.2 days). Only two local bleeding events were reported, both in the TFA group. No major complications were recorded.
    CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of local pain on the puncture site after coronary interventional procedures did not differ among the three groups. The dTRA group presented a lower incidence of pain during the procedure when compared to TRA and a lower incidence of purple color when compared to TFA. However, pain intensity and duration were higher in the dTRA group when pain was reported. Using dTRA for coronary procedures is a feasible and safe strategy in selected cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经桡动脉途径(TRA)被认为是冠状动脉造影(CAG)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的最安全途径。桡动脉狭窄(RAS)阻止在各种临床情况下使用桡动脉。即使在没有手缺血的情况下。在这种情况下,本研究旨在探讨桡动脉压缩装置[经桡动脉(TR)带]的空气量与RAS之间的关系.
    这项单中心回顾性研究的人群包括在3月1日之前在选择性条件下通过TRA接受CAG的患者,2020年5月1日,2022年。在这些病人中,111名符合研究纳入标准的人被纳入研究。
    用18ml空气充气的TR带患者的RAS发生率明显高于用12ml空气充气的TR带患者(19.6%-3.6%;p=0.009)。单变量逻辑回归分析显示,平均红细胞体积(MCV)和提供给TR带的空气量与RAS显着相关。用多变量逻辑回归分析对这些变量的进一步分析表明,MCV和供应给TR带的空气量都是RAS的独立预测因子(p<0.05)。
    研究结果表明,通过TRA在CAG后供应给TR带的空气量是RAS发展的独立预测因子。
    UNASSIGNED: Transradial access (TRA) is accepted as the safest route for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention. Radial artery stenosis (RAS) prevents use of the radial artery in various clinical situations, even in cases without hand ischemia. In this context, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between the amount of air supplied to the radial artery compression device [transradial (TR) band] and RAS.
    UNASSIGNED: The population in this single-center retrospective study consisted of patients who underwent CAG via TRA under elective conditions between March 1st, 2020 and May 1st, 2022. Of these patients, 111 who met the study inclusion criteria were included in the study.
    UNASSIGNED: The rate of RAS was significantly higher among the patients with a TR band inflated with 18 ml of air compared to those with a TR band inflated with 12 ml of air (19.6%-3.6%; p = 0.009). Univariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and amount of air supplied to the TR band were significantly associated with RAS. Further analysis of these variables with multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that both MCV and the amount of air supplied to the TR band were independent predictors of RAS (p < 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: The findings of the study revealed that the amount of air supplied to the TR band after CAG via TRA was an independent predictor for the development of RAS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号