transportation

交通运输
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然已知大气微塑料可以长距离运输,他们的停留时间和运输过程缺乏清晰度。这项研究利用了天然放射性核素7Be,210Pb,和210Po探索天津大气微塑料的运输,中国北方的一个沿海城市。一年内,微塑料的浓度范围为0.03至0.13个m-3颗粒。冬季微塑料碎片的比例明显高于其他季节,秋季和冬季的中值微塑料尺寸大于春季和夏季的微塑料尺寸。大气微塑料表面粗糙,表现出不规则的孔隙和多个凹陷和裂缝。微塑料在4月和8月经历了与高层大气的垂直混合,并在7月受到降雨的影响。大气颗粒物全年停留时间为9.47天至22.85天,平均14.41天。11月大气颗粒物的峰值停留时间可能与煤炭消耗导致的210Po水平增加有关。它们在大气中的长期存在和粗糙的表面允许微塑料充当各种化学污染物的载体,强调与它们在大气中的存在相关的复杂性和潜在风险。
    While atmospheric microplastics are known to be transported over long distances, their residence times and transport processes lack clarity. This study utilized natural radionuclides 7Be, 210Pb, and 210Po to explore the transport of atmospheric microplastics in Tianjin, a coastal city in Northern China. Microplastic concentrations ranged from 0.03 to 0.13 particles m-3 over the course of a year. The proportion of microplastic fragments in winter was significantly higher than that in other seasons, with median microplastic sizes in autumn and winter being larger than those in spring and summer. The atmospheric microplastic surface was rough, exhibiting irregular pores and multiple depressions and cracks. Microplastics experienced vertical mixing with the upper atmosphere in April and August and were influenced by rainfall in July. The residence time of atmospheric particles ranged from 9.47 to 22.85 days throughout the year, with an average of 14.41 days. The peak residence time of atmospheric particulates in November may be correlated with increased 210Po levels from coal consumption. Their prolonged atmospheric presence and rough surface allow microplastics to act as carriers for various chemical pollutants, underscoring the complexity and potential risks associated with their presence in the atmosphere.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    运输是健康的重要社会决定因素,也是许多患者治疗的障碍。癌症患者受到不成比例的影响,对于每天接受数周放射治疗的患者来说,它尤其明显。在我们机构进行的一项前瞻性调查试点研究,研究了与接受放射治疗的患者的运输有关的财务毒性,表明高运输成本与财务压力之间存在相关性。此外,那些生活在距离辐射中心10英里的人与更严重的经济毒性有关。以前为解决肿瘤学中的运输问题而实施的计划主要是不足或无效的。由于缺乏意识和利用率低,这些计划已被推迟。从拟议的放射肿瘤学病例率(ROCR)支付模式调整的放射治疗健康公平成就(HEART)将极大地缓解接受放射治疗的患者的运输障碍。每位患者500美元可用于风险最高的患者,就像那些远离辐射中心的人。
    Transportation is a significant social determinant of health and a barrier to treatment for many patients. Cancer patients are disproportionately affected, and it can be especially salient for patients undergoing several weeks of daily radiation treatment. A prospective survey pilot study at our institution examining financial toxicity related to transportation for patients undergoing radiation treatment showed a correlation between high transportation costs and financial stress. Furthermore, those living >10 miles from the radiation center were associated with worse financial toxicity. Previous programs implemented to address the transportation issue in oncology have been mainly inadequate or ineffective. These programs have been set back due to a lack of awareness and low utilization. The Health Equity Achievement in Radiation Therapy (HEART) adjustment from the proposed Radiation Oncology Case Rate (ROCR) payment model for radiation oncology will greatly alleviate transportation barriers for patients undergoing radiation treatment. The $500 per patient can be utilized for those patients at the highest risk, like those living far away from the radiation center.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:许多减少交通排放的气候缓解政策具有与环境空气污染相关的公共卫生益处。然而,很少有健康分析考虑替代政策的公平影响。公平可以以许多不同的方式概念化,这些方式可能与社区相关,决策者,和其他利益相关者。
    目标:考虑人口暴露减少和多重公平结构,评估整个美国东北部的替代交通减排方案。
    方法:我们开发了四个定量指标,这些指标反映了与利益相关者观点一致的公平结构,包括种族/族裔接触不平等,环境正义社区的利益比例,参与国之间的利益分配,和农村/城市的利益分享。我们分析了覆盖东北12个州和哥伦比亚特区的直接排放的细颗粒物(初级PM2.5)的众多运输减排方案。我们使用社区多尺度空气质量模型和解耦直接方法来估计每种情况下人口加权初级PM2.5暴露的减少以及对公平性的影响。
    结果:人口加权初级PM2.5暴露量减少幅度更大的方案通常强调城市地区或拥有大型城市中心的州的减排,不同场景的收益差异超过三倍。较高的暴露收益情景通常也会减少种族/族裔暴露不平等,但导致州与州之间或农村/城市之间的不平等。以轻型或重型卡车的统一减排百分比为目标的方案最好地解决了农村/城市的不平等,但导致种族/族裔不平等的减少最小。
    结论:权益结构之间存在内在权衡,将资源集中在各州或城市和农村人口之间分配利益可能会以减少种族/族裔接触不平等或环境正义社区的减少为代价。未来的健康效益分析应纳入多个公平指标,以反映不同的利益相关者观点,并阐明潜在的结构和权衡。
    BACKGROUND: Many climate mitigation policies to reduce transportation emissions have public health benefits related to ambient air pollution. However, few health analyses consider the equity implications of alternative policies. Equity can be conceptualized in many different ways that may be relevant to communities, decision-makers, and other stakeholders.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate alternative transportation emissions reduction scenarios across the northeastern United States considering population exposure reductions and multiple equity constructs.
    METHODS: We developed four quantitative indicators reflecting equity constructs that aligned with stakeholder perspectives, including racial/ethnic exposure inequities, proportion of benefits in environmental justice communities, distribution of benefits among participating states, and rural/urban share of benefits. We analyzed numerous transportation emissions reduction scenarios for directly emitted fine particulate matter (primary PM2.5) covering 12 Northeast states and the District of Columbia. We used the Community Multiscale Air Quality model with the decoupled direct method to estimate the reduction in population-weighted primary PM2.5 exposure and the impact on equity for each scenario.
    RESULTS: Scenarios that yielded greater reductions in population-weighted primary PM2.5 exposure generally emphasized emissions reductions in urban areas or states with large urban centers, with a more than threefold difference in benefits across scenarios. The higher exposure-benefit scenarios typically also had greater reductions in racial/ethnic exposure inequities but led to higher between-state or rural/urban inequality. Scenarios that targeted uniform percentage emission reductions from light or heavy-duty trucks best addressed rural/urban inequalities but led to the smallest reductions in racial/ethnic inequity.
    CONCLUSIONS: There are intrinsic tradeoffs among equity constructs, where focusing resources on distributing benefits across states or between urban and rural populations could come at the expense of less reduction in racial/ethnic exposure inequities or in environmental justice communities. Future health benefits analyses should incorporate multiple equity indicators that reflect different stakeholder perspectives and articulate the underlying constructs and tradeoffs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    扩大路网以容纳各种活动,显著增加了城市噪声污染,对人类健康和生活质量产生不利影响。许多因素影响城市地区的噪声水平,包括道路特征,交通特点,周围的建筑物,和天气条件。虽然以前的研究已经单独考虑了许多这些因素,这项研究旨在整合所有相关变量,以全面监测和分析它们对噪声水平的综合影响。目的是确定可以纳入有效降噪策略的最具影响力的因素。这项研究的重点是开罗,世界上人口最稠密的城市之一,高噪声水平是一个持续存在的问题。DokkiTahrir街的详细案例研究,开罗,为本次调查提供了依据。最拥挤的地区之一是Al-Dokki的El-Tahrir街,在这项研究中被选为案例研究。这个地区的交通量很大,在15分钟的间隔内,多达1700辆车通过。这种巨大的交通量是该地区噪声水平升高的主要驱动因素。使用声级计进行现场调查,进行交通和噪声水平监测。因此,进行了统计分析,以研究不同因素与噪声水平之间的相关性,并确定影响最大的因素。研究显示,交通量和拥堵是影响塔里尔街噪声水平的最重要因素,表现出较强的正相关(R=0.38)。此外,这项研究发现,由于高交通量,车辆速度和噪声水平之间的反比关系,并确定建筑特征和风向也起作用,虽然程度较小。
    Expanding road networks to accommodate various activities has significantly increased urban noise pollution, adversely affecting human health and quality of life. Numerous factors influence the noise level in urban areas, including road characteristics, traffic characteristics, surrounding buildings, and weather conditions. While previous studies have considered many of these factors individually, this study aims to integrate all relevant variables to comprehensively monitor and analyze their combined effects on noise levels. The objective is to determine the most influential factors that could be incorporated into effective noise reduction strategies. This research focuses on Cairo, one of the most densely populated cities in the world, where high noise levels are a persistent issue. A detailed case study of Tahrir Street in Dokki, Cairo, provides the basis for this investigation. One of the most crowded areas is El-Tahrir Street in Al-Dokki, which was selected as a case study in this research. This area experiences high traffic volume, with up to 1700 vehicles passing through within a 15-min interval. This significant traffic volume is the primary driver of the elevated noise levels in the area. Traffic and noise level monitoring was conducted using a field survey using the sound level meter. Consequently, a statistical analysis was conducted to investigate the correlation between different factors and the noise level and determine the most influential factors. The study revealed that traffic volume and congestion are the most significant factors influencing noise levels on Tahrir Street, exhibiting strong positive correlations (R = 0.38). Additionally, the study found an inverse relationship between vehicle speed and noise level due to high traffic volumes and identified that building characteristics and wind direction also play roles, albeit to a lesser extent.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    即使与其他残疾群体相比,自闭症成年人也明显失业或就业不足。就业是一个社会决定因素,当满意时,密切影响与健康相关的生活质量。对于自闭症成年人来说,运输的环境障碍会影响就业能力,导致就业机会有限。这项研究对交通使用与就业状况之间的关系进行了更深入的研究。
    检查就业和失业的自闭症成年人对不同类型的交通工具的使用以及公共交通的障碍。
    数据来自2017年5月至2018年6月之间使用宾夕法尼亚州自闭症需求评估(PANA)进行的一项大型全州研究,其中有关就业和交通使用的信息是从宾夕法尼亚州居民的自闭症成年人那里获得的。研究样本包括1120名自闭症成年人(Mage=28.03岁,标准差=9.84;70%男性;82%非西班牙裔白人)。
    受雇的参与者比失业者更有可能开车(45%与21%,p<0.001),而他们不太可能乘坐其他人的游乐设施(62%vs.75%,p<0.001)或使用服务运输(11%与18%,p=0.001)。对于公共交通的障碍,结果表明,就业参与者报告的公共交通障碍比失业参与者少,影响大小小(1.98vs.2.54,d=0.22)。
    雇佣自闭症成年人锻炼更多的交通独立性。失业的自闭症成年人报告更多的参与障碍和较低的独立使用公共交通的能力。未来的交通和就业研究是必要的。
    为什么这是一个重要问题?就业对收入很重要,生活质量,以及获得一个人需要的支持或服务的能力。与神经典型的成年人和其他残疾人相比,自闭症成年人更有可能失业或就业不足。在社区中参与成人活动有许多环境障碍,但是交通问题是主要障碍。在以前的研究中,大量自闭症成年人(72%)报告说,由于缺乏交通工具,他们错过了一些理想的活动。重要的是要了解交通和就业之间的关系,以了解如何克服障碍并改善想要工作的自闭症成年人的就业选择。这项研究的目的是什么?这项研究的目的是研究交通和就业状况(即,就业或失业)。具体来说,这项研究比较了受雇的自闭症成年人和失业者使用的交通类型和感知的交通障碍。研究人员做了什么?通过一项全州范围的大型调查,从1120名自闭症成年人那里收集了信息,其中包括有关就业和交通的问题。比较了受雇和未受雇的自闭症成年人的信息。这项研究的结果是什么?这项比较的结果表明,受雇的参与者更有可能自己开车,而不太可能从其他人那里乘车或使用服务交通工具。那些受雇的人也报告说公共交通障碍较少。障碍如犯罪,计划一次旅行,其他乘客的待遇,成本,关于如何使用公共交通的知识,感觉超负荷被更多的人发现失业的人比被雇佣的人。这些发现将如何帮助现在或将来的自闭症成年人?该研究确定了失业的自闭症成年人的交通障碍。这些信息可以帮助指导支持和政策,以减少就业所需的旅行障碍。此外,这项研究的结果可以帮助指导未来的研究,以开发或确定自闭症成年人上班旅行所需的交通技能。
    UNASSIGNED: Autistic adults are significantly unemployed or underemployed even compared with other disability groups. Employment is a social determinant that, when satisfied, closely influences health-related quality of life. For autistic adults, environmental barriers to transportation can impact the ability to get to employment resulting in limited employment opportunities. This study provides a closer examination of the association between transportation use and employment status.
    UNASSIGNED: To examine the use of different types of transportation and barriers to public transit by employed and unemployed autistic adults.
    UNASSIGNED: The data were from a large statewide study conducted between May 2017 and June 2018 using the Pennsylvania Autism Needs Assessment (PANA), in which information about employment and transportation use was obtained from autistic adults who were residents of Pennsylvania. The study sample included 1120 autistic adults (Mage = 28.03 years, standard deviation = 9.84; 70% men; 82% non-Hispanic White).
    UNASSIGNED: Participants who were employed were more likely to drive themselves than those who were unemployed (45% vs. 21%, p < 0.001), while they were less likely to take rides from others (62% vs. 75%, p < 0.001) or use service transportation (11% vs. 18%, p = 0.001). For barriers to public transit, the results identified that employed participants reported fewer barriers to public transportation than unemployed participants with a small effect size (1.98 vs. 2.54, d = 0.22).
    UNASSIGNED: Employed autistic adults exercise more transportation independence. Unemployed autistic adults report more barriers to participation and lower ability to independently use public transportation. Future transportation and employment studies are necessary.
    Why is this an important issue? Employment is important for income, quality of life, and the ability to get the supports or services a person needs. Autistic adults are more likely to be unemployed or underemployed when compared with neurotypical adults and people with other disabilities. There are many environmental barriers to participating in adult activities in the community, but issues with transportation are a primary barrier. In previous research, a high number of autistic adults (72%) reported that they had missed some of their desired activities due to lack of transportation. It is important to understand the relationship between transportation and employment to know how to overcome barriers and improve employment options for autistic adults who want to work. What was the purpose of this research? The purpose of this research was to look at transportation and employment status (i.e., employed or unemployed). Specifically, this study compared types of transportation used and perceived barriers to transportation between autistic adults who were employed and those who were unemployed. What did the researchers do? Information was collected from 1120 autistic adults through a large statewide survey, which included questions about employment and transportation. Information from autistic adults who were employed and those who were not employed was compared. What were the results of the study? Results of this comparison showed that participants who were employed were more likely to drive themselves and less likely to take rides from other people or to use service transportation. Those who were employed also reported fewer barriers to public transportation. Barriers such as crime, planning a trip, treatment by fellow passengers, cost, knowledge on how to use public transportation, and sensory overload were identified by more people who were unemployed than by people who were employed. How will these findings help autistic adults now or in the future? The study identified specific barriers to transportation for autistic adults who are unemployed. This information can help to guide supports and policies to reduce barriers for travel needed for employment. In addition, results of this study can help guide future research to develop or identify the transportation skills needed for travel to work for autistic adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着美国人口老龄化的持续快速增长,保持老年人的流动性和独立性对于成功实现衰老变得越来越重要。虽然个人车辆运输由于其提供的独立性和对他们生活的控制而仍然是这个人群中的流行选择,与年龄相关的变化可能会增加常见驾驶错误的风险,并降低驾驶能力。
    目的:本研究旨在调查老年人的驾驶习惯以及他们为保持安全和自信的驾驶习惯所做的努力。具体来说,我们试图找出积极和消极影响老年人驾驶表现和信心的因素,以及现有的努力来维持他们的驾驶能力。
    方法:我们从大纽约地区招募了20名年龄≥65岁的成年人,他们在招募期间仍然活跃。然后,我们对他们进行了半结构化的采访,以检查他们的看法,需要,以及关于安全和自信驾驶的挑战。
    结果:我们的发现揭示了老年人自我感知的驾驶技能和他们面临的挑战之间的显著差异,特别是由年龄相关的限制和健康状况引起的,如视力和记忆力下降以及药物常规。根据这些发现,我们提出了弥合这一差距的战略,并赋予老年人安全和自信地驾驶,包括培养对他们能力的现实理解,鼓励就他们的驾驶进行公开对话,鼓励定期评估,提高对现有资源的认识。
    结论:这项研究揭示了老年人的感知驾驶能力与他们在驾驶时面临的实际挑战之间的明显差异。这种差异表明,除了现有的援助之外,还需要更好的支持来保护老年人的驾驶技能。我们希望我们的建议将为致力于提高老年人在家中年龄的整体福祉和生活质量的从业者和学者提供有价值的见解。
    BACKGROUND: As the aging population in the United States continues to increase rapidly, preserving the mobility and independence of older adults becomes increasingly critical for enabling aging in place successfully. While personal vehicular transport remains a popular choice among this demographic due to its provision of independence and control over their lives, age-related changes may heighten the risk of common driving errors and diminish driving abilities.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the driving practices of older adults and their efforts to maintain safe and confident driving habits. Specifically, we sought to identify the factors that positively and negatively influence older adults\' driving performance and confidence, as well as the existing efforts put into sustaining their driving abilities.
    METHODS: We recruited 20 adults aged ≥65 years who remained active drivers during the recruitment from the greater New York area. Then, we conducted semistructured interviews with them to examine their perceptions, needs, and challenges regarding safe and confident driving.
    RESULTS: Our findings uncovered a notable disparity between older adults\' self-perceived driving skills and the challenges they face, particularly caused by age-related limitations and health conditions such as vision and memory declines and medication routines. Drawing on these findings, we proposed strategies to bridge this gap and empower older adults to drive safely and confidently, including fostering a realistic understanding of their capabilities, encouraging open dialogue regarding their driving, encouraging regular assessments, and increasing awareness of available resources.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study uncovered a noticeable disparity between the perceived driving competence of older adults and the actual challenges they confront while driving. This divergence underscores a significant need for better support beyond the existing aid available to preserve older adults\' driving skills. We hope that our recommendations will offer valuable insights for practitioners and scholars committed to enhancing the overall well-being and quality of life for older adults as they age in their homes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    将健康商品供应外包给第三方物流提供商是降低成本和/或提高公共部门服务水平的方法之一。本文评估了三种外包形式:库存管理的完全外包,特定活动的部分外包,以及特定物流活动的或有部分外包。它指出,在非洲,外包供应物流主要采取仅部分外包运输或将特定卫生商品储存和运输到所有或选定的地理区域的形式。部分外包带来的好处有限,因为它无法对公共部门的物流提供足够的压力,以提高效率或在灾难发生时保持不间断的供应。通过部分外包实现的物流绩效改善不应掩盖需要更广泛的安排,这些安排不仅支持部分外包,而且支持在效率低下和供应中断灾难时期的全部外包。
    Outsourcing of health-commodity supplies to third-party logistics providers is one of the ways of reducing costs and/or improving service levels in the public sector. This paper evaluates three forms of outsourcing: full outsourcing of inventory management, partial outsourcing of specific activities, and contingent partial outsourcing of specific logistics activities. It notes that, in Africa, contracting-out supply logistics has mostly taken the form of partial outsourcing of transportation only or storage and transportation of specific health commodities to all or selected geographical regions. Partial outsourcing offers limited benefits since it cannot provide adequate pressures on public-sector logistics to be efficient or maintain uninterrupted supplies in times of catastrophes. Improvements in logistics performance achieved through partial outsourcing should not mask the need for more expansive arrangements that support not only partial outsourcing but also full outsourcing in situations of inefficiency and in times of supply-disruption catastrophe.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有和没有交通挑战的个人之间的远程医疗使用仍未得到充分研究。这项研究旨在比较有和没有交通挑战的受试者之间的远程医疗利用率和医疗服务类型。使用2021年医疗支出小组调查(MEPS)的数据,我们在2021年确定了成年人(≥18岁)办公室就诊的远程医疗使用情况,对接受的医疗服务类型进行了分类,比如体检和心理健康咨询。采用加权逻辑回归来确定与远程医疗使用相关的因素。分析的总人口为204621985(未加权n=17674)。受试者的平均年龄(SD)为49(18)岁,53%是女性。平均而言,有交通挑战的个人有1.40次远程医疗访问,而没有此类挑战的患者有0.87次访问(P=0.03)。此外,与没有交通挑战的人相比,有交通挑战的人有更多与行为健康相关的访问(22%对11%,P<.01)。与没有交通挑战的人相比,面临交通挑战的人使用远程医疗的可能性高40%(OR=1.40,P=0.01)。研究结果表明,远程医疗可以作为克服交通障碍和改善获得护理的可行解决方案。然而,至关重要的是,通过远程医疗评估获得医疗服务的机会,以增强面临交通挑战的个人的健康结果.
    Telehealth use among individuals with and without transportation challenges remains understudied. This study aims to compare telehealth utilization and types of healthcare services between subjects with and without transportation challenges. Using data from the 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), we identified telehealth use for office visits by adults (≥18 years old) in 2021, categorizing the type of healthcare services received, such as checkups and mental health counseling. Weighted logistic regression was employed to identify factors associated with telehealth usage. The total population analyzed was 204 621 985 (unweighted n = 17 674). The average (SD) age of the subjects was 49 (18) years old, and 53% were female. On average, individuals with transportation challenges had 1.40 telehealth visits, while those without such challenges had 0.87 visits (P = .03). Additionally, individuals with transportation challenges had more visits related to behavioral health compared to those without transportation challenges (22% vs 11%, P < .01). Those facing transportation challenges were 40% more likely to use telehealth compared to those without transportation challenges (OR = 1.40, P = .01). The findings suggest that telehealth could serve as a viable solution to overcome transportation barriers and improve access to care. However, it is crucial to assess access to care through telehealth to enhance the health outcomes for individuals facing transportation challenges.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    不同地点之间的旅行时间构成了大多数当代空间可达性衡量标准的基础。旅行时间允许估计人与地方之间互动的潜力,因此是理解功能的重要措施,可持续性和城市的公平。这里,我们提供了一个开放的旅行时间矩阵数据集,该数据集描述了覆盖赫尔辛基都会区的网格(N=13,132)中所有单元格的质心之间的旅行时间,芬兰。数据集中记录的旅行时间遵循门到门的方法,为步行提供可比的旅行时间,骑自行车,公共交通和汽车旅行,包括每种模式的每次行程的所有行程,比如步行到公共汽车站,或者寻找停车位。我们使用了r5pyPython包,我们专门为这种计算开发的。数据对昼夜变化和人之间的变化(例如,缓慢和快速的步行速度)敏感。我们根据GoogleDirectionsAPI验证了数据,并从规划实践中展示了用例。指导数据集设计和生产的五个关键原则-可比性,简单,再现性,可转移性,以及对时间和人际变化的敏感性-确保城市和交通规划者,企业和研究人员都可以在广泛的应用程序中使用这些数据。
    Travel times between different locations form the basis for most contemporary measures of spatial accessibility. Travel times allow to estimate the potential for interaction between people and places, and is therefore a vital measure for understanding the functioning, sustainability, and equity of cities. Here, we provide an open travel time matrix dataset that describes travel times between the centroids of all cells in a grid (N = 13,132) covering the metropolitan area of Helsinki, Finland. The travel times recorded in the dataset follow a door-to-door approach that provides comparable travel times for walking, cycling, public transport and car journeys, including all legs of each trip by each mode, such as the walk to a bus stop, or the search for a parking spot. We used the r5py Python package, that we developed specifically for this computation. The data are sensitive to diurnal variations and to variations between people (e.g. slow and fast walking speed). We validated the data against the Google Directions API and present use cases from a planning practice. The five key principles that guided the data set design and production - comparability, simplicity, reproducibility, transferability, and sensitivity to temporal and interpersonal variations - ensure that urban and transport planners, business and researchers alike can use the data in a wide range of applications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:癫痫患者获得医疗保健的不一致导致抗癫痫药物的依从性下降,癫痫发作频率增加,癫痫手术的适当转诊较少。因此,识别和解决阻碍获得护理的因素应改善患者的预后。我们假设健康保险和交通会影响美国(US)患有癫痫的成年人获得门诊神经科护理。
    方法:我们在2015年和2017年通过国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)对美国患有活动性癫痫的成年人进行了回顾性横断面研究。我们确定了患者在过去一年中是否报告看过神经科医生,并使用多元逻辑回归来确定健康保险状况和交通获取是否与该结果相关。
    结果:我们从2015年和2017年确定了735名受访者,估计有298万美国成年人患有活动性癫痫。在调整了社会经济和癫痫发作相关的协变量后,我们发现,缺乏健康保险与过去一年没有癫痫治疗相关(调整后比值比[aOR]0.22;95%置信区间[CI]:0.09~0.54).由于运输不足而导致的延迟护理(aOR0.42;95%CI:0.19-0.93)也导致患者获得神经科医师的机会减少。
    结论:由于其状况的固有性质,癫痫患者不太可能获得雇主赞助的健康保险或一致的驾驶特权.然而,这些因素也会影响患者获得神经护理。我们必须通过社区之间的长期投资和伙伴关系来解决交通和保险障碍,healthcare,和政府利益相关者。
    OBJECTIVE: Inconsistent access to healthcare for people with epilepsy results in reduced adherence to antiseizure medications, increased seizure frequency, and fewer appropriate referrals for epilepsy surgery. Identifying and addressing factors that impede access to care should consequently improve patient outcomes. We hypothesized that health insurance and transportation affect access to outpatient neurology care for adults living with epilepsy in the United States (US).
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of US adults with active epilepsy surveyed via the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) in 2015 and 2017. We established whether patients reported seeing a neurologist in the past year and used multiple logistic regression to determine whether health insurance status and transportation access were associated with this outcome.
    RESULTS: We identified 735 respondents from 2015 and 2017, representing an estimated 2.98 million US adults with active epilepsy. After adjusting for socioeconomic and seizure-related co-variates, we found that a lack of health insurance coverage was associated with no epilepsy care in the past year (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.22; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.09 - 0.54). Delayed care due to inadequate transportation (aOR 0.42; 95 % CI: 0.19 - 0.93) also resulted in reduced patient access to a neurologist.
    CONCLUSIONS: Due to the inherent nature of their condition, people with epilepsy are less likely to have employer-sponsored health insurance or consistent driving privileges. Yet, these factors also impact patient access to neurological care. We must address transportation and insurance barriers through long-term investment and partnership between community, healthcare, and government stakeholders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号