了解什么可以预测边缘性人格障碍(BPD)的心理治疗的中止或成功,对于改善治疗方法很重要。文献中已经报道了许多变量,但复制是必要的,调查研究结果背后的治疗过程是必要的,以理解变量为何能预测结果.使用比较图式疗法和转移聚焦心理治疗作为BPD治疗的RCT数据,从文献中得出的变量作为停药和治疗成功的预测因子进行了检验.参与者是86名成年门诊患者(80名女性,平均年龄30.5岁),主要诊断为BPD,平均接受过3种以前的治疗方式。首先,用逻辑回归检验单一预测因子,控制治疗类型(以及在治疗成功的情况下使用药物)。接下来,利用多变量反向逻辑回归检测了基本预测因子。基线敌意和儿童身体虐待预测治疗中断。基线主观解离负担预测恢复的机会较小。第二项研究表明,会话中的分离,从会议录音带评估,介导了基线解离对回收率的观察到的影响,表明会话期间的解离会干扰治疗效果。结果表明,特别是解决高度敌意,童年虐待,和会议期间离解可能减少退出和缺乏有效性的治疗。
Knowing what predicts discontinuation or success of psychotherapies for Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is important to improve treatments. Many variables have been reported in the literature, but replication is needed and investigating what therapy process underlies the findings is necessary to understand why variables predict outcome. Using data of an RCT comparing Schema Therapy and Transference Focused Psychotherapy as treatments for BPD, variables derived from the literature were tested as predictors of discontinuation and treatment success. Participants were 86 adult outpatients (80 women, mean age 30.5 years) with a primary diagnosis of BPD who had on average received 3 previous treatment modalities. First, single predictors were tested with logistic regression, controlling for treatment type (and medication use in case of treatment success). Next, with multivariate backward logistic regression essential predictors were detected. Baseline hostility and childhood physical abuse predicted treatment discontinuation. Baseline subjective burden of dissociation predicted a smaller chance of recovery. A second study demonstrated that in-session dissociation, assessed from session audiotapes, mediated the observed effects of baseline dissociation on recovery, indicating that dissociation during sessions interferes with treatment effectiveness. The results suggest that specifically addressing high hostility, childhood abuse, and in-session dissociation might reduce dropout and lack of effectiveness of treatment.