transcrancial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在调查基于TMS的两种不同手部肌肉的皮质运动表征的侧向化和独特性测量中与年龄相关的差异的存在和模式。在一个由73名成人寿命期间惯用右手的健康参与者组成的样本中,使用经颅磁刺激(TMS)获得两个半球的第一背侧骨间(FDI)和极小指外展肌(ADM)皮质运动表征.此外,测量灵活性和最大力水平。计算同系物行为和TMS测量的横向商,而一个半球内FDI和ADM表示之间的独特性是通过重心(CoG)距离和余弦相似性来量化的。使用线性,多项式,和分段线性回归。对于两种内在手部肌肉的行为或皮质运动表现的偏侧化商,无法确定与年龄相关的差异。此外,没有证据表明随着年龄的增长,FDI和ADM代表性的独特性发生变化。总之,这项工作表明,皮质运动表征的侧向化和独特性,通过基于TMS的措施确定,在成年后保持稳定。
    This study aimed to investigate the presence and patterns of age-related differences in TMS-based measures of lateralization and distinctiveness of the cortical motor representations of two different hand muscles. In a sample of seventy-three right-handed healthy participants over the adult lifespan, the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) cortical motor representations of both hemispheres were acquired using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). In addition, dexterity and maximum force levels were measured. Lateralization quotients were calculated for homolog behavioral and TMS measures, whereas the distinctiveness between the FDI and ADM representation within one hemisphere was quantified by the center of gravity (CoG) distance and cosine similarity. The presence and patterns of age-related changes were examined using linear, polynomial, and piecewise linear regression. No age-related differences could be identified for the lateralization quotient of behavior or cortical motor representations of both intrinsic hand muscles. Furthermore, no evidence for a change in the distinctiveness of the FDI and ADM representation with advancing age was found. In conclusion this work showed that lateralization and distinctiveness of cortical motor representations, as determined by means of TMS-based measures, remain stable over the adult lifespan.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Objective: This pilot study aimed to investigate the immediate effects of single-session intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) on the cerebellar vermis during a balance task, which could unveil the changes of cerebral cortical excitability in healthy individuals. Subjects: A total of seven right-handed healthy subjects (26.86 ± 5.30 years) were included in this study. Interventions: Each subject received single-session iTBS on cerebellar vermis in a sitting position. Main Measures: Before and after the intervention, all subjects were asked to repeat the balance task of standing on the left leg three times. Each task consisted of 15 s of standing and 20 s of resting. Real-time changes in cerebral cortex oxygen concentrations were monitored with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). During the task, changes in blood oxygen concentration were recorded and converted into the mean HbO2 for statistical analysis. Results: After stimulation, the mean HbO2 in the left SMA (P = 0.029) and right SMA (P = 0.043) significantly increased compared with baseline. However, no significant changes of mean HbO2 were found in the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal lobe (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Single-session iTBS on the cerebellar vermis in healthy adults can increase the excitability of the cerebral cortex in the bilateral supplementary motor areas during balance tasks. Clinical Trial Registration: [www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [ChiCTR2100048915].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) targeting the primary motor hand area (M1-HAND) may induce lasting shifts in corticospinal excitability, but after-effects show substantial inter-individual variability. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can probe after-effects of TDCS on regional neural activity on a whole-brain level.
    UNASSIGNED: Using a double-blinded cross-over design, we investigated whether the individual change in corticospinal excitability after TDCS of M1-HAND is associated with changes in task-related regional activity in cortical motor areas.
    UNASSIGNED: Seventeen healthy volunteers (10 women) received 20 min of real (0.75 mA) or sham TDCS on separate days in randomized order. Real and sham TDCS used the classic bipolar set-up with the anode placed over right M1-HAND. Before and after each TDCS session, we recorded motor evoked potentials (MEP) from the relaxed left first dorsal interosseus muscle after single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation(TMS) of left M1-HAND and performed whole-brain fMRI at 3 Tesla while participants completed a visuomotor tracking task with their left hand. We also assessed the difference in MEP latency when applying anterior-posterior and latero-medial TMS pulses to the precentral hand knob (AP-LM MEP latency).
    UNASSIGNED: Real TDCS had no consistent aftereffects on mean MEP amplitude, task-related activity or motor performance. Individual changes in MEP amplitude, measured directly after real TDCS showed a positive linear relationship with individual changes in task-related activity in the supplementary motor area and AP-LM MEP latency.
    UNASSIGNED: Functional aftereffects of classical bipolar anodal TDCS of M1-HAND on the motor system vary substantially across individuals. Physiological features upstream from the primary motor cortex may determine how anodal TDCS changes corticospinal excitability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    神经变性疾病是导致神经元进行性变性和死亡的病症的集合。它们在临床上是异质的,可以表现为运动缺陷,认知,执行功能,记忆,视觉空间意识和语言。经颅磁刺激(TMS)是一种非侵入性脑刺激工具,可用于评估体内皮质功能。我们回顾了TMS如何用于研究三种神经解剖学轴不同的神经退行性疾病:(1)运动皮质-皮质脊髓束(运动神经元疾病),(2)非运动皮质区(痴呆),和(3)皮层下结构(帕金森病)。我们还提出了四项建议,希望对TMS在神经退行性疾病中的应用有益。首先,TMS传统上受到缺乏客观输出的限制,因此仅限于刺激运动皮层;可以通过使用并发神经成像方法(例如EEG)来克服这种限制。鉴于神经退行性疾病会随着时间的推移而发展,TMS措施应旨在跟踪纵向变化,特别是当研究的目的是观察疾病进展和症状时。缺乏黄金标准的诊断确认损害了临床人群中发现的有效性。因此,诊断确定性应通过多种方法最大化,包括多种方法,独立的临床评估,成像和流体生物标志物,并在可能的情况下进行验尸病理确认。人们对了解神经退行性疾病中症状产生的机制非常感兴趣。然而,患者的TMS评估通常在休息条件下进行,当参与这些症状的大脑网络不表达时。相反,适合上下文的TMS形式更适合于探测生理学驱动的临床症状。总之,我们希望这里提出的建议将有助于进一步了解神经退行性疾病的病理生理。
    Neurodegenerative diseases are a collection of disorders that result in the progressive degeneration and death of neurons. They are clinically heterogenous and can present as deficits in movement, cognition, executive function, memory, visuospatial awareness and language. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation tool that allows for the assessment of cortical function in vivo. We review how TMS has been used for the investigation of three neurodegenerative diseases that differ in their neuroanatomical axes: (1) Motor cortex-corticospinal tract (motor neuron diseases), (2) Non-motor cortical areas (dementias), and (3) Subcortical structures (parkinsonisms). We also make four recommendations that we hope will benefit the use of TMS in neurodegenerative diseases. Firstly, TMS has traditionally been limited by the lack of an objective output and so has been confined to stimulation of the motor cortex; this limitation can be overcome by the use of concurrent neuroimaging methods such as EEG. Given that neurodegenerative diseases progress over time, TMS measures should aim to track longitudinal changes, especially when the aim of the study is to look at disease progression and symptomatology. The lack of gold-standard diagnostic confirmation undermines the validity of findings in clinical populations. Consequently, diagnostic certainty should be maximized through a variety of methods including multiple, independent clinical assessments, imaging and fluids biomarkers, and post-mortem pathological confirmation where possible. There is great interest in understanding the mechanisms by which symptoms arise in neurodegenerative disorders. However, TMS assessments in patients are usually carried out during resting conditions, when the brain network engaged during these symptoms is not expressed. Rather, a context-appropriate form of TMS would be more suitable in probing the physiology driving clinical symptoms. In all, we hope that the recommendations made here will help to further understand the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:重度抑郁症(MDD)在青年中很常见,治疗选择有限。我们评估了重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)在青少年和患有难治性MDD的过渡老年青年中的有效性和安全性。方法:32例门诊患者,中重度,治疗抗性MDD,13-21岁接受了为期三周的培训,开放标签,rTMS的单中心试验(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT01731678)。使用神经导航将rTMS应用于左背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC),并连续15周(120%休息运动阈值;40个脉冲超过4s[10Hz];训练间隔,26秒;75列;3,000脉冲)。主要结果指标是汉密尔顿抑郁量表(Ham-D)的变化。治疗反应定义为Ham-D评分降低>50%。还检查了安全性和耐受性。结果:rTMS可有效降低MDD症状的严重程度(t=8.94,df=31,p<0.00001)。我们观察到18名(56%)应答者(Ham-D评分降低≥50%)和14名对rTMS无应答者。14名受试者(44%)获得缓解(rTMS后Ham-D评分≤7)。没有严重的不良事件(即,缉获物)。轻度至中度,报告了自限性头痛(19%)和轻度颈部疼痛(16%).参与者将rTMS评为高度可容忍。保留率为91%,依从率(完成所有研究事件)为99%。结论:我们的单一中心,公开试验表明,rTMS是治疗耐药性MDD的青少年安全有效的治疗方法.需要更大的随机对照试验。临床试验注册:www。ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符:NCT01731678。
    Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is common in youth and treatment options are limited. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in adolescents and transitional aged youth with treatment resistant MDD. Methods: Thirty-two outpatients with moderate to severe, treatment-resistant MDD, aged 13-21 years underwent a three-week, open-label, single center trial of rTMS (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01731678). rTMS was applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) using neuronavigation and administered for 15 consecutive week days (120% rest motor threshold; 40 pulses over 4 s [10 Hz]; inter-train interval, 26 s; 75 trains; 3,000 pulses). The primary outcome measure was change in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D). Treatment response was defined as a >50% reduction in Ham-D scores. Safety and tolerability were also examined. Results: rTMS was effective in reducing MDD symptom severity (t = 8.94, df = 31, p < 0.00001). We observed 18 (56%) responders (≥ 50% reduction in Ham-D score) and 14 non-responders to rTMS. Fourteen subjects (44%) achieved remission (Ham-D score ≤ 7 post-rTMS). There were no serious adverse events (i.e., seizures). Mild to moderate, self-limiting headaches (19%) and mild neck pain (16%) were reported. Participants ranked rTMS as highly tolerable. The retention rate was 91% and compliance rate (completing all study events) was 99%. Conclusions: Our single center, open trial suggests that rTMS is a safe and effective treatment for youth with treatment resistant MDD. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT01731678.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号